Thirty-Eight Who Saw Murder Didn T Call The Police Analysis

654 Words2 Pages

In an apathetic world, there would be famine, disease, anarchy, and all of the problems that constantly loom on the horizon today. The difference, however, is that no one would care enough to actively try to avoid or later fix the issue. Although the thought such a world is foolish, the implication that apathy brings upon society can be detrimental. It is often justified with the excuse that other people’s personal opinions should not control one’s actions, but that is false perspective to mask one’s own lack of motivation. Apathy, much like a disease, is a contagious perspective that will harm those in which it comes in contact. “Thirty-Eight Who Saw Murder and Didn’t Call the Police” is a news paper article by Martin Gansberg from 1964. It details the events of early one morning when a man stabbed the same woman on three separate occasions. With each stabbing, the people living in the apartments above the street had the opportunity to call the police and save this woman’s life. When asked why he did not call law …show more content…

Not only was it in public, the rape occurred in front of hundreds of beach goers. To even better the story, the woman would have not had a clue if she had not recognized herself in a video she saw later on the news. Needless to say, a people stood around, watched, and even videoed an illegal act affecting a young woman for the rest of her life and did absolutely nothing to stop it. The Sherriff of the area is quoted saying, "And yet our culture and our society and our young people have got to the point where obviously this is acceptable somewhere. I will tell you it is not acceptable in Bay County."(Stapleton). If this is unacceptable, why is it continuing to happen? It is because this bystander apathy is soaking through the cracks and saying that keeping to oneself is better than an effort to improve upon the situation at

Open Document