Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Harmful effects of smoking cigarettes
Causes and effects of smoking
Harmful effects of smoking cigarettes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Harmful effects of smoking cigarettes
Despite its contribution to state revenue and livelihood in area such as North Sumatera, Central Java and East Java, which well known as tobacco producers, it turns out that tobacco products bring negative impacts to society. There are three issues that should be considered for supporting bans on tobacco advertisement, promotion, and sponsorship, as well as other policy. First, related to health impacts. Research and Health Development Body from Ministry of Health (2015) states that, among top major causes of death in Indonesia, smoking contributes to the highest and second cause of death for cerebrovascular diseases and ischaemic heart disease, as well as chronic lower respiratory in fourth ranked. It was recorded that the number of deaths …show more content…
It is recorded that trillion rupiah has been contributed by tobacco industry. Banning tobacco advertisement, promotion and sponsorship, tighten supervision of retail shops, impose high taxes to tobacco products and expand smoke free zones in future will have different effect to some actors in the field. At least there are three actors which involved, which are tobacco companies, government, and citizens. For tobacco companies, these policy will affected companies’ sales. Tobacco companies argue that tobacco industry play an important role in national’s economy, therefore if all public relation activities related to tobacco products will be banned completely, the tobacco industry might be economically harmed by the bans such as the possibility of bankruptcy if there is a decrease in their profit, which led to massive unemployment. Then, bans on tobacco advertisement, promotion and sponsorship will lessen government burden in economic. Compare to economic loss or healthcare cost as a result of tobacco use, these loss is much higher that revenue which government received from tobacco excise, which only reached IDR 103.53 trillion 2013 (Research and Health Development Body 2014). Lastly, it will affect citizens’ behaviour by discouraging them to buy smoke. In addition, government position seems unwillingly or in dilemma position to enact a strict policy such as imposing all tobacco advertisement, promotion and sponsorship because potential benefits which might loss if harsh policy will be implemented in
“You’ve got what it takes – Salem Spirit” (Salem Lights). The RJ Reynolds Cigarette Company makes this daring claim, and it certainly sounds enticing. After all, the advertising poster depicts a group of young and vibrant professionals spending energy and fun filled time swinging on red balloons over the crisp lake, definitely experiencing the good life after having consumed this product. Even though the art of advertising has existed successfully for thousands of years in order to promote goods and services, the methods utilized have evolved significantly. Originally, vendors merely raised awareness of the existence of their offerings, but in modern times corporations actually distort the value of a product. As the Federal Trade Commission
positive and healthful image. This is where beautiful men and women would be seen socializing
The tobacco industry seems like a beneficial addition to our economy. It has basically been a socially acceptable business in the past because it brings jobs to our people and tax money to the government to redistribute; but consider the cost of tobacco related treatment, mortality and disability- it exceeds the benefit to the producer by two hundred billion dollars US. (4) Tobacco is a very profitable industry determined to grow despite government loss or public health. Its history has demonstrated how money can blind morals like an addiction that is never satisfied. Past lawsuits were mostly unsuccessful because the juries blamed the smoker even though the definition of criminal negligence fits the industry’s acts perfectly. Some may argue for the industry in the name of free enterprise but since they have had such a clear understanding of the dangers of their product it changes the understanding of their business tactics and motives. The success of the industry has merely been a reflection of its immoral practices. These practices have been observed through its use of the media in regards to children, the tests that used underage smokers, the use of revenue to avoid the law, the use of nicotine manipulation and the suppression of research.
Sloan Wilson did not publish The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit, a classic on 1950's middle-class conformity, until 1955. But, by July 1953, PALL MALL cigarette advertisers appear aware that "society seemed to reward those who lacked rough edges and eschewed eccentricity" (Blum 794). This conclusion seems justified by a TIME magazine advertisement. Here, these promoters apply this conformity principle and other advertising techniques to a specific socioeconomic group. They seek to lure the expanding male, middle-class audience by presenting indecorous fun, an enticing social situation, and smooth smoking delight all stemming from their product.
Tobacco companies should be prevented from using advertising tactics that target teenagers. There has always been controversy as to how tobacco companies should prevent using advertising tactics to target teenagers. As controversial as this is tobacco companies shouldn’t advertise teen smoking. Many teens may be lured to believe cigarette advertising because it has been part of the American Culture for years, magazine ads and the media target young people, and these companies receive a drastic increase financially; however, the advertising by these cigarette companies has disadvantages such as having to campaign against their own company, limiting their cigarette advertising and becoming a controversial dilemma as to encouraging teenagers to smoke. From billboards to newspaper advertisements, cigarette promotions started becoming part of the American Culture.
Each year 440,000 people die, in the United States alone, from the effects of cigarette smoking (American Cancer Society, 2004). As discussed by Scheraga & Calfee (1996) as early as the 1950’s the U.S. government has utilized several methods to curb the incidence of smoking, from fear advertising to published health warnings. Kao & Tremblay (1988) and Tremblay & Tremblay (1995) agreed that these early interventions by the U.S. government were instrumental in the diminution of the national demand for cigarettes in the United States. In more recent years, state governments have joined in the battle against smoking by introducing antismoking regulations.
