Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How to tell a true war story analysis tim obrien
How to tell a true war story analysis tim obrien
How to tell a true war story analysis tim obrien
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How to tell a true war story analysis tim obrien
In times of war, many men and women tend to forget or alter their memories. Thoughts became mixed up, the sense of time becomes delayed, and the telling of one man’s experience does not seem possibly true. In The Things They Carried, by Tim O’Brien, O’Brien writes about realistic events that never truly happened to him while he was at war. Nevertheless, he goes on telling about in writing a war story, a person can never remember the full event or will change it in a way that is not true. War will bring the worst out in people, and often, many of the men and women who live through it, cannot tell the full tale.
In The Things They Carried, O’Brien has a whole section on how to tell a true war story. Being a veteran of the war in Vietnam, O’Brien knows firsthand what happened in those years overseas. But early on he does claim that the novel he had written was not true. When O’Brien told of the death of his friend and comrade, Curt Lemon, O’Brien would go into detail about how he died. O’Brien never left out any information about how a body is mangled and mutilated in the time of their death. However, O’Brien did say, “When a booby trap explodes, you close your eyes and duck and float outside yourself.
…show more content…
When a guy dies, like Curt Lemon, you look away and then look back and then look away again. The pictures get jumbled; you tend to miss a lot” (O’Brien 1990 p 71). O’Brien means by this that in times of war, even the soldiers are frightened and look away when a fellow soldier dies. Though the death may seem like a graceful death, no one there wanted to see a person die. They all looked away. So the true story of Curt Lemon’s death is not known for sure. No matter how true one may claim their story to be, it will never be the full truth. O'Brien continues with his war story and mentions the man he killed. His daughter first asked if that he had ever killed a man while at war. Thinking back to his days in Vietnam, O’Brien can remember the sight of the Vietcong man going along the trails late at night. Without a second thought, O’Brien threw a grenade, killing the man. O'Brien, just like in his story with Curt Lemon, does not leave out any details. The Vietcong man had “His jaw in his throat, his upper lip and teeth were gone, his one eye was shut, his other eye was a star-shaped hole, his eyebrows were thin and arched like a woman’s, his nose was undamaged, there was a slight tear at the lobe of one ear, his clean black hair was swept upward into a cowlick at the rear of his skull, his forehead was lightly freckled, his fingernails were clean, the skin at his left cheek was peeled back in three ragged strips, his right cheek was smooth and hairless, there was a butterfly on his chin, his neck was open to the spinal cord and there was thick and shiny and it was this wound that killed him,” (O’Brien 1990 p 124). The image he saw in the man was gruesome and real. But as O’Brien kept looking at the man’s face, he began making a life for this Vietcong member. O’Brien saw the man as a student and a soldier. Not a communist. He wanted to be a teacher some day and teach students mathematics. Though this part of the story is not true, O’Brien had made this part up to resemble the life he would have if he did not go to war. O’Brien saw that this Vietcong soldier had set out to kill O’Brien and his men and he knew that it was his life or the lives of O'Brien and his men. But all the while, O’Brien can’t help to feel as if it could've been him that was lying there, mangled and mutilated from the blast. As another war story that is not fully true, the death of the Vietcong lingers in O’Brien’s memories. Larry Gwin was a man who fought in the Vietnam War in 1966. In Vietnam, Gwin saw men killing other men as he fought for his life. Day in and day out, Gwin and his men moved throughout the jungle looking for North Vietnamese. While under attack, Gwin searched for cover in a tree. But not long after spotting the tree was bits of bark flying off of it. Lying in the grass, Gwin had to think of the others in his platoon. Soon the Vietnamese came into sight and without a second thought Gwin ordered them to open fire, killing all of the Vietnamese. In Gwin’s words, “I remember those first men I ever killed, and I remember each one of them very distinctly. But if we hadn’t killed them, they would have killed us,” (Gwin 1998 p 396). Gwin and O’Brien faced similar events though Gwin claims to remember everything of this attack distinctly, he was telling about this experience in 1998. The event that he witnessed had been changed and altered throughout the years as he reflects on his time at war. Though it claims to be true, there is no definite answer proving that it is a true war story. As O’Brien and his men traveled through Vietnam, they attacked small villages and towns that they had suspected were helping the Vietcong. After the raiding of