Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Guy montag compared with a character outside of the book
Guy montag character analysis
Conformity fahrenheit 451
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Fahrenheit 451, written by Ray Bradbury. I am writing about Clarisse McClellan, Guy Montag, and Mildred, wife of Guy. I’ll be writing about the way these three act and why I chose them and not others. Guy and Clarisse met on a dark night, where he started to actually think. The characters Guy and Clarisse show non-conformity, while Mildred shows conformity.
Guy Montag is a fireman who, on one night runs into Clarisse. She asks him more and more questions, making him think about his life. He soon starts reading the few books he has secretly hidden away in his home over the years, unable to stop thinking about everything. His wife finds out, throwing a fit, about to throw the books into an incinerator he grabs her, saying “Listen. Give me a second, will you? We can’t do anything, we can’t burn these. I want to look at them, at least look at them once. Then if what the Captain says is true, we’ll burn them together,
…show more content…
believe me, we’ll burn them together. You must help me.”(Page 63). This quote shows how he doesn’t want to burn books like most people would, shows he actually wants to read the books he has. Hes looking for more in life than just moving on, doing simple minded, no thinking things, like Clarisse did. Clarisse would head out into the woods, walk around, looking at things, stay up all night, watch the sun rise. All things the average person doesn’t do anymore. She took time to smell the roses. She often left different things at Montag's door, the first night they met saying, “I’m seventeen and I’m crazy. My uncle says the two always go together. When people ask your age, he said always seventeen and insane. Isn’t this a nice time of night to walk? I like to smell things, and sometimes stay up all night, walking, watching the sunrise” (Page 5). This shows how different she is from all the other people who just rush around doing things or not doing anything at all. For example Mildred who is always in the parlor with her “family”. Mildred shows conformity because she doesn’t think about anything, is very forgetful and just does nothing.
She rarely leaves the house and doesn’t even care about the oncoming war. She even calls the firemen on Montag after he starts spouting poetry to her company, she leaves the house muttering “Poor family, poor family, oh everything gone, everything, everything gone now,” (Page 108). This shows she only cares about material things, not about her husband who she basically just had arrested. She’s only thinking about her things in the house.
That is why I chose Guy Montag, Clarisse McClellan and Mildred to show non-conformity and conformity. Those three are perfect examples of the two ways, Clarisse being a person who thinks, looks around. Montag being someone who wants to read, be able to understand books. Mildred, doing nothing, not thinking, just enjoying simple minded entertainment. Clarisse died for being how she is though, Montag was forced to flee from the city, and Mildred only moved, though none of that matters with what happens in the
end.
Guy Montag’s life, job, and wife were perfectly fine. He truly took pleasure in burning houses that contained books; this was what the
Once Montag witnesses the unethical extent that the firemen would go through to destroy the existence of books, he realizes how corrupt and unjust the societal rules were. “He looked with dismay at the floor. ‘We burned an old woman with her books” (47).
Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 opens with Guy Montag, a fireman, reminiscing of the pleasures of burning. As the story unfolds, we learn that Montag is a fireman who rids the world of books by burning all that are found. Walking home one night Montag meets Clarisse, his strong minded neighbor. She begins peppering him with questions. Clarisse doesn’t go along with societal norms and Montag realizes that immediately. “I rarely watch the 'parlor walls ' or go to races or Fun Parks. So I 've lots of time for crazy thoughts, I guess.” (Bradbury 3) Clarisse uses her imagination brought by stories from books and family instead of watching television. Clarisse helps Montag realize that the government induced censorship and conformation is stifling society’s education and imagination. Montag’s wife, Mildred ,is incapable of having a personal conversation with Montag. She conforms to societal standards and is greatly
Are you really happy? Or are you sad about something? Sad about life or money, or your job? Any of these things you can be sad of. Most likely you feel discontentment a few times a day and you still call yourself happy. These are the questions that Guy Montag asks himself in the book Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury. In this book people are thinking they are happy with their lives. This is only because life is going so fast that they think they are but really there is things to be sad about. Montag has finally met Clarisse, the one person in his society that stops to smell the roses still. She is the one that gets him thinking about how his life really is sad and he was just moving too fast to see it. He realizes that he is sad about pretty much everything in his life and that the government tries to trick the people by listening to the parlor and the seashells. This is just to distract people from actual emotions. People are always in a hurry. They have 200 foot billboards for people driving because they are driving so fast that they need more time to see the advertisement. Now I am going to show you who are happy and not happy in the book and how our society today is also unhappy.
1984 takes place in an alternate-reality future where after World War 2, the world was divided into three main nations: Eastasia, Eurasia, and the super-country, Oceania. The book is set in Oceania in the year 1984, in the city of London, Airstrip One. Oceania is in a constant state of war against the two other countries, with bombings occurring daily and the living conditions extremely poor – very little food, very little clothing, and broken down housing. The Party rules over Oceania, with telescreens in almost every room that monitor every move a person makes, as well as anything they say. Posters hang everywhere with the phrase – BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU.
The theme of Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451 can be viewed from several different angles. First and foremost, Bradbury's novel gives an anti-censorship message. Bradbury understood censorship to be a natural outcropping of an overly tolerant society. Once one group objects to something someone has written, that book is modified and censorship begins. Soon, another minority group objects to something else in the book, and it is again edited until eventually the book is banned altogether. In Bradbury's novel, society has evolved to such an extreme that all literature is illegal to possess. No longer can books be read, not only because they might offend someone, but because books raise questions that often lead to revolutions and even anarchy. The intellectual thinking that arises from reading books can often be dangerous, and the government doesn't want to put up with this danger. Yet this philosophy, according to Bradbury, completely ignores the benefits of knowledge. Yes, knowledge can cause disharmony, but in many ways, knowledge of the past, which is recorded in books, can prevent man from making similar mistakes in the present and future.
