Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflection on gender bias
Stereotypes and how they affect us today
Stereotypes and how they affect us today
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
It is irrefutable that media alters societal perceptions. As an audience, we are constantly being exposed to messages that influence us in minute and massive ways. With ever evolving technology, the exposure to concepts will only increase as the availability of these messages increases. The clips collected in the assignment demonstrate different aspects of masculinity from television shows: stereotypical masculinity in Parks and Recreation, Toxic Masculinity in Jersey Shore, and the fragility of masculinity in Shark Tank.
When trying to pinpoint examples of stereotypical masculinity, I almost immediately thought of Ron Swanson from the Television show Parks and Recreation. Swanson, played by well-known manly-man Nick Offerman, is a character
…show more content…
that is stereotypical Masculinity embodied. He has a penchant for eating meats, loves wood working, hunting, and whiskey. He’s a man that loves simplicity, is always prepared for a disaster, and rarely shows emotions. Ron’s masculinity was reinforced at a young age, and in one episode he states that he began his first job at a sheet metal factory at nine years old. In The Many Emotions of Ron Swanson the video exemplify Ron’s masculinity is a compilation of moments from the show. Ron can generally be described as either apathetic, angry or violent, and this is shown in the video. Most of the clips of Ron involve him going to extraneous lengths to avoid being sentimental and reacting to situations with violent outbursts (Parks and Recreation, 2013). My love for Ron’s character was initially confusing because I usually find difficulty connecting to overly masculine men. In this instance, I realize that Ron is a caricature of masculinity, rather than an example for other men to follow. Many men can relate to enjoying fixing and crafting things, but most would not be able to make a full canoe by themselves. Many men may enjoy breakfast food, but they would not go to a restaurant and request all their eggs and bacon. Ron is relatable character that was created to mock extreme masculinity. One of my guiltiest pleasures is watching Jersey Shore.
Even though the show is incredibly problematic, it makes me feel better about my own issues. There are many examples of gender roles, social issues, and toxic masculinity which are prevalent throughout the entirety of the show. The men of Jersey Shore are interesting examples of hegemonic masculinity because they have invented their own meaning of masculinity while simultaneously upholding misogynistic practices. These men place a lot of value in their appearance, and often exhibit behavior that is associated with femininity. They get eyebrow waxes, work on their tans, and regularly use hair and skin products. They have altered their perception of masculinity by adding in these feminine elements, and yet reinforce traditional gender roles and expectations. While their portrayal of masculinity is slightly altered they still exhibit aspects of toxic masculinity, such as overt aggression and violence. The clip I chose to demonstrate stereotypical masculinity is from an episode where two roommates, Ron and Mike, get in an argument that quickly becomes violent. Ron feels that Mike was intentionally trying to create problems in his romantic relationship, and Mike initially tried to verbally defend himself. As Ron began throwing things, Mike became loud and erratic. This event culminated in a physical fight, but Mike was only injured because he headbutted a wall. Mike later admitted that he recognized Ron was stronger, and …show more content…
would probably win in an argument. To counteract this, he became louder and more violent to scare Ron. He admitted that he thought attacking the wall would make him seem tougher, with a goal of startling Ron (SwagEntertainment1 2012). Instead of trying to deescalate the argument and discuss their differences, both men tried to intimidate the other until it became physical. This primitive display perfectly represents how masculinity and pride can be a barrier in communication and can lead to violence. Shark Tank is a television show where inventors pitch business concepts to a panel of investors in hopes of making a business deal that is beneficial to both parties.
