Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Define and describe how honor and glory are shown through various characters in the iliad
Glory in the iliad
Glory iliad achilees
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Define and describe how honor and glory are shown through various characters in the iliad
Homer reveals his ideas of glory through the use of similes, comparing great men to flora and natural forces, conveying the idea that glory comes from these forces themselves. These similes Homer uses in The Iliad exemplify how glory obtained in battle is nothing compared to the glory and immortality of nature. Homer purposely juxtaposes the images of nature, using diction to intensify their glory, to images of men fighting for glory. During battles, especially when warriors are gaining immense glory, many similes about plants and natural forces appear. In book XII, two Trojan warriors arising to the front line in battle are compared to “oaks that rear their crests on a mountain ridge, / standing up to the gales and driving rains, day …show more content…
In book XI, Nestor gives a speech in which he reflects back on his time as a warrior. During this dialogue, he compares him charging the enemy lines to “a black tornado” (XI. 888). A tornado is powerful and full of force, and Nestor uses this to describe himself as such (Weil). A tornado is full of glory because it is well known by all people for its destructive force, such force that only a god can even become close in equaling it. Just like a flood would, a tornado destroys all in its path, with no mercy because it is inanimate. Parallel to the life of a tornado, Nestor was a glorious warrior in his prime. But now that he is older, he no longer has great glory. He rather commands respect for his mass amount of knowledge, and in this way still holds some glory. The fame he still has is not anywhere close to the glory he held in his prime though. This loss of glory is also like a tornado: it is glorious in its power while it lives, but after it is gone it does not instill as much fear in the hearts of people. The path of destruction it leaves ends the glory of that specific tornado, but the stories passed along about it increase the glory in the concept of a tornado (Ready). The fact that Nestor, an older man with the most knowledge, chose to use a tornado to describe his glorious time as a warrior highlights the fact that he believes natural forces to hold true …show more content…
When warriors are killed, the glory they have acquired throughout their lifetime gets transferred to their killer. While glory is usually lost throughout time for warriors and other items, like glorious structures, death during war is a major reason of why many warrior’s glory is cut short. Paralleling to this loss of glory, glory can be lost from plants. When they are killed, they lose their glory. An example of this from the text is during book XIII, when warriors are killed and their fall to the earth is juxtaposed to “down he went like a tall ash on a landmark mountain ridge that glistens far and wide” (XIII. 213-214). Just like the warrior, the ash tree is being cut down, and its glory is ending. The tree no longer braces the forces on that mountain ridge, and instead will be burned or left to decompose. This shows that just as the warriors can lost their glory, so can plants. Another place this tree metaphor is used to explain a loss of glory, and life, is when a warrior is decapitated, and his head is described “rolling through the carnage like a log” (XI. 170). A log is but a husk of the former tree it used to be, devoid of both life and glory. While nature does embody true glory, its glory can be easily lost when disrupted by a stronger force (Weil). But, unlike humans, the plant’s glory is kept alive through its species, which created plants
Simone Weil’s essay “The Iliad: or Poem of Force” places importance on human interaction, the grounding, empathic, human relations which are rare, fleeting, and necessary. She claims Force to be a governing factor in all human interaction, and the ‘thingness’, which force prescribes to humans, as a dangerous, uncontrollable factor of human existence. In order to overcome force, one must direct all their attention towards recognizing others suffering. In her other essay, “Attention and Will,” Weil discusses religious attention as the most important. She claims that one must practice a passive attention to God in order to reach a divinity beyond reality itself which holds truth.
Similes are used by Homer within the Iliad to induce pathos by contrasting the unnatural bestiality of battle with vivid imagery from the natural world. The innocence of nature within the smilies not only allows for a break from the endless grim of war, but also increases the connectability of the epic. Not everyone, even during the historical time period the Iliad was composed in, experienced war. Therefore, the comparison of war to something common, like nature, allows the audience to connect with the work and experience the pathos it induces.
The subject of Homer’s epic poem, the Iliad, is very clearly stated--it is “the rage of Peleus’ son Achilles.” The reader remains continually aware of the extent of Achilles’ rage, yet is never told the reason why Achilles remains angry and unreconciled. There is no definitive answer to this question. Achilles is not a static character. He is constantly changing; thus the question of why he remains angry solicits different answers at various stages throughout the poem. To find an answer, the reader must carefully examine Achilles’ ever-changing dilemma involving the concepts of mortality and honor. At its simplest, Achilles’ dilemma is that if he goes to war, he will die. But he will die with glory.
“Then the screaming and shouts of triumph rose up together, of men killing and men killed, and the ground ran blood.” From first examination the Iliad seems to be an epic founded on an idealized form of glory, the kind that young boys think about when they want to join the army. A place full of heroism and manliness where glory can be achieved with a few strokes of a sword and then you go home and everything is just lovely. Many people view the Iliad this way, based on it’s many vivid battle descriptions and apparent lack of remorse for the deaths that occur. This, however, is not how war is presented in the Iliad. Homer presents a very practical outlook on war countering the attainment of the glory with the reality of its price and the destruction it causes. He successfully does this by showing the value of the lives of each person that dies and, in a sense, mourning their passing, describing the terror and ugliness of war, and, through the characters of Achilleus and Hector, displaying the high price of glory.
