Theoretical Perspectives and the Sociology of Religion A theory, according to James M. Henslin, the author of our text, is “A general statement about how some parts of the world fit together and how they work; an explanation of how two or more facts are related to one another” (Henslin, 2015). The three theoretical perspectives (conflict theory, functionalism, and symbolic interactionism) are each separate views— stances taken by sociologists that help us better understand how social interactions work. Henslin says, “Each theory is like a lens through which we can view social life.” (Henslin, 2015) I placed the three theoretical perspectives in the order above because it is my thesis that conflict theory is the broadest of the three theories …show more content…
That being said, success is the ultimate goal of the human being and it should be the goal of the sociologist to attain it. Symbolic interactionism is sort of like an intensive version of functionalism. If functionalism is neuropathy, then symbolic interactionism is biochemistry, and conflict theory is a histamine blocker. There isn’t much good that comes from conflict theory. According to the text, by definition, conflict theory “stresses that society is composed of groups that compete with one another for scarce resources” (Henslin, 2015) (notice the use of the word “resources”); and “The central idea of symbolic interactionism is that symbols— things to which we attach meaning— are the key to understanding how we view the world and communicate with one another” (Henslin, 2015). My theory is that conflict theory is impractical, and that without these “symbols” we would never know how to function as a “social framework.” Just as a tree cannot reproduce unless it produces seeds, in this same manner, social framework cannot continue unless it produces symbols. It’s a …show more content…
How would you describe your first experience with God? What does God mean to you? It would be very difficult to explain your experience with God without words. According to Henslin, “Symbolic interactionists focus on the meaning that people give their experiences, especially how they use symbols” (Henslin, 2015, emphasis mine). The words provide the religious group with what I call spiritual nourishment. I was a case worker at a prison ministry for two years. One thing I learned very quickly is that prisoners are very quick to justify and rationalize everything they do. Prison guards will tell you, prisoners will come up with a reason for why they had to rob a convenience store, why they had to kill that person, or why they were embezzling money from the federal government. For example, much of the envy and strife that I saw within the prison ministry stemmed from confusion and misunderstanding, not from physical harm. More specifically, from the mere confusion between the definitions of the words “condone” and “forgive.” To condone a behavior or habit is to allow that habit to form. Under no circumstances does one who condones an evil try to stop the behavior in any way, nor does it inquire about it. The one who condones evil is not concerned with the dysfunctions that will inevitably occur; latent or manifest. As a Christian who worked in a prison ministry, I was constantly forgiving people
One of the sociological theories is conflict theory. The conflict theory deals with people's level on wealth, or class. The conflict theory says that social change is beneficial, contrary to focuses on social order. In the story of the woman and her children, the conflict theory plays a big role on the situation. Police of higher class are threatening the homeless woman. The conflict theory is a constant struggle of people of higher class over powering people of lower class, or the weaker. The police are trying to over power the woman by telling her to leave. Even though the woman and her children were doing nothing wrong, the police used their power to tell her to leave. Also the people of the area showed their conflict theory by telling the police officers to come. They must have felt embarrassed to have a woman of such lower class to be around them. They used their power of class to have the woman removed from their community. The woman wants to be there because she has no home and it is a good community to be in, but the people look at it as an embarrassment to them because it makes their area look bad for someone of such lower class to be around them. The conflict theory is unique to all other theories because it separates people into categories determined by their wealth and standards. Their status is the element that categorizes them, weather it is class, race, or gender. The conflict theory do not always use class, race, and gender all at once. In this situation race and gender is not a main issue, although gender could be a reason, but it would fall under the feminist theory. This story is mainly dealing with class. Through all this conflict the woman feels over powered and domina...
In this paper will be talking about the three sociological perspectives as it pertains to the fraternities and sororities in today’s world. I have chosen this topic because it can be easily understood in all three perspectives.
