Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Justice and equality
Social influence in social psychology
Social influence in social psychology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Which is better, a just world or an equal one? Both are important to our world in different ways. Justice, or fairness, fights for a world in which everyone can survive. Equality, or sameness, wants the same things for all people. Harper Lee's To Kill A Mockingbird teaches us that justice is recognizing fairness is not sameness. Justice is when everyone receives what they need. As a general rule, people come from different social backgrounds. Therefore, nothing is fair from the beginning of one's existence. To Kill A Mockingbird has a lot to say about justice and the lack thereof. Tom Robinson is an honest, noble man who has the misfortune of being born black in Alabama. He is nothing but kind to Mayella Ewell, but she turns on him to hide her own guilt. Despite being clearly innocent, Tom is condemned because he has "the unmitigated temerity to feel sorry for a white woman." Nothing about Tom's story is just. The same thing happens in our everyday lives. A police officer can choke a man to death and walk away scot free. Our time and the time of To Kill A Mockingbird are not as …show more content…
different as we would like to think. Atticus' quotes still hold true. "A court is only as sound as its jury, and a jury is only as sound as the men who make it up. I am confident that you gentlemen will review without passion the evidence you have heard, come to a decision, and restore this defendant to his family. In the name of God, do your duty." Atticus knows how unjust people can be and tries to advise against this in his closing argument before the court. While justice is an important theme in To Kill A Mockingbird, equality is of equal importance. As opposed to justice, equality is when everyone gets the same treatment. Equality assumes all people have the same chance at life. Thus, all people need and deserve the exact same things. Atticus is an advocate of equality in TKAM. He speaks out against racism in Maycomb County, Alabama. At that time, many white people consider themselves better than blacks. Some even go as far as to ridicule those who defend African-Americans. Even children have picked up on their parents' prejudice. Scout comes home after school and asks Atticus if he is a nigger-lover. Atticus responds in his usual elegant fashion. "I certainly am. I do my best to love everybody." (109) Atticus tries to love all people the same, regardless of class or ethnicity. However, he is one of the few in the county with these ideals. So why do equality and justice need different paragraphs?
This is because they are similar but completely separate things. The fact that a cow has four legs but a human has two is unequal, but not unjust. Humans have no use for two extra legs, and cows need four legs to keep their balance. This inequality is not immoral in any way. Equality is not always a good thing, but justice is. Only the good side of equality is shown in To Kill A Mockingbird, however. The difference between justice and equality is not very clear. However, a quote from Henri-Frédéric Amiel, a Swiss philosopher, shows equality in a less positive light. "Liberty, equality, bad principles! The only true principle for humanity is justice, and justice towards the feeble becomes necessarily protection or kindness." According to this man, the only thing needed is justice and all other moral obligations will
follow. All of this brings us back to the question of our preference. Which is better, justice or equality? Equality is important on principle. In some cases, all people should be equal. All men were created equal, but time has passed. People are born into places so different they seem worlds apart. What is really necessary in our world is justice. Different people will need different things in life, and a world based on equality will not be able to provide. Sameness is not and never will be the same as fairness. As shown by Harper Lee, justice is needed in society.
Equality is not something we get to have when we come into this world. It is something that is being fought for and will continue to fight for as long as people think of themselves and do not think of the consequences that may occur from their own actions. In the book “Days of Destruction, Days of Revolt” by Chris Hedges and Joe Sacco they narrowed in on what structural violence is. The different examples of injustices that were occurring around the countries. Lastly explains the ways the oppressed used there actions, words, and ideas to fight the injustices. Injustices are all around world many of which still have a lot of control to this day and take a toll on the less able. Allowing large corporations to dictate what will be said and done.
Aristotle said, “ The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal.” True equality is hard to come by when there are so many things that make people so different. The word equality has a very general meaning. That meaning however, can be interpreted in many different ways. To some, the interpretation can lean more towards a sense of freedom. This freedom has been something society has been fighting for throughout the entirety of history. To others, such as author Kurt Vonnegut Jr., it could mean the complete opposite. In Harrison Bergeron, Vonnegut portrays equality as a sort of societal imprisonment.
Harper Lee is an author that most people know of due to her writing controversial novels and her novels also being classified as classics. It seems like most middle school and high school book lists consist of Lee’s most famous novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, which is about a single father with two children, the Finches, who fights for the rights and lives of black Americans. When the novel was published, it was considered very controversial because it dealt with white Americans fighting for black Americans, which was not the norm at the time the book was published in 1960. Her novel To Kill a Mockingbird was not her only controversial novel though; she released a second novel titled Go Set a Watchman in 2015 which is also about the Finches, just when the children are adults, and with a twist that the beloved audience of Lee’s first novel do not approve of ever so slightly. Although the books are very different with the aging of characters and opposing views from the characters in the first novel, there is one theme that is very prominent in both novels. The common theme between the novels is gender equality. Harper Lee uses gender inequality in both novels to show her readers
According to “Want to See Pay Discrimination Against Women? Look at the Top” by Bryce Covert, “Male-dominated fields pay nearly $150 more each week than female-dominated ones.” Women all over the world are treated differently because of their gender. This is clearly visible in To Kill a Mockingbird through Scout’s childhood. Scout’s aunt Alexandra encourages her to be calmer and more ladylike, but she doesn’t understand the appeal of being perfect. Throughout the book, Scout questions whether to be polite and refined or to run around with the boys. Atticus, her father tries to let Scout make her own decisions, but Alexandra is set on grooming Scout into the perfect little girl. Women in To Kill a Mockingbird are treated as fragile and sensitive
Ensuring equality among the people promotes fairness and reduces conflict and jealousy. By treating everyone equally we maintain our respect and are able to work together better. The rule we create treats everyone the same and does not provide any special treatment to any specific person. As long as everyone does what is required of them they will obtain what is rightfully due to them.
