"To His Coy Mistress"
Andrew Marvell's "To His Coy Mistress is a sieze the moment kind of poem in which an anonomyous young man tries to woo the hand of his mistress. This kind of poem gives the reader the idea that time is not only precious, but scarce. The speaker uses many smooth tatics to persuade the young girl, starting with compliments and ending with a more forceful, morbid appraoch. "To His Coy Mistress" is not only witty but imgagistic, full of wordplay, and percieved differently by both males and females.
Andrew Marvell was born March 31st, 1621 in yorkshire, England. Becasue he was the son of an Anglican preist, Marvell grew up in an extremely Godly Home. He got his prmary education at Hull Grammar school. At only the age of twelve, he attended Trinity College at Cambridge University. Marvell traveled to Europe, where he was given the role of tutoring the daughter of Sir Thomas Fairfax. Marvell wrote mostly lyrics poems. That helped build careers of other poets that had similar writing ideas. In 1659, he decided to drift away from poetry and ofcus on his political career. From there, he served the consitituency of Hull in Parliment until he died in 1678.
During Marvell's lifetime, many historical eents took place. King Charles was over thrown and beheaded all before Marvell was four. In 1660, Charles the Second was made king and under his reign, Oliver Cromwell was dug up and decapatated. The had his severed had placed on a pole and mounted over West Minister hall as caution to all the upcomming rebels("Andrew Marvell" 281).
The overall gist of "To His Coy Mistress" is established in the opening stanza of the poem. It describes a sceneario where a girl has the option to either give in to the young persuaders sexua...
... middle of paper ...
...vell." Poetry for Students. Vol. 5. Ed. Marie Rose Napierkowski. NY: Gale, 2007. 275-582.
Kelly, David. "Criticism." Poetry for Students. Ed. Mary Ruby. Vol. 5. Detroit: Gale, 2007. 283-285.
King, Bruce. "Irony in Marvell's 'To His Coy Mistress"." Southern Review. 5n.s3(July 1969): 689-703. Rpt. in Poetry Criticism. Vol. 86. Detroit: Gae, 2008. Literature Resources from Gale. Web. 4 Feb. 2014.
Meyer, Bruce. "Critical Essay." Poetry for Students. Ed. Mary Ruby. Vol. 5. Detroit: Gale Group, 1999. 285-288.
Pittock, Malcolm. "Virgins All Beware: 'To His Coy Mistress' Revisited." English 47. 189. (Autumn 1998): 215-230. Rpt. in Poetry Criticism. Vol. 86. Detroit: Gale, 2008. Literature Resources from Gale. Web. 4 Feb. 2014.
Reiff, Raychel Hangurd. "Marvell's 'To His Coy Mistress'." The Explicator. 60.4(2002) :196+ Literature Resources from Gale. Web. 4 Feb. 2014.
Upon further analysis of the poem you realize that the allusions used in the poem, are in fact, what makes this poem so interesting. The speaker begins the poem by explaining to his mistress that if they had the time and place to discuss there feelings...
“To the Virgins, to Make Much of Time” by Rober Herrick and Andrew Marvell’s “To His Coy Mistress” have many similarities and differences. The tone of the speakers, the audience each poem is directed to, and the theme make up some of the literary elements that help fit this description.
A common practice when faced with a difficult choice, self-examination, is the centerpiece of two popular poems: Gregory Corso’s Marriage and T. S. Eliot’s The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock. Both poems are dramatic monologues in which the speakers address the similar situations that they find themselves in. While the speaker of Eliot’s poem has a nervous and bashful approach in his attempts at romance, the hesitant postmodern speaker in Corso’s poem makes use of sarcasm to attack the institution of marriage. When these two monologues given by similar personas are analyzed together the result is a dialogue which discusses two distinguishing views on the ideas of romance and love.
The Flea and To His Coy Mistress are two poems written by poets living during the Renaissance Period. To His Coy Mistress was written by Andrew Marvell and The Flea was written by John Donne. Both of these poets were well-educated 'metaphysical poets', and these poems illustrate metaphysical concerns, highly abstract and theoretical ideas, that the poets would have been interested in. Both poems are based around the same idea of trying to reason with a 'mistress' as to why they should give up their virginity to the poet.
