Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The nature ,purpose and function of literary Criticism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
he two poems, “Travelling through the Dark” by William E. Stafford and “Woodchucks” by Maxine Kumin, both share similar thought involving the relationship between humans and nature.
Although the poems have different plots, settings, and characters, they both develop a common theme of a huge conflict in the way people interact with their surroundings. In both poems, the protagonist is forced to make a decision involving the life or death
In “Woodchucks”, the author describes a scenario in which her pacifist self comes face to face with a family of woodchucks and kills them all.
In “Travelling through the Dark”, the narrator comes across a pregnant deer that was hit by a car, lying in the middle of the road, and wonders about the unfair
ways of nature and the unborn fawn. The narrator uses caesuras, a pause within a line, to emphasize important thoughts and details.
Both authors use figurative language to help develop sensory details. In the poem It states, “And I sunned it with my smiles, And with soft deceitful wiles.” As the author explains how the character is feeling, the reader can create a specific image in there head based on the details that is given throughout the poem. Specifically this piece of evidence shows the narrator growing more angry and having more rage. In the short story ” it states, “We are below the river's bed. The drops of moisture trickle among bones.” From this piece of text evidence the reader can sense the cold dark emotion that is trying to be formed. Also this excerpt shows the conflict that is about to become and the revenge that is about to take place. By the story and the poem using sensory details, they both share many comparisons.
From the lone hiker on the Appalachian Trail to the environmental lobby groups in Washington D.C., nature evokes strong feelings in each and every one of us. We often struggle with and are ultimately shaped by our relationship with nature. The relationship we forge with nature reflects our fundamental beliefs about ourselves and the world around us. The works of timeless authors, including Henry David Thoreau and Annie Dillard, are centered around their relationship to nature.
These two poems may seem like very similar poems at first glance, but when they are picked apart line for line to find the true meaning, they are much different. The underlying themes of these poems aren’t even close to one another. One poem describes a moment that changed a teenager’s life, causing him to mature in the process. The other poem describes how nature, man, and technology can hurt and better each other. By saying these poems are the same simply because they are about animals dying would be merely scratching the surface of what these poems are about.
The poetry by these two poets creates several different images, both overall, each with a different goal, have achieved their purposes. Though from slightly different times, they can both be recognized and appreciated as poets who did not fear the outside, and were willing to put themselves out there to create both truth and beauty.
Therefore, although both poems are written on similar topics, the poems are quite different, mainly only agreeing on the fact that war is wrong.
These two poems are similar because of the two pasts the main character share. Both characters grew up in a town that was centered around the ability to play sports. Each town praised their athlete for the accomplishments
Maxine Kumin’s poem Woodchucks is not simply a farmer’s irritation over a couple of pesky woodchucks. The subject does have to do with humans having the tendency to become violent when provoked. However the theme of the poem takes a much darker path showing how it only takes something small to turn any normal humane person into a heartless murderer. The theme evolves by using dark references to the holocaust and basic Darwinist principles. These references are made through connotation, tone, allusions and metaphors.
Both poems where written in the Anglo-Saxton era in Old English and later translated into English. As well as both poems being written in the same time period, they are both elegiac poems, meaning they are poignant and mournful.
When considering the structure of the poems, they are similar in that they are both written loosely in iambic pentameter. Also, they both have a notable structured rhyme scheme.
One way in which the poems differ is in their use of imagery. A good
Though the point of views are different, there is one important similar factor that comes back in both poems, and that is the difference between black and white. Though these two poems are written from two totally different perspectives, it is fair to say that (even if the first poem covers it up by being written from a positive approach) both poems are quite sinister when fully understanding what they are about.
“Suddenly the young hunter saw the woman, with her dress above her waist, her bare legs sprayed wide apart. He had never seen a woman like that before. He ran quickly to her side and stared down at her belly, quite frightened to touch. There, lying beneath the woman's legs, was the body of a small, damp, pink animal, attached only by something that looked like a rope......”
Although the poetry was produced in different years and each has different authors, the similarities undeniably outweigh the differences. Thus, attempting to contrast the two pieces is simple because of the common ties each poem posseses. Due to the similarity in topic, the additional differences that exist between writers appear to weaken leaving the unifying focus certain.
In the poem “Traveling through the Dark”, I picture a man traveling at night on a narrow road. He approaches a dead deer and gets out of his car to investigate further. His first instinct is “to roll them into the canyon” (Stafford, 1998). He knows that the road is too narrow for both the dead deer and a passing car. The deer is already dead and he wants to prevent any further deaths. He notices that the deer was pregnant, so he thinks deep on his next course of action. He knows the baby is alive, but he does not know when it was expected to be born or if it was injured. He realized that there was nothing that he could about the
It is no secret that the mind is broadened by experience, and reading poetry is no exception. By reading these two poems together, one is able to get a more complete understanding of nature and its relationship to mankind, as both poems address such a theme but do so from slightly different perspectives. Through reading different but connected works, readers themselves grow intellectually as they are forced to contend with different ideas and have understand both perspectives. Indeed, to limit oneself to reading one poem is like keeping oneself on an island - one will only be exposed to a limited, incomplete