According to an NBC news article, 1.2 million animals, including endangered and threatened wildlife, were killed by American trophy hunters. Trophy hunting, which is also known as big game hunting, is a threat to wildlife and should be banned. Zimbabwe’s beloved lion Cecil, who was a major tourist attraction, was killed by Dr. Walter Palmer, a dentist in Minnesota. He had a fake hunting license that was never legal to hunt a collared lion. Cecil had been illegally lured out of his protected reserve. If trophy hunting was already banned, Cecil would still be alive. Trophy hunting is the type of hunting that is done for pleasure or for sport instead of for food. A majority of people see it as cruel and unnecessary. The animals that are killed
are not consumed but used as trophies to show off hunting skills.The animal has a chance of suffering from a long and painful death. This is one of the most controversial aspects of hunting. Many protest the idea of killing defenseless animals.Trophy hunting is also a dangerous sport. Many people die each and every year because of hunting accidents. A most common reported account is hunters accidentally shooting and killing their fellow hunters. Although trophy hunting can cause the extinction of animals, it can also control animal populations. Without hunting, there can be tons of overpopulation issues. If trophy hunting was banned, the population of deer will increase far too fast.There are over 20 million deer in the world. Without hunting, the cost of deer damage will increase. State Farm Insurance has paid $3.8 billion in one year for deer damage claims. Trophy hunting does not only control animal populations, but it also creates a fun experience for avid hunters. They claim it is a fun activity and enjoy the skill of it. It is considered to be a pastime and a fun hobby for many different people of all ages and from all parts of the world. Big game hunting can also benefit local communities. 86% of hunters preferred hunting in an area where they knew that a portion of the money gained went back into the local communities. Almost half of the hunters that were interviewed said that they would be willing to pay the equivalent price for a poorer trophy if it was a problem animal that would have been killed anyways.
In July of 2015, national treasure of Zimbabwe, Cecil the Lion was maliciously killed by dentist Walter Palmer. The hunt caused an uproar from many animal activists. The media covered the hunt and the aftermath for many weeks. This heartless act has many questioning why big game hunting is legal. Multiple African countries allow big game hunting, but it is harming the ecosystem. Many innocent, endangered animals are killed. Big game hunting should be banned because it lowers populations, causes further problems, and animal populations are already dropping.
Most sources spoke about the reason for trophy hunting is mostly towards conservation. In the article, Sustainable use and incentive-driven conservation: realigning human and conservation interests, by Nigel Leader-Williams and Jon M. Hutton, stated, “As a result, successful conservation is forced to rely heavily on the incentives generated by use and, for a whole raft of reasons often including a lack of accessibility, infrastructure and charismatic species, by extractive use in particular (Leader-Williams, 2000).” But what you don’t notice is that killing endangered species to “conserve” is not the only way to conserve. According to the article, Hunting – the murderous business, “Wildlife management, population control and wildlife conservation are euphemisms for killing – hunting, trapping and fishing for fun. A percentage of the wild animal population is specifically mandated to be killed. Hunters want us to believe that killing animals equals population control equals conservation, when in fact hunting causes overpopulation of deer, the hunters’ preferred victim species, destroys animal families, and leads to ecological disruption as well as skewed population dynamics.” This
There’s another catch to trophy hunting: it is extremely expensive. Permits for trophy hunting usually cost thousands of dollars, which leads to the idea that killing animals can actually help conservation. This concept might seem ridiculous at first, but trophy-hunting permits bring in a plethora of money. For instance, the so-called “ten-day ‘elephant package’ could cost… 36,000 [dollars]” (learnenglish). Even if you merely wish to watch the hunt, you are obliged to pay 3,800 dollars (abcnews). The prices are strikingly high, meaning that so is the revenue. South Africa alone brings in more than 744 million dollars every single year, making it its “most profitable form of commercial land use” (learnenglish). This enormous amount of money can not only be used to aid the many third world countries in Africa, but also with conservation. Many argue that by killing wild game during hunting, it causes some species to go extinct. However, strong economic incentive has motivated landowners to expand their territories, reintroduce species, and take care of the animals in general, which would indicate the opposite: more animals are safe. One might even conclude that the world is saving animals, by killing
When a Minnesota dentist killed a prized African lion named "Cecil" he received an onslaught of criticism and reignited the debate concerning big game hunting. Is big game hunting wrong? Should big game hunting continue? Big game hunting has been a very controversial topic for some time and these types of questions are being asked daily. There are a lot of people for it and a lot of people against it. This issue causes a lot of extreme behaviors and ideas by both sides. Those who oppose it believe it to be morally wrong, unfair to the animals and damaging to the environment. Those individuals for it believe that it is the citizens' rights and a way to be involved in the environment. Hunting is the law and shall not be infringed upon. In defense of the hunters' I believe that there are five main issues of concern.
Since the European colonization of eastern Africa, big game hunting, also know as "trophy hunting", has been a very controversial topic. During the early days of trophy hunting, dwindling numbers of some of the world’s most unique and prized wildlife was not a problem like it is today. When a trophy hunting dentist from Minnesota paid $55,000 to kill a prized African lion, he unintentionally reignited the heated debate concerning big game hunting. Wildlife conservationists and hunters debate the impact of hunting on the economy and the environment. Legal hunting can be controlled without government intervention, and the expensive sport of trophy hunting could generate a large sum of money to support conservation efforts.
