Theme Of Self Division In Othello

1239 Words3 Pages

“[A prince] needs to not depart from good, when possible, but know how to enter into evil, when forced by necessity” (The Prince 70). Here Machiavelli mentions an underlying principle that an ideal ruler must establish a balance between moral good and necessary evil. Yet, can an individual keep balance between good and evil acts? Shakespeare would argue otherwise. Through Shakespeare 's portrayal of Othello, one can observe that once an individual enters into evil, he or she is bound to evil and therefore should avoid entering evil at all. Ultimately, Shakespeare 's presentation of self-division, one where an individual is only capable of controlling either good or evil, but not maintain both, is more plausible than Machiavelli 's presentation
For instance, Othello 's speech before he decides to kill Desdemona is a clear example of self-division promulgated by his conflicted thoughts. Othello says “It is the cause… yet I 'll not shed her blood… yet she must die” (Othello 5.2.3). In this example, Shakespeare portrays the concept of self-division through Othello 's thought process. The repetition of “yet” indicates his self-division. He is troubled at the thought of killing Desdemona because he loves her, but also believes she deserves to die because he believes she betrayed their marriage. Shakespeare 's depiction of self-division is focused on Othello, whose emotional conflict impedes him from making a moral decision and ultimately leads him to becoming corrupt. Shakespeare does not indicate that Othello can maintain a balance between good and evil, rather, Othello merely succumbs to evil. Individuals in The Prince and Othello experience self-division differently and for different purposes. However, each author also presents a different interpretation about human nature in both texts. In Othello, Shakespeare presents the concept that a human is incapable of balancing both good and evil and therefore should avoid evil altogether and pursue virtue. On the other hand, Machiavelli argues that a human is capable of balancing moral good and necessary evil without succumbing to either too much cruelty or

Open Document