Theories Of Endogenous Conflict

1111 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Native american conflicts in america

In the town of Flatwater, tensions run high amongst the white farmers and the local Native Americans. Racism is abundant between the two groups, both taking shots at the other. In regards to this situation Robbins, S. P., Chatterjee, P., & Canda, E. R. (2011) theory of Endogenous Conflict, which is when conflict happens within a group or community. Robbins, S. P., Chatterjee, P., & Canda, E. R. (2011) states “It includes conflicts over changes, values, the distribution of desired resources, and authority” (pp. 61). The Indians are fighting with the farmers and the government over getting the rights back to their tribal land. The farmers are fighting with the Indians because they do not want to lose their land, which is their livelihood …show more content…

For the local Indians, the land that way owned by the farmers was set up with faulty land treaties and Tom, Mary Ann’s childhood friend is using that to get his tribe 's land back. According to Feagin (2014) Native Americans lost their right to create treaties with the United States government in 1871. Since then, federal administration has moving almost all living Native Americans to federally supervised reservations (Feagin, 2014, p. 37). Some federal policies even allowed whites to take even more land from the Native Americans, and pushed the Natives to incorporate the ways of the white man (Feagin, 2014, p.37). Mary Ann is being constantly torn between the two groups because she understands Tom’s issue and why he’s doing what he’s doing, plus she still sees him as one of her childhood best friends. On the other hand she is also a part of the Township Defense League, which includes her ex-husband and father as active members. The league strongly dislikes Tom and what he is trying to do. For Mary Ann she would be losing her family 's land along with her job at the factory which pays the bills and keeps food on the table. This internal battle with Mary Ann came to a head during a press conference that was held by Tom and a local Senator to …show more content…

Her emotional reactions this difficult situation could easily make her a target in her own group because she could be seen as a sympathizer for the Indians cause. Using Delgado’s (2012) Intersectionality theory based off of Critical Race Theory, Mary Ann’s plite puts her in two categories in the eyes of her peers, one being she is a woman and two she is an Indian sympathizer. Despite those two factors on Mary Ann her situation can be compared to Tom’s situation where both of their issues overlap one another despite having opposite views. Mary Ann wants to save her family 's land and her job ultimately to protect her family. Tom wants to regain his tribe 's land that is being butchered by the potato farmers so that he can protect his tribe, aka: his family, from becoming extinct eventually. Both want what is best for their group and both can see where the other is coming from in their views on the situation at hand. Mary Ann grew up with a racist father who moved them to get away from the African-Americans in the south to then be surrounded by Native Americans in the north. Mary Ann grew up with how her father talked about the different races and was ignorant to how the world was towards the Native Americans, this is shown when her friend Tom got called and “Apple” at school and she did not understand what they meant by

Show More
Related

  • Social Injustice in Roundhouse

    557 Words  | 2 Pages

    Lives for Native Americans on reservations have never quite been easy. There are many struggles that most outsiders are completely oblivious about. In her book The Roundhouse, Louise Erdrich brings those problems to light. She gives her readers a feel of what it is like to be Native American by illustrating the struggles through the life of Joe, a 13-year-old Native American boy living on a North Dakota reservation. This book explores an avenue of advocacy against social injustices. The most observable plight Joe suffers is figuring out how to deal with the injustice acted against his mother, which has caused strife within his entire family and within himself.

    Read More

  • Onandogas And Cayugas Summary

    961 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...4). By the 1760s, the whites and the Indians began “…asserting their…group solidarity” (10). This divided the two communities as they identified with each other and were willing to stand and defend their own group if needed. They felt that the boundaries between each other had to be further strengthened in order for them to fully disassociate from each other. The “savage” label was used to describe the Natives, which gave people a scapegoat to attack the Indians unprovoked. For example, there was an attack on a group of Natives by a group Scottish and Irish men called the Paxton Boys, which added to the tensions. Many reasons contributed to ill will between the Indians and whites, but Merritt believes that the main factor was race. This reading showed the hostility between the two groups, which ultimately led to a nasty and bloody breaking apart a few years later.

    Read More

  • A True History of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson by Mrs. Mary Rowlandson

    1274 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the times of colonies when land was untouched there was a distinct hatred between the native Indians and the new colonists. As one reads the essay: A True History of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson, written by Mary Rowlandson in 1682, one will understand this hatred. Although the Indians captured Mary Rowlandson, with the faith of God she was safely returned. The reader learns of her religious messages and how she turns to God for safety and strong will. One sees how her Puritan beliefs are of the strong New England Puritans way of life. The reader also understands through her words how she views the Indians and their way of life.

    Read More

  • The Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson

    1716 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the beginning of the narrative, Mary Rowlandson describes the manner in which the Indians invade her home, kill many of her friends, and drag her away from her husband and two children. She watches as the “murderous Wretches [burn] and [destroy]” her home before her eyes. It is the “dolefullest day that [her] eyes have ever [seen].” At this point in time, Mary has no knowledge of the Indian lifestyle, or even of their motive for ravaging the land of the colonists. She sees them merely as merciless heathens who come from Satan. Mary writes that before the incident, she said that if “the Indians should come, [she] should choose rather to be killed by them then [be] taken alive,”(124) but when that choice actually comes to her, she chooses to go with them, despite her unwillingness. At this point, she puts her life into the Indians’ hands. Once they leave the town, Mary and the Indians begin a series of “removes,” or moves to different areas of the New England wilderness. Mary describes the celebration rituals of the Indians, where they dance and chant, and “[make] the place a lively resemblance of hell!” Their unchristian lifestyle...

