Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social class conflict in the great gatsby
Social class conflict in the great gatsby
Social class conflict in the great gatsby
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social class conflict in the great gatsby
The division of social classes has been an issue since before recorded history. From the revolts against the upper class in the French Revolution, to the more recent Occupy Wall Street movements, people are almost always trying to improve their social standings. In The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, the clash between social classes in the 1920’s, mainly the areas of West Egg, East Egg, and the Valley of Ashes, is a pivotal theme in the book; driving the characters’ actions and goals throughout the course of the novel. West Egg is where the “middle class” live. Residents are wealthy, but they’re much rowdier than their East Egg neighbors. They throw loud, eccentric parties and “they conducted themselves according to the rules of behavior associated with amusement parks” (45). Jay Gatsby and Nick Carraway are both residents of West Egg. Their homes, however, are completely different in size and grandeur. Nick described his house as “. . . an eyesore, but it was a small eyesore, and it had been overlooked, so I had a view of the water, a partial view of my neighbor's lawn, and the consoling proximity of millionaires—all for eighty dollars a month” (9-10). The neighbor, later revealed to be Gatsby, is of higher class than Nick, even though they live in the same region due to the size of his home, and his riches. The citizens of West Egg, like Nick and Gatsby, don’t come from wealthy families. Their “non-pedigree” status stops them from getting what they want. For example, Daisy gets tired of waiting for Gatsby to get back from war and acquire wealth, and she marries Tom, a very rich man with family history, instead. The residents of West Egg are stuck between the poverty they escaped and the status they want to achieve, this ... ... middle of paper ... ... marriage is falling apart because Myrtle wants more of a life than George has given her. She despises him, and yet he is too in love with her to see it. Myrtle constantly tries to act like she’s of higher class, "’I told that boy about the ice.’ Myrtle raised her eyebrows in despair at the shiftlessness of the lower orders. ‘These people! You have to keep after them all the time’” (36). Her statements actually make her seem more vulgar and crass, which brings her low social standing to light. People are always trying to get out of the valley. Myrtle even dies trying to raise her social standing, The clash between social classes consistently affects the plot of the novel. It affects each character's interactions with each other, and puts many barriers up for the characters as they try to achieve their goals. Without this central theme, the story would fall apart.
Fitzgerald and the journalists of Class Matters both placed major emphasis the differences in between classes and the absence of class mobility. This was in order to show that changes must be made and class mobility needs to increase. Both classes need to take on some characteristics of the opposite class in order for this to happen.
In the book Great Gatsby there are many examples of society and social class, many are shown to us as the book progresses. Some are shown to us very up front while, others are hidden in the text. Society and social class play a critical part in this book such as how people interact with the lower classes, to how the rich live their lives. When we look deeper into on how the Great Gatsby handles sociality and social class, which puts the characters in the positions they are in.
The East and West Egg are two opposite parts of Long Island. The East Egg is where people of old money reside, like Daisy and Tom, who have inherited the riches of the aristocracy. However, the West Egg is the home of the nouveau riche or new money. It is where Gatsby and Nick reside, who have accumulated great wealth on their own. Fitzgerald contrasts these two places and the characters from each Egg to highlight the cultural clash in the 1920’s between old and new money and the contrasting theme of corruption and morality.
...and the upper middle class members mixed in the neighborhood, creating a disturbing mix. West Egg provided a direct confrontation to the establishment that disturbed the rich such as Daisy Buchanan (107). The residents of the city have foreign names like “Joens”, “Muldoon”, and “Eckheart” with uncouth professions such as actors and politicians (63). Epitomizing the qualities of the people and the buildings of West Egg is Jay Gatsby. Gatsby possesses a house designed to imitate royalty. However, Gatsby fills that very house with the risque parties, juxtaposing the old idea of wealth with a new one. The juxtaposition between the two ideas strongly characterizes the West Egg resident.
This essay discusses the role of social mobility in The Great Gatsby. It argues that not all people can reach the highest social class, this is a class you must belong to from the beginning of life or marry in to. However, the characters are living the American dream which makes social mobility to the other social classes available. The essay addresses the American Dream, the difference in social class between the main characters and how some social mobility is unreachable.
In his novel The Great Gatsby, F. Scott Fitzgerald contrasts the loving conditions and lifestyles of the wealthy and poor through the Buchanan’s and the Wilson’s. In the heart of the first chapter, Fitzgerald describes the home of the Buchanan’s, and in the beginning of the second chapter, he describes the home of the Wilson’s. The contrasting lifestyles are apparent in Fitzgerald’s descriptions due to his use of diction, details, and imagery. This dichotomy in social status holds major importance throughout the plot structure of the novel.
The first location, West Egg, correlates to a person who is dazzling and extravagant. A person who became rich and possesses new money just like people who live there. The person who corresponds to West Egg is Jay Gatsby. Both the location and person symbolize the rise of the new rich alongside the conventional aristocracy of the 1920s. Previously, only people who were born into their riches were generally part of the upper class. Social mobility was difficult for those in lower classes because the “old rich” who maintained their prosperity across many generations retained control. During the 1920s however, people were starting to acquire their wealth within their own generations giving themselves the name “new rich”. Gatsby is an example of a person who constituting his own fortune after belonging to a lower social class and economic stratum. Gatsb...
