Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The relationship between pay and motivation
Compensation and benefits its impact on employees motivation
The relationship between pay and motivation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The relationship between pay and motivation
Introduction
PeoplePower is a company whose role is to provide labor services to its clients operating in the tourism and hospitality industry. The company offers its services to clients who need cleaning and maintenance services and this range from individual clients to business premises such as hotels. The company employees have the role of cleaning the clients’ premises, and the number of employees expected to carry out these duties vary depending on the clients who have asked for the services. The company has a total number of 12 management and administrative persons, 70 full time workers, 20 part time workers, and 160 casual workers. The clients pay the company 120 per cent of what they would pay if they got the services from their staff and the extra 20 per cent is for convenience and reliability to the company. This paper will describe the performance based compensation system that PeoplePower would use on all the employees, including the management and administration staff.
Theoretical Description and Justification
It is important for any company’s management to be concerned with the performance of its employees. The employees past performance also determines future performance thus the need for continuous enhancement of the employees performance. This means that, employers have the role of ensuring that they improve the performance of their employees, and this is greatly impacted on the compensation system that the company uses on all its employees. According to Sturman (2006), money is the overall incentive value that most of the employers give to their employees, but it is also important to note that the employees can improve in their performance if the management motivates them by linking pay to performance. This mean...
... middle of paper ...
...ational Performance: Incentives as Moderator. Journal of Academic Research. 1 (2): 229-242
Pazy, A., & Ganzach, Y. (2006). Pay Contingency and the Effects of Perceived Organizational and Supervisor Support on Performance and Commitment. Journal of Management.
Resurreccion, P. F. (2012). Performance Management and Compensation as Drivers of Organization Competitiveness: The Philippine Perspective. International Journal of Business and Social Science. 3 (21): 20-30
Sturman, M. C. (2006). Using your Pay System to Improve Employees’ Performance: How you pay makes a Difference. The Centre for Hospitality Research. 6 (13): 1-12
Weisbach, M. S. (2007). Optimal Executive Compensation versus Managerial Power: A Review of Lucian Bebchuk and Jesse Fried’s Pay without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation. Journal of Economic Literature. 45:419-428
Mujtaba, B. G., & Shuaib, S. (2010). An Equitable Total Rewards Approach to Pay for Performance Management. Journal of Management Policy and Practice vol. II (4), 111-121.
Frydman, C., & Saks, R. E. (2010). Executive Compensation: A New View from a Long-Term Perspective, 1936-2005. Review Of Financial Studies, 23(5), 2099-2138.
When employees were asked, what factors could be changed at USAA to help maintain employee motivation levels, a couple of them answered with, “higher wages” and “more money”. This response corroborates other studies regarding pay which state surveys will more likely under emphasize the importance of pay relative to other motivational factors. (Rynes, Gerhart & Minette, 2004). “Financial incentives had by far the largest effect on productivity of all interventions. For example, pay was four times more effective than interventions designed to make work more interesting.” (Rynes, 2004). One reason for this phenomenon is social desirable responding. It should be noted, that although pay may be under reported, the results indicate other factors are also important for employee
The company Steel Co, which has been established for around 30 years, has been in a steady decline during the current recession and although a Divisional Director has been employed by the owner the fortunes of the company have not improved. The staff is unhappy, unproductive and unimpressed by the Human Resource system that currently exists in the company. The pay structure that currently exists within the organisation has been much debated among employees who feel it is unsatisfactory. The Business Adviser will research Performance and Reward management tools in order to help the company develop a more suitable Performance and Reward system to use. A variety of sources will be used in order to evaluate the system and tools against other organisational frameworks. The pay structure within the company will also be looked at in order to identify any possible changes that could be made.
In April 2010, KK BB, the CEO of Marshall & Gordon, a leading public relations firm met with the firm’s leadership committee off-site in Miami. This off-site brought together Marshall & Gordon’s executive committee, practice and regional heads, and senior HR officers to discuss on redesigning the firm’s compensation system. A global advisory taskforce, under the direction of an external consulting firm, had spent three months collecting and analyzing data. Marshall & Gordon hired external specialists to design the new performance management program. The specialists proposed that the senior managers and human resource form a global advisory unit together with Marshall & Gordon partner to represent the firm’s five regions of the firm and lead the design process. The advisory unit surveyed all consultants in February in order to understand their way of thinking about the fairness, worth, and effect of the current performance management system. Majority of the interviewees responded to the corporate surveys implying that the subject was topic was especially exciting to them. Interviews gave insights on present and prospective business plans and direction. The survey also showed that specific focus across certain employee populations should be given. Six current hires from key competitors were also interviewed to comprehend competitor pay practices and compensation program structures. Further focus groups discussions and key information interviews enabled the taskforce’s to understand the needs of certain groups within Marshall & Gordon’s worker population. The survey culminated with the taskforce conducting interviews of 20 partners and principals togeth...
