Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Creative writing about war examples
What writing techniques did tim o brien use in the things they carry
How to tell a true war story literary devices
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
As a child, my parents would tell me personal stories about the Vietnam War. My dad would tell me how he and his family traveled by boat to America to escape the brutal war, but were robbed of everything — their money, their clothes & their pictures. My mom, on the other hand, would talk about how my late great-uncle, her uncle, and my late grandpa served for South Vietnam and how they all suffered physical and emotional ailments. Just like my family, Tim O’Brien describes the soldiers’ suffering in The Things They Carried. The Protagonist, Tim O’Brien, remembers the past and continuously works the details of these memories of his service in Vietnam into meaning. Through a series of linked semi-autobiographical stories, O’Brien illuminates …show more content…
the characters of the men with whom he served and draws meaning about the war from meditations on his relationships.
Through strategic employment of tone, Tim O’Brien communicates to his audience the difficult burdens the men bore physically and emotionally.
O’Brien evokes emotional tone to emphasize the harsh realities of war. Throughout “On the Rainy River,” the author conveys reasons why he did not want to participate in the war due to the fact that it was not something he agreed with, nor did it match his moral principles. Commencing the chapter, he remembers how he involves himself in the war: “Not to anyone. Not to my parents, not to my brother or sister, not even my wife” (O’Brien, “On the Rainy River”). O’Brien implements an impassioned tone in which he allows people to understand his point of views on the war. The repetition of the phrase “not to,” emphasizes how important and exclusive the story is to him, and it shows how ashamed he is to have done such a thing. O’Brien applies “not to” to convey why he does not want anyone to experience the horrors of war. He witnesses people die right in front of his eyes and the stories he hears from the men in his family just adds fuel as to why he does not think think the war is legitimate. He showcases the courage he has to ultimately sign up for the war: “I feared the war, yes, but I also feared exile. I was afraid of walking away
…show more content…
from my own life, my friends, and my family, my whole history, everything that mattered to me. I feared losing the respect of my parents. I feared the law. I feared ridicule and censure” (O’Brien, “On the Rainy River). The repetitive use of “I feared” shows how much he did not want to serve in the war. Because the men in his family were fellow soldiers, it adds additional pressure on him to serve in the war — a war he does not necessarily agree with nor does he want to compromise his own life for. However, because of his culture, his family, and where he lives, he is more afraid of not serving in the war than actually serving. Throughout the history of society, war is continuously deemed as something men must partake in to exhibit their masculinity. Unfortunately, in his eyes: “I survived, but it’s not a happy ending. I was a coward. I went to the war” (O’Brien, “On the Rainy River”). He believes that he “was a coward” for going to war because submitting to others’ demands in his eyes makes him weak. O’Brien associates submitting to war with weakness because he let his shame and fear win over his principles. For the author, the strong thing to do would have been to run away from the war and bear the censure. Through the employment of a touching tone, O’Brien depicts the cruel hardships of war — the truth — that men are forced to live with and unfortunately remember, causing them to relive the events in their head. O’Brien’s clinical tone engages those who did not witness the war themselves to allow them to feel as if they were there.
Throughout “How to Tell a True War Story,” the author clarifies that in order for someone to really feel as if they are actually there in the war, specific stories will be exaggerated to create the vivid, realistic imagery. “War is nasty; war is fun. War is thrilling; war is drudgery. War makes you a man; war makes you dead” (O’Brien, “How to Tell a True War Story). O’Brien employs descriptive tone so that people will be able to understand what the soldiers are going through. He encourages people to see the true colors of war the soldiers, primarily teenagers and young men in their early twenties, had to endure. They soon find themselves in the midst of an intense war feeling nothing but uncertainty and fear. They hate it, but they love the fear and adrenaline that run through their skin and bones, and it serves as a crucial part of their young lives that changes the way they see their own world. Even though this unemotional tone, O’Brien is still able to bring forth the true raw emotion of the soldiers because the words implemented to describe the war are mind boggling. He arises the realization that anything can happen at any minute and anything can change at any moment. In order to implement that realization, sometimes stories seem over exaggerated: “In many cases a true war story cannot be believed. … Often the crazy stuff is true and the normal
stuff isn’t, because the normal stuff is necessary to make you believe the truly incredible craziness” (O’Brien, “How to Tell a True War Story). Because of the mind boggling descriptions of war, the soldiers know that they will not believed when they talk about the war. They consciously make up “normal stuff” so that they have a chance of communicating with civilians. By making up “normal stuff,” the soldiers are able to relate certain aspects of the story to the civilians who do not fully understand the hardships the soldiers go through. Most people do not know what a true story is because: “in the end, of course, a true war story is never about war … It’s about love and memory. It’s about sorrow. It’s about sisters who never write back and people who never listen” (O’Brien, “How to Tell a True War Story). Through the phrase “it’s about sisters who never write back and people who never listen,” O’Brien again employs the idea that civilians will never understand. He also implements the idea that war, at its heart, is about the people who are caught up in war, with their love and their memories and their sadness. Through reserved tone, O’Brien is able to present the war in a way that is not typical or expected. War is a time for men to serve their country with honor and pride. However, the acts that these soldiers see are not ideal and many civilians find it hard to relate. But through the tactical implementation of emotional and emotionless tone, Tim O’Brien is able to convey the physical and emotional hardships that these men bare and provide the opportunity for people who did not witness the war, to understand the perspective of soldiers.
