Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Now and then character analysis
Now and then character analysis
Now and then character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the play ‘A Man For All Seasons’, written by Robert Bolt, we are intoduced to an existentional hero, Sir Thomas More. More is a man with unwavering integrity, who is true to himself and stands firm in what he believes. In this essay, I will discuss the characteristics of Sir Thomas More and how it adheres to the statement, “Man is the measure of all things”, by the Greek philosper Protagora. I will provide quotations from the play, to support my arguments.
Firstly, in the play ‘A Man For All Seasons’, the audience learn about the protagonist Sir Thomas More, who is presented with a problem that will result in the outcome regarding his life. Bolt portrays More as a complex character, whose characteristics are rooted in the sense of integrity.
…show more content…
More displays to a phenomenal degree, righteous qualities and customary virtues – such as obedience, magnanimity and self-discipline. Importantly these noble qualities are combined with laudable wisdom which coalesce with a zealous nature. According to E.E Reynolds, More is a man of principles and he would not compromise those principles(1968). We see this when More refuses to yield to external strain to sign the oath disregarding the Act of Supremacy. This proves that More is indeed a man of moral integrity, despite what many would think, under no circumstances will More get invovled in King Henry VIII’s life and be influenced with regards to the divorce, He follows his heart by doing what he believes is right, it does not matter what the consequences are. To his friend and family, signing the oath is not a major thing, despite personal beliefs, it is something that must be done to pacify the King. However, it is major to Thomas More, as his decision to sign the oath should be grounded on his personal beliefs.
The quote, “I neither could nor would rule my King. But there is a little... little, area... where I must rule myself. It’s very little – less to him than a tennis coart”(Bolt, p59), proves that More will lose all the respect he has for himself, if he were to sign the oath. According to Randy Lee , More feels, ‘If a man is prepared to take an oath than he must stand by that oath’(2000). However, More will go against everything he believes in, if he signs the oath and therefore he is not willing to sign it. He reveals his perspective by saying, “When a man takes an oath, Meg, he’s holding his own self in his own hands. Like water...”(Bolt, p40).His conscience is tremendously important to him and if he were to go against his moral conscience, it would be like destroying his soul, and without his soul there is no point in living. More stays true to hlmself and his beliefs. His beliefs depict his profound truths of his inner self, therefore he would destroy himself if he were to compromise them, “Because what matters is I believe it, or rather, no .... not that I …show more content…
believe it, but that “I” believe it. I trust I make myself obscure”(Bolt, p52). Thomas More stands firm in what he believes and is anchored to his principle, “Will, I’d trust you with my life. But not your principles. You see, we speak of being anchored to our principles. But if the weather turns nasty you up with an anchor and let it down where there is less wind, and the fishing’s better. And “look”, we say. “look”, I’m anchored! To my principles!”(Bolt, p43). Secondly, throughout the play, Sir Thomas More’s chracter remains constant.
