More handpicked essays just for you.
Racial inequality in society
Social inequality between blacks and whites regarding education
An essay on the theme of the necklace
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Racial inequality in society
The theme of “The Necklace” is greed. I’ve observed that Ms.T_ has a really adamantine job. She is a teacher that a lot of kids have problems with, since they do not want to do what she wants them to do. These kids are lazy and don’t care about anything but their own selves. Ms.T_ wanted us to get on social media for our finals, well kids decided they were going to rant over this because they thought they were not learning anything. Little did they know Ms.T_ has plenty up her sleeve. They thought it would be a superior idea to go tell Ms.H_ because they thought they were going to make everyone’s lives better. Kids in this generation have no idea what they have gotten their own selves into. What these kids have done is make Ms.T_ life hard
6. (CC) Since Madame Loisel is the protagonist; I would say the necklace itself is the antagonist. As you can tell from the title of this short story, the necklace is the center of the conflict that is created to the Loisels. It is after Madame loses the necklace that all the trouble begins. Also, the necklace causes them misery and they end up being in debt. Madame and her husband had to work harder than they ever before to pay off the
which explains well how she had a finite amount of money and thought material wealth was more important than happiness. If she only knew before that she would spend the next decade working off her debt, she would have never asked for the necklace and she would have had a happy life. Furthermore, wealth isn’t the only thing that brings happiness to life. With an easy explanation, it explains how having material possessions doesn’t matter, because the moments we have are more valuable.
Ten years of suffering is the cost of having pleasure for only one night! In “The Necklace,” by Guy de Maupassant presents Mathilde Loisel, an attractive, charming but vacuous and selfish middle class lady transforms to selfness, poor, satisfied and hard-working lady. Even though, Mathidle owns a comfortable home and married to a faithful and kind husband, Monsieur Loisel, who seeks her happiness and satisfaction; she was ungrateful to the things that she had been given, because her greed and desire of wealth had captured her thoughts and blurred the real meaning of happiness in her perspective. Mathidle spends most of her time surfing in her day dreams of being wealthy and suffering from accepting the reality, because her imagination was more than she could not afford. One day Mathidle’s husband brought his wife an invitation for a fancy party, but as a result of their low income, Mathidle’s was ashamed to wear flowers as decoration, so she decided to borrow an expensive looking necklace from a friend of her, Madame Forestier. After attending the fabulous party and spending a memorable great time looking stunningly beautiful, Mathidle discovers that she had lost the expensive necklace that she borrowed, so she decides to buy a similar copy of the necklace to her friend after loaning an enormous amount of money and narrowing the house outcome. The author surprises his readers with a perfectly detailed twist at the end of the story. Losing the necklace was a turning point in Mathidle’s life and the best thing that ever happened to her.
Authors choose to use symbols for various reasons in short stories. It is a way for them to use on object or idea to convey many different meanings to the audience. In “The Necklace,” the author Guy de Maupassant uses a very lavish looking necklace as his main symbol. The necklace helps defining what type of woman Mme. Loisel is. It also acts as the central conflict of the story. The symbolism that is used throughout this story is crucial to revealing the theme and understanding the main character.
Around the world, values are expressed differently. Some people think that life is about the little things that make them happy. Others feel the opposite way and that expenses are the way to live. In Guy de Maupassant’s short story, “The Necklace”, he develops a character, Madame Loisel, who illustrates her different style of assessments. Madame Loisel, a beautiful woman, lives in a wonderful home with all the necessary supplies needed to live. However, she is very unhappy with her life. She feels she deserves a much more expensive and materialistic life than what she has. After pitying herself for not being the richest of her friends, she goes out and borrows a beautiful necklace from an ally. But as she misplaces the closest thing she has to the life she dreams of and not telling her friend about the mishap, she could have set herself aside from ten years of work. Through many literary devices, de Maupassant sends a message to value less substance articles so life can be spent wisely.