‘The Things They Carried’ by Tim O’Brien provides a insider’s view of war and its distractions, both externally in dealing with combat and internally dealing with the reality of war and its effect on each solder. The story, while set in Vietnam, is as relevant today with the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan as it was in the 1960’s and 1970’s in Southeast Asia. With over one million soldiers having completed anywhere from one to three tours in combat in the last 10 years, the real conflict might just be inside the soldier. O’Brien reflects this in his writing technique, using a blend of fiction and autobiographical facts to present a series of short narratives about a small unit of soldiers. While a war story, it is also an unrequited love story too, opening with Jimmy Cross holding letters from a girl he hoped would fall in love with him. (O’Brien 1990).
Life can sometime bring unwanted events that individuals might not be willing to face it. This was the conflict of O’Brien in the story, “On The Rainy River”. As the author and the character O’Brien describes his experiences about the draft to the Vietnam War. He face the conflict of whether he must or must not go to the war, in this moment O’Brien thinking that he is so good for war, and that he should not be lost in that way. He also show that he disagree with the consbet of the war, how killing people will benefit the country. In addition O’Brien was terrifying of the idea of leaving his family, friends, and everything that he has done in the past years.
In the chapter titled, “On the Rainy River,” O’Brien demonstrates his “experience” of going into the war, and being drafted to Canada. O’Brien adds immense amount of detail to express the things motivating him from wanting to escape the draft. “I’d slipped out of my own skin hovering a few feet away while some poor yo-yo with my name and
In The Things They Carried, an engaging novel of war, author Tim O’Brien shares the unique warfare experience of the Alpha Company, an assembly of American military men that set off to fight for their country in the gruesome Vietnam War. Within the novel, the author O’Brien uses the character Tim O’Brien to narrate and remark on his own experience as well as the experiences of his fellow soldiers in the Alpha Company. Throughout the story, O’Brien gives the reader a raw perspective of the Alpha Company’s military life in Vietnam. He sheds light on both the tangible and intangible things a soldier must bear as he trudges along the battlefield in hope for freedom from war and bloodshed. As the narrator, O’Brien displayed a broad imagination, retentive memory, and detailed descriptions of his past as well as present situations. 5. The author successfully uses rhetoric devices such as imagery, personification, and repetition of O’Brien to provoke deep thought and allow the reader to see and understand the burden of the war through the eyes of Tim O’Brien and his soldiers.
Tim O’Brien is a very gifted author, but he is also a veteran of the Vietnam War and fought with the United States in that controversial war. Tim O’Brien was drafted into the Vietnam War in 1968. He served as an infantryman, and obtained the rank of sergeant and won a Purple Heart after being wounded by shrapnel. He was discharged from the Vietnam War in 1970. I believe that O’Brien’s own images and past experiences he encountered in the Vietnam War gave him inspiration to write the story “The Things They Carried.” O’Brien tells the story in third person narrative form about Lt. Jimmy Cross and his platoon of young American men in the Vietnam War. In “The Things They Carried” we can see differences and similarities between the characters by the things they hold close to them.
O Brien 's point of view is an accurate one as he himself because he is a Vietnam veteran. The title of the short story is meaningful because it describes each soldier’s personality and how he handles conflict within the mind and outside of the body during times of strife. The title fits the life as a soldier perfectly because it shows the reality that war is more than just strategy and attacking of forces. O’Brien narrates the story from two points of view: as the author and the view of the characters. His style keeps the reader informed on both the background of things and the story itself at the same
The novel, “The Things They Carried”, is about the experiences of Tim O’Brian and his fellow platoon members during their time fighting in the Vietnam War. They face much adversity that can only be encountered in the horrors of fighting a war. The men experience death of friends, civilians, enemies and at points loss of their rationale. In turn, the soldiers use a spectrum of methods to cope with the hardships of war, dark humor, daydreaming, and violent actions all allow an escape from the horrors of Vietnam that they experience most days.
Several stories into the novel, in the section, “How to tell a true war story”, O’Brien begins to warn readers of the lies and exaggerations that may occur when veterans tell war stories.