    Read More

  • Lakota Woman

    6839 Words  | 14 Pages

    Mary was born with the name Mary Brave Bird. She was a Sioux from the Rosebud Reservation in South Dakota. She belonged to the "Burned Thigh," the Brule Tribe, the Sicangu. The Brules are part of the Seven Sacred Campfires, the seven tribes of the Western Sioux known collectively as the Lakota. The Brule rode horses and were great warriors. Between 1870 and 1880 all Sioux were driven into reservations, fenced in and forced to give up everything. Her family settled in on the reservation in a small place called He-Dog. Her grandpa was a He-Dog and told about the Wounded Knee massacre. Almost three hundred Sioux men, women, and children were killed by white soldiers. Mary was called a iyeska, a breed which the white kids called her. She had white peoples blood in her. Her face was very Indian, but her skin was light. She hated being "white" and loved the summer because she would tan and make her look more Indian. She had a husband from the Crow Dogs which were full-bloods. They were the Sioux of the Sioux. Her people had very strong family ties and everyone cared for everyone. Still even though the white man has ruined their close family ties they have many traditions which keep the intermediate family closely tied together. The whites however completely destroyed the tiyospaye, which is the extended family like the grandparents, uncles and aunts, in-laws and cousins. The government tore the tiyospaye apart and forced the Sioux into the kind of relationship now called the nuclear family. Those who refused to be ruined by the government were pushed back in the country and into isolation and starvation. Her father, Bill Moore, was only part Indian and mostly white. He left almost immediately after Mary was born becaus...

    Read More

  • The Frontier as a Place of Ethnic and Religion Conflict by Patricia Nelson Limerick

    1414 Words  | 3 Pages

    The eastern frontier became the start of the “melting pot” due to many settlers coming in and settling in different areas in America. However, once people start migrating towards the west, everyone started to travel together and settle in together with people who were of the same race or ethnic group. Because many people settled together in the western frontier, racial tension rose between each group. For example, before the migration into the frontier, there was already discrimination between the whites and the Natives and blacks. Some wondered which race was better than the other, Natives or blacks, and what about Asians, how superior are the Asians, or the Hispanics (52). In the western frontier,...

    Read More

  • Causes of War: Systemic vs. Domestic

    1789 Words  | 4 Pages

    The purpose of this essay is to inform on the similarities and differences between systemic and domestic causes of war. According to World Politics by Jeffry Frieden, David Lake, and Kenneth Schultz, systemic causes deal with states that are unitary actors and their interactions with one another. It can deal with a state’s position within international organizations and also their relationships with other states. In contract, domestic causes of war pertain specifically to what goes on internally and factors within a state that may lead to war. Wars that occur between two or more states due to systemic and domestic causes are referred to as interstate wars.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Not Like Us

    989 Words  | 2 Pages

    With hope that they could even out an agreement with the Government during the progressive era Indian continued to practice their religious beliefs and peacefully protest while waiting for their propositions to be respected. During Roosevelt’s presidency, a tribe leader who went by as No Shirt traveled to the capital to confront them about the mistreatment government had been doing to his people. Roosevelt refused to see him but instead wrote a letter implying his philosophical theory on the approach the natives should take “if the red people would prosper, they must follow the mode of life which has made the white people so strong, and that is only right that the white people should show the red people what to do and how to live right”.1 Roosevelt continued to dismiss his policies with the Indians and encouraged them to just conform into the white’s life style. The destruction of their acres of land kept being taken over by the whites, which also meant the destruction of their cultural backgrounds. Natives attempted to strain from the white’s ideology of living, they continued to attempt with the idea of making acts with the government to protect their land however they never seemed successfully. As their land later became white’s new territory, Indians were “forced to accept an ‘agreement’” by complying to change their approach on life style.2 Oklahoma was one of last places Natives had still identity of their own, it wasn’t shortly after that they were taken over and “broken by whites”, the union at the time didn’t see the destruction of Indian tribes as a “product of broken promises but as a triumph for American civilization”.3 The anger and disrespect that Native tribes felt has yet been forgotten, white supremacy was growing during the time of their invasion and the governments corruption only aid their ego doing absolutely nothing for the Indians.

    Read More

  • The Sociological Effects of Residential Schools

    970 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to conservative conflict theory, society is a struggle for dominance among competing social groups defined by class, race, and gender. Conflict occurs when groups compete over power and resources. (Tepperman, Albanese & Curtis 2012. pg. 167) The dominant group will exploit the minority by creating rules for success in their society, while denying the minority opportunities for such success, thereby ensuring that they continue to monopolize power and privilege. (Crossman.n.d) This paradigm was well presented throughout the film. The European settlers in Canada viewed the natives as obstacles in their quest of expansion by conquering resources and land. They feared that the aboriginal practices and beliefs will disrupt the cohesion of their own society. The Canadian government adopted the method of residential schools for aboriginal children for in an attempt to assimilate the future generations. The children were stripped of their native culture,...

