Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory
Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory
Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory
Urie Bronfenbrenner created the ecological systems theory of child development. This theory suggests that we encounter different environmental systems, which shape (influences) us. These systems are known as the microsystem, the mesosystem, the exosystem, the macro system, and the chronosystem. According to the Woolfolk text, social development is influenced by relationships in the micro system, people we have direct social interaction with. Family, friends, classmates, teachers, neighbors and other people who we have a direct contact with are included in the microsystem. Your parent’s parenting style, whether you have a blended or extended family, what group/clique you are part of have all influenced your development. Our development is …show more content…
also influenced by whether or not we met Erik Erikson’s 8 stages of psychosocial development. Someone at my father’s age would be at the generativity vs. stagnation stage. During middle adulthood, people need to begin their own families and develop a sense of being a part of the bigger picture. This is often done by having children, but it can also be through making a mark on the world. Creating things that will outlast them, and giving back to society. By failing to achieve these objectives, people become stagnant and feel unproductive. Development can also be influenced by how you see yourself. Your self-image, self-esteem, and self-efficacy all play a role. Someone who isn’t happy with their body, doesn’t really value themselves, and gives up quickly will develop differently than someone who is the opposite in those areas. Social: He is somewhat close to his family (the one in which he was raised in). They don’t see each other often, and do not communicate frequently, but he gets phone calls and letters during special occasions, like Christmas and Birthdays. Identity: His heroes are Jesus and Abraham Lincoln. The latter is because Abraham Lincoln went through many difficult trials, but persevered. When I asked him what he thinks of himself, he awkwardly chuckled and responded “I’d say I’m a pretty swell guy.” Self-Concept: He describes himself as analytical, and he hates to fall behind in class. He has a positive view of himself. He said there were many times in which he felt a task was very difficult, but he does not give up. Francis Dupuis is currently in Erickson’s “Generativity vs. Stagnation” stage, and I believe that he has passed successfully through this stage. He has volunteered and made contributions to society, and he has two children. I believe that Dupuis’ development falls within the expected range. He has a strong sense of self, and he has met and passed through Erik Erikson’s various stages of psychosocial development. A teaching strategy that could help Francis Dupuis’ to become more social would be practising spontaneous speaking. Video: Think Fast, Talk Smart: Communication Techniques In this video, Matt Abrahams, a lecturer at the Stanford Graduate School of Business, talks about different strategies for improving spontaneous speaking. He suggests not “stockpiling or planning,” what you are going to say, which everyone does. Rather, just speak in the moment. See the conversation as an opportunity, not a challenge. Stockpiling information can cause someone to trip up if the conversation does not go as one expects it to, so instead just listen and speak what comes to your mind. In the video, he uses a lot of improvisation techniques with his audience, and plays several games, one of them being tongue twisters, which he uses to get people to focus, relieve anxiety, and get themselves in the moment. When someone is an adult, they should have developed theory of mind, and a sophisticated perspective-taking ability.
Theory of mind is when one becomes capable of taking into consideration others' wants, needs, knowledge and mental states. What they may be thinking, how they may be feeling, what they may do next. Theory of Mind is a necessary component of perspective-taking. Perspective-taking refers to our ability to relate to others. It is our ability to perceive someone else’s thoughts, feelings, and motivations. In other words, it refers to our ability to empathize with someone else and see things from their perspective. Adults should have also developed a sense of right and wrong, a sense of moral reasoning. Moral reasoning is when one uses their personal judgment to determine what is right and what is wrong in a situation. It is influenced by the values and beliefs of their family and friends, and their own experiences. These rights and wrongs are also often defined by social conventions, what is perceived as right and wrong in the culture in which one lives. Social conventions are rules and expectations that one must conform to if they are to be participants in the …show more content…
culture. A man named Lawrence Kohlberg developed a model that he thought could explain how people develop morality. There are three stages, each one containing two phases.The stages are preconventional morality, conventional morality, and postconventional morality. Adults should be at the postconventional morality stage. At this stage, individuals have developed their own personal set of ethics and morals that they use to govern their behavior. Their ethics and morals often agree with social conventions, but there can be conflicts between what is socially acceptable and what the individual believes is right. Francis Dupuis has done things in his life that he feels guilty about.
