Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on antigone sophocles
Essays on Antigone the book
Essay on antigone sophocles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on antigone sophocles
Theories on Tragedy in Antigone
Many dramatic theorists have documented their opinions of Sophocles' tragic play
Antigone. They have presented their interpretations as to the motives and moral
character of Antigone and Creon. I will attempt to encapsulate the basic logic behind the
arguments of the critics Brian Vickers, A.C. Bradley (who interprets Hegel), and H. D. F.
Kitto, and venture my own humble opinion as to their validity.
Brian Vickers clearly favors the character of Antigone. He challenges Hegel and
Hegel's view that both Creon and Antigone were essentially right in their beliefs. Vickers
sums up Hegel's theories in a single diagram (Vickers 526), showing Creon and Antigone
as forces in antithetical opposition. I believe that Hegel's theories of tragedy, as explained
by A.C. Bradley, encompass much more than a simple diagram. Hegel thought that Creon
and Antigone represented these forces, but not necessarily that they were diametrically
opposed. Hegel thought that the tragedy of Antigone was that the beliefs of Antigone and
Creon forced them into opposition, because their beliefs were valid and just, though they
did not go about practicing their beliefs in a valid and just manner.
Vickers presents the notion that Sophocles himself favored the character of
Antigone, since Sophocles never criticized her. With this I must disagree; there were
many aspects of Antigone's character that Sophocles would not have included had he
viewed her as above reproach. For instance, she is dreadfully overbearing and righteous.
While Sophocles clearly showed he could paint the picture of a sympathetic character if
he so chose in Oedipus the King, I believe that...
... middle of paper ...
... believed that the tragedy of Antigone lies in the conflict between the
rules of the state and the rules of man. It is unfortunate that these two forces must be in
opposition, and therefore their practitioners or champions in this particular case have to
be in opposition as well. I agree with this; the tragedy is in the circumstances that pit two
essentially "right" forces against each other. The morality of the characters determines
the course of the tragedy, and their personalities and convictions determine the emotional
power for the reader.
Bibliography:
Vickers, Brian. Towards Greek Tragedy: Drama, Myth, Society
Bradley, AC. Oxford Lectures on Poetry
Kitto, HDF. Greek Tragedy, A Literary Study
4. Knox, Bernard MW. The Heroic Temper: Studies in Sophoclean Tragedy
Sophocles. "Oedipus the King"
Sophocles. "Antigone"
" This indicates Creon’s decision to punish Antigone was not taken kindly by the gods, but his ego wouldn't allow him to solve that as shown by Haemon, which, again, contribute to his nemesis. This proves by how Creon’s stubbornness isn't liked by the gods establishing him as a tragic
In the awe-inspiring play of Antigone, Sophocles introduces two remarkable characters, Antigone and Creon. A conflict between these two obstinate characters leads to fatal consequences for themselves and their kindred. The firm stances of Creon and Antigone stem from two great imperatives: his loyalty to the state and her dedication to her family, her religion but most of all her conscience. The identity of the tragic hero of this play is still heavily debated. This tragedy could have been prevented if it had not been for Creon's pitiful mistakes.
Antigone, a tragic drama written by Sophocles explores the different ranges of characters: static and dynamic or flat and round. Creon, King of Thebes in the dramatic play Antigone takes on the role that of a static character. Throughout the whole play Creon believed the idea that he was above the law of the Gods and his decrees cannot be disputed. Unknowingly, who would think that Creon’s sense of pride would cause him the life of his wife, son, and niece? However, at the very end of the play Creon returns to the palace, holding his son’s lifeless body, where he finds out that his wife has killed herself as well. Overwhelmed with grief about the death of his loved ones, Creon turns to the Chorus and says, “Lead me away. I have been rash and foolish. I have killed my son and wife. I look for comfort; my comfort lies here dead. Whatever my hands have touched come to nothing. Fate has brought all my pride to thought of dust” (1833). Creon takes responsibility of the death of his son and wife by calling himself a “rash” man and this is where Creon undergoes the changes of a dynamic character by admitting that he was wrong.
Antigone, as a character, is extremely strong-willed and loyal to her faith. Creon is similarly loyal, but rather to his homeland, the city of Thebes, instead of the gods. Both characters are dedicated to a fault, a certain stubbornness that effectively blinds them from the repercussions of their actions. Preceding the story, Antigone has been left to deal with the burden of her parents’ and both her brothers’ deaths. Merely a young child, intense grief is to be expected; however, Antigone’s emotional state is portrayed as frivolous when it leads her to directly disobey Creon’s orders. She buries her brother Polynices because of her obedience to family and to the gods, claiming to follow “the gods’ unfailing, unwritten laws” (Sophocles 456-457). CONTINUE
Creon does not learn a lesson from Oedipus' accusatory behavior. Instead he adapts this bad personality trait. Throughout Antigone, he accuses everyone who tries to give him advice of betraying him. Whereas, in Oedipus, he is falsely accused by Oedipus of trying to take over the throne. This paper will compare and contrast his behavior and evaluate if he learned anything from one play to the next.
knew full well that what she was doing was wrong. She knew that if she buried
Antigone has defied the king's edict. However, the edict says that her brother, Polynices, cannot be given a proper burial. The reason given for this is that Polynices is a traitor. Antigone's uncle, Creon, the king, makes this edict after many events happen. Antigone says herself that she has experienced "no private shame, no public disgrace, nothing" that cannot be experienced (Antigone, p. 658).
