Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
French revolution political ideologies
Importance of propaganda in american revolution
French revolution political ideologies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: French revolution political ideologies
The wars of the French Revolution took aspects of warfare that had existed individually during the reign of the Old Regime and brought them together ultimately culminating in a new form of warfare known to history as total war. A new scale of warfare was achieved thanks to the recruitment of all that France had to offer including men, women and all other available resources. The French people set out on a grand quest for universal liberty looking upon those who resisted them as evil and something which needed to be eradicated no matter the cost. The Russians were to effectively use the scorched earth policy slowing and draining the French of resources until Napoleons Grand Armee could take no more. Together these main, aspects of the Revolutionary …show more content…
With their mindset moving away from the limited wars that were fought by the old regimes, people’s ideas of war turned towards the extreme. Most French leaders had a new understanding of war, something that must end in either total victory or total defeat. This is also exemplified in the idea that the revolutionaries believed the war to turn into a war of liberation and that the ideals of the revolution would be applicable to all peoples in all countries. If the French were to successfully embark on a war or conquest with such a high purpose it would be by its nature, long, grueling and as David Bell feels, potentially apocalyptic. Due to the hostile nations and governments surrounding the French at the time, in order to achieve such a goal the French would have to be prepared to conquer in order to live free from outside enemies or perish to the last man in the process. Anacharsis Cloots, a Prussian nobleman who played a significant role in the French revolution spoke of the way that the French must fight if war was to …show more content…
The best example of this comes from the violence and horror that took place in the Vendee, in the west of France during the War in the Vendee. The war itself was an uprising, seen as counterrevolutionary by those in Paris, against an early 1793 levy and the closing of churches in the Vendee area. A year into the revolt in 1794, the republican general Louis-Marie Turreau sent twelve detachments of two to three thousand soldiers each marching across the Vendee area, with orders to make it uninhabitable. The so called “hell columns” burnt down houses and woods, confiscated or destroyed food, killed livestock and in some areas engaged in large scale rape and slaughter. According to David Bell the most reliable of estimates sits at around 220,000 to 250,000 men, women, and children lost their lives in the years 1793-1794 during the War in the Vendee. David Bell also believes that what made the Vendee so much worse than previous mass slaughters was that it took place during the kind of warfare with no precedent, total war. Previously, enemies of the revolution could expect to be relatively well treated bar providing food and accommodation for the passing soldiers. Enemies of the revolution, no matter whom they may be were perceived as an “existential”
According to Christopher and James Collier,”War turns men into beasts.” It is true because many people are willing to
France entered into the Napoleonic Wars as a result of the French Revolution and the European sovereigns’ opposition to the creation of the French republic out of the fear that such ideas of democracy may spread to neighboring nations and remove the monarchs from their thrones through revolutions. The actions of these nations only served to ironically lead to the spreading of French idealism across the continent during France’s peak of military prowess. By alienating and siding against France, France entered into war with the “Coalitions” of European Monarchies and under Napoleon’s rule, conquered their opposition and under their rule, learned of the French ideology of Demo...
Beginning in mid-1789, and lasting until late-1799, the French Revolution vastly changed the nation of France throughout its ten years. From the storming of the Bastille, the ousting of the royal family, the Reign of Terror, and all the way to the Napoleonic period, France changed vastly during this time. But, for the better part of the last 200 years, the effects that the French Revolution had on the nation, have been vigorously debated by historian and other experts. Aspects of debate have focused around how much change the revolution really caused, and the type of change, as well as whether the changes that it brought about should be looked at as positive or negative. Furthermore, many debate whether the Revolutions excesses and shortcomings can be justified by the gains that the revolution brought throughout the country. Over time, historians’ views on these questions have changed continually, leading many to question the different interpretations and theories behind the Revolutions effectiveness at shaping France and the rest of the world.
Even though, the French Revolution saw the Terror as a sign to create peace and restore a new France, it was not justified because the extremities of the internal and external threats spun out of control and the methods of the period were over the top. As the Reign of Terror in France grew and invoked fear, the internal threats became more radical and deadly. The French Revolution began in 1789 as an attempt to create a new and fair government. (Doc A) As year four of freedom lurched, the thirst for power in Maximilien Robespierre stirred and the hunger for more blood provoked him, urging him to create the Reign of Terror.
