Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The historical contribution of thomas jefferson
Basic essay describing thomas jefferson
Essay about thomas jefferson
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The historical contribution of thomas jefferson
Trevon Williams
7 October 2014
History Zelden
Thomas Jefferson by R.B. Bernstein
In the late 1700’s and early 1800’s, the generation of our founder fathers faced internal and external problems during the fight for American freedom and the creation of the Constitution. These problems were either the result of the colonists and their fight for liberty and ideology between themselves or the British trying to evoke their power onto the colonists. Both conflicts go hand in hand with each other, but present different forms of problems. While reading the Bernstein’s “Thomas Jefferson” it was easy to see the internal conflict that the colonist would face after gaining there freedom from the British simply because they didn’t have a background in
…show more content…
creating a nation. Early on in the book, it goes into detail about Thomas Jefferson’s education. We see that the Lawyers and people of political importance’s had to study directly the political process from previous cases to get an idea of how they might act when placed in court. This supports the idea of the colonist’s unpreparedness for creating a new nation because the framework of the nation had to be discussed between very intelligent individuals who interpreted the means of American liberty differently. This is the main problem that the continental congress faces because it divides them in ideology against themselves and against the British. This leads those who fear change to side with appeasing the British and those who want freedom from the British to fight for liberty. When the book went into detail about how planters go into debt because they attempted to make themselves look well off, I instantly thought of the parallel between the planters and the newly born nation of America.
Like the planters America was raised in debt which only seems to accumulate over time. An idea like this presents the second problem the colonist of the new country faced, debt. Recently coming out of the American Revolution, the young American Government owed overseas countries money for their involvement and support. America’s leader choose to sell bonds in attempts reallocate their debt. Even though Thomas Jefferson was against the idea of the America supporting the “elites” in arguments against Hamilton, American modeled after some of Hamilton’s ideas that Jefferson repeatedly countered and caused American to continually go into debt, just as the planters did years before. This shaped the lives of the new capitalistic country because it basically established the idea that debt is fine as long as it “eventually” gets paid …show more content…
back. Marriage also presented a strong social force in the times of our Founding Fathers especially if you look at the life of Thomas Jefferson who was infatuated with the idea of love.
Jefferson sought to find a wife who fit his social standards as well as ability to fill his heart. Jefferson gained more than love from his wife Martha. Like most prestigious men during his time who were fortunate enough to marry a women like from an honorable family, Martha come with an enormous inheritance. This not only propelled Jefferson in social status, but also helped him in politics given that he was already exceptionally influential. However, Jefferson’s marriage to Martha also brought him turmoil. Jefferson not only received one of the largest slave holdings in Virginia, but took on the enormous debt of his late father in law. Passing debt through your inheritance was a normal thing of that
time. Even though he owned many slaves, Jefferson was a strong believer that as a nation American would have to get rid of slavery, or at least address the issue. But being a Virginian man, Jefferson was raised with slaves. Jefferson’s earliest memory was even of a slave caring for him. I believe that it is possible for Jefferson to have these views and be a slave owner because as R.B. Bernstein puts it, “He is a man of his time” a product of his era. This presents an inner conflict within Jefferson because he was one of the biggest slave owners in Virginia yet he supported the opposing side. Slavery was a huge problem in America which conflicted the founder fathers, as we can easily see within Jefferson. This problem not only fueled the economy of the South but provides a cheap means of exploitable labor that both the North and South could use. This idea of slavery contradicted what the colonists were fighting for, because instead of creating a nation of free individuals, the colonists were freeing who they saw fit and categorized the slaves as property. Thomas Jefferson saw the contradiction of wanting a free nation while slavery lived on and felt that it had to be discussed if the country were to be a free and sovereign nation. R.B Bernstein’s “Thomas Jefferson” helps readers see how the colonist lived in times of fear of a big government after their successful succession from British rule. Bernstein shows how the fear of having a big government and a strong executive shaped the decisions of the members in congress, and how the people supported their Governors rule. The people that Jefferson had to convince had rigid ideals of how much power they should give the executive branch, because they didn’t want to create another Britain in the New World. It took bold men to step forth and create the framework for the system we have today, and to make a decision against the popular vote.
