Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The separation of germany
The separation of germany
Advantages of parliamentary system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The separation of germany
The nation of Canada fought alongside the Allies during WWII and against Germany. After Germany's defeat, they are now unorganized without a strong central government as their Nazi party crumbles. We follow suit of the United Kingdom on this issue, still being under the influence of the royal crown. Our nation believes that reorganization and reconstruction of the German government should be the first step for Germany so that they can restore their economy that has been suffering since the Great Depression. We believe that the security council should not allow the division of Germany under several countries because that will result with further conflicts between the states as different nations such as the Soviet Union have different ideas of influence. …show more content…
Democracy has created prosperous nations in the Western Hemisphere and Western Europe. "Parliament is more than procedure - it is the custodian of the nation's freedom." stated by politician John Diefenbaker in the House of Commons, September 21, 1945. From this, it shows how Canada has the strong belief that citizens in a nation should have a say in government.
We believe nations like the U.S. and U.K. should have a say in how to govern Germany and modernize them, but USSR should be necessary if they are only going to spread their communist ideas. The main issue we need to improve in Germany is their economy and opening them to trade with globalization will assist with. We should not be as forceful with political influence to the point that nations treat them as colony, but they should assist with denazification. After all of this is completed, we believe we can then unite Germany under one, central
Canada refused to participate in the Suez canal crisis, “this action was a symbolic gesture that showed both England and the World that Canada was now a fully autonomous nation in total control of its foreign policy” (http://mrmillerss11.blogspot.ca/2010/02/feb-24-canadas-autonomy-timeline.html) . To stop any violence that would soon abrupt Lester. B.Pearson came up with the idea of “peacekeeping”. He stated “We are now emerging into an age when different civilizations will have to learn to live side by side in peaceful interchange, learning from each other, studying each other’s history and ideals, art and culture, mutually enriching each other’s lives. »
Democracy may be the best foundation on which to build a society, but to glorify it
Canada has become a superior nation thru, perseverance, courage and even care as they persevered thru many dark battles, and made sure they all came thru together as a unit other than individuals. Their courage made there fighting 100% stronger as they wouldn’t back down to any task and they weren’t afraid to lose their life to help a fellow friend and country out. Care played a major aspect in each Canadian heart. There cared about Britain so they weren’t to go help them when they declared war, they helped other troops with their emotional problems and lastly they even cared a little about there enemies as they are the same person, however the only thing separating them is there culture. Canadians contributed in many ways to help our country's great efforts in the First World War.
Canada’s parliamentary system is designed to preclude the formation of absolute power. Critics and followers of Canadian politics argue that the Prime Minister of Canada stands alone from the rest of the government. The powers vested in the prime minister, along with the persistent media attention given to the position, reinforce the Prime Minister of Canada’s superior role both in the House of Commons and in the public. The result has led to concerns regarding the power of the prime minister. Hugh Mellon argues that the prime minister of Canada is indeed too powerful. Mellon refers to the prime minister’s control over Canada a prime-ministerial government, where the prime minister encounters few constraints on the usage of his powers. Contrary to Mellon’s view, Paul Barker disagrees with the idea of a prime-ministerial government in Canada. Both perspectives bring up solid points, but the idea of a prime-ministerial government leading to too much power in the hands of the prime minister is an exaggeration. Canada is a country that is too large and complex to be dominated by a single individual. The reality is, the Prime Minister of Canada has limitations from several venues. The Canadian Prime Minister is restricted internally by his other ministers, externally by the other levels of government, the media and globalization.
In conclusion, Canada is held strong with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. As citizens know their rights and freedoms they can help change the shape of Canada by Charter Challenges. Changes move
Canada is a society built on the promise of democracy; democracy being defined as “government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system.” In order to operate at full potential, the people of Canada must voice their opinions and participate fully in the political system. This is why it’s shocking to see that people are becoming less engaged in politics and the voter turnout has steadily been declining over the last 20 years. This lack of participation by Canadians is creating a government that is influenced by fewer people, which is detrimental to the democratic system Canada is built on.
