Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The imagery in Harry Potter
Freedom vs fate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The imagery in Harry Potter
J.K Rowling employs symbolism, literary techniques, themes and characters to portray the role Fate and Free will play in the Harry Potter series. The role they play is a reflection of how Fate and Freewill interact and overlap in the real world as well. They compliment one another!
“I have been careless, and so have been thwarted by luck and chance, those wreckers of all but the best-laid plans. But I know better now. I understand those things that I did not understand before. I must be the one to kill Harry Potter, and I shall be.” (Lord Voldemort). In one of Lord Voldemorts’ famous dialogues, J.K Rowling presents the role of both Fate and Free Will in her fictitious world. Lord Voldemort acknowledges Free Will when he says ‘best-laid plans’
…show more content…
She predicted “The one with the power to vanquish the Dark Lord approaches.” The course of Harry’s life is decided by the prophecy, Voldemorts’ choice of Harry over Neville, and Dumbledores’ guidance. Snapes’ accusation “ Raising him like a lamb for slaughter” weighs heavily as we see how Dumbledore played a key role in determining Harry’s Fate. The religious symbolism likens Dumbledore to a God-like figure and Harry to Jesus, whose role is to save the wizarding world. Examples of other people’s choices determining Harry’s Fate in the series are when Dumbledore leaves Harry with the Dursleys, Dobby stopping Harry from entering the platform, and Voldemort choosing Harry over Neville. However, the word chooses stands out here because it refers to other characters’ choices, but does that mean they had free will? Or was somebody/something influencing their choices as well? Moreover, do characters really have the liberty to make choices? Or do they just think that they …show more content…
A terrible insult in the wizarding world is ‘Mudblood’ and we see families like the Malfoys and the Blacks take great pride in their pure blood lineage. This refers to having wizarding parents, and everyone in the family having the fated skill of magic. So magic is passed down through genetics, however in some cases like Hermione and Filch we see the magic gene skip a few generations! In Hermione’s case, her parents are non-magic folks and Filch case he doesn’t possesses the gift of magic. This shows the role of Fate in the series because certain things like genetics are out of everyone’s control. In the Deathly Hallows we see wizards with non-magic parents being tried for ‘stealing magic’; this sounds absurd and is used to show how desperate the Ministry of Magic has become because stealing magic is just not
In Edith Wharton’s book Ethan Frome, the main character, Ethan, struggles every day with decisions that are predetermined or made through the use of free will. Free will and determinism play a key role in deciding whether to abandon his current wife or not, which is his main internal struggle. Mattie Silver, who has come to take care of Zeena, falls in love with Ethan but feels wrong in doing so because Zeena is her cousin. Ethan loves her back but also feels bad about having a secret relationship with Mattie. They both have free will to run off and abandon Zeena but are predetermined to stay in Starkfield with her forever. In the real world, there is controversy about people having free will or determinism, and research
A main example of fate would be when Billy is on an airplane. In Slaughterhouse-Five, it states that "Billy, knowing the plane was going to crash pretty soon, closed his eyes, traveled in time back to 1944" (198). Soon after, "the plane smacked into the top of Sugarbush Mountain in Vermont. Everyone was killed but Billy and the copilot" (199). Instead of doing anything about it, Billy just waits for the plane to crash. If Billy had free will, he would have tried to warn the others on the plane, or not gotten onto it at all.
... in check. For example, during the Crusades, priests of the church claimed that if you were willing to serve in God’s army and slay Muslims in the Holy Land, you would guarteen you and your family’s way to heaven, possible changing your fate and God’s will for you. How is it that men can determine the will of a being, who’s purpose is to determine the fate of men in the first place. It’s a situation that places the concept of fate in a more negative, and less glorious light than the epics of our class.
In the play The Tragedy of Macbeth by William Shakespeare, the character Macbeth acts on free will as opposed to fate. The definition of free will is having the ability to make a choice; including the possession of options, logical reasoning for choosing each option, as well as understanding the consequences of each decision. Macbeth obeys all the criteria, using “fate” as an excuse to act like a murder-crazy lunatic, ultimately resulting in his demise.
In society, people have varying opinions on fate. Many question whether life’s events are pre-determined by fate or whether people have a destiny to serve a greater purpose. Fate versus free will is an archaic topic among philosophers that is ultimately up for interpretation.The question on whether or not something else is controlling life’s events or if they are simply a coincidence faces us in some point of our lives. In Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, Shakespeare plays with the idea of fate and its control on the events in the play. He forces us to realize the destiny between Romeo and Juliet involves the fate between the two opposing households as well. Shakespeare blurs the line between fate and free will in his play Romeo and Juliet to show that the outstanding cause of Romeo and Juliet’s tragedy was not something decided- it was fate. It is evident by the events in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet that fate was the main cause of the tragedy in the play, and that Romeo and Juliet held the destiny to finally end the feud between the Capulets and the Montagues.