For example, just yesterday, (as I am writing this) my mother had to go to the hospital when she had a severe acid reflux reaction and could not breathe. My father spent time bemoaning about the traffic jam when we finally arrived. He complained about the traffic while my mother was sitting in the hospital. He later apologized, and gave me that as an example when I asked him for something that he has done to feel guilty about. By the way, my mother is fine. I gave Dupuis the Heinz Dilemma. He did not feel that what Heinz did was right, but he admitted that if he were in the same situation, he would have done the same. I also gave him an emotional intelligence test and he got 80% of them right. This showed me that he has developed his theory of mind. Francis Dupuis has a developed sense of morals, he knows what is considered right and wrong in society, but he would also sometimes commit what society considers a wrong if he believes it is right, and evidenced when I gave him the Heinz Dilemma. Furthermore, he has done things that he feels guilty about, and has apologized for them. This places him at the appropriate postconventional
stage. A teaching strategy that could help Francis Dupuis develop his perspective-taking is roleplaying. Video: Get Into Character: Develop Empathy Through Drama In this video, a drama teacher has students explore how it feels to be mistreated as an elder. In the video, a drama teacher had the students role-play as elders and the situation was that they were being removed from their building so a large corporation could take the land. The spokesperson for the corporation didn’t listen to the concerns of the elders, and treated them pettily. After the role-play, the students were asked how they felt, and most of them had an emotional response of some kind. This role-play helped the students to feel more empathy for other people, in this case, elders. It would not have to be this particular scenario for Dupuis, but roleplaying in general, or even just putting himself in someone else’s shoes.
In his article, Unger argues for a principle called Pretty Demanding Dictate which claims that we ought to spend most of our income in order to alleviate the suffering around the world. In support of this principle, Unger comes up with two cases: Bob’s Bugatti case and Ray’s Big Request case. To briefly discuss how Unger’s argument is structured, Unger proposes that if we agree that Bob should ruin his expensive Bugatti in order to save a child, we are inclined to believe that Ray should donate most of his money to UNICEF because he can do more good with lesser cost than Bob’s case. Here, Unger also proposes the Reasonable Principle of Ethical Integrity, which argues that if you believe someone should perform a certain act of benevolence, then you should be able to carry out the same act under the same circumstance as well. This principle is used to persuade us if we believe Bob or Ray should perform an act of benevolence in their situation, we should also do so under the same circumstance. At the end of this reasoning, we are led to believe that we should sacrifice most of our money just as we believe Bob and Ray should do.
Ecology in early childhood education means the study of the relationships and interactions between human groups and their surrounding conditions that impact on the child’s development and learning. Any changes to the surrounding conditions start from the most intimate home ecological system moving outward to the larger school system and the most expansive system which is society and culture. Each of these systems inevitably interacts with and influences each other and every aspect of the child’s life. According to famous psychologist Urie Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory, ‘he divided the person's environment into five different levels: the microsystem, the mesosystem, the exosystem, the macrosystem, and the chronosystem’ (Study.com
(Hyson, 2008) In her book, she stated that once the child was born, they are already connected with the world. According to Urie Bronfenbrenner, he emphasized that children are not only being affected but also they are affecting those that surrounds them. The members of those settings are also connected and influenced one another, he called this theory as ecological system theory. The ecological system theory was used by Marilou Hyson as a framework on the factors that influences the children’s approaches to learning and she named it as “Circle of Influence on Children’s Approaches to Learning”. The “Circle of Influence on Children’s Approaches to Learning” includes the family, school, culture, politics and policies. She believed that the family
Ethics are the principles that shape individual lives in modern society. It is a subjective idea that seems to have a standard in society. Ethics and morals are the major factors that guide individuals to make right and wrong choices. Something that is morally right to one person might be the very opposite of what another person would view as right. There are many factors that can trigger a change in an individual’s view of morality.
The study of children’s theory of mind has grown tremendously attractive to many developmental psychologists in the past few decades. The reason for this being because having a theory of mind is one of the quintessential skills that define us as being human and because having this ability plays a major role in our social functioning. To have a theory of mind is to be able to reflect on the categorical contents of one’s own mind, such as dreams, memories, imaginations, and beliefs, which all provide a basic foundation to understand how someone else may think and why they may behave in the manner that they do (Bjorklund, p.199). It is the development of one’s concepts of mental activity; their ability to understand that they think things that others do not and that their thoughts are theirs alone, as well as understanding that other peoples’ minds work in the same way, in which they too, have their own individual thoughts. Our theory of mind grants us ability to navigate our personal and social world by explaining past behavior, and anticipating and predicting future actions (Moore & Frye, 1991).
So, in conclusion theory of mind is a method of explaining human social interaction, which goes some distance to explaining our somewhat seemingly planetary unique ability to empathise, comprehend, and guess others actions and behaviour. It has been researched by a number of psychologists in the field, and is an extremely useful and viable tool in explaining some of the complexities of the human condition. It has a central position in the field of evolutionary psychology, and will continue to do so; with good reason, for without its presence a large amount of the remainder of the psychological spectrum would have difficulty understanding anything about the human mind.