Antigone utilizes her moral foundations, her religious roots, and the events of her past to form a sophisticated argument. Despite being unable to convince Creon to reverse her punishment, Antigone is able to convince the people of Thebes that she was right in her actions. After Antigone’s death, and the deaths of several others, Creon reflects on this monologue and realizes the honest truth behind Antigone’s actions and words.
In the following paper, I plan to discuss the source of conflict between the title characters of Antigone and Creon in Sophocles’ “Antigone”. I also plan to discuss how each character justifies his or her actions and what arguments they give for their justifications. I will also write about the strengths and weaknesses of these arguments. The final points I try to make are about who Sophocles thinks is right and who I think is right.
Creon highlighted as the tragic figure, initially created decisions he thought was for the welfare and well-being of Thebes; however, Antigone, who rebelled against Creon’s decisions, caused Creon’s rage to cloud his rational way of thinking. When Creon decided to forbid the burial of Polynices, as he believed Polynices was a traitor to Thebes, Antigone was outraged. This decision, viewed through the eyes of Creon, was just and fair; on the other hand, Antigone viewed his decision as cruel and selfish, which resulted into a major conflict between these two characters. When Antigone disobeyed his proclamation, Creon became infuriated towards this rebellious act. Those small events within the play expressed Creon as a ruler doing what he believes is right; on the other hand, Antigone’s rebellion expressed otherwise. Antigone was soon shown to cause an evil spark within Creon. This “spark” caused Creon to intensify his punishments towards Antigone, which in turn caused a chain reaction of events and eventually led to his tragic decline. Being portrayed as a menacing villain throughout the play, Creon began as an honorable man; however, overwhelming events and confrontations caused Creon to evolve in to this monstrous figure.
By placing heavy emphasis on taking the contradictions and tensions he saw not only in philosophy, but also in society as a whole Hegel attempted to interpret them as part of a comprehensive unity he described as “absolute knowledge”. He believed everything was interrelated and that attempting to separate it from reality into various parts was wrong. However, Hegel’s triadic dialect is perhaps too simplistic. From Hegel’s point of view, an analysis of a apparently simple idea will reveal it’s underlying contradictions, and these contradictions will lead to the dissolution of the idea in it’s simplest form. Then these contradictions will lead to a development into a higher-level and more complex form of that same idea.
In Sophocles’ Antigone, Antigone saw her action of burying her brother as a just one. It may not have been just in the eyes of Creon and the people of Thebes, but she was not concerned with the laws that mortals had made. Antigone saw the divine laws of the gods to be much more important than those of mortals. She felt that if she died while upholding the laws of the gods, that her afterlife would be better than if she had not. Our lives on this earth are so short, that to see a good afterlife over the horizon will make people go against the laws of humans.
The origin of the Sophocles’ Greek tragedy “Antigone” has created much controversy about the definition of a tragic hero, as defined by Aristotle. A literary character that makes a judgment error that leads to his/her own downfall. Both Creon and Antigone challenge each other’s conception of the divine and civic law while each has lawfulness in their argument. It is evidently noted that Antigone is the hero of the tragedy; she was a romantic idealist whose beliefs on family loyalty and religious values could not be condemned by civil laws.
Tragedy of Antigone The play “Antigone” by Sophocles displays many qualities that make it a great tragedy. A tragedy is defined as a dramatic or literary work in which the principal character engages in a morally significant struggle ending in ruin or profound disappointment. In creating his tragedy “Antigone”, Sophocles uses many techniques to create the feelings of fear and pity in his readers. This, in turn, creates an excellent tragedy.
However, he did realize that no religion would be able to survive just based on the supposed experiences and ‘revelations’ of other people, which is what led him to understanding that it must be based on peoples understanding and personal interpretations of reality (Handout #1). Even though he did feel as though he was indebted to the Enlightenment, Hegel opposed many of its basic concepts even while protecting a lot of the developments that were brought by the Enlightenment (Handout #1). The views of religion that are offered by Hegel lean more positively to Christianity and religion in general since he does agree with the belief of God and he was Lutheran which is a sect of Christianity and also supports his acceptance of religion (Handout #1). He also frequently utilizes Christian terms in his writings, especially those of the Trinity which actually supports religion in general even though he thought that religion should be transformed into philosophy which proves that Hegel inspected and researched religion more as a philosophy which is more harmful to it since philosophies have never been proven. However, Hegel opposes a portion of orthodoxy because he believes that Evil was created by God and that humanity is nothing without the contrast between good and evil. Some of his views are also more harmful for Christianity because he