1 Most sociologists interpret social life from one of three major theoretical frameworks or theories: symbolic interactionism, functional analysis, or conflict theory. Describe the major points and key concepts of each framework. List at least one sociologist who is identified with each of these three frameworks.
are the three major paradigms that function in today’s society. Functionalist, and conflict paradigms are macro-sociological paradigms. Symbolic interaction is a micro-sociological paradigm. Functionalist paradigm focuses on the integration of society, while social conflict focuses on the issue of division among society. Symbolic interaction works on communication and social change as a consequence. The three paradigms are completely different from each other in a social point of view. The macro-sociological paradigms view America as an inequality state. The social conflict paradigm fits today’s society.
In sociology we have learned about the three major sociological perspectives which are; symbolic interactionism, functionalism, or conflict theory. Conflict theory is my favorite topic that I learned about this year. Conflict theory was founded by Karl Marx that claims society is in a state of perpetual conflict due to competition for limited resources. Conflict theory holds that social order is maintained by domination and power, rather than consensus and conformity. The main elements in social conflict are that society is created in ways to benefit the higher class, and factors such as race, sex, class, and age are likely to experience social inequality. To a social conflict theorist, it is all about dominant group vs. minority group relations. Karl Marx is considered the 'father ' of social conflict theory. The movie “The Hunger Games” shows many examples of social conflict throughout the whole movie.
“In sociology, a theory is the framework for analysis that outlines what to focus on and provides predictions about logical outcomes within the framework.” (Durkin & Carrothers, 2015, Ch. 1.3, para 1) Sociologists have been trying to create a single theory to give explanations and understandings towards social and human behavior. However, this has only caused more theoretical perspectives to sprout and has led to the creation of three main theoretical perspectives within sociology. These perspectives are used to explain the social behavior and phenomena that are experienced and shown by humans. The perspectives are functionalism, conflict theory, and symbolic interaction. This paper will focus on conflict theory and the influence that Karl
Sociologists study social phenomena at many different levels and different perspectives. They look at the small and large details of the society and the social behaviors. Sociologists today make use of three primary theoretical perspectives knows as the: the symbolic interactionism, the functionalist perspective, and the conflict perspective. These perspectives offer sociologists theoretical models to explain how society influences people, and contrariwise. Each perspective theorizes society, social forces, and human behavior.
Sociology is a part of everyday life. People experience sociological changes when they get married, get a new job, or get discriminated against. All of these things can alter a person’s perspective on a group of people or even the world. Since the beginning of this class, I have personally endured several sociological changes in my life. I recently started a new job. I’m meeting new and wonderful people and I no longer dread having to go to work. I have also begun setting plans for my wedding to the one girl who I know will make everyday better than the one before. But, perhaps the one instance that has affected me the most and the deepest was when my parents got a divorce.
There are three main theories of sociology; functionalism, conflict theory and symbolic interactionism. This paper will focus on two of those theories, functionalism and conflict theory. The objective is to delineate the assumptions of two out of the three theoretical perspectives and apply these assumptions to an analysis of social stratification. How this will be accomplished will be by comparing and contrasting their assumptions and by analyzing the two theories affect on social stratification. Then I will state my opinion on which of the two better fits my personal sociological views. Functionalism is many people's way to view the world sociologically. It states clearly that the objectivity of the researcher is necessary and can be accomplished. There are three main points, which make up a functionalist theory on sociological expression. The first point is that culture is made up of interacting, interdependent parts. Each of these parts has a function in maintaining the society as a system on the whole. The second point states that shared values and expectations(or beliefs) among the members of the society help hold the society together. The third point states that these systems have a need for stability and a need to try to keep all the parts working together congruously in a sort of system. Social change in this system is uncommon, and when it does happen, it is a very gradual change. Conflict theory is centered on the tension, or struggle that goes on in everyday life. There are many different parts, which make up the conflict theorist's view on the sociological perspective. The first main part is that society promotes general differences in wealth, power, and prestige. Wealth...
