To What Extent Was Reconstruction A Success?

2567 Words6 Pages

The post Civil War Reconstruction Era in the United States was an attempt by varying political factions that existed within the United States government to mold the rebuilding country to their desired image. This lack of unity over a desired outcome and resulting political strife both enabled former Confederate states to enact barbaric laws and restrictions against people of color and led to large amounts of unnecessary suffering, death, and disease. While certain factors of reconstruction could be considered a success, such as its limiting of reprisals against the South, the passage of the reconstruction amendments, and the establishment of the public school system, reconstruction was largely a failure to create an economically sound, representationally …show more content…

Grant, to emerge victorious in the next election. While Grant did take a more radical stance than his predecessor by passing the Civil Rights Act of 1875, the perpetual political infighting and indecisiveness had worn on Americans and the Democratic party was poised to take advantage of this. The Republican fronted Reconstruction was increasingly being called into question, “Along with rising taxes and swollen state debts, corruption not only handed the Democrats a potent issue, but contributed to the demise of the entire gospel of prosperity.” Americans were quick to describe Reconstruction efforts with three traits, “High cost, corrupt practices, and meager results.” This growing sentiment led to the election of Rutherford B. Hayes, and when he led the eventual withdrawal of troops from the South, Reconstruction was effectively ended. What then, does a post-reconstruction America look like? If the Radical Republicans goals were to: politically empower former slaves, punish Confederate leaders, protect civil rights, promote economic growth, and reform Southern society, it is safe to say they failed on almost all …show more content…

And look at us now, still arguing about the rebel flag. To me that says we're still a lost cause in a lot of ways.” It's easy to write it off as simply racists attempting to obfuscate their true feelings behind a slightly justifiable cause, but I think the truth is more nuanced than that. Reconstruction failed all parts of the South, and while it affected some more than others, from a holistic view its failures left the South permanently broken. The South historically has the lowest literacy rates, lowest high school graduation rates, highest disconnected youth rates, highest unemployment rates, lowest human development index, ect. Many Southerners still harbor resentment towards the North, their resentment born out of an idea, would things be better for us if we had won? When people can't find an outlet for this discontent that gnaws at the back of their mind and the perceived failure of the federal government to aid them, they direct it towards the smallest things they can grasp at. Bickering over minutia, like statues no one truly cares about, or flags flying at the state

Open Document