In Pot of Gold, a Roman comedy by Plautus, a man by the name of Euclio discovers that he has a pot of gold. He is filled with greed and paranoia. His neighbor, Megadorus, an older bachelor, asks to marry Euclio’s young daughter, but instead of being happy, he is filled with suspicion. After insisting to Megadorus that he has no dowry to offer for his daughter, Euclio finally agrees to the marriage. Little did they know that the daughter, Phaedria, is great with the child of Megadorus’s nephew, Lyconides. Megadorus and Euclio agree to have the marriage that day, so Megadorus goes to town to buy the food and hire cooks and musicians. The cooks use both houses to cook and this set Euclio’s paranoia level off the charts, so he takes his pot of …show more content…
Greed is represented in the obvious way that Euclio won’t tell anyone about the gold he possesses, so he can continue to live off of everyone else’s charity, such as the way he made Megadorus pay for the whole wedding and he would give no dowry for his daughter. He wanted to keep his gold for himself, a very greedy ideal. One could say that he had a lust for his riches. Although he wasn’t trying to acquire more, he was hiding it and thinking about it so often that it consumed him to the point that he didn’t even know his own daughter was pregnant. Similarly, the way Megadorus, an older man, lusted after Eulcio’s young daughter points to greed as well. He pointed out that a woman with no dowry is much easier to control than one who thinks the man owes them for their dowry. Megadorus was trying to acquire control over the girl but also fulfil his sister’s request for him to be married. Neither of the characters’ greed worked out for them, and this is probably a lesson within the play. Greed gets you nowhere. Eulcio was miserable until he finally gave the gold away, and Megadorus did not get the …show more content…
The role reversal within this play is really just how the main character, Euclio is constantly outsmarted by someone who is supposed to be lower than him: a Slave. Funny enough, the slave isn’t even known by a name in the play, just “a slave.” That points to how low he is supposed to be, and yet he had the cleverness to steal the gold from this man. Although he did make it quite easy for the slave to get, which adds to the comedic value of this play. I believe the moral of this theme is to never pre-judge someone based on their social status or even wealth, they can always deceive you or outsmart you, or even turn out to be a great person. Or they could just really want to be a free person, as this slave
Greed has influenced human behavior for thousands of years. It is perfectly natural to covet objects or to pine for a promotion. Almost everyone wishes they were wealthier or owned a nicer house. Society has learned to accept these forms of greed because they are a common thread throughout civilization. But, on occasion, greed can transform and twist people into inhumane monsters. In The Count of Monte Cristo, Alexandre Dumas depicts this transformation taking place in the character of Danglars. The story begins with young, highly-ambitious Danglars as a ship’s accountant. He complains to the ship’s owner about Dantes, the first-mate, in an attempt to advance himself. Danglars also writes a letter that accuses Dantes of being a
In the case of the first poem, it was more of the perspective of a high class woman. The narrator who saw the women cleaning in the airport did not like the scene due to the fact that she believes that there are better jobs and options out there. As a woman coming from a higher class, she may think one way. However, we do not know whether or not the lady actually cleaning feels the same way. In line 16, Oliver mentions, “Yes, a person wants to stand in a happy place”, in a poem. But first we must watch her as she stares down at her labor, which is dull enough.” This quote goes to show that the narrator dislikes the fact that she is doing such a low job. The narrator considers that peoples too showy and live only on the external, and the woman
The post-Civil War years between 1865 and 1900 were a time of immense social change and economic growth in the United States. This time period, commonly referred to as “The Gilded Age,” saw an end to Reconstruction, rapid industrialization, and new wealth. Despite these achievements, however, the era between Reconstruction and the beginning of the twentieth century was plagued by political stalemate, a decline of human values, increased materialism, and widespread corruption.
The Modernist movement took place in a time of happiness, a time of sadness, a time of objects, a time of saving, a time of prosperity, a time of poverty and in a time of greed. Two novels, written by Steinbeck and Fitzgerald, portray this underlying greed and envy better than most novels of that period. These novels, The Great Gatsby and The Grapes of Wrath, show that despite the difference between the 1920s and the 1930s, greed remained a part of human life, whether superficially or necessarily, and that many people used their greed to damage themselves and others.