Unlike the leaders of America, the leaders of the French did not turn out to be as positive for the country. In fact, some of these leaders caused much more harm than good. These leaders taught the French people more about what type of government would be the best option for them. One of the most radical, and extreme leaders was Maximilien Robespierre. The duration of his dictatorship was known as "Reign of Terror." He demanded a republic and soon after his demands; the monarchy was overthrown. He also felt that a constitutional government would have to wait until all the enemies of the revolution have been eliminated. To accomplish this task, he murdered close to 40,000 people, most by guillotine, and some sentenced to life in jail. The Reign of Terror was one of the most controversial, and terrifying phases of the Revolution. Some French colonists thought it to be a path to democracy; others thought it was just a attempt for Robespierre to assume dictator. The other great leader was Napoleon Bonaparte. He believed that the only way to have control in France was to put a limit on democracy. Over a period of time Napoleon 's party overthrew Robespierre 's party. Soon enough, Napoleon was dictator of France. The French soldiers who fought in the American Revolution came back from the war with new ideas and reason for revolution. These ideas included the right to take up arms against tyranny, all men should
Nardo, Don. A. The French Revolution. San Diego, California: Greenhaven Press, Inc., 1999. Print.
...rent laws and views. Revolutionists fought for a government by the people and for the people, one where everyone was equal and had the right to vote. The Enlightenment changed the way people viewed politics, the government and religion. It made the people realize what they wanted France to be, eventually causing them to revolt against the government make France a republic.
The French Revolution evokes many different emotions and controversial issues in that some believe it was worth the cost and some don't. There is no doubt that the French Revolution did have major significance in history. Not only did the French gain their independence, but an industrial revolution also took place. One of the main issues of the Revolution was it's human costs. Two writers, the first, Peter Kropotkin who was a Russian prince, and the other Simon Schama, a history professor, both had very opposing views on whether the wars fought by France during the Revolution were worth it's human costs. Krapotkin believed that the French Revolution was the main turning point for not only France but for most other countries as well. On the other hand, Schama viewed the French Revolution as unproductive and excessively violent.
During the summer of 1793, the radical phase of the French Revolution was intensified by the Terror, created by The Committee of Public Safety. The Terror successfully preserved the Revolution by weeding out counter-revolutionaries to eliminate corruption within the government and giving equality to all social classes which untied France under one government. However, these successes were undermined by the many failures of the Terror due to the oppression of citizens which would lead to many executions and the paranoid slaughtering of citizens from all social classes which led to the changes in support of the Revolution.
The later 18th century was a time of crisis for the old regimes of Europe and their economic systems and political agitation sometimes breaking out into revolts. English Industrial Revolution vaulted Britain to the fore. France was the most powerful and the most typical of the old aristocratic absolute monarchies of Europe. (lower taxes off backs of lower classes).
If we look at the history of the world with a kaleidoscope, we can see the different aspects of war and what effect it had on the mind of different people and artists such as poets, painters and authors. Many poets romanticized war, luring it with their pen and giving it a beautiful look by glorifying death and obliging young blood to fight for their motherland. For example the poems “Peace” by Rupert Brooke and “Fall In” by Harold Begbie painted war with the highlights of glamorous and sensation. Apart from poets there are also politicians who achieved their aims with the help of war and violence while others who used the weapons of non violence to achieve their goals. The most famous example is of Adolf Hitler who took the aid of war to conquer the territories. The media also has a great impact on the mind of the public, like newspapers, televisions, radios arouses the public’s interest and motivates the young generation to join the army and fight for the nation. However, there are artists who look at war in its very naked form. For example the poet Wilfred Owen in his poem “Dulce Et Decorum Est” demonstrates that no sweetness or honor is earned in dying for one’s country, instead humanity is taken away during war.
The illustration of the atrocities of war shows the increase in battles and wars of the period. This coincides with the European m...
... has been shown in 1792, there were many different individuals and groups which hoped to be strengthened by war. Napoleon had crushed opposition at home by his victories abroad. French foreign policy had become a reflection of the uncertainties of French government, France and the French people had acquired the reputation of being restless and dangerous as they involved the rest of Europe in their quest for a regime that would prove to be permanent and satisfactory. France had always been living dangerously.
The French Revolution had many causes. According to the historian, French people revolted because they were, “intelligent, free, and prosperous to be critical of the existing conditions.” In other words, this historian is saying that the people of France knew what was going on in their country. I agree with this historian and this quote. There were conditions that existed in France the people were aware of. The ideas of the Enlightenment, social classes, and tax system contributed to the French Revolution. The French Revolution was based mostly on the Third Estate’s desire to obtain liberty and equality.