Smoking cigarettes is a detrimental practice not only to the smoker, but also to everyone around the smoker. According to an article from the American Lung Association, “Health Effects” (n.d.), “Smoking is the leading cause of preventable death in the U.S., causing over 438,000 deaths per year”. The umbrella term for tobacco use includes the use of cigarettes, cigars, e-cigs and chewing tobacco. While tobacco causes adverse health consequences, it also has been a unifying factor for change in public health. While the tobacco industries targets specific populations, public health specifically targets smokers, possible smokers, and the public to influence cessation, policies and education.
Images are a powerful force in advertising as they are the ones that promote different perceptions and attitudes towards products. They are also the ones that create stereotypes. They are very manipulative, for they will never focus on the negative things that are associated with their products, only the positive ones. Advertisements are ambitious which gives them power, and engage customers for their approval.
Smoking Kills. This is no longer a myth, it’s a fact. According to the British Medical Journal, every time a person smoke a cigarette, he or she will lose about eleven minutes of life here on earth and subject yourself to cancer. In the advertisement below, you can easily tell from just looking at the picture that this ad is against smoking. The ad portrays the message that smoking is deadly, and is able to be comprehended by people of all ages in the hopes that the viewers do not get into a fatal habit such as abusing cigarettes. Essentially, smoking cigarettes is a long term form of suicide. A man is holding a lit cigarette in his hand with his middle and pointer finger, and his thumb held up. As shown in the
In our contemporary society smoking has sort of lost the appeal it once had. Families and states are suing big tobacco for multimillion-dollar lawsuits. Their advertising and promotions have been taken away from them. The whole world of tobacco is being turned upside down. The Seven Dwarfs are doing what ever they can to keep the appeal that smoking once had. The tobacco industry is trying to slow the social erosion of tobaccos appeal by creating the national smokers alliance, trying to smearing the statistics that hurt the appeal of smoking, and by trying to silence Dr. Jeffery Wigand.
Plague and cholera caused thousands of millions of people dead. Thanks to the medical advances, those diseases were eradicated. Now, when the whole world is worrying about AIDS, which has not found the solution yet; the appearance of tobacco is causing the great harms to human life. Many people think that they have the right to smoke; smoking helps them deal with stress and work more effectively, and they are contributing to their country’s economy when they smoke. On the other hand, people will get addicted to cigarette. Moreovers, smoking has many negative effects on the smokers, the non-smokers, and the environment. Smoking cigarette extremely affects human health. Smoking can cause diseases of the lungs, liver, and heart. Smoker’s life expectancy will be reduced greatly compared with non-smokers. The people near the smokers also inhale the toxic smoke, and they will be poisoned. Especially, the inhalation of second-hand tobacco smoke also has high capable risking of getting diseases than smokers. Moreover, according to Kathleen Sebelius - the Secretary of Heath and Human Services, “Tobacco use imposes enormous public health and financial cost on this nation-cost that are completely avoidable. Until we end tobacco use, more people will become addicted, more people will become sick, more families will be devastated by the lost of loved ones and the nation will continue to incur damaging medical and lost productivity cost” (“How Tobacco Smoke Causes Diseases”). Although smokers have their own reasons to support smoke, smoking cigarette should be banned because people will be addicted in smoking, and smoking has negative consequenses on smokers, nonsmokers, the ecomony and the environment.
The tobacco business-sector, which mainly produced cigarettes, comprises only about 16% of the market, while remaining 84% was accounted for by other products like 'beedi, ' 'ghutkas, ' etc. The ban is likely having major impact on their sales. Without advertising, tobacco consumers will reduce drastically, therefore, consumers won’t be able to differentiate between products of different qualities, this can slow down the progression of Indian consumers up the scale from harmful tobacco consumption (like ghutka, zarda etc.) to more refined forms. The tobacco industry in India provides direct and indirect employment to 26 million people of this, roughly 6 million were farmers and almost 5 million were 'beedi ' rollers. The ban on advertising could cause millions of workers to lose employment. India is the third largest producer of tobacco in the world and with one of the lowest per capita tobacco consumption in the world; therefore the ban of advertising should be done with careful
Should tobacco and alcohol advertising be allowed on television? The ban on advertising tobacco is already in affect, however, alcohol is another harmful substance. Should liquor be allowed to be advertised, if tobacco can not advertise their product? The ban on advertising tobacco products on television and radio, was passed through legislation in 1970 by Richard Nixon. This argument like others out there has two sides, one side in favor these advertisements and the other against these advertisements. Since both of these substances are highly addictive and costly. Would we like to see these advertisements continued? Are these advertisements the hazard they are communicated to be? Through the research of these two important sides, this essay will explore which side has a stronger stance on the topic.
The problem of tobacco smoking appeared long ago, but exist to present day and becomes more global day after day. Tobacco smoking is not a simple and harmless enjoyment, it is a destructive common habit. But the biggest problem is that society takes it as a normal and allows this behavior for every order of all age groups. Besides this, a number of
Although it is beneficial for the economy for the production of tobacco products, it is extremely risky to use the product. According to researchers, second-hand smoke is terrible for everyone in the world who walks by someone who is exhaling. In the article by Robert Proctor “Why ban the sale of cigarettes? The case for abolition” states that cigarettes are the “most deadly object in the history of human civilization”.... ...