one small village, O’Brien and his men found a young girl, about the age of 14 dancing violently outside her home. “The girl danced mostly on her toes. She took tiny steps in the dirt in front of her house, sometimes making a slow twirl, sometimes smiling to herself,” (O’Brien 1990 p 135). The movement of the young girl had symbolized her feeling and what she was going through. With the death of her family, her jagged, rough movements of her dancing expressed a feeling that not even O’Brien was really sure how to interpret. The girl couldn’t speak to them or tell them how she felt. All she could do was move around as her village burnt down and her family laid there dead. Her story was hard to tell and hard to understand what she was going though as war raged on. The young girl’s movements in Vietnam were hard for O’Brien and his men to understand what she was feeling about the war. None of them could ask her how she felt or how to help. In Nguyen Hung’s story, it was an inside look of a Vietnamese person’s point of view. Hung was a boy when the war had started and was in college when he was drafted. Not looking forward to the war, he still reluctantly went and served for his country. He was much like the young girl in the way that he was separated from his family at a young age. He had to say out of the city and watch from afar as his neighborhoods were bombed. While in war, he had come to the conclusion that death was coming for him and it was coming at any moment. But while under attack, he had lived while his friends had died. “[Hung] had seen so much death and so many bombs that it had just taken everything out of [him]) (Hung 1998 p 400). Hung and the young girl from The Things They Carried were very much similar in the way that war had taken every last ounce of life they had left. The war was so intense and destructive that it had left them emotionless and unable to tell their full story. In The Things They Carried, Tim O’Brien says right away that his story is not a true war story.
But he goes on telling the reader that many of his stories are true. Whether anyone will really know or not, a true war story is never the full truth. A veteran of war will leave out details and gruesome facts of their experience while fighting in war. They do it either to suppress certain memories or they genuinely forgot what really happened, their story is never the full version. O’Brien, Hung, and Gwin all witnessed war first hand in Vietnam. Each man had seen different things and had been in situations that required them to risk one life to save others. The war in Vietnam had forever changed these men. However, no one will ever truly believe their story as the true
story.
‘The Things They Carried’ by Tim O’Brien provides a insider’s view of war and its distractions, both externally in dealing with combat and internally dealing with the reality of war and its effect on each solder. The story, while set in Vietnam, is as relevant today with the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan as it was in the 1960’s and 1970’s in Southeast Asia. With over one million soldiers having completed anywhere from one to three tours in combat in the last 10 years, the real conflict might just be inside the soldier. O’Brien reflects this in his writing technique, using a blend of fiction and autobiographical facts to present a series of short narratives about a small unit of soldiers. While a war story, it is also an unrequited love story too, opening with Jimmy Cross holding letters from a girl he hoped would fall in love with him. (O’Brien 1990).
In The Things They Carried, an engaging novel of war, author Tim O’Brien shares the unique warfare experience of the Alpha Company, an assembly of American military men that set off to fight for their country in the gruesome Vietnam War. Within the novel, the author O’Brien uses the character Tim O’Brien to narrate and remark on his own experience as well as the experiences of his fellow soldiers in the Alpha Company. Throughout the story, O’Brien gives the reader a raw perspective of the Alpha Company’s military life in Vietnam. He sheds light on both the tangible and intangible things a soldier must bear as he trudges along the battlefield in hope for freedom from war and bloodshed. As the narrator, O’Brien displayed a broad imagination, retentive memory, and detailed descriptions of his past as well as present situations. 5. The author successfully uses rhetoric devices such as imagery, personification, and repetition of O’Brien to provoke deep thought and allow the reader to see and understand the burden of the war through the eyes of Tim O’Brien and his soldiers.
The novel, “The Things They Carried”, is about the experiences of Tim O’Brian and his fellow platoon members during their time fighting in the Vietnam War. They face much adversity that can only be encountered in the horrors of fighting a war. The men experience death of friends, civilians, enemies and at points loss of their rationale. In turn, the soldiers use a spectrum of methods to cope with the hardships of war, dark humor, daydreaming, and violent actions all allow an escape from the horrors of Vietnam that they experience most days.