More refuses to be shaped and molded into somthing that he is not, and therefore fought for what he believes in. More is a strong religious man with unshakable faith. He would not go against his religious beliefs, no matter what the consequences are. More feels that his soul is more important than anything and therefore it needs to come first, this is proven when he resigns as Lord Chancellor, due to him not being able to go against his religious beliefs., “If the Bishops in Convocation submitted this morning, I’ii take it off”(Bolt, p48). According to F. Michael Higginbotham, More would stay true to his conscience until the bitter end(2000), “.... yet God exists. In matters of conscience, the loyal subject is more bounden to be loyal to his conscience than to any other thing”(Bolt, p92). More attained more at the end of the play because he did not let death stop him nor did it make him worry, “He will not refuse one who is so blithe to go”(Bolt, p99). His death was not in vain because he knew he was in line and steadfast in his beliefs. More dying proves a point to the public of England as well as to himself, that he was a noble and honorable man and that he was not going to fall short to the mendacious reasonings of King Henry VIII and Thomas Cromwell, “I have not disobeyed my sovereign. I truly believe that no man in England is safer than myself”(Bolt,p40). He mightily believes in the church and
in the Pope, that is why he constantly did what he felt in his heart was the right thing to do. More knew that by staying alive was not an option, it would result in a life full of suffering, “I do no harm, i say none harm, I think none harm. And if that be not enough to keep a man alive, in good faith I long not to live”(Bolt, p97). Up until the very end, as he died infront of many people in England, he clearly puts his point across, “.....but because I dont bend to the marriage”(Bolt, p78). He is simply declaring that he would not agree with Kibg Henry VIIi, for the sole purpose of staying alive. Bolt portrays his character, Sir Thomas More, as a honorable man who stays true to himself, up until the bitter end. Futhermore, According to J.M Ophuijsen, the statement, “Man is the measure for all things” by the ancient Greek philospor Protagora, can be interpreted as ‘the individual human being, rather than a god or an unchanging moral law,is the source of value’(2013). W.K Guthrie states that, “It can be explained to mean that there are no objective or absolute standards in existence that are not relative to human beings, Rather all standards by which things may be measured, including morals and values, come from human beings and are dependent on the human condition(1977). Sir Thomas More’s characteristics and way of thinking adheres to Protagoras statement, as More decide that it is not fit to dictate anything hastily, and seemed to have uncertainties regarding the different forms of religion and whether they all came from God, which might motivate man in various contrasting ways, and be gratified with this heterogeneity. Sir Thomas More therefore thouht it obscene and idiotic to menace and petrify another, forcing him to believe in something that did not come across as being true. In conclusion, it is evident from the arguments above that Bolt portrays what seem to be a perfect character, a man who is measured for all things. The title “A man for all seasons”, may have various meanings but one meaning is that, Thomas More’s unwavering integrity is relevent to any given situation or time. Bolt strongly seeks to show that moral integrity is possible, through his character More.
In the novel The Immoral Life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot, the author tells the miraculous story of one woman’s amazing contribution to science. Henrietta Lacks unknowingly provides scientists with a biopsy capable of reproducing cells at a tremendusly fast pace. The story of Henrietta Lacks demonstrates how an individual’s rights can be effortlessly breached when it involves medical science and research. Although her cells have contributed to science in many miraculous ways, there is little known about the woman whose body they derived from. Skloot is a very gifted author whose essential writing technique divides the story into three parts so that she, Henrietta
A Ticket out of the Past By (Teresa) Yung-Ching Chuang. Life is like an ascent, the more you climb, the higher you will get. J. C. Burke skilfully undertakes this philosophy as a source of inspiration for ‘The Story of Tom Brennan’. It is not another crazy adventurous tale with a heroic storyline that seems unrealistic; the novel is about individual representation as Burke insightfully illustrates the long and slow journey of Tom Brennan, navigating through his road of self-discovery that eventually leads to his destination and achieves his “ticket out of the past” (Burke, pg 182). The catalyst of the novel is a traumatic car accident causing two instant deaths and one paralysis.
The novel ‘Jasper Jones’ and the film ‘Jindabyne’ both use the representation of characters and their relationships to challenge the treatment of individuals with regards to race, class and gender. The historical contexts surrounding these two texts sets the basis for the stratification and racial discrimination present. The lack of dignity that is depicted between the relationships formed between characters displays the regard in which communities treat each other. ‘Jasper Jones’ and ‘Jindabyne’ are comparable texts as it is clear that the gap between these communities has reduced since the time period of ‘Jasper Jones’ when compared to ‘Jindabyne’, however, it is identified that this gap still exists.
In the short story The Devil and Tom Walker, written by Washington Irving, the protagonist Tom Walker, is characterized as being a negative man. This is demonstrated through Tom Walker being characterized as being meager, outspoken, fearless, greedy, stubborn, and unloving.
In the play, “Much Ado About Nothing”, love and romance play a major role throughout the play.It takes place in Messina. The play has a lot of characters that fall in love with each other. Besides romance and love there is a lot of jealousy in the play. Characters will have up and down moments throughout the book, but they will all get together at the end of the story. Many scenes in the play will be about characters making other characters fall in love by telling one another that one likes the other. The play is all about characters getting together and being happy.