Describe Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory and how it impacts teacher practice. The Ecological System Theory declare that human beings development is impacted by the different types of environmental systems. For example, it states that humans jump from one stage to the next. For instance, one stage at a time like taking the stairs. However, it is an ecological system, because at the beginning a person starts interacting with their families, peers, classroom, and religious setting. Then, with school, community, etc., and lastly, culture, society, etc. Furthermore, it can impact teacher practice because teachers are part of the microsystem. Which mean that teachers are a positive influence and a role model for children’s. Moreover, teachers are part of the mesosystem and parents as well. Meaning that teachers and parents communicate directly towards their child’s goals, such as, encouraging a child’s interest in reading, or even racing a low grade. The result would be that children’s will rely on their parents and teachers to pursue their goals and this will impact a teacher’s
Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory will be applied throughout this essay to delve into the reasoning behind particular behavioural issues. According to Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory, an individual has multiple environments known as their ecological systems (Bronfenbrenner, 1994). Bronfenbrenner (1994) suggests that a developing child is influenced by the relationships surrounding them and the best way to understand a child’s behaviour is to look at the numerous aspects of the child’s environment and how they interact with each other. The relationships and environments that the child interacts with have been separated into layers known as the microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem and the overarching chronosystem (Bronfenbrenner, 1994). The microsystem is the environment where the child has direct face-to-face relationships such as at home, day care and school (Bronfenbrenner, 1994). The relationships formed within the microsystem directly impact the development of a child (Bronfenbrenner, 1994). It is through the processes of repeated interactions with people, objects and symbols that the human develops (Bronfenbrenner, 1994). The second layer in the ecological model is the mesosystem, which is the interaction between two of the microsystems such as the relationship between a parent and a teacher (Bronfenbrenner, 1994). The exosystem is an external environment, with which the
Ecological theory is a theory developed by Urie Bronfenbrenner that states that the “systems” around you are vitally important in human development. Within the theory there are many systems including the microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem, and chronosystem. Each system is defined by a different aspect of a person’s surroundings that would affect their development. The systems begin with the aspect that is closest to you, your day-to-day life. The Microsystem includes all of the places, people, and experiences that are found in your daily life. These include school, work, parents. friends, neighbors, and so forth. The next most impactful system is the exosystem. The mesosystem is defined by two entities within your microsysytem affecting each other. The next system is called the exosystem. The exosystem is full of things that don’t affect you directly but will eventually
In Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory, there are five systems that ultimately influence an individual. The first system is the microsystem, which consists of the people who have direct contact to an individual. In my own life, my immediate family consists of my mother and I. I am an only child to my mother and since my mother and my father have been separated since I was a baby, he has not been part of my microsystem. In addition, I am also a student at CCP. I have a network of friends whom I keep in close contact with. The people that I encounter at home, school, and work have direct contact with me and thus, they are part of my microsystem.
The Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Theory focuses on how ones environment can affect a person’s development. It focuses on 5 main areas namely the Microsystem, Mesosystem, Exosystem, Macrosystem and Chronosystem (Bronfenbrenner, 1977, p. 514-515). Each system represents the setting in which they live in and how these people affect their growth. In this particular case study, Andy’s main influence is from the Microsystem and Mesosystem.
In my opinion, Brooks-Gunn’s argument that the aspects of your environment influences your development is a valid one. In my neighborhood, my peers were wonderful. Before I met them, I would typically just stay inside and watch television or play video games, and when I became friends with them, they would convince me to withdraw from my house to play with them daily. They convinced me to go to the park, play sports, or go on adventures through the neighborhood with them, and we would play outside from sunrise to sundown everyday. Thanks to my peers, I feel that I became more
In the social development theory,( Leo Vygotsky primarily) explains that socialization affects the learning process in an individual. It tries to explain consciousness or awareness as the result of socialization. This means that when we talk to our peers or adults, we talk to them for the sake of communication.
Moral ethics is the belief that all human beings are born to know right from wrong. We come into this world as good people, but the temptations and challenges in life influence our mind set to as it will. Every person on Earth chooses if they’re to follow through with their life of good or go down the path of bad. “A person’s moral ethics” (unknown.)
In the concept of Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems they played huge role to shape my character, values and so on to make me a better person right now that I still value them. For example, in my mesosytem to force me to be more religious because I studied in catholic school. Until now, I become more religious person and makes some more friends which it help me to build up my confident to my social activities. Also, my microsystem made me more independent because in my every early age I started to be help in house chores that helps me to be my foundation in the real world. Only few people will help out. So far, the concept of Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems still keeps continuing as I grow up and helps me to be more successful in the real world.