The Iliad by Homer is an epic poem separated in different books or chapters that shows a fictionalized account of the Trojan War. Book 6: Hector Returns to Troy is the specific portion of the poem that is being covered in this essay. Hector from the Iliad shows a very clear aspect of his personality, a strong sense of loyalty and tenderness for his loved ones and also his people by being on the front lines during the war and showing his people he is willing to fight with them and essentially sacrificing himself for his family. Hector even knows his forgiveness towards his brother, Paris even though Paris is the main reason the Trojan War is in existence.
In Homer’s epic poem The Iliad, Homer depicts the difference between the lives of the Gods and humans through the larger context of the ongoing war, featuring the Achaeans versus the Trojans. This difference can be defined in how glory and worship affect their lives, but most importantly their underlying desire to experience their opposite nature: mortality and immortality. For one, the Gods gain glory for aiding their favored side, while humans attain glory through victory in battle. Moreover, Gods are worshipped for their ability to act, while humans are worshipped for their achievements. Immortal as they are, Gods symbolically die through forgetfulness, while humans die through mortality. Ultimately, the conflicting nature of glory and worship
Throughout the Iliad the warriors' dream of peace is projected over and over again in elaborate similes developed against a background of violence and death. Homer is able to balance the celebration of war's tragic, heroic values with scenes of battle and those creative values of civilized life that war destroys. The shield of Achilles symbolically represents the two poles of human condition, war and peace, with their corresponding aspects of human nature, the destructive and creative, which are implicit in every situation and statement of the poem and are put before us in something approaching abstract form; its emblem is an image of human life as a whole.
Throughout history, people evaluated themselves and others based on moral judgements. The basis of those evaluations changed over time. In the Homeric period, from approximately 1200-800 BCE, people practiced “warrior ethics.” Warrior ethics were based on teleology, meaning all things had a purpose/function in society. The concept of good/bad was directly related to how well the function was performed. For example, a warrior was considered good when he was an excellent warrior and bad if he performed poorly. In Homeric times, excellence was considered god-like.
This epic poem by the ancient Greek poet Homer, recounts some of the significant events of the final weeks of the Trojan War and the Greek siege of the city of Troy. All of the places where Homer’s stories took place were in areas that had been significant in the Bronze Age of Ancient Greece. Excavations at Troy and Mycenae have revealed that affluent kingdoms did indeed exist there. The Iliad provides examples of the culture and traditions that took place in Ancient Greece. The warrior culture that is presented in The Iliad is based on honor and bravery, a good example of this is when Diomedes is trying to rally his fellow warriors in says, “I know only cowards depart from battle. A real warrior stands his ground. Whether he is hit or hits another.” This society was strongly against cowardice; bravery was the only option in these times. The Iliad preserves the Ancient Greek’s views on masculinity and what it meant to be a “real warrior” in their times. The evolution of what people consider honorable and brave is evident, for The Iliad has conserved past views that can be juxtaposed with more modern
than the times of today. Back then, the most important aspect of life for a
The Iliad is an epic tale of war and hero’s within the Greek way of life. A
The world that Homer shows in the Iliad is a violent one, where war is not only a means of gaining wealth, but also the arena in which a man demonstrates his worth. The Greek army gathered in front of the walls of Troy exhibits the weaknesses and strengths of the Homeric world. Greece is not one nation, and the army of Greeks mirrors this. It is a collection of small city-states with a common culture and a common language, capable of coming together for a great enterprise, but also capable of being driven apart by petty squabbling. The common culture is based on acceptance of characteristics seen as virtuous: xeineia, or hospitality; agathos, the successful warrior; oikos, which means from noble birth; keleos, glory; pine, honor, which is a central motif throughout the Iliad; and finally, the ultimate virtue of arête, which stands for goodness or excellence and encompasses the other virtues. For Homer, a good man must be of noble family, strong, brave in battle, and wealthy. Earthly possessions show that a man has initiative and has the esteem of others. But the most important qualification to be considered a good man is honor, because honor is gained, not born into.
"The Iliad is a poem that celebrates the heroic values war imposes on its votaries (27)." Homer himself describes war as "bringing glory to man." War is a huge part of both the Achaeans and the Trojans' lives. Characters gain glory through their performances and bravery in battle. Furthermore, Homer persuades the reader that war is the glorious way to settle a dispute. For example, Hector and other Trojans scorn Paris for backing down from Menelaus. On the other hand, Achilles acquires glory by deferring the option of a long, peaceful life in order to fight and become an epic hero. The characters in The Iliad value honor and glory to such a degree that they are willing to give up life itself in order to possess it.
For the Homeric hero, honour was a code to live by, won on the battlefield, achieved through oratory discourse and attained via athletic ability. However, to understand why honour was an important theme in Homer’s Iliad, we need to look at how the heroes of the epic poem, such as Agamemnon and Achilles lived by this code, observing their behaviour and how they treated others throughout the story. With this in mind, we can establish the ideal conduct that warrants honour and the reality of what living by such a code meant to everyone involved.
Homer's Iliad is commonly understood as an epic about the Trojan War, but its meaning goes deeper than that. The Iliad is not only a story of the evolution of Achilleus' persona, but at times it is an anti-war epic as well. The final book proposes many questions to the reader. Why not end with the killing of Hektor? Most stories of war conclude with the triumphant victory of good over evil, but in the Iliad, the final thoughts are inclined to the mourning of the defeated Hektor, which accentuates the fact that good has not triumphed over evil, but simply Achilleus triumphed over Hektor. Ending with the mourning of Hektor also brings to center stage for the first time the human side of war and the harsh aftermath of it. We see that war not only brings great glory, but also much suffering and anguish. Homer puts his anti-war views on display.