Theodore Roosevelt New Nationalism Summary

2307 Words5 Pages

Roosevelt’s speech possessed a groundbreaking appeal. Theodore Roosevelt’s “New Nationalism Speech” called for a revolution – a reform in the nations economy, policies and social justice, in particular for those who were underprivileged. He called for an increase in federal power to regulate the interstate industry. He strains on the need for a clear distinction between property rights and human rights in order for the nation to prosper. If the country was to prosper internationally, Roosevelt stressed on the need of a large Army and Navy capable to protect the nations interests abroad. To be the “mightiest nation,” Roosevelt explained, the nation could not be divided, it couldn’t be composed of “a dozen little squabbling contemptible commonwealths.” …show more content…

The fear of losing a child to the dangers of the factory are unknown to the elite. They are so occupied with one’s private affairs they fail to acknowledge their empire depends on the commoner. Corporates are the privileged self-centered part of this era’s society. As far as the actions needed by the working man to help change the nation’s inequality, he should acknowledge property as a desirable positive good to be obtained by “the fruit of labor.” [7] The speech emphasizes how hard work pays off. Two conclusions can be derived from the speech without outside knowledge: either the working man does not work hard enough to have obtained the desired property or the hardworking man possesses a certain disadvantage where his hard work is not being paid off. Either derivation needs to be substantially significant to create enough concern where it is addressed in a presidential candidate’s speech. My guess would be that laborers are not being paid enough for their work. I can only imagine the frustration in the people’s hearts who are being told “hard work pays …show more content…

Web. 13 June 2016. The biggest misleading statement is in regard to the government needing more power on a state and Federal level to protect the interest of the people. The Founding Fathers and Lincoln himself believed there should be a separation in powers to avoid a central unity to govern. As far as what constitutes to too much power, it is not clearly defined in our documents. This leads to a doorway of interpretations – interpretations where leaders of the country can miss use the power for their own self-interests. How long would it take the government to free itself from “the sinister influence of control of special interests?” [8] A year? Three years? Ten years? Never – the problems keep evolving? Roosevelt does not explicitly state who long it would take to free itself (an estimated guess would have been just fine) not does he every clearly referees as to who are these “special interests.” By the context and era of the paper I will infer they are the Corporation. To achieve equality, “special interest” groups were intended to show “complete and effective publicity” of their corporate affairs. [9] I questioned the ability to have achieved the publication of the

Open Document