For centuries humans have survived thanks to the ability we have to adapt. One of this amazing activities that helped us is hunting. Unfortunately as we have changed throughout time, hunting has been degenerated into what’s called Trophy hunting. Have you ever heard this phrase before? Well if you haven’t, trophy hunting is when people kill any kind of animal, simply for keeping their bodies as a souvenir for the brutal and ferocious action they’ve just committed.
The general argument made by Richard Conniff in his work “Why We Have Become Such Suckers for Hunting Trophy Photo Outrage” is that people put too much value on pictures of trophy animals that have been hunted. He writes, “For the hunters, sure, take your pictures...But please, please, please, skip Facebook, Twitter, or even your local hunting club website. Anyplace digital is likely to turn your memorable moment into a nightmare.” In this article, Conniff is implying that taking pictures of the animal you hunted is acceptable, but it is not acceptable to post in online where others can openly debate about it. He says, “Hunters need to make clear that conservation is their first priority and any trophy strictly secondary.” He is explaining
"In Britain the goal is to kill the fox. Because there is no rabies in
A social outrage has broken recently amid the scandal of Cecil the Lion’s death. Cecil was illegally hunted and killed by the American dentist Walter Palmer. Since then, it has caused the world to change their minds on the effects of trophy hunting. Succeeding the death of the renowned lion, a recent poll in America displays that on a three to one margin, the respondents said they would rather be tourists in a country that prohibits trophy hunting, instead of one that does not. The debate is ascending as more hunters proudly present their ‘trophy’ on social media. Many nature conservatives and animal protection agencies are raising awareness because of the fact that Cecil died in a meaningless and violent manner.The problem is not only in America, but around the globe. Trophy hunting should be illegal in the world because it is merely killing animals without a meaningful purpose, and it produces harmful effects to the environment.
It’s a brisk November morning like any other day, but today isn’t any other day, today is the first day of firearm deer season. Shots are going off everywhere like world war three declared on deer. I’m wrapped in every hunting garment I own but winters cold embrace always finds its way in. My cheeks are rosy red and my breath was thick in the air. As I raise my shotgun and pull the trigger, my heart races and my hands shake. As I race after my prize, the sounds of leaves crunching beneath my feet are muffled by the ringing in my ears. I’m walking face to the ground like a hound on a trail and then my eyes caught it, my very first whitetail. I will never forget my first deer and the joy I felt sharing it with my family. Hunting is a passed down tradition for my family and friends. Throughout the world, millions of people participate in the spoils and adventure of the hunt. Hunting has been a pastime since the beginning of man. Hunting is one of those things either you like or you don’t like. It’s hard to explain the joys of hunting ,because it’s something one must experience for his self. Hunting does have laws and regulations you have to abide by. Are hunting regulations benefiting the hunter or the animal? This paper will discuss some of the regulations and laws, types of game, disadvantages of regulations, the pros of regulations, poachers, and ways to preserve wildlife and there habitat.
Fox hunting is a very controversial subject, and for many years people have campaigned against it. Fox hunting is classed as a blood sport, which involves hounds chasing a fox, in order to kill it. There are also people following the fox on horses. Many of these people carry guns, in case the fox manages to escape with injuries. This way, the fox is put out of its misery and suffers little pain. Apart from being a sport that is enjoyed by many people, fox hunting is also a tradition and provides many people with employment as the animals need to be looked after, and the participants of the sport need accommodation.
The current ban on fox hunting has been very controversial, and there have been many arguments, both for and against hunting. Fox hunting is typically viewed as a traditional British activity, but actual fox hunting that uses hounds takes place all over the world. Historically wherever the British have gone building their empires, they have taken the sport of fox hunting43 with them. In addition, plenty of other countries have their own fox hunting traditions. In France, Italy and Ireland they are thriving fox hunts.
Hunting animals or people for sport is cruel, unethical, and unfathomable. Those who think hunting humans is okay could possibly be mentally unstable because it is such an inhumane way of thinking. In a way it can be considered bullying which is never okay regardless of who the victim is. General Zaroff eliminated the sailors he trapped on his island in way that only brought pleasure to himself and fright to others. Killing should not be a way to bring satisfaction but could possibly be useful for others things such as population control and getting rid of people who only cause harm to others.
In early civilizations hunting was a necessity for human survival, the dead animals would be sometimes worshiped for religion even. Now modern humans no longer have to hunt for survival, because people now have more opportunities for subsistence that the people back then did not have. People who do not have access to a grocery store could possibly grow plants as an alternative to hunting. Hunting should be illegal in New York State, because it is cruel to animals, unnecessary and morally wrong.
Hunting is an unnecessary activity in the modern world. Slob hunting is the way many so-called sportsmen hunt these days. The phrase slob hunting refers to indiscriminate assault on animals, whatever their type. This type of recreation is harmful and undesirable in the United States for three reasons: 1) It reduces the number of areas available for tracking animals, 2) It upsets the natural balance, causing many species to have their ranks drastically reduced. and 3) It can be unnecessarily cruel to animals.