In one episode, inventors pitched the product Dude Wipes, which are just disposable wipes for men. The clip that I found related to this is an update video where the inventors state that since appearing on Shark Tank they have earned over 3 million dollars (Benzyfi, 2017). One of the most ridiculous aspects of consumerism is gendered products. While people have freedom to buy products that appeal to them, the concept of remarketing, instead of inventing or improving, a product to make it seem more masculine speaks of the problem Men have with avoiding products with any connection to femininity. The performance of masculinity is so fragile that the façade could be ruined if men bought or used anything unless it is specifically marketed towards men. Using masculine nicknames like “Dude”, and colors associated with masculinity is enough to make some individuals purchase a
product. While there are issues with misrepresentation and poor societal message within the media, it is important to also highlight the rare ways it makes nontraditional gender performance more available. Much of these representations rely on stereotypes, and this is particularly true about gender stereotypes. The stereotypical masculinity in Parks and Recreation, the Toxic Masculinity in Jersey Shore, and the fragility of masculinity in Shark Tank are all examples of masculinity in the media. Masculinity constantly evolves to fit the time, but problematic masculinity will not improve until the media stops relying on these predictable stereotypes.
The topics that Joe Ehrmann uses as framework for his Building Men for Others program are quite intriguing and make you really question masculinity. The first topic, rejecting false masculinity, can be interpreted a few different ways. In the book, it states: “As young boys, we’re told to be men, or to act like men” soon followed with “we’ve got all these parents say ‘be a man’ to boys that have no concept of what that means. I completely agree with the statement of Joe Ehrmann and often question the definition of ‘being a man’. Many boys and men will reject the idea of a man being anything other than being big and strong or having power.
Klumas, Amy L., and Thomas Marchant. “Images of Men in Popular Sitcoms”. Journal of Men’s Studies 2.3 (1994): 269. ProQuest. Web. 27 Jan. 2014.
Jensen proposes three ideas on why masculinity must be terminated: masculinity is harmful for both men and women, men are surrendering their humanity by conforming to masculinity, and that all characteristics should simply be human characteristics, not male or female.
As a group, we believe that popular culture does in fact perpetuates stereotypes. Television is a main source of information of popular culture. Television has forever changed how humans have interacted with another and introduce a world of diversity and knowledge. But with this profit, television has also harbored negative aspects. As a group, we studied how racial stereotypes are portrayed in television. In the history of television, different racial and ethnic groups have been widely underrepresented and television itself has been overwhelming represented by white figures. And when racial groups are presented on TV, the characters are often played in limited roles based on stereotypes. A stereotype isn’t necessarily untrue, but it is an assumption based on an incomplete and complex ideas that are oversimplified into something that isn’t what it meant to be, and it’s usually negative. For example, African Americans are often depicted as violent or involved in some kind of criminal activity. Their characters often portrays a person who is always sassy and angry or that isn’t intelligent and won’t succeed in life and inferior to whites in some manner. Asian characters are
Craig breaks down the gender biased commercials into four different categories. The first category, “Men’s
Michael Abernathy’s article “Male Bashing on TV” uses many television sources and percentages to explain how men are treated like idiots inside of the media. Abernathy is a television reviewer, cultural critic, and queer culture commentator (350). While Heather Havrilesky's article “TV’s New Wave of Women:Smart, Strong, Borderline Insane” is the opposite and uses television sources to explain how women are treated as smart yet crazy inside of the media. These two articles describe how men and women are portrayed differently in television shows and the media. The articles have smaller subtopics in common which are the portrayal of men and women in the media, the comparison of men and women in each article, and how Abernathy and Havrilesky want
All over the world Masculinity has many different cultural definitions. Depending where someone is from, and what they were brought up to believe, defines what the term “masculinity” entails. Different Social institutions all over the United States, such as the military, sports, clubs, and fraternities, have been constructing their interpretation of masculinity. One major social institution that is active in thousands of Universities across the United States is campus fraternities. Campus fraternities create their own sense of masculinity by generating certain requirements and characteristics a man must hold in order to represent them as a part of their fraternity.
