Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths and weakness of the dsm 5
Improvements in the DSM 5
Improvements in the DSM 5
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strengths and weakness of the dsm 5
Challenges in the Treatment Planning Process Federal and state laws, including Public Law 94-142 and the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA), require that children with emotional, behavioral, and learning disorders be given a diagnosis in order to receive the needed services and accommodations (Neukrug & Fawcett, 2015). An clinical diagnosis is also necessary when requesting reimbursement from managed care organizations and insurance companies, as they will base the number of authorized therapy sessions on the diagnosis and treatment plan goals. The DSM -5 is an important tool in determining a client’s diagnosis and should be used in combination with clinical interviews, family assessments, and standardized assessment instruments when developing a treatment plan (Neukrug & Fawcett, 2015). Giving an Accurate Diagnosis Some of the disorders listed in the DSM-5 contain clusters of symptoms, however many disorders are now on a spectrum with other closely related disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association, 2013). It is important to remember that clients frequently do not meet all of the criteria for a given disorder, and there may be overlapping symptoms across multiple disorders that warrant clinical attention. Thus, the boundaries between various disorders can easily become blurred. Clinicians often have to give a diagnosis fairly quickly, particularly when seeking third party reimbursement. And, while a diagnosis should not be given solely for reimbursement purposes, giving a diagnosis is often a time-sensitive process. INSERT CODE OF ETHICS. Helping professionals can do harm to clients when an inaccurate diagnosis is given, particularly because the diagnosis is a key element when making treatment decisions.... ... middle of paper ... ...J. L. (2010). Interdisciplinary treatment planning in inpatient settings: From myth to model. Psychiatric Quarterly, 81(3), 263-277. doi:10.1007/s11126-010-9135-1 Neukrug, E., & Fawcett, C. (2015). Essentials of testing and assessment: A practical guide for social workers, counselors, and psychologists (3rd ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage. New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. (2003). Achieving the promise: Transforming mental health care in America: Final report (DHHS Pub. No. SMA-03-3832). Rockville, MD: Author. Walker, J. S., & Schutte, K. M. (2004). Practice and Process in Wraparound Teamwork. Journal of Emotional And Behavioral Disorders, 12(3), 182-192. doi:10.1177/10634266040120030501 Walker, J. S., & Schutte, K. (2005). Quality and individualization in wraparound team planning. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 14(2), 251-267. doi:10.1007/s10826-005-5052-6
This fifth revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or DSM will be the standard classification of mental disorders (Nauert, 2011). Mental health professionals and other health professionals will use this standard in their diagnoses and researches. The American Psychiatric Association released a draft of proposed changes after a decade of review and revision by the Association. Allen Frances, chairman and editor of DSM IV, and Robert Spitzer, editor of DSM III, expressed objections to the task force conducting the revisions and the proposed revisions. Present chairman is David Kupfer and vice chairman is Darrel Regier (Nauert; Collier, 2010).
Identification of any psychosocial or contextual factors to be considered, as outlined in the DSM-5
Their dedication and hard work have been combined together in the new edition DSM-5 that defines and classifies mental disorder in order to improve treatment, diagnoses and research. DSM-5 has no greater changes from DSM-IV-TR. However, there are some new disorders introduced and reclassified. The multiaxial system has been removed in DSM-5 because Axis I, II and II have been combined into the descriptions of the disorders. DSM-5 approved the posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which is a self-report scale develop based on data. DSM-5 focuses to make better characterize symptoms for groups of people who are seeking for clinical help. These symptoms were not defined well in DSM-IV and are less likely to have access to the
Mental healthcare has a long and murky past in the United States. In the early 1900s, patients could live in institutions for many years. The treatments and conditions were, at times, inhumane. Legislation in the 1980s and 1990s created programs to protect this vulnerable population from abuse and discrimination. In the last 20 years, mental health advocacy groups and legislators have made gains in bringing attention to the disparity between physical and mental health programs. However, diagnosis and treatment of mental illnesses continues to be less than optimal. Mental health disparities continue to exist in all areas of the world.
