Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Shakespeare's love and marriage
Romeo and juliet romeo character critical analysis
Analysis of Romeo and Juliet on the theme of hate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Shakespeare's love and marriage
Think Before you Act
Has making a decision ever ruin your life? Have you ever done anything you could to settle a situation, but no matter what you do it just gets worse? In the play, Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare, a long-standing hatred between two families affects their two unlucky children, who have fallen in love with each other. Many situations arise where decisions have to be made. Only the lovers’ tragic deaths end the two family feuds. Out of all the poor decisions in the play, Romeo’s decision to kill Tybalt is one of the most important decisions in the play; it is the catalyst that leads to the ultimate tragedy.
Romeo’s decision to kill Tybalt leads to his banishment, which affects Romeo and Juliet to be wretched. As Romeo talks to the Friar he complains about how, “There is no world without Verona walls but purgatory, torture itself” (III. iii. 17-18.). Romeo thinks that being banished from Verona is like being banished from the world. He believes that exile is way worse than death and would rather die than not being able to see Juliet (III. iii. 12-14). In addition, Romeo’s banishment has also affected Juliet very much. She cries over Romeo’s banishment as she says, “There is no end, no limit, measure, bond, in that words death. No words can that woe sound” (III. ii. 126-127). Juliet is upset that Romeo has been banished. But, she convinces herself that the only reason Romeo killed Tybalt was because Tybalt wanted to kill him, so she forgives Romeo. She also believes “that ‘banished’ that one word… hath slain ten thousand Tybalts” (III. ii. 114-115). Somewhat like Romeo, Juliet believes that banishment is worse than death. Though in this case, she believes that banishment is worse than Tybalt’s death. Ki...
... middle of paper ...
...but it doesn’t work. She then finds a knife and says, “O happy dagger, this is they sheath. There rust and let me die” (V. iii. 183-184). Juliet, being the same as Romeo, would rather much die than to not be with him. So, she kills himself with the dagger beside Romeo. If Romeo hadn’t killed Tybalt, Juliet wouldn’t have gone to the Friar and the plan wouldn’t have happened.
Romeo killing Tybalt leads to his banishment, which leads to Juliet being unhappy. Wanting Juliet to become happy, Lord Capulet moves to marriage between Paris and Juliet forward. Since Juliet doesn’t want to marry Paris she goes to the Friar for help. A plan is set in action and doesn’t end well. If Romeo hadn’t killed Tybalt none of events afterwards would have happened. In life you should always think before you act. As one little mistake could lead to a series of unlucky things to happen.
Romeo senses tensions are high with Tybalt, so he states, “I do protest I never injured thee but love thee better than thou canst devise.” (Lines 65-66 Act Three, Scene One). Romeo is trying to diffuse the situation because he realizes that Tybalt is his love's cousin. Mercutio is surprised by Romeo’s behavior, so he decides to fight Tybalt himself. Mercutio’s decision to fight Tybalt leads to his own death. Romeo is angered by the death of Mercutio and states, “Now, Tybalt, take the “villain" back again/ That late thou gavest me; for Mercutio’s soul.” (Lines 123-124 of Act Three, Scene One). Romeo is indicating that Tybalt is the villain now, because he slayed Mercutio. Romeo forgets about his attempt to befriend the Capulets and slays Tybalt. Romeo, murderer of Tybalt, solely focuses on Juliet and states “Ha, banishment? Be merciful, say “death"/For exile hath more terror in his look.” (Lines 12-13 of Act Three, Scene Three). Romeo does not care about Tybalt’s life, but only cares for the way it affects his relationship with Juliet. Romeo’s mother dies out of grief because of his banishment. Romeo’s recklessness in loving Juliet has led to the death of three
...se he believes Juliet to dead, drinks poison to take his own life as a last resort. What Romeo is unaware of is that Juliet is very much alive, so it is very ironic when he says, “Death, that has sucked the honey of thy breath,/ Hath had no power yet upon thy beauty:/ Thou art not conquered; beauty’s ensign yet/ Is crimson in thy lips and in thy cheeks,/ And death’s pale flag is not advanced there” (V iii 101-105). This is fate in the works in the play. When Juliet sees that her love has not rescued her and rather is dead, she kills herself with a dagger found in the proximity. “O happy dagger/ This is thy sheath; there rust and let me die” (V iii 182-183).
If Romeo had restrained himself from killing Tybalt, or waited a day before killing himself after hearing about Juliet's death, it. might have ended happily, and if Romeo didn't have such deep feelings. his love for Juliet wouldn't have existed in the first place. Juliet, like Romeo, shouldn't have rushed into marrying each other, and. Juliet said, "It was too rash, too unadvis'd, too sudden.
If Tybalt hadn’t been so aggressive with the whole situation, Romeo wouldn’t have been banished, and Juliet wouldn’t have needed to come up with a plan that resulted in both of their deaths. Capulet can also be blamed for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet as he is selfish and unsupportive. Capulet was trying to force Juliet to marry Paris, and he had the final say in her life. After Tybalt’s death, Capulet decides to move the wedding up, which shows he is selfish and doesn’t care what Juliet thinks or if she wants to marry him. When Juliet said, she didn’t want to marry Paris, her parents (mainly her father) wanted to disown her.
Romeo’s problems arose when he was banished for avenging Mercuito by murdering Tybalt. His decision to murder Tybalt was not entirely thought through. In fact, after Romeo kills the Capulet, he exclaims that he is ‘fortune’s fool’ (73) line 132. Additionally, his banishment certainly contributed to his death because it kept him away from Verona and Juliet. If he hadn’t been banished, he would have been aware of the plan the Friar and Juliet had created.