The sociological perspective plays a significant role in everyday living, although many are unaware of the specific impact this perspective may have on our lives. This perspective studies human behaviors and the way certain society factors impact such behaviors. There are three main sociology perspective groups, the conflict perspective, functionalist, and the symbolic interactionist perspective (Mooney, Knox, and Schacht, 2007). Between my extracurricular activities, education, and workplace, the sociological perspective plays a significant role in my life. Today, I currently live in a society that has had a great foundation and plays an enormous role on my behavior and the things I’m able to do, as reflected by my extracurricular activities,
We measure health so that we are aware of what illness are the most common in a certain area for example Walsall. By measuring health and illness we are able to find out what types of people are affected by a particular illness and the social group that it affects are categorised into. There are many ways of measuring health and illness for example it is usually measure in different social groups for example age, gender, ethnicity and location. Health and illness can also be measured in surveys, for example in local areas you might be asked to complete a survey or questionnaires in a hospital about your current health condition. Hospitals, clinic and doctors surgeries also
In the textbook Sociology chapter one talks about three sociological theories: functionalist, conflict, and interactionism. All three sociological theories have something to do with each social institution. Functionalist perspective is a sociological approach that emphasizes the way of which the parts of a society are structured to maintain its stability (Schaefer, 24). Functionalist applies to the education sociological institution by teaching knowledge and skills, cultural transmission, social control, and some agents of structured change. All of these are important in making sure that education is structured to maintain its stability. The conflict perspective is a sociological approach that assumes that social behavior is best understood in terms of tension between groups over power or the allocation of resources, including housing, money, access to services, and political representation (Schaefer, 24). Conflict applies to the education sociological institution by reproducing social order, using hidden curriculum, intolerance and inequality, credentialism, and status. Using hidden curriculum refers to standards of behavior that are deemed proper y society and are taught subtly in schools (Schaefer, 315). Status refers to standardized testing, tracking, public/private, gender, class, and role. And then there is the interactionism perspective. Interactionism perspective is a sociological approach that generalizes about everyday forms of social interaction in order to explain society as a whole (Schaefer, 24).
While functionalist and conflict perspectives are represented through societal cohesiveness and societal engagement symbolic interactionism shows the signifigance of it all. Society is symbolic interactionism. It's emphasizes of how society mingles and intertwines within itself through conflict and resloution every moment of everyday. Without interaction we would all be hermits or living in underground bunkers fading away. It would all become nothingness and it's history would be a distant
Sociologists employ three major theoretical perspectives in sociology today. They are the structural-functionalist perspective, the conflict perspective, and the symbolic interactionism. The structural-functionalist perspective is done at a macro level and its focus is on the relationships between the parts of society. The Conflict perspective is done at a macro level and its main focus is on how the wealthy controls the poor and weak. Symbolic Interactionism is done at a micro and it focuses on the use of symbols and face to face interactions.
When it comes to comprehending or understanding any concept to why individuals may do some of the things they do, there are social theories out there to help better explain those actions. Sociological theories help to focus more on the aspect of social life, as well as explain behaviors that can be driven by passion, tradition, self-interest, religion, and the laws we have set out today in stone. “Unlike scientific theories, social theories tend to be more evaluative and critical than the theories in the natural sciences” (Appelrouth A. S.; Edles D. L 2012) Today, an analytical frame is used to help guide the comparing and contrasting of the several theoretical perspectives and traditions. In simpler terms, this four way frame is basically used to help compare and contrast theorist better. There are four main cells that make up this analytical frame which include, individual-rational, individual-nonrational, collective-rational, and collective-nonrational. Also included into this basic theoretical orientation or framework, are the core classical theorists. Those influential theorists included into the framework are Mead, who falls into the individual-nonrational side, Durkheim whom falls into the collective-nonrational side, Weber whom falls into the collective-rational side, and Marx who is also included into the collective-rational side.