The Necklace also displays distinctive realism in the use of socioeconomic influences which are essential to the plot. The major conflict in the story would be absent and the theme would not be obtainable without Mathilde Loisel’s insecurity about her own socioeconomic reputation. An example of Loisel’s self-deprivation nature is presented when she realizes she does not have a necklace, she says “I shall look absolutely no one. I would almost rather not go to the party” (Maupassant, sec. 3). Another example of the self-conflict caused by social pressure is Loisel’s immediate attempt to replace the necklace and her reluctance to speak to her friend Madame Forestier about the necklace for ten whole years. If she were not conflicted by societal pressures she might have avoided the whole situation altogether. The Necklace establishes a realistic difference in value between the necklaces and proposed clothing. Her husband proposes flowers which were valued 10 franks so in any case if she had chosen the flowers there would have been an insignificant economic loss. Her decision not to tell her friend about the necklace ends up costing her seven times the worth of the original. The roses symbolize the simpler things in life to the theme of the story. Mathilde Loisel’s withered appearance at the end
However, it can be the hardest to realize and figure out what it is, as some stories can make you think about what the theme really is. The theme is what the story is about. In “The Necklace” by Guy De Maupassant, the theme of this story is to never be ashamed of one’s place in society and always tell the truth or it could cost. It certainly cost Mathilde, the main character, and her husband unnecessary stress and money spent. The following quote shows what Madame Forestier says to Mathilde at the end of story, hence showing how not telling the truth could cost you in the long run. “Oh, my poor Mathilde! But mine was imitation. It was worth at the very most five hundred francs!” (Maupassant 11). If she would have told the truth in the beginning about loosing the necklace, then it would have saved her much unneeded stress and at least 35,500 francs. In society today we see things of this nature all of time. For example, some people want to have what the rich have, like fancy cars. However, what would happen if cars didn’t have emblems to show if they are a Lexus or a Toyota. The same manufacturer makes both brands of vehicles. Think about this though, take the Lexus emblem off of a Lexus SUV and and a Toyota 4runner. Would people still want the Lexus or the 4runner. Odds are people would have to think really hard about which one they would want. They would probably
In the short story “The Necklace”, the main character, Loisel, is a woman who dreams of greater things in her life. She is married to a poor clerk who tries his best to make her happy no matter what. In an attempt to try to bring happiness to his wife, he manages to get two invitations to a very classy ball, but even in light of this Loisel is still unhappy. Even when she gets a new dress she is still unhappy. This lasts until her husband suggests she borrows some jewelry from a friend, and upon doing so she is finally happy. Once the ball is over, and they reach home, Loisel has the horrible realization that she has lost the necklace, and after ten years of hard labor and suffering, they pay off debts incurred to get a replacement. The central idea of this story is how something small can have a life changing effect on our and others life’s. This idea is presented through internal and external conflicts, third person omniscient point of view, and the round-dynamic character of Loisel. The third person limited omniscient point-of-view is prevalent throughout this short story in the way that the author lets the reader only see into the main character’s thoughts. Loisel is revealed to the reader as being unhappy with her life and wishing for fancier things. “She suffered ceaselessly, feeling herself born for all the delicacies and all the luxuries.” (de Maupassant 887) When her husband tries to fancy things up, “she thought of dainty dinners, of shining silverware, of tapestry which peopled the walls…” (de Maupassant 887) As the story goes on her point of view changes, as she “now knew the horrible existence of the needy. She took her part, moreover all of a sudden, with heroism.” (de Maupassant 891) Having the accountability to know that the “dreadful debt must be paid.” (de Maupassant 891 ) This point-of-view is used to help the reader gain more insight to how Loisel’s whole mindset is changed throughout her struggle to pay off their debts. Maupassant only reveals the thoughts and feelings of these this main character leaving all the others as flat characters. Loisel is a round-dynamic character in that Maupassant shows how she thought she was born in the wrong “station”. “She dressed plainly because she could not dress well, but she was as unhappy as though she had really fallen from her proper station.