The desire for sophisticated social class represented in The Great Gatsby can either destroy or build character and potential in a young person. Due to the fact Fitzgerald’s novel is flexible, the realistic and romanticized attributes can be interpreted in different ways. However, Fitzgerald’s technique utilized when building his social structure plays a major role in the novel’s penetration in high school academic literature.
Social class and status is also emphasized through the barrier that exists between East Egg and West Egg which symbolises “old money” and “new money” effectively, and the corruption of morals as witnessed and expressed by the narration of Nick Carraway. Fitzgerald shows that for all the lavishness of society there is ultimately unfulfilled dreams, corruption and separation, and in the case of Gatsby a tragic end to a tragic hero of the lower class.
The homes of Tom Buchanan and Jay Gatsby sit directly across from each other in the opposite Eggs. Gatsby “lived at West Egg, the – well, the less fashionable of the two though this is a most superficial to express the bizarre and not a little sinister contrast between them” (Fitzgerald 5). Through Fitzgerald’s diction, beauty masks the underlying ugliness in West Egg. Although West Egg’s residents have “new money” wealth, they do not have the “proper” etiquette or background of those in East Egg, who “observe the rules of formality and tradition, at least on the surface” (Parkinson 35). Those in East Egg have generations of training in proper society and the importance of it, creating a barrier to those who did not grow up with such lineage of wealth. This perception
East and West Egg clearly symbolize the class divide between the highest pedigree of society and those they look down on. East Egg is home to the aristocratic families who hold a perceived superior social standing to the new wealth. Gatsby, who belonged to this new wealth class is described as “Mr. nobody from nowhere” by Tom Buchanan. This exclusion serves to remind the dreamer that although they may be financially successful the dream will still elude them.
The 1920’s were known to many as a period of change and rebirth. It was a period of history known for lavish parties and extravagant lifestyles. When F. Scott Fitzgerald wrote The Great Gatsby, he created an illusion for readers to decipher and interpret on their own. This allusion contributes to the varied ideas and opinions of the novel. Despite the fact that a majority of the novel can be interpreted so differently, there is one central theme that is portrayed endlessly throughout the novel: wealth. Wealth was looked upon as a deciphering factor between social classes which ultimately led to a distinct gap in the categories of society. Many thought that wealth led to an invitation into society inhibited with wealth and
The Great Gatsby displays social status as a theme to distinguish settings and to portray the mentalities of people belonging to different social classes. The characters are distinguished by their wealth and where they live. Throughout the 1920s and onwards, class was essentially separated into three categories; old money, new money and no money. ‘Old money’ families have fortunes dating back for centuries. Over time they have built up promising and worthwhile social connections. They are often ‘two-faced’, in that they hide their superiority and fortune behind civility. ‘Old money’ lives in East Egg, a place for the elite and those who are inherently wealthy. Then there is ‘new money’. To fit into the class of ‘new money’ their fortune needs to have been made during the 1920s boom, therefore they have no superior social connections. ‘New money’ lives in West Egg. West is commonly associated with the Wild West, which in turn is relevant to the wild behaviour the West Egg residents display with their excessive drinking and uncontrollable parties. Evidently, they tend to overcompensate for the lack of social superiority with extravagant displays of wealth. Typically, the ‘no money’ class get forgotten, due to their lack of significance and ‘importance to the wealth’. They inhabit ‘The Valley of Ashes’ and are often seen as “the victims of the
Even from the word ‘enormous’, the read can already anticipate that the residents living there have enormous propositions, importance, economic prosperity and most importantly class. This is further discussed when describing the contrast between Gatsby’s house and the Buchanan’s house. If we define class based on wealth and economic prosperity, we could say that their class is the same just as the eggs are ‘identical’ However Nick’s description of the two houses exposes differences which reflect their differences of class. Firstly, Gatsby’s ‘mansion’ is described as a ‘colossal affair’ and an ‘eyesore’. Generally, Gatsby’s house is ostentatious and a desperate and artificial display of wealth. One could argue that although wealth plays a big part in class, the way in which wealth is displayed also plays a part. This is proved by the almost paradox of the Buchanan’s ‘elaborate’, ‘cheerful’ ‘house’. This comparison does portray the inter class system, of which even those in higher class, have extravagant ways of differentiating from each other and divided physically by the
The lower class citizens throughout the entirety of the world are hardworking and do what they can to survive; the same cannot be said for the wealthier classes. While reading The Great Gatsby, this type of social class inequality is found everywhere throughout the text, and is seen in most of the main characters, especially when looking through the perspective of a Marxist. From a Marxist lens, F. Scott Fitzgerald reveals the insignificance of the proletariat through his unnamed servant-class characters in The Great Gatsby.