Few people in the world choose to stand out instead of trying to be like everyone else. In Fahrenheit 451, most people are the same because no one ever thinks about anything and their world moves so fast. In Ray Bradbury’s novel Fahrenheit 451, the author uses characterization to show the individuality and sameness of the characters.
In the book Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury, the main character, Guy Montag, lives in a city where there is no knowledge, emotions, nor anything else. The citizens of this city also have to live their lives be watched by machines. All these rules setup by the government are in place in order to keep citizens from overthrowing the government. They, the government, keep these rules so that the government can manipulate and corrupt citizens, overall making a corrupt city.
The world is lucky to have authors who can see and write about the flaws in society. One of these authors is Ray Bradbury, author of Fahrenheit 451, who writes about futuristic society and uses symbols to communicate with the reader in deeper meaning. In this futuristic society firemen burn books to destroy ideas. There are a few characters who can see the world for what it is, Bradbury uses the symbol mirrors to show the reflectiveness in society. Seashell earbuds are used to block out reality people wish not to be in. In his dystopian novel Fahrenheit 451, Bradbury demonstrates that ignoring reality can be destructive through his use of fire, mirrors, and seashell earbuds.
Montag is a non conformer in the book Fahrenheit 451. It’s shown when it says “Then he reached up and pulled back the grille of the air conditioning system and reached far back inside to the right and moved still another sliding sheet of metal and took out a book” (65). Montag is a fireman, instead of putting out fires they are starting books on fire, Montag starts taking books from houses they were burning and hides them in his ceiling. He is breaking the rules of his society by having books. In Tom Godwin's “By the Waters of Babylon” John is a non conformer that wants to know the truth. It’s shown in this statement “The north and the west and the south are good hunting ground, but it is forbidden to go east. It is forbidden to go to any of the dead places” (175). John's society is a group of survivors that has been living in fear, after a nuclear war. John goes to the forbidden city which is against the rules of his society. Because Montag and John are both non conformers it reveals this obvious similarity.
In modern day society people don’t realize that a lot of knowledge is given through books. Thomas Jefferson once said, “Knowledge is power, that knowledge is safety, and that knowledge is happiness.” This goes particularly well with this book because the people in the society do not have knowledge and obviously aren’t happy, this way of life is demonstrated by Mildred. Montag realizes throughout his journey that there needs to be emotions to be happy. Montag and Mildred gradually separate through the whole of the novel.
Fahrenheit 451 is a novel that was written based on a dystopian society. It begins to explain how society copes with the government through conformity. Most of the characters in this story, for example: Mildred, Beatty, and the rest, start to conform to the government because it is the culture they had grown up in. Individuality is not something in this society because it adds unneeded conflict between the characters. The government tries to rid of the individuality it may have. Individuality was shown in the beginning quite well by using Clarisse McClellan and Montag. Clarisse McClellan shows her individuality quite clearly, more towards Montag. After Montag has been living off conformity, he decided to start questioning the world and ends
Fahrenheit 451’s Relevance to Today Fahrenheit 451’s relevance to today can be very detailed and prophetic when we take a deep look into our American society. Although we are not living in a communist setting with extreme war waging on, we have gained technologies similar to the ones Bradbury spoke of in Fahrenheit 451 and a stubborn civilization that holds an absence of the little things we should enjoy. Bradbury sees the future of America as a dystopia, yet we still hold problematic issues without the title of disaster, as it is well hidden under our democracy today. Fahrenheit 451 is much like our world today, which includes television, the loss of free speech, and the loss of the education and use of books. Patai explains that Bradbury saw that people would soon be controlled by the television and saw it as the creators chance to “replace lived experience” (Patai 2).
Guy Montag is a fireman who is greatly influenced in Ray Bradbury's novel, Fahrenheit 451. The job of a fireman in this futuristic society is to burn down houses with books in them. Montag has always enjoyed his job, that is until Clarisse McClellan comes along. Clarisse is seventeen and crazy. At least, this is what her uncle, whom she gets many of her ideas about the world from, describes her as. Clarisse and Montag befriend each other quickly, and Clarisse's impact on Montag is enormous. Clarisse comes into Montag's life, and immediately begins to question his relationship with his wife, his career, and his happiness. Also, Clarisse shows Montag how to appreciate the simple things in life. She teaches him to care about other people and their feelings. By the end of the novel, we can see that Montag is forever changed by Clarisse.
Fahrenheit 451, written in 1953, still advocates for a traditional monogamous relationship for the protagonist. Much unlike The Handmaid’s Tale, which was written in 1985 – a time in which the feminist movement was at large – and wanted a chance to break away from traditional relationships. Initially, Montag is happily under the impression that his relationship with Mildred is acceptable; however this is called into question after her suicide attempt. Montag slowly breaks away from conformity as he realises that their relationship is hardly one at all, that they are unable to connect with each other. Even when he tries to bond with her, asking her about how they met, her Mildred’s response is impersonal and unsympathetic. This is reinforced when she informs him of the death of his friend, Clarisse telling him “she’s gone for good. I think she’s dead” in a nonchalant manner, disregarding her husband’s feelings. His relationship with Clarisse, however, defies what is expected. Upon their first meeting, Montag asks her “But what do you talk about?” showing his shock at the thought of a relationship like that. The society in which they live supports the idea of a lack of communication, as it is easier to conform if the populace cannot connect with one another, thus isolating them; in concordance Aleš Kozel notes that “The emptiness of their bond can be supported