Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical dilemma within the criminal justice system
Ethical issues in criminal justice
Ethical principles in criminal justice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical dilemma within the criminal justice system
Thoroughness is foundational to legal investigators because we owe an ethical duty to our clients to gather information to the best of our ability and pose a professional liability to our attorneys if we do not do so in a careful, deliberate and procedurally correct way. For example, we might be able to obtain a helpful piece of evidence, even through legitimate means, but if we fail to chronicle every step of obtaining and logging that evidence to create a chain of custody, we may still fail our client by ruining its ability to be authenticated. Being thorough in the planning phase of exactly what you will be investigating, how you will collect it, who or what you will need for authentication, and what factors the opposing side might be considering
Reasonable doubt plays a significant role in this particular case, as it requires a standard of unsurpassable evidence in order to be able to convict the plaintiff in a criminal proceeding. This is required under the Due Process Section in the Fifth Amendment of the American Constitution, allowing a safeguard and circumvention
2. Did you easily find the National Criminal Justice Reference Service when you searched for NCJRS on the search tools?
Ever since the start of using courts, the main goal of it was to deliver a fair environment where the accused could defend themselves and show the jurors that he/ she did not commit the crime that they were accused of. Sometimes this system fails us and they sentence an innocent man to jail for something they didn’t commit. The activity that I observed in the field of criminal justice was I went to the boulder court house and watched one of the cases that’s was happening that day. As I sat there watching I saw the defendant’s lawyer trying to convince the jurors that his client was innocent, I thought to myself: how can we improve the court room. Sometimes we see some cases where the criminal can be let go because of not a lot of evidence like Casey Anthony. We also might see that the case might be unfair to person being convicted of a crime that they didn’t do. An example of this is the jurors have some past experience with a person of that race and they don’t like them or they already come with a decision before they even hear the evidence found. We might also see a case where the jurors decide that the accuser is innocent even though there’s evidence that proves otherwise. The main point is how we can make
Subsequently, one of the main components of the procedural limitation is innocent until proven guilty, which brings about the right to a Grand Jury- a panel that determines whether or not there is a need to go to trial. As a result, a guilty verdict in criminal cases is determined with evidence that is sufficient and that must be proved “‘beyond a reasonable doubt’” (pg.131), so there is an immense need to increase the chances for the respect of “reasonable doubt” (pg.
Filing information and documents (manually and using computerised databases) and being able to find them again when necessary. They must also ensure confidentiality of private and sensitive information.
Over the years many cases had emerged on police brutality , like for example, in 2015 , Sandra Bland was pulled over for not using her signal light when switching lanes .During getting pulled over she was asked to put out her cigarette then refused . Later that day , she was killed in police custody .While seeing the video many people speculate that the video that was recorded on the car camera was tampered with . If the officer had on a body camera that day we would've see what happened of out the cameras view .If officers would wear body cameras it would lessen brutality from policemen, honest reports , and lessen the number of complaints .
The optimal mindset of an investigator is to look for possible motives while remain open to all possibilities while focusing on the easiest evidence that can be gathered from the scene (Osterburg 2010). An investigator also has to be willing to keep an open mind and be able to change and adapt to the different evidence that might present itself. An investigator cannot be dead set on something or a certain way they conduct work, they must also be unwilling to change their approach. It is important to avoid tunnel vision while investigating a crime scene. I think that an optimal mindset is where the investigator can make the best of their job and help them process all the evidence possible, it might help them come to a conclusion of what happened. I also feel that the state of mind that is required to be a successful investigator can be taught through training and experience.
police brutality is when a police officer use excessive force on a civilian under suspicion of a crime or not. Like this it's hard to know what is and is not excessive so collecting data can be very inaccurate. Based on the fact that I've found police brutality is shockingly far too common in the media recently has been blowing up with cases and its become even worse of an issue. Recently in Ferguson there have been riots due to the use of a policeman's firearm on on an unarmed man. These riots alone have costed the United States $6 million shops of been looted streets are so dangerous everyone there is either moved out or doesn't leave their home. Police now probably fear shooting any one which could cost lives. Citizens all over will fear if this will happen in their city.
With the number of police brutality cases increasing over time, there has become a variety of causes as well. Policing the police departments is done at the hands of both the chief of the police department and the courts. When dealing with police brutality, the courts look at these situations and cases as just the officers did not use excessive force but used the necessary amount of force to protect the officer and the other officers that are involved in the situation (Worden (1995). The courts do not believe that these allegations are true and they do not fully investigate the allegations because they do not want to find out that their department is not following the policies and that they are taking matters into their own hands. Bandes
Evidence collection is a crucial part of forensics. Its reliability can be compromised by input bias from law
In the film, "Criminal Justice: Nothing Cuts Deeper" a young girl, Denise Moore, is robbed and slashed across the face by an unknown assailant. After the altercation, Denise Moore identifies her attacker to be Jesse Williams. The film portrays the entire process of the criminal justice system.
Assemble a set of guidelines for conducting preliminary investigations in a criminal case. When there is a criminal case, there are a set of guidelines a criminal investigator should follow when conducting a preliminary inquiry. These guidelines consist of arriving at a crime scene in a timely manner, just in case the suspect may still be at or near the scene (Hess, K.M. & Orthmann, C.H., 2013). They will need to take care of any injured person or people that may need emergency care. Check to see if there are any witnesses who have seen what happened.
When it comes to mental illness and how individuals who are involved with the criminal
...ditional visits to the crime scene could cause a compromise if entered into evidence at trial.
I took a great deal of time to conduct research and to think about issues that I feel need to be addressed despite the countless that can be discussed. There are numerous issues within the field of Criminal Justice, but I've been extremely intrigued by the problems that continue to be at the forefront of the news. There two issues with the Criminal Justice field that I want to place great emphasis on these matters. The first problem the I perceive as a significant issue that exists is the considerable disparity between instances of fatalities involving officers opposed to that of an individual not connected to law enforcement. The manner in which casualties are handled by an individual who has no ties to law enforcement is hugely different.