In the chapter the “Rainy River” of the novel The Things They Carried by Tim O’Brien, O’Brien conveys a deep moral conflict between fleeing the war to go to Canada versus staying and fighting in a war that he does not support. O’Brien is an educated man, a full time law student at Harvard and a liberal person who sees war as a pointless activity for dimwitted, war hungry men. His status makes him naive to the fact that he will be drafted into the war and thus when he receives his draft notice, he is shocked. Furthermore, his anti-war sentiments are thoroughly projected, and he unravels into a moral dilemma between finding freedom in Canada or standing his ground and fighting. An image of a rainy river marking the border between Minnesota and Canada is representative of this chapter because it reflects O’Brien’s moral division between finding freedom in Canada or standing his ground and fighting in the Vietnam war.
Experiences and Emotions in The Things They Carried Tim O'Brien's The Things They Carried is not a novel about the Vietnam War. “It is a story about the soldiers and their experiences and emotions that are brought about from the war” (King 182). O'Brien makes several statements about war through these dynamic characters. He shows the violent nature of soldiers under the pressures of war, he makes an effective antiwar statement, and he comments on the reversal of a social deviation into the norm. By skillfully employing the stylistic technique of specific, conscious detail selection and utilizing connotative diction, O'Brien thoroughly and convincingly makes each point.
Through The Things They Carried, Tim O’Brien moves beyond the horror of fighting in the Vietnam War to examine with sensitivity and insight the nature of courage and fear. Included, is a collection of interrelated stories. A few of the stories are brutal, while others are flawed, blurring the distinction between fact and fiction. All the stories, however, deal with one platoon. Some are about the wartime experiences of soldiers, and others are about a 43-year-old writer reminiscing about his platoon’s experiences. In the beginning chapter, O’Brien rambles about the items the soldiers carry into battle, ranging from can openers, pocketknives, and mosquito repellent o Kool-Aid, sewing kits, and M-16 assault rifles. Yet, the story is truly about the intangible things the soldiers “carry”: “grief, terror, love, longing… shameful memories (and) the common secret of cowardice” (Harris & O’Brien 21).
Written by author Tim O’Brien after his own experience in Vietnam, “The Things They Carried” is a short story that introduces the reader to the experiences of soldiers away at war. O’Brien uses potent metaphors with a third person narrator to shape each character. In doing so, the reader is able to sympathize with the internal and external struggles the men endure. These symbolic comparisons often give even the smallest details great literary weight, due to their dual meanings. The symbolism in “The Things They Carried” guides the reader through the complex development of characters by establishing their humanity during the inhumane circumstance of war, articulating what the men need for emotional and spiritual survival, and by revealing the character’s psychological burdens.
Regret is something that is apparent in everyone’s life whether they want it to be or not. The Things They Carried, by Tim O’Brien, is a collection of short stories about his time in the Vietnam War. A common theme throughout all the stories is regret. Although I have never been drafted to war I can very closely relate to the feeling of regret. Regret is not a good feeling. It is something that follows you around for a long time. It hangs over your head like a gray cloud. In one of Tim’s stories On The Rainy River he says “Still, it’s a hard story to tell” (37). This draws you to believe that Tim found it very difficult to tell others about his time in the war, he did some things he was not proud of and he found it best he keep quiet. The decision my parents made eleven years ago to get divorced, was something that will have an affect on me for the rest of my life. I found it very difficult to talk about the divorce,
Life can bring unexpected events that individuals might not be prepared to confront. This was the case of O’Brien in the story, “On the Rainy River” from the book The Things They Carried. As an author and character O’Brien describes his experiences about the Vietnam War. In the story, he faces the conflict of whether he should or should not go to war after being drafted. He could not imagine how tough fighting must be, without knowing how to fight, and the reason for such a war. In addition, O’Brien is terrified of the idea of leaving his family, friends and everything he loves behind. He decides to run away from his responsibility with the society. However, a feeling of shame and embarrassment makes him go to war. O’Brien considers himself a coward for doing something he does not agree with; on the other hand, thinking about the outcome of his decision makes him a brave man. Therefore, an individual that considers the consequences of his acts is nobler than a war hero.
This allows the reader to see what takes place rather than what is perceived. O’Brien’s main objective is to expose the subjectivity that lies within truth. To point out a specific contradiction within truth, he uses war to highlight this difference. He writes, “The truths are contradictory. It can be argued, for instance, that war is grotesque. But in truth war is also beauty” (77). The truth has two different meanings and it all depends on who is interpreting it. One person may think one truth and another person can see the complete opposite. To go along with this ambiguity within truth he states, “Almost everything is true. Almost nothing is true” (77). He once again shows that truth is up for interpretation. There is not a single, universal truth, however, there are many variations of it. As previously mentioned, O’Brien claims that he honestly admit that he has both never killed a man and has in fact killed somebody. Here he is stating that there can be completely different answers that all seem to be the truthful. Whether or not O’Brien killed someone, he felt like he did, but could answer that he didn’t. It is this discrepancy that proves that it is all relative. When it comes to telling the story it becomes “difficult difficult to separate what happened from what seemed to happen,” (67). This is what causes the subjectivity, the unknowingness of the situation. Since