What principles and ideals lie at the heart of a free democratic society? Canadians take pride in their country’s values of tolerance, inclusion, and respect, and over Canada’s guaranteed freedom of expression, including the right to vote (Thevenard & Orend, 2015). In democratic Canada, “all eligible citizens have the right to participate, either directly or indirectly, in making the decisions that affect them” ("Democracy Defined"). Voting, in essence, ensures all citizens receive an equal opportunity to express their views by selecting and supporting a political party of their choice. Such an approach provides freedom of expression for all eligible citizens, allowing for the political party with the most votes to take over the ruling.
In the decades following World War Two, there were a number of movements which focused on global developments. Groups such as the United Nations and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization were centres of international cooperation. In these dealings there were, of course, great powers; the countries that had the greatest riches and militaries often dominated the global political stage. Beyond that, there were countries which were not the biggest or strongest, but were influential through other means. These were middle powers, and Canada is one of them.
There are Canadian citizens who thought that the Canadian government we have is perfect, citizens who believed that every aspect of the government was truly democratic, and citizens who believe that government could do no wrong. Truly this group of believers has been living a lie. In our Canadian system of government, large aspects within are far from democratic and need to be changed. Liberal-minded people will cry out for a change in order for government to serve the people better, and on the other hand the more conservative thinkers will argue that no change is needed because our government is efficient and considerate. However, our voting system, our Senate, and the power vested to the Prime Minister are far from democratic, do not meet the actual needs of the people and definitely need to be addressed.
...I truly think that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms has paved a path for creating a free and democratic Canada and I believe it will create Canada as the greatest democratic nation.
Famous American poet James Russell Lowell once said, “Democracy gives every man the right to be his own oppressor” (“Quotations” 2011). And it should be just that. James Russell Lowell successfully defined democracy when it is in its truest form; a citizen’s beliefs should be equally represented and considered for. The representative democracy instated in the United States presents the need for three branches in the government; they include the executive, legislative, and judicial branch. The Congress embodies the lawmaking branch of the government, having “all legislative powers” as it is stated in Article I of the Constitution. To prevent one state from having too much power over other states, the Congress was separated into the House of Representatives and the Senate to have checks and balances over each other. Although they have several different functions in society, both legislative bodies play a very important role in representing both the citizens’ and government’s choices.
Canning, Kathleen. “Responses to German Reunification.” The Journal of the International Institute. 2000. The Regents of the University of Michigan. 07 March 05
In Canada, the type of government it should have is a monarchy. Although, there are many benefits and disadvantages to a monarchy, there are many drawbacks to having a republic government. Canada is a theatre, in which every citizen played a significant role. Of this grand production, the monarchist is a playwright who tampers with the script to give Canada the benefits, while giving the nation it’s own independence.
There are two kinds of benefits which are commonly attributed to democracy: relatively better laws and policies and improvement in the characters of participants. John Stuart Mill argued that a democratic method of making legislation is better than non-democratic methods in three ways: epistemologically, strategically and via the improvement of the characters of the democratic citizens. (Mill,1861, Chapter 3.) Epistemologically, democracy is the finest decision-making method on the premise that it gives people access to the decisions of their choice more often than in any other form of government. The democratic decision making is believed to be more informed than any other form of rule, about the citizens’ interests and the steps necessary steps required in fulfilling those interests. As democracy influences a good number of demos in the domain of decision making, it manages to take dominance over data and analytical appraisal of policies and laws. Additionaly, we can say that broad based discussion of democracy enhances the evaluative estimation of the different virtuous ideas that guide people who make decisions.
The practice of democracy existed, under many names or without realization, in numerous places even before the Greeks had the word written and recorded. However, the concept of giving citizens of a nation equal power in influencing decisions that affect them had been a monumental achievement in human civilization. The strength and fortitude of such a concept can be seen in the modern era where a great majority, if not all, of the governments of the most developed countries in the world are a form of democracy or have a great democratic aspect to them. The United States of America is a noticeable example of this. The US is a republic where citizens elect representatives who represent their views and make decisions in their name. However, with