Hood, A.B., & Johnson, R.W. (2007). Assessment in Counseling: A guide to the use of psychological assessment procedures (4th ed.). Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
States obtain many services that fall under mental health care, and that treat the mentally ill population. These range from acute and long-term hospital treatment, to supportive housing. Other effective services utilized include crisis intervention teams, case management, Assertive Community Treatment programs, clinic services, and access to psychiatric medications (Honberg at al. 6). These services support the growing population of people living in the...
The largest problem with the diagnostic model of the DSM I believe is the complete neglect of social context in relation to behavior. The DSM provides criteria for which clinicians and psychiatrists can make diagnoses but fails to incorporate how a social factor, like the loss of a family member, can lead to behaviors characteristic of a mental disorder such as General Anxiety Disorder. This can lead to many instances of misdiagnosis in either a false negative or false positive manner. There could also be misinterpretation due to social differences where something that is natural to someone in one culture is seen as problematic to another in a different culture. The largest problem that arises from this lack of recognition for social factors is the fundamental attribution bias, which is the misinterpretation of a behavior as due to a person’s personality rather than a result of environmental forces. If people do not have the time or energy to consider these implications that society has on behavior, many misdiagnoses and misinterpretations will continue ...
The DSM-V plays a huge role in the classification and treatment of somatoform disorders. It was not until this model that somatoform was not just one category, but had multiple sub-categories under it. With all of this being said, the DSM-V has gotten multiple hits of hard criticism that the new edition has a lack of scientific evidence for specific classifications, and unclear boundaries between every day stressors, and a classified “illness.” However, with constant progress, new information, new disorders and treatments, the DSM, no matter what version, will always take criticism for one thing or another (McCarron, 2013).
Multidiscipline involvement is important within mental health nursing as people with mental health problems have multiple needs, so a variety of expertise is required to meet the needs of these people (Darby et al 1999).
This belief highlights another difference between the DSM-5 and Individual Psychology. Individual Psychology stresses on the strengths of the individual. Again, it directs attention back to what purpose the symptoms of the disorder and the resulting behaviors play in the client’s life. Individual Psychology highlights the “meaning, purpose and use of dysfunctional thinking, behavior, and symptoms” (Sperry & Carlson, 1996, p. 8). In contrast, the DSM-5 is based on a “pathological model and a psychology of possession” (Sperry & Carlson 1996, p.
In the case of changing the mental health policy in North Carolina, the impetus for the change seems to be adopted by the State Auditor’s report beside other reports of many entities confirming the deviation of mental health service away from its original goal. According to these reports, mental health services are still delivered via traditional health delivery models rather than coordinated well-managed ones. Interestingly, these reports analyze the spectrum of mental health services nationwide with the exception of the State Auditor’s 2000 report Study of the Psychiatric Hospitals and the Area Mental Health Programs which was specifically designed for the North Carolina.
This is an area where advocacy and empowerment are essential, especially if a client feels less than able to go deal with major systems in society alone. It is also an area where a client may be coming to use for many different reasons and we should look further than just a diagnosis. It is also a field as we discussed in class that is not always culturally competent. Many other cultures can show signs for mental illness when in reality it is their way of functioning in that group. This is major reason practitioners should ask clients about their backgrounds and questions about their behavior if they are unfamiliar before placing
NASMHPD. (2014, Accessed April 27). Retrieved from NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAM DIRECTORS: http://www.nasmhpd.org/About/AOMultiStateDisaster.aspx
...row WE, Rae DS, Manderscheid RW, Locke BZ, Goodwin FK. The de facto US mental and addictive disorders service system. Epidemiologic catchment area prospective 1-year prevalence rates of disorders and services. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1993 Feb;50(2):85-94.
Toseland, R & Rivas, R 2012, An Introduction to group work practice, 7th edn, Allyn & Bacon, Massachusetts.