He states that as a soldier, there is so much to soak in from war scenes that it all becomes a muddled mess. Therefore, the story of the moment can be different from each soldier’s perspective due to the parts where each man puts in his own ideas. This leads to some speculation as to whether or not O’Brien’s stories are true or false.
In Tim O’Brien’s The Things They Carried, the readers follow the Alpha Company’s experiences during the Vietnam War through the telling’s of the main character and narrator, Tim. At the beginning of the story, Tim describes the things that each character carries, also revealing certain aspects of the characters as can be interpreted by the audience. The book delineates what kind of person each character is throughout the chapters. As the novel progresses, the characters’ personalities change due to certain events of the war. The novel shows that due to these experiences during the Vietnam War, there is always a turning point for each soldier, especially as shown with Bob “Rat” Kiley and Azar. With this turning point also comes the loss of innocence for these soldiers. O’Brien covers certain stages of grief and self-blame associated with these events in these stories as well in order to articulate just how those involved felt so that the reader can imagine what the effects of these events would be like for them had they been a part of it.
Another unique aspect to this book is the constant change in point of view. This change in point of view emphasizes the disorder associated with war. At some points during the book, it is a first person point of view, and at other times it changes to an outside third person point of view. In the first chapter of the book, “The Things They Carried,” O’Brien writes, “The things they carried were largely determined by necessity (2).
Through The Things They Carried, Tim O’Brien moves beyond the horror of fighting in the Vietnam War to examine with sensitivity and insight the nature of courage and fear. Included, is a collection of interrelated stories. A few of the stories are brutal, while others are flawed, blurring the distinction between fact and fiction. All the stories, however, deal with one platoon. Some are about the wartime experiences of soldiers, and others are about a 43-year-old writer reminiscing about his platoon’s experiences. In the beginning chapter, O’Brien rambles about the items the soldiers carry into battle, ranging from can openers, pocketknives, and mosquito repellent o Kool-Aid, sewing kits, and M-16 assault rifles. Yet, the story is truly about the intangible things the soldiers “carry”: “grief, terror, love, longing… shameful memories (and) the common secret of cowardice” (Harris & O’Brien 21).
Written by author Tim O’Brien after his own experience in Vietnam, “The Things They Carried” is a short story that introduces the reader to the experiences of soldiers away at war. O’Brien uses potent metaphors with a third person narrator to shape each character. In doing so, the reader is able to sympathize with the internal and external struggles the men endure. These symbolic comparisons often give even the smallest details great literary weight, due to their dual meanings. The symbolism in “The Things They Carried” guides the reader through the complex development of characters by establishing their humanity during the inhumane circumstance of war, articulating what the men need for emotional and spiritual survival, and by revealing the character’s psychological burdens.
In Tim O’Brien’s novel, “The Things They Carried,” imaginations can be both beneficial and corrosive. This novel consists of story, truth and real truth. Throughout the novel, imagination plays a big role. Tim O’Brien wrote his book about the war, mainly based on his memory of the war. He did not remember every detail of the war, thus he made up some false details to the stories to make it seem more interesting.
The novel The Thing They Carried is a compilation of short stories that share underlying themes and characters. One of the stories is called “How to tell a True War Story”. In this story the narrator expands on a central theme of the distinction between truth and fiction when writing a war story. The story, like most of the other stories in the novel jumps erratically between events, which oftentimes creates confusion and a sense of the surreal in the story. Throughout the story the narrator repeatedly shows that when writing a war story the “story truth is truer sometimes than happening truth.”(O’Brien pg. 171) This quotation encompasses the theme and supports it. The narrator’s use of stylistic devices coupled with stories such as “How to Tell a True War Story” and “Good Form” exemplifies how fiction can fully represent the truth whilst the facts fall miserably short.
