Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of toxic leadership
Importance of Army Leadership
Impact of toxic leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of toxic leadership
Contemporary Issue in the Army: Toxic Leadership
1
CONTEMPORARY ISSUE FACING THE ARMY:
“The Problem of Toxic Leadership”
Sergeant First Class, Ericca Cole
U.S. ARMY SERGEANTS MAJOR ACADEMY,
Master Leader Course Non-Resident (MLCNR)
Contemporary Issue in the Army: Toxic Leadership
2
“A leader who allows their subordinates to suffer as proof of who is the boss, likely
quenches their thirst with salt water from a rusted canteen,” Donavan Nelson Butler, Master
Sergeant US Army. According to the Army’s leadership Field Manual (FM) 6-22, Army
leadership is “the process of influencing people by providing purpose, direction, and motivation
…show more content…
Contrarily, if an engines receives toxic fuel, it will
malfunction, have difficulty starting, decrease in power, and have performance problems. Toxic
leadership is a prevalent problem in the Army. Toxic leadership is like an intuitional cancer,
with the potential to spread throughout an organization. Toxic leaders possess detrimental
characteristics and attributable which can negatively impact Soldiers, however, there are ways to
combat this issue.
FM 6-22 and Army Doctrine Reference Publication (ADRP), defines toxic leadership as:
“a combination of self-centered attitudes, motivations, and behaviors that have adverse effects on
subordinates, the organization, and mission performance. The toxic leader operates with an
inflated sense of self-worth and from acute self-interest. Toxic leaders consistently use
dysfunctional behaviors to deceive, intimidate, coerce, or unfairly punish others to get what they
want for themselves.” According to Army Colonel, Denise F. Williams, there are eighteen
different types of toxic leaders (The United States Army War College Strategy Research
Project). The Absentee Leader, The Incompetent Leader, The Codependent Leader, The
…show more content…
(The United States Army War College Strategy Research
Project). I can personally relate to the Narcissistic Leadership. This particular leader was only
interested in himself. He relentlessly took credit for my work. He was demeaning, and
constantly belittled my ideas. He would publicly humiliate the junior enlisted. This leaders
made the work environment extremely toxic.
Destructive leadership in the Army can potentially have life or death consequences.
Researcher Dave Matsuda conducted an investigation on the suicides of eight Soldiers. At the
conclusion of his study, Matsuda revealed that the Soldiers leadership didn’t cause them to
commit suicides. However it did help push them over the edge. Matsuda says “Suicidal
behaviors can be triggered by toxic command climates.” The presence of toxic leadership can
establish a destructive cycle with harmful effects on moral, work ethic, and retention. “Toxic
leaders lack concern for others and the climate of the organization, which leads to long term and
short term, effects, FM 6-22. My first experience with toxic leaderships was 13 years ago.
The post “The High Cost of Low Morale- and What to do About it” addresses how the command structure affects morale “Managers that create low morale in employees do so from a top-down command and control mode, which implies that employees’ do the listening and managers need not reciprocate.” Bad managers hurt profits of the company. Time magazine listed 10 signs of having a bad boss. These signs include failing to engage with employees, not establishing trust and thinking they have all the answers. If employee had direct control of management then they would vote for a candidate that is personable, qualified and
Black Hearts is a great example of the reality on how severe bad leadership skills can ripple throughout a unit and impact its overall mission. This book serves as a guide for future leaders of America and will set the examples of what not to do in leadership positions. The lessons we can take from these soldiers can help us as potential leaders to become more competent and effective. The fact that this book focused on the hardships, poor decisions and sound judgment of the soldiers it helped emphasize on what was not the best choice of action and leaves a moment for you as the audience to think how you would of done it better. So right or wrong there was a lesson to be learned and the book did a good job including the reader. This book puts you in the shoes of a small group of soldiers from the 502nd Infantry Regiment and gives you an up close and personal take on the experience of the soldiers, from the bottom of the the ranks all the way up to the commander. 502nd Bravo Company 1st platoon deployed in the fall of 2005 into one of the most dangerous battle zones in Iraq known as the “Triangle of Death”. Thrown into the heartland of a growing insurgency, with undefined goals and a shortage of manpower, Bravo Company began piling up casualties at an alarming rate. They suffered many losses, as well as mental anguish. Because of the long and tragic deployment, a collapse in leadership began to unfold causing one of the most tragic, brutal, and infamous deployments in U.S Army history. There were many reasons that caused the deconstruction of leadership, and eventually, the actions of the soldiers accompanied by the lack of control, lead to the rape and murder of an innocent Iraqi girl and her family. This is a story about character...
...mples are extreme. But, leaders must really watch their management styles, and not let the slightest inkling of coercion or manipulation enter into their leadership techniques. Bad news travels fast and the effects are very difficult to restore; the hardest thing for a manager to hear are whispers from a cubicle, "Here comes little Hitler."