Sir Gawain and the Green Knight edited and translated by James Winny is a poem about a knight, Sir Gawain, from King Arthur’s court. In the very beginning Sir Gawain volunteers to take King Arthur’s place upon the Green Knights arrival when he declares that one knight must agree to receive a blow by his axe after having the chance to give a blow to him. Sir Gawain ends up chopping off the Green Knights head and is then declared to meet the Green Knight in one year to accept a blow from the Green Knight and his axe. When the year comes Sir Gawain sets off to find the Green Knight at the green chapel, which where he will receive the blow. On Sir Gawain’s ventures
Sometimes a trusted friend cannot give you good advice. In the play, Romeo and Juliet, by William Shakespeare, the character Friar Lawrence was a trusted friend who cost his friends their lives.Friar Lawrence is responsible for Romeo and Juliet’s deaths because he helped them rush their relationship and came up a faulty plan that eventually cost them their lives.
“Love goes by haps; Some Cupid kills with arrows, some with traps” (Shakespeare pg. 45). One of Shakespeare’s most famous plays is Much Ado About Nothing and it specifically shows the tragic flaws of each and every character throughout the story. One character that will be mainly focused on that’s the most tragically flawed, is Claudio because he’s passionate about his love for Hero and how he’s easily manipulated.
Friar Laurence, a father figure to many citizens and one of the holiest and most admired men in Verona. He held many responsibilities in the city and enforced several of the laws. Well, that is what everybody thought. Friar Laurence is now being held for trial for committing multiple felonies and breaking the law in his very own city of Verona. He not only conspired against the Capulet and Montague families but ultimately played an important role in the suicide of Romeo and Juliet.
Christopher’s father, Ed Boone and his mother, Judy Boone both have one important trait or aspect that they share together which is their way of showing their love and protection towards their child. In this case, that would be Christopher. A quote that Christopher’s father said in the book that supports this answer is “”And Father said,”Christopher, do you understand that I love you.” This shows how he desperately wants his son to love him despite all of his efforts in trying to prevent Christopher from knowing about the truth that he is hiding. A quote that Christopher’s mother saying in the book is, “Christopher, I never meant to hurt you. I thought that what I was doing was the best for all of us. I hope it is. And I want you to know that this is not your fault.” This demonstrates that she really cares about Christopher in what is right which is leaving the house just like what his father believes that it was the best decision in preventing Christopher to know the truth about his mother.
Anne Frank a young girl who died believing that people are good at heart. ‘’You could not do this you could not do that.’’ A quote from Anne Frank. Found in the collection book page number 283. In this essay, I will be showing you why Anne might feel certain ways during this hardship. Also what it reveals about her character. Anne is a brave young girl who always does what she feels is right and her way of taking on life and its challenges is taught for a person to do in that time and she managed to take on so much. In advance to Anne hard life, she keeps a diary to share her thoughts and option on life in hiding during the dreadful event called World War Two. This dairy was a miracle to the world. They now know the hardship and struggles that the Jews had two indoor. Anne dairy opened so many doors for journalists and many others. They have a diary of a real end of the Holocaust in their hands.
ideas. A reader of A Man for All Seasons, by Robert Bolt, may not be accustomed
People have free will. People have the ability to choose right from wrong. With this responsibility people need to think about the outcome of actions and how it will affect society.
Reason to defend Sir Thomas More: More is just thinks that his private conscience is more important than his public duties and will do what he thinks is right, not what is convenient. This is not considered High Treason as More is not attempting to betray his country in any way.
When More died it sent a message to the public that the Kin was wrong in what he was doing. As More died in front of a lot of people, it certainly showed to the public that it was honorable and he put his point across in the clear way. “….but because I would not bend to the marriage” (pg. 78) More is simply stating that he wouldn’t agree with the King for the clear intention of staying alive.