    Read More

  • The Dakota 38: A Documentary Analysis: The Dakota 38

    959 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Native Americans were promised a large amount of private land for their families to live on forever in peace. As time went on throughout the years, Native Americans started to see their land shrink by acres. This was unsettling to many of the Natives and would start to raise problems with the white soldiers. By having the Promised Land taken away from them it would only start to add fuel to the fire before the Indians would attack back. Taking of land was of several items that would start to enrage the Indians. The next item that I took away from class was how the U.S. would continuously steal from the Native people and made it evident in the video. The U.S. would continually steal Native American money for their benefit. This would not help the Indians moving forward in trying to provide a life for their family. U.S. agents would withhold Native Americans money that was given to them from their federal government. It was the payment for the land that U.S. bought from them. The United States (US) would continue to make numerous treaty violations by having to make Natives make payments to Indian agents who would use the money for what they want. With all of this occurring, it caused an increased number of families to stricken of hunger and adds to the never-ending hardship among the Dakota tribes in Minnesota. This would all boil over to having the Great Sioux Revolt that would trigger the infamous Dakota

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Conflict And External Conflicts

    1143 Words  | 3 Pages

    “We all fight on two fronts, the one facing the enemy, the other facing what we do to the enemy” (Boyden 199).

    Read More

  • The Subjugation Of The American West

    1214 Words  | 3 Pages

    The movement westward during the late 1800’s created new tensions among already strained relations with current Native American inhabitants. Their lands, which were guaranteed to them via treaty with the United States, were now beginning to be intruded upon by the massive influx of people migrating from the east. This intrusion was not taken too kindly, as Native American lands had already been significantly reduced due to previous westward conquest. Growing resentment for the federal government’s Reservation movement could be felt among the native population. One Kiowa chief’s thoughts on this matter summarize the general feeling of the native populace. “All the land south of the Arkansas belongs to the Kiowas and Comanches, and I don’t want to give away any of it” (Edwards, 203). His words, “I don’t want to give away any of it”, seemed to a mantra among the Native Americans, and this thought would resound among them as the mounting tensions reached breaking point.

    Read More

  • Comparison Of The Pequot War And King Phillip's War

    1025 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Pontiac, chief of the Ottawa Indians, is trying to take Detroit, and the neighboring Indian groups join in and help. They have become disenchanted with the French, plus the French aren’t really there anymore. They hate the English. They want their land back. Starting to succeed and the British negotiate and reach a settlement. In order to keep Pontiac happy, no settlement allowed in the Frontier region. An imaginary line is drawn down the Appalachian Mountains, colonist cannot cross it. This doesn’t last long, in 1768 & 1770, Colonists work with the Iroquois and Cherokee and succeed in pushing back the line and send in surveyors. Colonists begin to settle. So, despite this line, colonists push west anyway” (Griffin, PP4, 9/16/15). During the Revolutionary War, “Native Americans fought for both sides, but mostly for the British, thought they stood to be treated more fairly by British than colonists. Those that fought against the colonists were specifically targeted to be destroyed during battles. There were no Native American representatives at the treaty meetings at the end of the war” (Griffin, PP8, 9/21/15). Even the Native American’s thought of their women, because they believed “an American victory would have tragic consequences: their social roles would be dramatically changed and their power within their communities diminished” (Berkin,

    Read More

  • Realistic Conflict Theory

    1388 Words  | 3 Pages

    Realistic Conflict Theory As one of the oldest social psychology theories, the Realistic Conflict Theory deals with the conflict and hostility that is projected to arise between individuals or groups competing over the same limited resources. Therefore, as a resource, opportunity, or even goal, becomes harder to obtain, the amount of aggression is projected to increase as well. This theory is not only visible in many everyday situations, but it also establishes a basis for which discrimination and prejudice can be partly explained. The initial study of this theory was conducted in a three-step experiment.

    Read More

  • How External Conflicts impact Internal Conflicts

    605 Words  | 2 Pages

    The perception of thought and observation of the stories contains external conflicts that will enforce feelings for the internal conflict. In Long Walk to Freedom, Nelson Mandela’s life changes drastically with his father’s lost title, which leads to a new, positive environment for Mandela. The protagonist, Mandela, and his father were both in a high status but are now living in Qunu as regular people of the village. Mandela creates new toys for himself and plays with village boys. Although his bonds with his father are not very powerful, Mandela enjoys his new life. On the other hand, in “The Death Of A Tree”, Teale demonstrates the imagery of a dying tree and the importance of what it means to one family. The stories “The Death of A Tree and “A Long Walk To Freedom” have internal conflicts which demonstrates Mandela’ feelings towards his father, on the other hand the external which is the relationship between the death of the tree and the family loss.

    Read More

More about Theories Of Endogenous Conflict

Open Document