However, the author 's interpretations of Jefferson 's decisions and their connection to modern politics are intriguing, to say the least. In 1774, Jefferson penned A Summary View of the Rights of British America and, later, in 1775, drafted the Declaration of the Causes and Necessity of Taking Up Arms (Ellis 32-44). According to Ellis, the documents act as proof that Jefferson was insensitive to the constitutional complexities a Revolution held as his interpretation of otherwise important matters revolved around his “pattern of juvenile romanticism” (38). Evidently, the American colonies’ desire for independence from the mother country was a momentous decision that affected all thirteen colonies. However, in Ellis’ arguments, Thomas Jefferson’s writing at the time showed either his failure to acknowledge the severity of the situation or his disregard of the same. Accordingly, as written in the American Sphinx, Jefferson’s mannerisms in the first Continental Congress and Virginia evokes the picture of an adolescent instead of the thirty-year-old man he was at the time (Ellis 38). It is no wonder Ellis observes Thomas Jefferson as a founding father who was not only “wildly idealistic” but also possessed “extraordinary naivete” while advocating the notions of a Jeffersonian utopia that unrestrained
In the book Founding Brothers by Joseph Ellis, the author relates the stories of six crucial historic events that manage to capture the flavor and fervor of the revolutionary generation and its great leaders. While each chapter or story can be read separately and completely understood, they do relate to a broader common theme. One of Ellis' main purposes in writing the book was to illustrate the early stages and tribulations of the American government and its system through his use of well blended stories. The idea that a republican government of this nature was completely unprecedented is emphasized through out the book. Ellis discusses the unique problems that the revolutionary generation experienced as a result of governing under the new concept of a democracy. These problems included- the interpretation of constitutional powers, the regulation of governmental power through checks and balances, the first presidential elections, the surprising emergence of political parties, states rights vs. federal authority, and the issue of slavery in a otherwise free society. Ellis dives even deeper into the subject by exposing the readers to true insight of the major players of the founding generation. The book attempts to capture the ideals of the early revolutionary generation leaders and their conflicting political viewpoints. The personalities of Hamilton, Burr, Adams, Washington, Madison, and Jefferson are presented in great detail. Ellis exposes the reality of the internal and partisan conflict endured by each of these figures in relation to each other. Ellis emphasizes that despite these difficult hurdles, the young American nation survived its early stages because of its great collection of charismatic leaders and their ability to ...
In this book Founding Brothers, the author Joseph J. Ellis writes about American Revolution's important figures such as George Washington, John Adams, Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, Aaron Burr, Benjamin Franklin and James Madison exhibit that how the specific relationships of the Founding Fathers have influenced, or were influenced in the course of the American Revolution. These men have become the Founding Fathers and had a strong connection with each other as friends fighting one another to eliminate the British from North America, and forming optimistic brotherhood eager for freedom. However, many of the Founding Fathers were preoccupied with posterity. They wanted to construct and preserve images that served both their egos and
A Lesson Before Dying takes place in a small Louisiana Cajun community in the late
The British colonies in the 17th century were afflicted by many strenuous periods of tension that boiled over resulting in violent rebellions. Bacon’s Rebellion and the Stono rebellion are two such rebellions that rocked the colonies. These conflicts rose from tension between the governance of the colonies and those who they ruled over. The Stono Rebellion and Bacon’s Rebellion were both examples of the American people’s willful determination, unifying capability, and ability to fight back.
“Common sense will tell us, that the power which hath endeavored to subdue us, is of all others, the most improper to defend us.” Such words scribed by the Revolutionary radical Thomas Paine epitomized the drive behind the American Revolution of the 18th century. For nearly two hundred years, the citizens of the American Colonies had been fastened securely to the wrist of the mother country, England. They had tolerated the tyrannous rule, but not without the simmer of rebellious thoughts. As England piled tax after tax onto their colonies, thoughts of revolution and revolt sprung up in the minds of the colonists and brewed there, waiting for a catalyst to drive them into action. The catalyst ignited on January 10th, 1776 when Thomas Paine published his fiery pamphlet ‘Common Sense’. The 48-page pamphlet presented before the colonists a vision for independence that had never been conceived before. It radically altered the course of the Revolution and would later find itself molding the foundation of America’s government indefinitely.
“Jeffersons Influence on the United States -Program No. 35.” VOA Learning English. n.p. n.d. Web. 25 March 2014.