Another thought that exemplifies the significance that free will holds, is seen in elements of Sophocles' classic, which revealed that Oedipus had more knowledge over the details of his dilemma than he let himself become conscious of. The last idea will reveal how the onset of fear will push people down a treacherous path of risk and pain, which is also seen in the play through multiple characters. Free will is an attribute that all people possess. It could work as a tool to get individuals through the scary twists their lives may entail. It could also work against them in many ways, which depends on the level of human weakness and ignorance. But, the most important assertion that can be made after considering the argument of, "fate vs. free will," is that...
Throughout The Hobbit by J.R.R. Tolkien, the dwarfs and Bilbo survive through their adventures by the skin of their teeth. Yet the characters never seem to consider that there is anything strange about this, to the reader though it seems that Bilbo and the dwarfs have a series of coincidence or a vast amount of luck on their side. It seems that there could be someone or something that is guiding Bilbo and the dwarfs’ course and turning their adventures in their favor. It might matter that Bilbo and the dwarfs adventure succeeds and could have an impact on other people, than just the dwarfs. There is a presence of luck in the book and this implicates that there is a power beyond that is playing a role in the fate of
Fate and free will both have a strong rooting in the play Macbeth. The role of fate was to tell Macbeth that he was one day to become king of Scotland. Fate was not the cause of Macbeth’s downfall. The actions made under Macbeth’s free will are the sole reason for his own downfall. Macbeth was afraid that he might not become king, so he took matters into his own hands to be absolutely sure he would attain the throne. He decided to leave out chance and take the throne for himself by killing Duncan. By leaving out chance, Macbeth left out the chance for fate to bring his downfall.
Whether or not the concept of fate is legitimate is regularly debated by many people. Some believe that the events of one’s life are predetermined by a supernatural power, out of human control. Others believe that free will allows us to create our own fate, and that one’s decisions determine how the events of one’s life play out. In William Shakespeare’s Macbeth, both fate and free will are predominant themes in the play. The ever-present supernatural aspect of the play can create an interesting debate over whether or not Macbeth’s downfall could have played out differently, or even been avoided completely. The witches’ prophecies had an impact on Macbeth’s actions, however, it is ultimately free-will that causes his downfall.
Fate may state what will be in one's life however, how that destiny comes about is a matter of man's own choice. In other words, incidents don't occur because our destinies are written. In the play Macbeth, Shakespeare expertly uses the theme of fate vs. free will and raises the pre-eminent question of which holds power over the characters. In Shakespeare’s tragedy, fate is not the cause of his downfall, his own desires and choices prove to be the deciding factor.
In J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter book series, fate plays a large part in the life of Harry Potter. As soon as Voldemort chose Harry to be the “Chosen One”, his fate as the defender of wizardkind was sealed. Harry must be the one to defeat Voldemort, or vice versa. However, although Harry’s fate was seemingly sealed from the time he was one year old, he still had free will throughout the series.
The concept of fate has existed since the time of the ancient Greeks. The Greeks believed very strongly in fate, which can be defined as either a power beyond human control that determines events, or the outcome or end. In "Oedipus Rex," King Oedipus lives and dies by fate. Fate influences the entire plot, thereby allowing for some interesting developments that may be unpredictable to the audience.
Ever thought about who controls the decisions you make regarding your daily activities? You may think you control every aspect of your life, but some philosophers have questioned such notions. Many schools of thought explain the analogy of free will, and they present the argument of whether we have the freedom to act or other causes and effects determine our destiny. Free will in this context is defined as the freedom to choose and act where there several alternative courses of action. Theologically, the concept of free will is presented as the power to make decisions on our own without necessarily been influenced by external or predetermined courses.
Free will tends to be a topic where even the most non-philosophical person will have an extreme opinion on it and understandably so. The issue of free will has an immense consequence that affects even the most basic day-to-day activities in our lives. Specifically, free will is entirely intertwined with the idea of responsibility. Two contrasting views of free will are determinism and indeterminism, both of which threaten the idea of human responsibility in their own way. Similarly to most everyone else, I experience my own decisions as choices between genuine possibilities and this undoubtedly has an effect on how I could choose to commit to an answer on whether or not we have free will.
In this class one key point kept coming up in the readings for me, and that was fate. Fate is an idea that nothing you do will change your final out come in life. Are we able to truly have free will in the way we live and die? Or is it fate and our life’s outcome is out of our control? Is the characters desire to go against fate what truly lead them to this path? In the readings I was never able to say either way but I lean in favor of fate. My three examples of this are the charters Loki, Odin and Oedipus. These three are said to have been fated on how they live, die and even kill in a way that is predestined.