The narrator in “The Things They Carried” deals with the subjective conditions of war. Throughout the story, straining emotions often brought O’Brien’s teams emotions, especially after a death, causes a “crying jag” with a “heavy-duty hurt” (O’Brien 1185). The fury of emotion associated with death begins to erode the sharp minds of the soldiers and become mentally effective. After an event of large magnitude, it still began to take its toll on the protagonist as they often “carried all the emotional baggage of men who might dies” during the war (O’Brien 1187). The travesties that occurred with the brutality of war did not subside and began to affect those involved in a deeply emotional way. The multitude of disastrous happenings influenced the narrator to develop a psychological handicap to death by being “afraid of dying” although being “even more afraid to show it” (O’Brien 1187). The burden caused by the war creates fear inside the protagonist’s mind, yet if he were to display his sense of distress it would cause a deeper fear for those around him, thus making the thought of exposing the fear even more frightening. The emotional battle taken place in the psyche of the narrator is repressed directly by the war. The protagonist in “The Yellow Wallpaper” is also faced with the task of coping with mental
In the novel The Things They Carried by Tim O'Brien the author tells about his experiences in the Vietnam war by telling various war stories. The quote, "It has been said of war that it is a world where the past has a strong grip on the present, where machines seemed sometimes to have more will power than me, where nice boys (girls) were attracted to them, where bodies ruptured and burned and stand, where the evil thing trying to kill you could look disconnecting human and where except in your imagination it was impossible to be heroic." relates to each of his stories.
The chapter “The Man I Killed” includes an in depth examination of the dead Vietnam man. Describing all of the man’s new physical attributes from a grenade explosion. “His jaw was in his throat, his upper lip and teeth were gone, his one eye was shut, his other eye was a star-shaped hole, his eyebrows were thin and arched like a woman's, his nose was undamaged…” For a full page, O’Brien reminisces about the picture of the man that is now engrained in his head. He further analyzes all of these features deducing and making assumptions about personal details of the life of the dead man. “He would have been taught that to defend the land was a man's highest duty and highest privilege. He had accepted this. It was never open to question. Secretly, though, it also frightened him. He was not a fighter.” This chapter is also extremely influential to O’Brien, who uses imagery as a way to grasp his actions. O’Brien does not try to dull his pain or separate himself from the dead man. Giving the dead man a back-story only makes him more human making this kill so much less detached and much more personal. Kiowa tries to help O’Brien justify his actions, but O’Brien is not focused on the
Tim O’Brien’s The Things They Carried has readers and critics alike scratching their heads with wonder about the meaning of “story-truth” and “happening-truth.” Although, he served in the Vietnam War from 1968 until 1970, he fabricates the events of the war throughout The Things They Carried. At the same time, he insists that the truth lies at the heart of the emotion in the story, an idea that many readers question. Furthermore, it is pointless for the reader to attempt to sort through the stories and differentiate between the “story-truth” and “happening-truth,” because it is nearly impossible. This tactic is one of O’Brien’s more ingenious writing methods. He does not want the reader to know the difference between the two because in his opinion that fact is irrelevant. O’Brien obviously thinks outside the box and has everyone questioning reality. However, this fact is truly ironic, because the point is not to care what type of “truth” it is, but to instead feel the raw beauty of the emotion and to accept it as the truth. While trying to define “story-truth” and “happening-truth,” a couple chapters in particular focus on the idea of truth, “How to Tell a True War Story,” “The Man I Killed” and “Good Form.” O’Brien believes that the most important thing for a reader is to experience the emotion of the story, be it “story-truth” or “happening-truth,” as long as the real emotion is conveyed and understood by the reader, then it is as true as it could possibly be.
Tim O’Brien’s novel The Things They Carried challenges the reader to question what they are reading. In the chapter “How to Tell a True War Story”, O’Brien claims that the story is true, and then continues to tell the story of Curt’s death and Rat Kiley’s struggle to cope with the loss of his best friend. As O’Brien is telling the story, he breaks up the story and adds in fragments about how the reader should challenge the validity of every war story. For example, O’Brien writes “you can tell a true war story by its absolute and uncompromising allegiance to obscenity and evil” (69), “in many cases a true war story cannot be believed” (71), “almost everything is true. Almost nothing is true” (81), and “a thing may happen and be a total lie; another thing may not happen and be truer than the truth (83). All of those examples are ways in which O’Brien hinted that his novel is a work of fiction, and even though the events never actually happened – their effects are much more meaningful. When O’Brien says that true war stories are never about war, he means that true war stories are about all the factors that contribute to the life of the soldiers like “love and memory” (85) rather than the actual war. Happening truth is the current time in which the story was being told, when O’Brien’s daughter asked him if he ever killed anyone, he answered no in happening truth because it has been 22 years since he was in war and he is a different person when his daughter asked him. Story truth