CEO compensation has been a heated debate for many years recently, and it can be argued that they are either overpaid or that there payment is justified by the amount of work they do and their performance. To answer the question about whether CEO compensation is justified it must be looked at by the utilitarian viewpoint where the good of many outweighs the good of one. It is true that many CEO’s are paid an exorbitant amount of money; however, their payment is justified by the amount of money that they bring back to the company and the shareholders. There are many factors that impact the pay that the CEO receives according to Shah et.al CEO compensation relies on more than just the performance of the CEO, there are a number of factors that play a rule in the compensation of the CEO including the fellow people who help govern the corporation (Board of Directors, Audit Committee), the size of the company, and the performance that the CEO accomplishes (2009). In this paper the focus will be on the performace aspect of the CEO.
We cannot afford financially or strategically to pay “whatever it takes” to retain or attract a client. Rather, we must devise a compensation system that will encourage our employees to focus on efforts that will increase our profitability by ensuring that our system supports our business objectives. Therefore, we have devised a pay system which is fair, encourages innovation, and takes extra special care of our top talent pool, the Marketing and R&D
Jones, F.F., Scarpello, V., & Bergmann, T. (1999). Pay procedures - What makes them fair? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(2), 129-145.
Management spends a huge amount of time to design incentive systems and schemes to motivate their workers and to ensure they work in their best possible manner. Motivating workers by giving them decent pay helps in winning employees heart to make the work done efficiently, significantly and effectively. The most effective way to motivate people to work productively is through individual incentive compensation (Pfeffer, 1998). An attraction of getting more is a powerful incentive to people for high performance. While most people agree that money plays a major role in motivating people, in organizations there is a widespread belief that money may also have some undesirable effects on morale.
Employee compensation and reward systems have undergone a couple of paradigm shifts since inception. Reward systems were traditionally compensation based and focused on the individual or the position (Beam 1995). After a recession in the early 1980's, employers turned to performance based models in an attempt to save money while still rewarding top performers (Applebaum & Shapiro, 1992). Today, the most successful organizations are using a total reward model, a hybrid of the performance based model combined with strategic human resource management planning to create reward systems that both benefit the employee and help organizations realize their operational goals (Chen & Hsieh, 2006).
Remuneration management is defined as the sum received for an employment or service delivered, this includes the money received on a monthly basis as well as benefits given as rewards (investopedia,para.1 ). Individualism need to be taken into account when implementing these remuneration structures or reward schemes, equal pay plays a role in balancing earnings among the diverse workforce (Shen, Chanda, D’Neetto and Monga,2009,p.241). The Woolworth’s Holdings uphold remuneration policies which have the purpose of making sure to attract and hold on to the best talent, that they are congruent with the strategies of the company and are the determinants of performance during the short and long phases. The policy considers the board members and the employees. This policy manages employees of the company by giving...
In today’s knowledge-based economy, the need for skilled, well trained and highly motivated individual, for organizations to attract and retain high value people, rewards must be at least somewhat competitive. There have been arguments over what constitute the source of competitive advantage – human resources, or their effective management (Kazlauskaite & Bučiūniene, 2008). Human assets play a significant role in the creation and sustaining of any organisation. One cannot manage something unless you appraise it. Performance management is the process of assessing the proficiency through measurable indicators that can be thoroughly tracked to measure growth made in achieving set objectives. ‘One size fit all’ approach have been put to be destructive to an organization. Thus, different challenges require that organization must its build plans to suit the unique demands of the organization and these challenges offer its own design dilemma.
There is considerable debate over merit pay and the effect it has on employees within an organization. Psychologists believe merit pay is related to the incentive theory of psychology; people respond to rewards and with the proper motivation, it increases performance (Cherry). Employers consider merit pay an effective tool and a form of competition strategy for motivating employees to achieve positive performance outcomes. Many employers ignore the fact that incentive plans may motivate some individuals while others have high work ethics and do not need motivation. The intent of this paper is to discuss merit pay used by companies, the motivational factors on employees to reach high achievement, and the challenges that employees face due
Formalized compensation goals serve as guidelines for managers to ensure that wage and benefit policies achieve their intended pur¬pose. The more common goals of compensation policy include to reward employees’ past performance, to remain competitive in the labor market, to maintain salary equity among employees, to motivate employees’ future performance, to maintain the budget, to attract new employees, and to reduce unnecessary turnover. It is important for the organ...
Organizations are working hard in today’s world of business, not only to remain competitive, but also to focus on stability and structure. Employees are the backbone of an organization. It is becoming more important to offer quality HRM programs to staff, in order to support the retention of trained and experienced staff. Employees have always been concerned with salary however, there is a new focus emerging that looks at compensation as a whole entity. Monetary wages are now just as important as other benefits such as paid time off, medical and dental offerings and retirement. This paper will discuss the importance of the total compensation program which includes many aspects, not just salary. Attention must be paid to equal pay, pay