Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The giver critical analysis
Symbolism example in the giver
Analysis essay on The Giver
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The giver critical analysis
Is Sameness the Answer? Could you imagine a world where everything is the same? Lois Lowry wrote a novel called The Giver to show her idea of a perfect, or utopian world. Here, there is Sameness. Sameness is when there is no variety in anything and everything is alike. Jonas, the main character, is a 12 year old boy living in this utopian world. The community controls everything that the people do. This is how the community has Sameness. Jonas soon finds out when he is selected to be The Receiver of Memory, that his utopian world may not be as great as he thought it was. Losses of people are forgotten, there is climate control, and everyone is color-blind. These characteristics of the society are equal, painless, and protectful. To …show more content…
When someone dies in the town, the people have a ceremony where the entire community chants the name of the lost person. As the day moves on, the chanting gets softer and eventually it is just a murmur. After this, the lossed member of the community is never mentioned again. “The entire community had performed the Ceremony of Loss together, murmuring the name Caleb throughout an entire day, less and less frequently, softer in volume, as the long and somber day went on, so that the little Four seemed to fade away gradually from everyone’s consciousness.” (44) Therefore, people do not dwell on losses of people. This can be utopian because people do not feel the grief and sadness of loss. It causes no pain and suffering for anyone, and people are not greatly affected by one’s death. This can also be dystopian because it is important to have love in your life. People are not affected in this society by losses because they never loved the person. It is better to love and then lose than to never have loved at all. Jonas is discouraged with this because he is starting to feel love toward people and he would like to remember someone he had lost after they had died. Even though Ceremony of Loss helps people not to grieve and be upset, there is no substitution or replacement for the love of someone, and ignoring someone’s death is not an appropriate
The Giver and Matched are both futuristic societies with a lot of rules. In The Giver the Elders choose their match as well as their children. Jonas starts loving Fiona but isn’t allowed and stops taking the pill. In Matched the officials choose their match but they can have their own children. Cassia is matched with Xander but also loves Ky and doesn't know what to do. In both story they all get jobs for the rest of their lives but in Matched they just call it vocations. Jonas gets the Receiver of memory and Cassia is supposed to be the sorter.
The utopian communities Logan and Jonas inhabit are both controlled by the state. Logan's world is run completely by machines that manage births and deaths, food supply, and recreation. Jonas's world is managed by an extensive set of rules that spell out exactly what citizens do throughout their lives. For both these protagonists, the community is a safe haven and the concept of "outside" for Logan, and "Elsewhere" for Jonas are worrisome. The state in both of these communities regulate death but have sugar-coated the idea through vague language or ceremonies that promise rebirth. Logan and Jonas begin to see through the deception and rebel against it by opposing the rules and escaping from what seemed to be perfect communities.
Sameness is the quality or state of being alike or of not changing. Everyone is same in Jonas’s community. Sameness has both advantages and disadvantages, but more advantages in The Giver by Lois Lowry.
Throughout the history of the world, there has been many societies. All these societies had similar structures and ideas, but they all are different by their own special traditions and ways of life. Similarly, both our society and the society in The Giver share similar ideas, but they are different in certain areas. For example, they both celebrate birthdays and have family units, but they have their own way of doing so. Based on the celebration of birthdays and the formation of family units, our society is better than the society in The Giver by Lois Lowry.
The apple in The Giver symbolizes change. In Jonas’s visions he “had noticed, following the path of the apple through the air with this eyes, that the piece of fruit had-well, this was the part he couldn't adequately understand - the apple had changed. Just for an instant.” (21-22) This shows Jonas has the power to see beyond, he is experiencing the color red. Change may happen even by accident but that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s bad. Such as in this case where changing continuously allowed Jonas to help others constantly by taking the burden of all the pain in the world because of a mistake in genetic engineering. As you can tell sameness, precision, and indistinguishable people doesn’t mean perfection. Change is necessary to allow everyone a chance to grow, to experience, to grow as a person and in their jobs, to be unique, and different. That way
The term The Giver refers to the old man, the former receiver who transfers all his memories to Jonas. The names giver and receiver remind us that memories are meant to be shared, the function of the old man is not holding memories but passing them from one person to another. That is why the title is not memory keepers' .The old man becomes the giver as Jonas becomes the receiver. Jonas also becomes the giver when he transfers his memories to Gabriel. But more interestingly, Jonas becomes the giver when he gives his memories to Gabriel (Booker10).
