Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Jfk biography essay
Jfk biography essay
John f kennedy biography essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
According to John F. Kennedy what are the three pressures that discourage acts of political courage? John F. Kennedy, a firm believer that congressional representatives should be willing to risk honor, prestige, and even one's own career in the pursuit of solving an issue for the citizens of the nation, believes that pressures that discourage political courage include the pressures of one’s constituency, interest groups, letter writers, economic blocs, and the average voter. He believes that these pressures lead to politicians not acting as they would like to due to risks to one’s career, the unpopularity of the course they follow, the degradation of their characters, and, in some cases, the vindication of both their reputation and their principles. …show more content…
Write a brief synopsis of the American politicians whose stories are told here. John Quincy Adams came to the senate as a federalist in 1803 seeking to follow his own beliefs and preserve his father’s legacy. However, his party quickly grew distasteful with him after he voted in favor of the Louisiana Purchase. Adams then found himself further in political isolation when it came to Jefferson’s embargo against the British following their aggressive manners towards American merchants. Adams, unlike other federalists, supported the embargo and helped to sign it into law. The embargo idled the shipbuilding industry and destroyed trade, causing stagnation, bankruptcy, and distress. New Englanders considered Adams to be a deserter of his party and people as he continued to stand behind the legislation. Daniel Webster, a Massachusetts senator, agreed to aid Henry Clay by standing in favor of his 1850 Compromise Bill in an attempt to keep the union together.
Despite knowing that his support of the bill would leave him unelectable within Massachusetts, Webster promised his support. This decision with ultimately lead to his historical condemnation. Within his “Seventh of March” speech, Webster argues in favor of Clay’s proposed legislation, which proposed that the only way in which the nation would thrive as a whole was if slavery was upheld within the south, put aside in debate for a moment to preserve the union, and that fugitive slave laws should be strengthened. Webster would die still standing beside his firm belief that he made the right decision supporting the bill and that he only ever had the union’s best interests at …show more content…
heart. Despite Missouri’s stance as a slave owning state as well as being a slave owner himself, Thomas Hart Benton opposed John C. Calhoun’s efforts to introduce slavery within newly acquisitioned territories. Benton considered the debate between the north and south over the issue to be causing the expansion of a barrier between the two sides. His opposition to allow the divide to further as well as his refusal to vote in favor of Calhoun’s resolutions ultimately led to his loss of popularity within his state as well as the loss of most of his committee memberships. His later opposition to the Great Compromise as well as President Fillmore almost led to Benton being shot. Instead, Benton was voted out of office as well as continuously plagued to regain and lose his seat in congress. However, Benton’s efforts, though fairly unpopular, were one of few factors that kept Missouri from seceding from the union during the civil war. A southerner who stood for the preservation of the union, Sam Huston refused to support the Kansas-Nebraska Act due to it’s passing meaning the repeal of the Missouri Compromise as well as the fact that such a piece of legislation would allow for those who settled beyond the Rocky Mountains to embrace slavery if they wished to do so. Due to Huston being the sole southern democrat to vote against the act, his constituents were furious and soon rumors of his eventual downfall ran rampant. Because of this, his first quest to be elected as the governor of Texas failed. Despite his efforts to remain within the union, Texas seceded. Though he was elected upon his second run for office, Huston was ousted as governor due to his refusal to take the oath of allegiance to the confederacy. President Johnson, believing secretary of War Edwin Stanton to be a tool placed by the radical republicans in order to create military dictatorship within the south, broke the tenure of office act.