Romeo is angry and in need of revenge, which creates an intense fight between Tybalt and Romeo. Romeo wins this battle, killing Tybalt. He leaves in a hurry, only to discover that he would be banished from Verona. The death of Tybalt is absolutely devastating for Juliet. Her cousin was murdered by her husband.
Romeo and Juliet were soon married and later that afternoon Juliet's cousin Tybalt kills Mercutio during a small fight in the street. Romeo sees this injustice and upon impulse kills Tybalt in revenge. Under the advice of his friends he flees the scene of the murder. Soon the prince finds out and he banishes Romeo from Verona. That same day Juliet finds out that her lover Romeo has been banished for killing her beloved cousin and she threatens to kill herself. She goes to friar Lawrence's cell and he gives her a strong sleeping potion. This strong potion will put her to sleep for a few hours so then she will appear dead; and not have to marry Paris like her father had arranged for her.
As Juliet enters Friar Laurence’s she says, “Good even to my ghostly confessor”(Act 2 scene 6). This happened when Juliet left home to go marry Romeo, she lied to her mother. She could have told the truth and avoided both her and Romeo’s death.” Juliet also states, ”What if it be a poison, which the friar, Subtly hath ministered to have me dead… Romeo, I come! this do I drink to thee”(Act 4 Scene 3). Meaning that she went with the unknown and she could’ve died or she would wake up and go insane. It was her fault that she was so desperate to do something to herself where she wouldn’t know the outcome. Juliet was the cause of her own problems, but she did had help from other to destroy her life, but all of it could’ve been avoided with a little
Tybalt did not take a direct role in Juliet’s ‘death’, but he set the course for incidents that lead to it. As a Capulet, he had long participated in the feud between his family and the Montagues. The day after he spotted Romeo at a party hosted by his family, he went out looking for him – and a fight. He accidentally murdered Mercutio, Romeo later killed him in revenge. Juliet, rather than being upset by Tybalt’s death, sobbed for Romeo, who was banished for the murder. The misunderstandings regarding Juliet’s grief led to a marriage she felt she could only escape by faking her own death. While Tybalt was not immediately involved in Juliet’s ‘death’, he played such a major role in starting the events that would ultimately lead to it that he must be deemed partly responsible.
While Tybalt is to be held accountable, Romeo’s and Juliet’s tragic flaw, impulsivity, contributes greatly to their deaths. It was understood by everyone that their relationship was moving too hastily. Within seconds of meeting, the two had already exchanged kisses. In itself, the concept of marrying Paris rendered Juliet suicidal.
Once in a while many people make bad decisions. Usually these decisions don’t cause them any harm in their futures, unlike Romeo Montague’s and Juliet Capulet’s decisions. In Verona, a city in Italy, two lovers fall in love. The catch is their families despise each other. Eventually Romeo get’s banished from Verona, and Juliet is forced to marry someone she doesn’t want to marry. Juliet takes a potion that knocks her out for 42 hours, and feigns her death, hoping she does not have to marry Count Paris. Romeo assumes Juliet is dead, and drinks a potion that kills him, and when Juliet wakes up and realizes that Romeo is dead, she stabs herself. In William Shakespeare’s tragic play, Romeo and Juliet, the main protagonists, Romeo and Juliet, make poor choices which eventually lead to their death at the end of the story.
This rash decision also caused Juliet and Romeo pain and disappointment. “When something bad happens to one you love, something bad also happens to you. If a loved one is hurt or disgraced, you are hurt; if something wonderful happens to her, you feel better off. ”(“Love’s Bond”, Robert Nozick) If that is true when loving someone, Romeo evidently made the wrong decision to kill Tybalt.
Tybalt was a adversary of Romeo and had the drift to kill him. His spleen of the situation is Romeo trying to love his coz Juliet. He approached Romeo and Mercutio looking for a fight. Tybalt and Mercutio ended up fighting and Tybalt killed Mercutio, because Tybalt did this, he deserved the death penalty for his transgression. Romeo then took revenge and killed him (3.1.70). This is a legal issue because Tybalt was going to be treated to the death penalty anyway so Romeo killing him was just like giving him the death penalty. This death is a lot different than the others because his was a legal issue and he deserved to die, the other deaths in the play like Romeo, Juliet and Mercutio decided to die for a family member that they love.
After the wedding, Romeo runs into Juliet’s cousin Tybalt, who hates him. They engage in a duel, and Romeo kills Tybalt. He fled the scene of the crime. Later, he discovers from Friar Lawrence that rather than executing him for murder, the Prince of Verona has declared that he be banished forever. Instead of being relieved and grateful, Romeo laments his fate and claims that he would rather be dead than be separated from his dear Juliet.
All my life I have been taught to think before I act, in order to prevent myself from making a mistake. Yet, I have learned through my many errors in life not to duplicate my unfortunate actions. Many times I have been told to consider the consequences of my actions prior to acting. I have found, though, that this may not always be the best approach. I would not argue this to be true in every situation, however. What is to be said, for example, of those who have acted on their emotions, only to find themselves in prison? One must be able to know instinctively which situations are appropriate to be dealt with solely on emotions, and which are to require a certain amount of development. Nevertheless, as von Kleist states, in “On Thinking Things Over: A Paradox”, the proper time to reflect on an action is after the act has occurred.