Interracial relationships were a very controversial idea in the American society when slavery began. If one were to have an interracial relationship it would be kept in the dark from society or a consequence was paid. The link between Sally Hemings and Thomas Jefferson was Martha Wayles Jefferson. John Wayles was the father of both Martha Wayles and Sally Hemings, making them half-sisters. Martha Wayles also married Thomas Jefferson. “After the death of John Wayles and Martha Wayles, Thomas Jefferson inherited the ownership Hemings family and moved them to Monticello. This was the permanent living arrangement for the Hemings” (Sally Hemings’s Parisian Affair, Kelly Wilkens). This is where Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings relationship began. “Some speculate that due to their kinship, Hemings and Martha Jefferson may have looked very similar which could have been a key factor in Jefferson’s attraction to Sally Hemings” (Wilkens). Since there is no factual evidence in writing from either Thomas Jefferson or Sally Hemings, many people relied on other family members writings and used assumptions to draw conclusions about their relationship. Til this day, many people still have inconclusive evidence about their relationship and why it lasted a long time. Sally made the decision to continue a long term relationship with Thomas Jefferson, after a heavy evaluation of her options, her conditions and the little empowerment she had over Thomas Jefferson.
In “From Notes on the State of Virginia,” Thomas Jefferson includes some proposed alterations to the Virginia Laws and discusses some differences between blacks and whites. First, he describes one of the proposed revisions regarding slavery: All slaves born after the enactment of the alteration will be freed; they will live with their parents till a certain age, then be nurtured at public disbursement and sent out of state to form their own colonies such that intermarrying and conflicts can be avoided between blacks and whites. Next, Jefferson indicates some physical differences between blacks and whites, including skin color, hair, amount of exudates secreted by kidneys and glands, level of transpiration, structure in the pulmonary organ, amount of sleep, and calmness when facing dangers. As he notes, these differences point out that blacks are inferior to whites in terms of their bodies. In addition, Jefferson also asserts that the blacks’ reasoning and imagination are much inferior to the whites’ after he observes some of the art work and writings from the blacks. As a result, based on his observation, he draws a conclusion that whites are superior to blacks in terms of both body and mind. However, Jefferson’s use of hasty generalization, begging the question, and insulting language in his analysis is a huge flaw which ruins the credibility of his argument and offenses his readers.
In 1774, Jefferson wrote “A Summary View of the Rights of British America”, in which he claimed that the colonies were tied to the king only by voluntary bonds of loyalty. The “Summary View of the Rights of British America” was published without Jefferson’s permission. This document was presented as a political pamphlet. It was taking Jefferson’s career to a whole another level, way further than
The document “The American Crisis” focuses mainly on the crises that America would face during the time of revolutionary war. Thomas Paine, in this article urged people to unite and to fight against Britain. He encouraged and inspires the colonialist’s soldiers to strive for independence from “tyrant and evil” colonial kings and its government. He believed wholeheartedly in the American Revolutionary cause but oppose violent practices.
The American Revolution was a conflict that arose from growing tensions between Great Britain and the Thirteen North American colonies. It was a long bloody war and one of the most well-known, and because of that it has many interpretations, and these interpretations have made it a challenge to be able to come to a single understanding of the war. In this week’s readings, two different views on the same war are given. The American Yawp describes the American colonies point of view on the revolution while the History Lesson discusses how British wanted to control America but instead drove them to rebel and fight for their independence. The colonists saw the war for their independence as a revolution, but through British eyes, events and people were, not surprisingly, seen quite differently.
Thomas Jefferson was the third American President. Due to the fact that he was such an early President, he influenced our political system greatly, both in the short and long term with his seemingly quiet approach to congressional matters. During his presidency, many things happened that changed the United States as we know it. He coordinated the Louisiana Purchase, assisted in implementing the twelfth amendment, formed the character of the modern American President, and cut the U.S.’s war debt by a third.
The American Revolution was marked by the colonies’ independence from Britain. This separation pronounced a new age marked by a decisive political change in the colonies because of the implementation of the Enlightenment ideals and the continuation of English liberties. However, the American Revolution was considered a conservative movement because it “originated from an effort to preserve the existing liberties of the colonies rather than create new ones” (Strayer, 782). Furthermore, the revolution occurred not on the issue of taxation, but on the issue of representation. The colonists believed autonomy was part of their birthright and as Englishmen along with their economic rights and their “natural rights to life, liberty, and property” (Kramnick, Lockean Liberalism). These two sentiments can be seen in their famous slogan “No taxation without representation”. By challenging their economic interests, their established traditions of local autonomy, and their identity as true Englishmen, the colonists were truly infuriated. Thus the American Revolution didn’t grow out of the social tensions within the colonies but rather from an unexpected effort by the British government to tighten its control over the colonies and ex...
What would we know about history if we didn’t also learn about the people who lived through historical events? We learn a lot about history just by knowing what the people believed or wanted, because it helps us better understand the motivations of their actions. Three people who were very important in US history were Thomas Jefferson, Ulysses S. Grant, and Robert E. Lee. Without their contributions to history, the history of the US might have been very different.