Because of this, radical republicans immediately moved for the impeachment of the president. The trial eventually made it clear that the president was not be tried fairly as congress moved to have him declared guilty. Edmund G. Ross, a Kansas Republican, held no sympathy for the man; however, he pledged that he would make sure that Johnson was to be tried fairly. Due to his standing on the trial, the senator became the target of abuse from his fellow republicans, the public, and the media. Nonetheless, Ross would go on to cast the deciding vote against the president’s conviction, thus ending the impeachment proceedings. Because of this, Ross was not reelected to the senate and would go on to suffer ostracism and poverty because of it. However, Ross is now praised for saving the United States from dictatorship as the Tenure of Office Act would later be declared
illegal. Though Charles Sumner was widely hated among southerners due to his radicalism and opposition to slavery, Lucius Lamar, a democrat from Mississippi, gave a eulogy to the departed senator upon the house floor. Lamar's eulogy praised Sumner for his desire for unity between North and South. Many southerners considered such an appraisal as a betrayal. In 1876, Lamar once again acted in opposition to his constituents when he agreed to the findings of an election commission that declared Republican Rutherford Hayes as president. Though the commission's findings were controversial, Lamar felt that standing with them would stave off another sectional controversy that would eventually lead to more bloodshed. His alienation of both his party and the people of Mississippi only continued when he voted against free silver measures that would have enriched the state. However, despite all of this, Lamar kept his Senate seat until his resignation to become secretary of the interior and, eventually, a Supreme Court justice. George Norris, a Republican from Nebraska, first came to national attention in 1910 when he introduced a reform resolution that would strip Speaker Joe Cannon of most of his authority by stopping him of his ability to appoint committee members and their chairmen as well as removing Cannon from the Rules Committee. To everyone's
The excerpt “Congress: The Electoral Connection” written by David Mayhew centers around the fundamental arguments that discusses how members of congress are self-interested for reelection. Mayhew further elaborates on his idea by discussing the electoral activities that congress members devote their time into and resource from, which are advertising, credit-claiming, and position taking. Mayhew’s excerpt further examines the framework in how congress operates which contributes to the explanation of how and why congress partakes in the certain electoral activities.
Paul Wellstone knew that, as Kennedy wrote, “it would be more comfortable...joining whomever of our colleagues are...enslaved by some current fashion” (17). But he understood that true statesmanship is putting the national interest above one’s own benefit. Wellstone, in a time of conformity, showed courage and strength in risking his political life for an ideal he cared deeply about. Perhaps the best description of Wellstone’s character came from a colleague, Sen. Barbara Mikulski: “He didn’t look ahead to the next election; he looked ahead to the next generation” (CITE
What motivates members of Congress to act the way they do? Mayhew would argue in Congress: The Electoral Connection that members of Congress are ‘’single-minded re-election seekers’’ and that re-election is their one and only goal. Whilst the assumption that all members of Congress are ‘‘single-minded re-election seekers’’ does go some distance in analysing the motives behind members of Congress, the reading fails to take into account the other key goals of members of Congress. Other goals include good policy and future career positions. It is important to remember that the achievement of both re-election and other goals are not exclusive, members of Congress often are motivated by more than one goal.
By the time of his speech South Carolina, Mississippi, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Louisiana and Texas had already seceded from the Union. In his speech Lincoln had three main points: “to hold, occupy, and possess the property and places belonging to the government,” secession was impossible because the Union was unbreakable, and that any use of arms against the United States would be met with force but he would never be first to attack (Grafton 80). Lincoln aspired to increase his support in the North without alienating the South where most disliked him in fear of the end of slavery. In his speech however, Lincoln made it clear that his intention was not to interfere with slavery quoting “I have no purpose, directly, or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so” (Grafton 81). In hope to make amends with the South Lincoln closed by saying “We are not enemies, but friends. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield, and patriot grave, to every living heart and hearthstone, all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature” (Grafton 81). Although meant to unify the North and South, this address had a larger impact on another
Clay had a unique perspective on the abolishment of slavery. Henry Clay wanted to slavery to be abolished within the early United States, but his motives leaned more towards have these slaves returned to their original countries, thus making them unable to become citizens of the United States. A large number of citizens in the north supported this ideal because they felt it was an effective way to eliminate slavery and remove the possibility of these enslaved men becoming apart of their society. Abraham Lincoln had a strong moral compass that he used to determine decisions on most of the major issues he encountered. He believed slavery to be morally wrong and had difficulty comprehending how people were able to justify its morality. Lincoln was disgusted by the treatment that took place in slavery. He believed that if one to remove the moral obligation within slavery and the mere realization of its cruelty, there are no there reasons to inhibit the expansion of it. At this particular time, slavery was an exceptionally prominent source of income, giving those who owned the most slaves, the most wealth. Because slavery produced such a resource of income, Lincoln knew that if given the opportunity, slavery would only increase.
Perhaps the three most influential men in the pre-Civil War era were Henry Clay, John C. Calhoun, and Daniel Webster. These men all died nearly a decade before the civil war began, but they didn’t know how much they would effect it. States’ rights was a very controversial issue, and one which had strong opposition and radical proposals coming from both sides. John C. Calhoun was in favor of giving states the power to nullify laws that they saw unconstitutional, and he presented this theory in his “Doctrine of Nullification”. Daniel Webster strongly disagreed with this proposal and showed this by giving powerful support to President Jackson in resisting the attempt by South Carolina to nullify the ‘tariff of abominations’, as they called it; a shipping tax passed in 1828 that they saw as unfairly favoring the industrial North.
