Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The constitutional convention of 1787 conflict and compromise
Essay on three major events on slavery
Events that explain how slavery influenced american society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
When it comes to naming the three principal lessons in American history, slavery, the nature of the federal union, and regulation of commerce are the most important. Each of these principal lessons has significantly changed history because they appeared several different times in the period of 1607-1865. Human behavior has resulted in the failure of the Constitutional Convention over slavery. It has also brought contentions over the Missouri compromise and the Compromise of 1850 because neither side could come in between. There have been multiple instances about the nature of the federal union because criticism was particularly harsh in the south. The nullification controversy and the Supreme Court rulings of McCulloch v. Maryland and Gibbons v. Ogden relate to the nature of the federal union. Lastly, regulation of commerce has an impact in American history because in the end someone is always going to be mad. Examples of those are the Tariff of Abominations, and the Bank of the United States.
The Constitutional Convention of 1787 had two issues that contended into slavery; apportion of congressional representation and how to regulate commerce. Each delegate had the best nation in mind however, when it comes to politics neither side could get what they want. The South wanted to count slave labor for the apportionment of representatives because it strengthens their wealth. But the North had a different viewpoint. Count slaves for representatives would give the South more power than they had and give them more votes. Since neither side could agree, they came to a somewhat rational compromise, three-fifths. Three-fifths persons were to add three-fifths to include to its whole number of free persons. Technically, the Constitution red...
... middle of paper ...
...sies in American History. Infobase Publishing, 28 Feb. 2011. Web. 1 May 2014. .
Raphael, Ray. "Let's make a deal: there would have been no Constitution without compromise, but politics trumped principles in surprising--and unsettling--ways when it came to slavery." Academic OneFile (2013): 50. Web. 1 May 2014. .
Tindall, George B., and David E. Shi. America: A Narrative History. 9thth ed. Vol. 1. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc, 2013. N. pag. Print.
“Why Did Congress Impose the 1828 'Tariff of Abominations'?” Issues & Controversies in American History. Infobase Publishing, 30 Apr. 2010. Web. 1 May 2014. -.
Beard, Charles Austin. An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 1998. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), EBSCOhost (accessed February 23, 2014
George Browm Tindall, David Emory Shi. American History: 5th Brief edition, W. W. Norton & Company; November 1999
One agreement the Constitution consisted of was the three-fifths Compromise. Foner states that the Constitution did not allow the national government to meddle with slavery in the states. This meant that three out of every five slaves could be counted as part of the state 's population. The powerpoint mentions that this raised their representation in the House of Representatives. The congress could not mess with the slave trade until
Brinkley, Alan. The Unfinished Nation: A Concise History of the American People. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2010. Print.
was lacking in some aspects but excelled in most. For example, a good aspect was that Richards questioned the actual people and factors that freed the slaves rather than adopting the overgeneralized view. This is a good question to ask considering the widespread ignorance surrounding the actual process of the 13th amendment. To answer this question, Richards meticulously analyzed evidence from several historical periods to support his argument. In addition, the bulk of his sources were primary sources. In this regard, he successfully supported his argument through his use of credible evidence. Richards does not present any alternative hypotheses because he focuses on strengthening his main argument throughout the book. Richards’s explanations utilized a variety of sources and used logical deduction. As a result, these tended to be believable and reasonable. Richards does not make many moral judgements but is slightly biased against Northern Democrats. He tends to portray them as devious and excessively aggressive against opinions that conflict their own
Divine, Robert A. America past and Present. 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education/Longman, 2013. 245. Print.
Since the beginning of their new nation, the United States had many differences between the Northern and Southern states. During the Constitutional Convention they disagreed on how to determine their representation in the house based on population; the Southerners wanted to count their slaves and the Northerners did not, which lead to the three-fifths compromise. Later in the Convention there were concessions given to the South, which left the Northerners feeling uneasy, such as: a guarantee that the slave trade would not be interfered with by Congress until 1808 and slave owners were given the right to recover refugee slaves from anywhere in the United States. While many Northern delegates were disappointed with the rights given to the South, they felt it was necessary for the good of the Nation. This was necessary to form a strong central government and union between the states.
Henretta, James A., and David Brody. America: A Concise History. Vol. 1. Boston/New York: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2009.
Tindall, G.B. & Shi, D.E. (2010). America a narrative history 8th edition. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. p.205-212.
The two factors that shape the Constitution as being pro-slavery: the necessity of the slaveholders to protect their private property by the means of the law and the limited support of the North for the abolition at the time of the drafting of the Constituti...
Therefore, in 1787, two delegates by the names of Roger Sherman and James Wilson introduced the Three Fifths compromise in the Philadelphia Convention. The Three Fifths compromise states that a slave be counted as three-fifths of a person. Therefore, the population of the southern states equaled the population of the northern states. Now that the populations were balanced, the south and the north sent the same amount of representatives to The House of Representatives. Pro-slavery southerners felt as if the north still had an advantage, but it was actually the south that had the advantage in the Senate and The House of Rep...
These compromises are found in four main places within the Constitution. The first is the three-fifths compromise, which detailed how slaves would influence the population of each state for the purpose of determining representation and taxation. Located in Article 1, Section 2 of the Constitution the compromise states that three-fifths of the slave population would be counted for enumeration purposes (Dolbeare, 71). This compromise was important for the Southern states, whose populations consisted of large numbers of slaves, because without it they would have a significant smaller number of representatives in the House. Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution prohibit...
Furthermore, the creation of The Constitution caused much debate between the elite and democratic states because they thought that if the Government got all of the power, they would lose their rights. The conflict between the North and South played a major role in the development of this document. The North felt that representation in Congress should be based on the number of total people and South felt that it should be based on number of whites. However, The Three Fifths Compromise settled this when it was said a slave will count as 3/5 of a free person of representatives and taxation. Article one section two of the Constitution defines how the population will be counted, obviously there was a strong opposition to this by Southern states like Virginia because their economy was based on slave labor and they had a bigger population because of it.
... An American History of the World. 4th ed. of the book. W.W. Norton, 2012, 671. 2.)
Knowles, H. J. (2007). The Constitution and Slavery: A Special Relationship. Slavery & Abolition, 28(3), 309-328. doi:10.1080/01440390701685514