Dwight David Eisenhower (1955), the 34th President of the United States, gave an explicit definition of leadership, “The job of getting people really wanting to do something is the essence of leadership….” The Army, like any other civilian organization, defines different levels of leadership depending on a size of a unit a leader is in command of. Tactical and organizational leaderships are two first interconnected levels of leadership in the Army. Both levels of leadership have many commonalities regarding duties and responsibilities; yet they are very different in the way the leaders develop themselves, train, and take care of their soldiers.
In the minds of many people today, the United States Army is considered to have one of the best structured organizational communication networks. This is based upon the specified code of conduct that the Army is underlyingly ruled by. This is upheld by the specific chain of command, which is easily distinguished by rank and uniformity. Strict punishment is carried out upon those who violate rules and conduct, commonly accepted by this organization. The authority figures, in the Army, set tasks, and relay a common purpose to all subordinates down to the lowest level in the organization.
Kellerman, B. (2004). Bad Leadership: What it is, How it Happens, Why it Matters. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press.
In any discussion of leadership, thoughts immediately begin to turn to examples of leadership gone wrong. These may include leaders who bully, threaten, or allow their mood to affect the environment of the agency (Reed, 2004, p. 67). The reason we focus upon these examples is the destructive impact they have upon the agency as a whole, as well as the individual officers unfortunate enough to serve under that type of leader. Leaders such as these foster an environment of backbiting and belittling as a method of control, resulting in an untenable environment for those officers who choose not to engage in such behavior and, as often as not, promotion of those that do. This kind of management gives way to:
Leadership is contagious throughout the world and most importantly in the Army. It is not just my view, but of all leaders, at all levels, that organizations are responsible for setting conditions that lead to long-term organizational success. As I reflect on my experiences, through experience and observation, I realize how my values, beliefs, and perspectives about leadership continuously evolve over time. Recognizing these changes over time helps me better understand that people in organizations have different perspectives in life. This leadership narrative serve as important guiding principles for how I will lead at the organizational level and represents my thought, values and beliefs.
Abortion has been a choice for people who have unwanted pregnancies for the last four decades. There is an error in this because abortion is murder. Many people have called for Planned Parenthood to be defunded by the government. Many say that if we defund Planned Parenthood that those in need of an abortion or other care, whether because of rape, incest, or simply an unwanted pregnancy would not be able to get the help. Those who support abortion are under the belief that abortion is not murder because they believe that life does not begin until after birth. But I do not agree with this, life begins at conception. If Planned Parenthood were to be defunded by the government it would not mean that abortions would become illegal again, unless Roe v. Wade were reversed, abortion would still be legal. All that would happen is that Planned Parenthood would need to raise
Regardless of the career you choose in your life, whether it be an accountant or a Soldier in the United States Army, someone, somewhere most likely had an influence to bring you to that decision. The Army defines leadership as the process of influencing people by providing purpose, direction, and motivation while operating to accomplish the mission and improve the organization (JP, p. 1). Now imagine you are a young Private, in one of the most dangerous places in Iraq and you have constant leadership changes, and not much support from your direct leadership. I am sure at this point you can imagine, it is not the best scenario to be in. Throughout the duration of this essay you will read about Sergeant First Class Rob Gallagher and Sergeant First Class Jeff Fenlason, their leadership abilities, and the techniques they attempted to use to resolve the issues in this Platoon that was in a downward spiral after losing many leaders to the hell of war.
Lord, R. (2000). Leadership. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology, vol. 4. (pp. 499-505). Doi:10.1037/10519-216
As an officer in the United States Army, it has been imperative for me to understand every facet of leadership and why it remains important to be an effective leader. During this course, I have learned some valuable lessons about myself as a leader and how I can improve on my leadership ability in the future. The journal entries along with the understanding of available leadership theories have been an integral part of my learning during this course. For all of the journals and assessments that I completed, I feel it has given me a good understanding of my current leadership status and my future potential as a leader. All of the specific assessments looked at several areas in regards to leadership; these assessments covered several separate focus areas and identified my overall strengths and weaknesses as a leader. Over the course of this paper I will briefly discuss each one of these assessments and journal entries as they pertained to me and my leadership.
Organizations have leaders who are effective and ineffective. Many of us want to be leaders but, do we have what it takes to be effective or are we going to be ineffective. Leaders are people who build their organization and employees up. Ineffective leaders are those who only care about getting a check. This paper will discuss effective and ineffective leaders. The effective and ineffective leaders I have had the pleasure to work with.
There are many examples of poor leadership behavior in today’s workplace. Inadequate leadership can be detrimental not only to a team within an organization, but also to the entire organization itself. I believe it is vital for upper management to ensure that their leaders are properly trained and aware of how to handle certain situations and employees. When a leader’s weaknesses are overlooked, large problems occur.
In such organizations it is common for leaders to provide direction without concern for subordinates disagreeing or providing negative feedback. A second behavior which often leads to exploitation is consolidation of information. When a few select personnel in a firm have restricted access to valuable information, a toxic leader can leverage this situation to great effect. Information control can be used to enact isolation for dissenters or to reward those who support the leader. Toxic leaders can even use information to foment distrust among sections of the business preventing them from being galvanized in opposition (Wilson-Starks, 2003).