Due to this fact, we have become greedy in order to gain the attention we seek. Avarice defines happiness for us as we believe that happiness lies in the eyes of the beholder of wealth. Our pursuit of attaining riches blindfolds us and we lose our ability to think rationally, thus, resulting in apathy. Furthermore, my generation gives fame to illiterate buffoons who sell their bodies on the internet, and to those who beguile us into believing they are geniuses because of their collection of green papers. We fail to understand the prominence of doctors, scientists, inventors, and some politicians who have granted us the tranquil life we have today as we solely see the melodramatic and evasive celebrities that media hypes up. Hence, we are marionettes controlled by media. We worship these “stars” by pasting their photos on all walls, billboards, shirts, and wallets, and thus, we are revamping our definition of God solely because they are wealthy. Therefore, “The Necklace” is a sincere representation of my generation as it plainly exhibits our defects and the power we have presented to
In the case of the woman in the story "The necklace" the object being the necklace which she eventually loses and tries to replace. Instead of hiding the truth and facing the music, which was harder, to take than when she lied. The old adage which says," What a tangled web weave when we first start to deceive." We humans can't handle the truth. We think we know what is the truth. What that really is just bullshit. It's arrogance-playing tricks on our minds making us think we are in control of our lives. If we really were in control of our lives then why can't we control every little aspect of it that gives discomfort? Because we can't, because we don't know how, and eventually the truth will show that is we don't what the truth really is. Using the slippery slope logic one can conclude that the two stories are more similar than they are different but because the assignment at hand requires for me to compare and contrast in an illustrative manner then I guess I should start.
A Deadly Sin Indeed: The Elements of Fiction that Convey a Theme of Greed in The Pearl
As I did research on how others interpreted the story, the same conclusion would pop up. The necklace was used as a symbol of higher class of wealth. We use symbolic items to try and fit into societies belief of “fancy”. The deeper meaning is within the true value of the necklace. It is a fake just as she is! She is trying to be something she is not and ends up losing the necklace which holds a false value as well. This is why a person should not take everything as it
At many places in the story he shows the irony of Madame Loisel’s situation. From the time of her marriage, through her growing years, Madame Loisel desires what she does not have and dreams that her life should be other than it is. It is only after ten years of hard labor and abject poverty that she realizes the mistake pride led her to make. At that point, the years cannot be recovered. In my opinion, the moral lesson of the necklace story is that we should not judge people on appearances because they may appear to be rich and successful and they may not be. It also explains us we should not pine after material possessions, but realize we are happy with what we have and we must be satisfied with what we have and what we are. We must be honest enough to confess his mistake instead of running from situations and turning back. There’s nothing wrong in have wishing though and dreams, but you must know your limits and your condition as
The moral of Guy de Maupassant’s story “The Necklace” seems to be suggested by the line, “What would have happened if Mathilde had not lost the necklace?” If Mathilde had not lost the necklace, or in fact, even asked to borrow the necklace, she and Mr. Loisel would not of been in debt ten long years. Because Mathilde had to borrow the necklace to make herself and others like her better her and Mr. Loisel’s economic situation had become worse than it already was. I think that the moral of the story is that people need to be happy with what they have and not be so greedy.
In Pot of Gold, a Roman comedy by Plautus, a man by the name of Euclio discovers that he has a pot of gold. He is filled with greed and paranoia. His neighbor, Megadorus, an older bachelor, asks to marry Euclio’s young daughter, but instead of being happy, he is filled with suspicion. After insisting to Megadorus that he has no dowry to offer for his daughter, Euclio finally agrees to the marriage. Little did they know that the daughter, Phaedria, is great with the child of Megadorus’s nephew, Lyconides. Megadorus and Euclio agree to have the marriage that day, so Megadorus goes to town to buy the food and hire cooks and musicians. The cooks use both houses to cook and this set Euclio’s paranoia level off the charts, so he takes his pot of