Jensen provides evidence throughout the text for three assumptions on why masculinity must be terminated from pertaining to just males. It is proposed that masculinity is harmful for both men and women, that men are surrendering their humanity by conforming with masculinity, and
The "others" do not want to demonize men, yet are not taking an active role in eliminating the occasional poison that masculine expectations inhibit. Hamblin 's opinion, as well as several respected experts in psychology, criminology, and sociology, believes that toxic masculinity is an accurate term that can further both discussion and action on how to stop the aggressive and destructive notions of
... black packaging that depicts a man ever so chivalrously allowing a women to enter the protection of his manbrella. These products, while seemingly innocent, are constant reinforces of gender stereotypes. A choice between the Dude Wipes brand and the Playtex Wipe is not just about splitting consumers into male and female buyers. This process bears implications of what it means to fall under the category of the male box and the female box. These products reinforce the gender related characteristics that our society has labeled as masculine and feminine. Men are not to show compassion or empathy, and women are not to be tough, or in charge. Beyond the inappropriate societal reinforcement of gender norms, the products targeted at women are often more expensive then similar products aimed at a male consumer. In a world of blue and pink packaging, women loose every time.
Early feminist studies of gender often depicted the expression of masculinity as solely meant to subordinate women. Upon further research and understanding of gender and its role in society, gender theorists have realized that masculinity is not only a patriarchal regulation against women, but that it also has negative effects against men. Masculinity has different characteristics in different cultures, but masculinity in general presents a hierarchy of traits, with femininity as the lowest, least desirable trait. In American culture, masculinity is defined within multiple structures, such as race, class, and sexuality, where a man’s masculinity can be lessened by his traits as well as these identities. Often, normative expressions of masculinity
Masculinity in the modern age is changing, so much so that many men feel inadequate. A large amount of men are unable to understand what type of masculinity they fit into and what they want to fit into. In Gurmeet S. Kanwal’s article from “Psychology Today: The masculinity crisis, male malaise, and the challenge of becoming a good man” he says that, “the perception and image of heterosexual men in this country has never been as negative, de-idealized, and potentially harmful as it is now. And lots of men are feeling it.” Men are now feeling that they do not fit into or do not want to fit into popular masculinity. This is similar to the way American men were feeling about masculinity after World War II. Even though the male malaise was not present, many men were not content with the popularized breadwinner masculinity, according to Elizabeth Fraterrigo in her book Playboy and the Making of the Good Life in Modern America. In the time where Playboy was first starting off the most accepted masculinity was the breadwinner, which has now been looked down upon by media. The unhappiness men had at the time towards that one accepted masculinity was mended by Hugh Hefner’s creation of the Playboy lifestyle. Fueled by the male malaise and negativity from the media, masculinity will have to change in the near future even if it means creating a new kind like Playboy did.
The media, through its many outlets, has a lasting effect on the values and social structure evident in modern day society. Television, in particular, has the ability to influence the social structure of society with its subjective content. As Dwight E. Brooks and Lisa P. Hébert write in their article, “GENDER, RACE, AND MEDIA REPRESENTATION”, the basis of our accepted social identities is heavily controlled by the media we consume. One of the social identities that is heavily influenced is gender: Brooks and Hébert conclude, “While sex differences are rooted in biology, how we come to understand and perform gender is based on culture” (Brooks, Hébert 297). With gender being shaped so profusely by our culture, it is important to be aware of how social identities, such as gender, are being constructed in the media.
Another major factor that influences millions of impressionable females and males is television. Not only does the television teach each sex how to act, it also shows how one sex should expect the other sex to act. In the current television broadcasting, stereotypical behavior goes from programming for the very small to adult audiences. In this broadcasting range, females are portrayed as motherly, passive and innocent, sex objects, or they are overlooked completely or seen as unimportant entities. Stereotyping women is not only rampant in the adult world; it also flourishes in the kiddie universe as well.
Gender stereotyping has been ongoing throughout history. The media has been distorting views by representing gender unrealistically and inaccurately. It created an image of what "masculinity" or "femininity" should be like and this leads to the image being "naturalized" in a way (Gail and Humez 2014). The media also attempts to shape their viewers into something ‘desirable’ to the norm. This essay will focus on the negative impacts of gender-related media stereotypes by looking at the pressures the media sets on both women and men, and also considering the impacts on children.