Throughout his life... was a man self-haunted, unable to escape from his own drama, unable to find any window that would not give him back the image of himself. Even the mistress of his most passionate love-verses, who must (one supposes) have been a real person, remains for him a mere abstraction of sex: a thing given. He does not see her --does not apparently want to see her; for it is not of her that he writes, but of his relation to her; not of love, but of himself loving.
...gth into one ball;/ And tear our pleasures with rough strife” (To His Coy Mistress, 41-42). The seducer’s argument is blunt and straight to the point. He tells her that while they are still youthful, they should have sex. After his other arguments, the man might be able to convince the lady, through flattery and trust. When compared with “The Flea,” “To His Coy Mistress” seduction techniques are much more refined and well thought out.
During the 17th century, certain poets wrote poems with the specific purpose of persuading a woman to have sexual intercourse with them. Three of these seduction poems utilize several strategies to do this: Andrew Marvell’s “To His Coy Mistress,” and Donne’s “A Valediction: Forbidden Mourning” and “The Flea.” Some of the reasoning used by both poets is similar to the reasoning used today by men to convince women to have sexual intercourse with them. These gimmicks vary from poem to poem but coincide with modern day rationalization. The tactics used in 17th century seduction poems are relevant and similar to the seduction tactics used in the 21st century.
The. Maybe it is a genuine love poem to his mistress, sort of. offer of a way of life. Both concepts, though, underline the point. simplistic romanticism of the poem.
At the start, the first stanza of the poem is full of flattery. This is the appeal to pathos. The speaker is using the mistress's emotions and vanity to gain her attention. By complimenting her on her beauty and the kind of love she deserves, he's getting her attention. In this first stanza, the speaker claims to agree with the mistress - he says he knows waiting for love provides the best relationships. It feels quasi-Rogerian, as the man is giving credit to the woman's claim, he's trying to see her point of view, he's seemingly compliant. He appears to know what she wants and how she should be loved. This is the appeal to ethos. The speaker seems to understand how relationships work, how much time they can take, and the effort that should be put forth. The woman, if only reading stanza one, would think her and the speaker are in total agreement.
The first step to Marvell becoming a marvelous poet was when he was born. He was born March 31, 1621 in Winestead-in-Holderness, Yorkshire. This little town was not very much into visual communication. However, that did not stop Andrew. While the town was focused on cattle and hard labor, Andrew focused on expressing his feelings. Before the town could recognize Marvell's talent, he and his family moved to Hull, Yorkshire. This migration happened because Andrew's father became a lecturer in that city. The move did not disturb Andrew much, however. He continued to do what he loved- write (poemhunter.com).
And in some perfumes is there more delight than in the breath that from my mistress reeks." (Lines 7-8) expresses his mistress' dire need for a breath mint. These comparisons give one a vivid description of his mistress' lacking beauty, and sets one up for the couplet at the end of... ... middle of paper ... ... manner, making them focus primarily on the lacking, yet lustful, physical attributes of his mistress.
In the poem “To His Coy Mistress”, the speaker is trying to seduce his wife. In the assumption the mistress is his wife; she is being bashful towards losing her virginity. The speaker, which is the mistress’s husband, develops a carefully constructed argument where the speaker seeks to persuade his lady to surrender her virginity to him.
Shakespeare’s story, Love Labour’s Lost, focuses the story on the endearing lust of men. Women are a powerful force, so in order to persuade them men will try to use a variety of different resources in order to attract the opposite sex. Men will often use their primal instincts like a mating call, which could equivocate today to whistling at a woman as she walks by. With the use of lies to tell a girl what she wants to hear, the musk cologne in order to make you appear more sensual, or the cliché use of the love poem, men strive to appeal to women with the intent to see his way into her heart. William Shakespeare is a man, who based on some of his other works, has a pretty good understand and is full of passion for the opposite sex. Nonetheless, whether it had been honest love or perverse lust, Shakespeare, along with most men, aimed to try to charm women. With keeping this understanding of Shakespeare in mind, his weapon of choice, to find his portal way into a woman’s heart, was his power of writing.
the woman to take action and endows her with a sense of control over the
Although in the 21st Century, it is more common if a woman has a child out of wedlock, she could still be seen as an outcast. Both men take a different ways of choosing how to seduce the woman, but both take the same thought in the process, “To bed the woman”. Throughout time, way of having sexual ways with each other, has changed. Throughout this essay, I will be explaining the difference. similarities, between these two poems, “To His Coy Mistress” and “ To... ...