Even Candide has his encounters with greed when robbers take away some of the sheep that he is given by the king of Eldorado. Voltaire even makes his mind known when the king says, “I can’t understand why you people from Europe are so fond of our yellow mud…” (Voltaire 71). Voltaire sees the horrors of greed, but does not see the need for greed when if “a man is fairly well off somewhere, he ought to stay there” (Voltaire 71). Both of these statements relate that Voltaire views a good life as far superior to the chaos of aspiring for riches or what a person does not need. Although Candide gets attacked by robbers, Voltaire shows just how greedy humanity is through the contrast of Candide whose only desire is to “go and present his sheep to Lady Cunegonde” (Voltaire 72) and those who exploit him for his riches by deceiving him. These deceptions start as soon as Candide is back in civilization and searching for a ship. One such person, a ship captain, says “he [can] not take [Candide] to Venice for less
While these differences alter the experiences felt by each character due to their respective cultures, each aspect that differs between the two societies still adds to the overall oppression of women. Othello was set in the late 16th century in a hierarchical, status oriented society. The effects of a culture focused on rank and class level are reflected by the reactions that Othello, Brabantio, Iago and Cassio had throughout the play when their status was threatened. Iago’s ability to so easily manipulate these men by threatening their position shows the importance honour had in this society. Brabantio’s reaction to Othello’s and Desdemona’s marriage, Cassio’s anguish over his lost title, and Othello’s ease in being influenced by Iago are examples of this. The society in The Yellow Wallpaper differs in this way because while John did put himself as superior to Jane, he did not harm Jane in the name of his status, but rather a misguided medical belief that she was sick due to her gender’s pathology. The actions of the men in Othello were motivated by honour, while it was John’s arrogance that instead caused him to mistreat Jane. In The Yellow Wallpaper, the oppression towards women was led by the belief that women were pathologically inferior to men, where in Othello, as explained by Hammons, “[a]ccording to The Lawes Resolutions, because Eve’s transgression
The quote, “Greed is a bottomless pit which exhausts the person in an endless effort to satisfy the need without ever reaching satisfaction.” by Enrich Fromm truly describes the effect greed can cause others. In the novel The Great Gatsby by F.Scott Fitzgerald and the play Macbeth by William Shakespeare various themes are shown throughout. One of the most important themes is greed for wealth and power. These works focus on the impact greed for wealth and power causes on the main character and how it affects their relationships with others. At first, these characters are so infatuated by what they want that they do not realize the harm they are causing. However, as these works continue each character reaches a moment of epiphany realizing how
Hamartia is a fatal flaw leading to a person’s downfall. The desire for wealth rose greatly during the 1920s after World War I. The standard of living increased in the twenties due to new technology that allowed a greater ability to manufacture and distribute goods (Amidon Lusted). During this time America experienced “the greatest economic expansion in its history” (Gross). Mass production was possible through the assembly line, which allowed for products to be produced faster and more efficiently (Amidon Lusted). Along with mass production, advertisements of the time attracted Americans to buy more products and in order to buy more products, more money was needed (Amidon Lusted).
Oryx and Crake, by Margaret Atwood is a novel that warns us of possible dangers in the future, such as the destruction of the human race and nature. Throughout the novel, Atwood uses examples of destruction as a way to convey the danger of greed when combined with science. There are many examples of destruction within the novel; however, every example of destruction displayed throughout the novel is ultimately caused by greed.
Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice exemplifies a principle that is as unfortunately true in our time as it was in his - he who has money also has love, sex, and above all, power. In this case, the use of 'he' is deliberate; 'she,' in the Elizabethan era, rarely had either financial independence or much control over the course of her life. Portia, the deceitful heroine of the play, is a major exception. To put it bluntly, Portia is enormously rich. This unique position allows her to meddle in the affairs of the unsuspecting and somewhat dim male characters, and eventually gives her unprecedented power of self-determination. However, the play is more than a tale of feminine wiles overcoming male dullness of wit. Portia's wealth and intelligence may fuel her successes in marriage and the courtroom, but in each case it is her ability to usurp traditionally masculine roles that guarantees her victory. As Portia exploits the codependence of wealth, masculinity, and public power in her society, she becomes the only woman in the play who consistently controls her own destiny.
In both Xenophon’s Oeconomicus and Lysias’ defense of Euphiletus’ murder of Eratosthenes, insight into the purpose and function of Athenian marriage may be gained by examination of the speeches of two citizens about their wives and their homes. Through both texts, it becomes apparent that the citizen’s value of his wife is based upon his wife’s ability as an “oikonomikos” or “skilled household manager” (Strauss, 3). It is through filling this role as her husband’s housekeeper that an Athenian woman experienced a loss of personal freedom and found herself trapped within a marriage in which she had little contact or much in common with her husband. A woman’s role as oikonomikos is described by Euphiletus’ address of an Athenian citizen-jury and by Socrates’ discourse with Ischomachos, through which he strives to understand the best way by which a household may be managed.
The portrayal of gender roles in William Shakespeare’s play Othello, demonstrates the inferior treatment of women and the certain stereotypes of men placed on them by society. Both the male and female characters in the play have these certain gender expectations placed on them. In a society dominated by men, it is understood that the women are to be seen rather than heard. The women are referred to and treated much like property. If indeed they do speak up, they are quickly silenced. One woman’s attempt to be the perfect wife is what ultimately led to her demise. The expectations of men are equally stereotypical. Men are to be leaders and to be in control and dominant especially over the women. The male characters compete for position and use the female characters in the play as leverage to manipulate each other. Shakespeare provides insight in understanding the outcomes of the men and women who are faced with the pressures of trying to live up to society’s expectations, not only in the workplace, but also in the home. The pressure creates jealousy issues amongst the men and they become blind to the voice of reason and are overtaken by jealous rage, leads to the death of many of the characters.
Greed, being a key human condition, has shaped society from the very start. In fact, some scholars believe that greed was the first major milestone of human success, when the first human wondered why he/she had to scrounge around for necessities; it is a part of being human to be greedy. Wanting a new car, to be loved by another, or to desire the feeling of well doing when feeding the needy, these are all factions of greed...
In the play Euripides skillfully uses the Chorus, the Nurse, and the children to help the audience feel compassionate, relate and understand her. Although these characters are presented separately, in the end they support each other for the most part, although they represent different side of views at others. Euripides by using these characters transforms the play into a representative symbol of freedom and power. Instead of Medea appearing as a heartless mother who only cares for her own safety, he represents her a very caring and loving mother who was only forced into this situation and she has no other choice but to murder her children. Thus Euripides turns a story of jealousy and betrayal, to a play which represents very fundamental human emotions.
There is definitely a reversal of roles in the play. "A man's role was to "help his friends and harm his enemies."(users globalnet) Medea offered to help her friend King Aigeus become childless in exchange for helping her get away. She will harm anyone who gets in her way. It is the children who bring about this reversal.