Few people are the same as they are on the street in their homes. Few people can treat others equally; no matter what colour their skin is. Atticus Finch is one of those precious few. Racism in the town of Maycomb is nothing but disguised by the polite smiles and ladies missionary meetings; although it is the strongest belief that each person of the town holds apart from some such as Atticus. Racism is an issue of great importance, yet to the eye of a visitor waltzing through, it's just a slight whisk of air.
America has always been a country with different cultures, races, and people. Only, not everyone has been accepting of different kinds of people. A persons thoughts on another person can differ depending on a person's race, gender, or age. In Harper Lee’s, To Kill a Mockingbird, racial equality is nonexistent. The African Americans were treated like they weren’t people, and were totally isolated from the Maycomb, Alabama society. America will never achieve true racial and social equality because people are ignorant, have a history of being prejudiced, and are unjust.
How many times have you heard someone say, “That’s not fair!”? Life is a constant battle in determining what is and what is not fair. Khaled Hosseini once said, “It may be unfair, but what happens in a few days, sometimes even a single day, can change the course of a whole lifetime.” The novel To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee is about the unfair trial of Tom Robinson. In 1930 Maycomb, a young girl named Scout learns from her father the lessons of racism, inequality, and injustice. Scout and her brother Jem are curious about the mysterious neighbor Boo Radley, who ultimately save their lives. There are many steps on how to be fair which include: listening to both sides, telling the truth and offering a compromise.
Justice is a translation of the law by an individual’s ideals. Although it can be defined by many, justice is confidently placed in the hands of individuals that understand and interpret the law to the fullest extent, in regards to their integrity and morality. While the law coincides with justice, tension arises when a conflict of ethics comes into play. The subversion of justice is portrayed in, “To Kill A Mockingbird” by Harper Lee as a result of racism, stereotyping, and preconceived notions (bias).
Why does it matter? Why do humans harp on the topics of justice and equality consistently? The answers to above mentioned questions aren’t easy to formulate, and they open up a door to greater questions about morality, humanity and so forth. Humans live in a cooperative society. The aim of this body of organization is to advance as a whole and individually simultaneously. John Rawls’ states this goal of human society in Distributive Justice published in 1979: “We may think of the human society as a more or less self-sufficient association regulated by a common conception of justice and aimed at advancing the good of its members.” Hence, our society is shaped by an idea of justice – one that is applicable to all members of this society, and this set conception of justice promotes the advancement of the society and the individuals living in
Everyone has the ability to be a functioning member of society, despite any dissimilarity or obstacles in their life; diverse individuals who stand out are often taken advantage of and targeted. Equality is a right that everyone should be entitled to on all levels, despite gender or any mental, physical or developmental differences.
Many people have fought for equality, over many centuries. The basis of inequality is a lack of freedoms. These freedoms are either on an individual basis or on a group basis. Today not many people would argue against allowing women to vote, or allowing different races to eat in the same restaurant. However at a fundamental level is equality dangerous? Can a world like that illustrated in the story “Harrison Bergeron” from Welcome to the Monkey House by Kurt Vonnegut become a reality? Can freedom and equality become detrimental to society? Essentially can equality be taken to an extreme that leads to the loss of freedom? To all of these questions the answer is yes. Equality is directly opposed to freedom. However equality is also essential for freedom. Equality and freedom are symbiotic ideas. Parasites that feed off of and destroy the basic building blocks of the other yet cannot live without the other.
Justice, as defined from dictionary.com, is “the quality of being just; righteousness, equitableness, or moral rightness.” When it comes to Justice as defined in 1984, however, the noun can be viewed as “the maintenance or administration of what is just by law, as by judicial or other proceedings.” These two definitions differ immensely in the society that the novel depicts, which allows the reader to understand each character’s view of justice as having the ability to contradict another’s. These two varying ideas are crucial to the story not only to help distinguish right from wrong, but it also allows the reader to understand exactly what each character’s quest for justice actually entails.
Injustice is a theme that reigns in the book To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee. Injustice is evident in many aspects of life. The trials the characters in the book face are very different from most of the situations people endure right now. A few of the trials faced in the story are racism, and judgment. The theme of injustice is displayed in the judgment of Arthur Radley, in Tom Robison's trial, and Jem and Scout's life-threatening encounter.
Of course I looked “justice” up in the dictionary before I started to write this paper and I didn’t find anything of interest except of course a common word in every definition, that being “fair”. This implies that justice has something to do with being fair. I thought that if one of the things the law and legal system are about is maintaining and promoting justice and a sense of “fairness”, they might not be doing such a spiffy job. An eye for an eye is fair? No, that would be too easy, too black and white.