Abraham Lincoln’s original views on slavery were formed through the way he was raised and the American customs of the period. Throughout Lincoln’s influential years, slavery was a recognized and a legal institution in the United States of America. Even though Lincoln began his career by declaring that he was “anti-slavery,” he was not likely to agree to instant emancipation. However, although Lincoln did not begin as a radical anti-slavery Republican, he eventually issued his Emancipation Proclamation, which freed all slaves and in his last speech, even recommended extending voting to blacks. Although Lincoln’s feeling about blacks and slavery was quite constant over time, the evidence found between his debate with Stephen A. Douglas and his Gettysburg Address, proves that his political position and actions towards slavery have changed profoundly.
In the past century, people continued to express an increasingly discontent view of Congress especially true when one looks back before the Clinton Impeachment debacle As the size of the nation and the number of congressman have grown, the congress has come under attack by both public influences and congressman themselves. Yet looking at one congressman's relationship with his or her constituents, it would be hard to believe that this is the branch of government that has come under suspect. In “If Ralph Nader says congress is 'The broken branch,' how come we love our congressman so much?” author Richard F. Fenno, Jr., provides insight into this view and why, through congress coming under fire, constituents still feel positively about there congressmen. Although congress is often criticized, its fine tuned functioning is essential in checking the power of congress without hindering the making of legislation.
During a time of great brutality due to the controversial idea of Kansas being either a free or slave state, otherwise known as “Bleeding Kansas”, Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois composed the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which would repeal the Missouri Compromise and set the foundation for Kansas to solely decide its stance on slavery, an idea otherwise known as popular sovereignty (United States Senate). Charles Sumner spoke out against the Kansas-Nebraska Act in his “Crime Against Kansas” speech in which he maintained that the intention of the “Slave Power” was to “rape a virgin” and give birth to a slave state and spoke in favor of prompt affirmation of Kansas as a free state (Meade)...
Not surprisingly, Jackson became the object of political slander. In his reply to Jackson’s veto, Daniel Webster complains, “[This message] raises a cry that liberty is in danger, at the very moment when it puts forth claims to powers heretofore unknown and unheard of. It effects alarm for public freedom, when nothing endangers that freedom so much as its own unparalleled pretenses.” In other words, Webster proposed that through Jackson’s overuse of the veto, he was not only holding Congress hostage, but also subverting democracy.
middle of paper ... ... Interchanging between the short sentences and the lengthy sentences grabs the audience’s full attention, permitting Kennedy to persuade them that he qualifies for his position as U.S. President. Hence, through various rhetorical strategies, Kennedy achieves his purpose of gaining the spectators’ favor by stressing major current events that concern the American people. These significant concepts include American patriotism and American diplomacy, stressed when he begins four subsequent paragraphs with the same recurring three words, “Let both sides.”
America had to counter and move towards freedom. Kennedy said that America had to be as strong as possible to keep the world moving in the right direction.... ... middle of paper ... ... And I believe it.
Even though Kennedy endured many hardships during his childhood, he grew up into a successful and ambitious man. He was born in Brookline, Massachusetts on May 29, 1917 to Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy. Although, to the public he was known as “Jack Kennedy”. John F. Kennedy was also prone to being ill. He suffered from many illnesses such as chickenpox, measles, and whooping cough. However, this was not all that he had to endure. Before the age of three, Kennedy was diagnosed with scarlet fever, a life-threatening disease. Fortunately, he fully recovered from it and continued the routines of daily living (“John F. Kennedy”). Numerous individuals look back on someone’s life and evaluate of what importance their life was. Kennedy demonstrates that even though one may n...
Like the impeachment of President Clinton, the impeachment trial of President Andrew Johnson in 1868 also ended in an acquittal.And like President Clinton, Johnson was a Democratic president who faced a Republican-controlled Congress. And while many were hostile to him for his political agenda, it would be an event separate from his policies that would nearly bring him down.Before it would end, a drama would play out in the Senate filled with partisanship, legal hairsplitting, and the swing votes of a handful of Republicans.
...nows that slavery would have ripped our great country into two sides, one for slavery and one against slavery. He knew that our county would not have survived it we had slavery in it and through his speech he shows it.