The story in The Giver by Lois Lowry takes place in a community that is not normal. People cannot see color, it is an offense for somebody to touch others, and the community assigns people jobs and children. This unnamed community shown through Jonas’ eye, the main character in this novel, is a perfect society. There is no war, crime, and hunger. Most readers might take it for granted that the community in The Giver differs from the real society. However, there are several affinities between the society in present day and that in this fiction: estrangement of elderly people, suffering of surrogate mothers, and wanting of euthanasia.
Throughout quarters 3 and 4 we have touched on many of the essential questions that we have learned about throughout the year, but I feel we have touched mostly on how do experiences help define who we are and who we will become and how can choices impact an outcome. So with those two questions I had came up with a thesis statement to sum up those questions with things that had happened in real life and what we have learned during third and fourth quarter. My thesis statement is, Our actions define who we are and who we will become in life.
What is the basis for being called a hero? Is it as simple as doing good deeds for others without asking anything in return? Or, do we sacrifice our lives to save the others? Empathy may become a standard for heroism. We can all be considered heroes by the small acts that we do, as long as we choose to better our society. In the book The Giver by Lois Lowry, Lowry tells the story of a young 11-year-old boy Jonas who lives in “the community.” The people of the community all practice “Sameness,” where there is no war, death, and suffering. There is no freedom of choice in the society, which is why Jonas decides to leave his hometown. Everyone and everything are treated equally. Despite abandoning his community, Jonas is an example of a heroic character and demonstrates true meaning of heroism. Using the outline of The Hero’s Journey, the outline justifies
society, everyone wears the same clothes, follows the same rules, and has a predetermined life. A community just like that lives inside of Lois Lowry’s The Giver and this lack of individuality shows throughout the whole book. This theme is demonstrated through the control of individual appearance, behavior, and ideas.
Lois Lowry’s utopian novel, the giver, tells the story of a young boy named Jonas whom lives in a world of sameness. The intriguing story addresses issues that are destroying today's society. As readers we can see that sameness benefits towards a perfect world by eliminating racism and discrimination, removing differences in looks, meaning no one is unique and eradicating poverty. Sameness in the giver creates a united and inclusive community where no one feels judged.
In the book, ‘The Giver’ by Lois Lowry, the theme’s are probably the most important thing that can be discussed. What are the theme’s, you may ask, well in my opinion, the two major themes are being an individual means knowing when to conform and when to rebel, which basically means if you are independant you know the right time to stay together and when to do something on your own. The other theme is humanity cannot exist without memories and feelings, which basically means memories are forever, you can’t get rid of them, but with memories comes feelings for you can’t feel nothing when riding the rollercoaster, which is life. I’ve decided to develop the theme humanity cannot exist without memories or feelings because I feel that this is pretty
Throughout history, people had made numerous futile attempts to create an Utopian society. The term "Utopia" depicts on an imaginary ideal state. Such a state is describe in The Giver. In The Giver, Jonas's community believes in the renunciation of personal properties, rights, one's unique characteristics and of binding personal relationships (such as marriage). This society is believed to be perfect, free of pain and sorrow; everything is under control and "same". This serene society greatly contradict with the one we live in. Our society is furnished with hatred and warfare, yet in return, we are given freedom and the privilege of having distinctive characters. Given the nature of human beings, our society is more idealistic to live in.
Jonas hates how his society decides to keep memories a secret from everyone. Jonas says: “The worst part of holding the memories is not the pain. It’s the loneliness of it. Memories need to be shared” (Lowry 154). Jonas feels that memories, whether it be good or bad, should be shared with everyone. Furthermore, memories allow the community to gain wisdom from remembering experiences of the past. As for The Giver, The Giver disagrees with how the community runs things. He believes that memories should be experienced by everyone as well, because life is meaningless without memories. The Giver says: “There are so many things I could tell them; things I wish they would change. But they don’t want change. Life here is so orderly, so predictable–so painless. It’s what they’ve chosen [...] It’s just that… without memories, it’s all meaningless. They gave that burden to me” (Lowry 103). The Giver is burdened with the responsibility to not share memories even though that is what he feels the community deserves. In addition, he believes the community lives a very monotonous life where nothing ever changes. Everything is meaningless without memories because the community does not know what it is like to be human without feelings. Overall, Jonas and The Giver’s outlooks on their “utopian” society change as they realize that without
Jonas’ community chooses Sameness rather than valuing individual expression. Although the possibility of individual choice sometimes involves risk, it also exposes Jonas to a wide range of joyful experiences from which his community has been shut away. Sameness may not be the best thing in the community because Jonas expresses how much he feels like Sameness is not right and wants there to be more individuality. Giver leads him to understand both the advantages and the disadvantages of personal choice, and in the end, he considers the risks worth the benefits. “Memories are forever.”