Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Great gatsby character essay
Compare and contrast characters of Lord of the Flies
Character development in the great gatsby essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Great gatsby character essay
The Fall of Christ - Culminating
Since the first storytellers, religion has played an important part in developing both character and plot. From Ancient Greece to Egypt to Judaism to Christianity, the basic stories of human origins have stood the test of time. Classic books such as The Great Gatsby, The Stranger, and Lord of the Flies are full of religious parallels and imagery. Conceptually, main characters of each work--Gatsby, The Stranger’s Meursault, and Lord of the Flies’ schoolboys attempt to be Christ-like figures, but whose demise is ironically brought about by their own sins.
Central characters in each novel display Christ-like characteristics. In The Great Gatsby, title character Jay Gatsby shares many similarities with Christ.
…show more content…
When Daisy kills Myrtle while driving his car, Gatsby takes ultimate responsibility in order to protect his lover. When asked by his close friend and neighbour Nick if Daisy was driving, Gatsby responds, “Yes, but of course I’ll say I was” (Fitzgerald 137). He pays for this with his life when Myrtle's husband George shoots him (Fitzgerald 162) in retaliatory response. Gatsby dies for Daisy’s sin just as Jesus Christ died for the sins of the entire human race (1 Peter 2:24). Like Christ, he is a sacrificial lamb who died bearing the punishment deserved by his beloved. Other parallels also exist between the Gospel and Gatsby's life. In the end, Gatsby's friends desert him, as "nobody came" (Fitzgerald 174) to his funeral. Jesus’ friends also desert him during his final days. When questioned, the apostle Peter denies knowing Jesus three times (Luke 22:54-62). Both men were popular while alive but had their friends turn on them after their deaths. Likewise, Albert Camus conceived The Stranger's protagonist Meursault as a type of Christ figure. In the foreword, he writes, "[this is] the story of a man who, without any heroics, agrees to die for the truth... I had tried to draw in my character the only Christ we deserve" (Camus).
Like Christ, Meursault is silent in the face of his accusers during his trial. "The court scene evokes many aspects of the last judgment of Christ as Meursault can find nothing to say to defend himself" (Maher 279). Meursault exhibits "his identification with the sacrificial offering" (Ohayon 201) when he says (like Jesus's "It is finished"), "For everything to be consummated… I had only to wish that there be a large crowd of spectators the day of my execution and that they greet me with cries of hate" (Camus 123). Like Gatsby, he lived hedonistically but met a very Christ-like end. In contrast, Lord of the Flies includes a more traditional Christ-like character in Simon, who “embodies a kind of innate, spiritual human goodness that is deeply connected with nature and, in its own way, as primal as Jack’s evil” (CCSE). His confrontation with the Lord of the Flies is often compared to Jesus' with the devil during his 40 day exile. First, it is worth noting that Beelzebub--the devil's name in the Bible--literally means "Lord of the Flies" (Catholic Encyclopedia). The pig-head harasses Simon, claiming he is, "just an ignorant, silly little boy," and that, "there isn't anyone to help [him]. Only [the Lord of the Flies himself]" (Golding 128). Just as Jesus had rejected Satan (Matthew 4:1-11), Simon also rejects …show more content…
the devil in his encounter. Both stray from the savagery and temptation of man and stay true to their beliefs. Their deaths are unjust as well, as the societies that killed them have no legitimate rationale behind their actions. Simon is killed out of fear and adrenaline when the other boys mistook him for the beast (Golding 152-153). Jesus was killed for heading a radical new belief, and Simon was killed simply because he was in the wrong place at the wrong time. In both situations, the group which killed them acted unjustly. Simon, though, did not command the following that Christ did. That role is filled by Jack in Lord of the Flies. He is voted as head of the hunters and is obsessively followed by his boys, who raise their spears together and announce "The Chief has spoken" (Golding 78) upon receiving orders. He and his group later separate themselves from the others (Golding 115), much like Jesus and his followers distanced themselves from mainstream Judaism. Though there are drastic differences between Meursault, Gatsby, and two polar opposites in Jack and Simon, all display Christ-like characteristics. The concept of sin pervades all three works.
The “green light” (Fitzgerald 180) Gatsby sees from his house can be interpreted as representing envy. The term “green-eyed monster” refers to the sin of envy, as does "green with envy" (Bourn Creative), which makes sense given Gatsby’s major motivation is envy. While he is still James Gatz, his jealousy of the opulent lifestyles of the rich drives him to succeed. He is jealous of Tom for marrying Daisy, and spends his whole life throwing extravagant parties in hopes that Daisy will "walk through the door" (Fitzgerald 63). In pursuing a married woman, Gatsby is "coveting his neighbour's wife" and attempting to commit "adultery" (Exodus 20:1-17). In addition, other sinful activity definitely occurs during these parties. Chief among them is gluttony, "the excessive indulgence in food and drink" (Christianity Today). The parties are full of "hard-drinking people" (Fitzgerald 77) during the prohibition era. Sin is everywhere in the Great Gatsby, mirroring contemporary culture of the time. In the same way, the deadly sins abound in Lord of the Flies. While Jack has been out hunting, Ralph and Simon were the only two working to construct the shelters. Ralph argues the importance of finishing the shelters before anything else, including hunting. Jack rebuffs him, saying "'We need meat,'" as he "tried to convey the compulsion to track down and kill that was swallowing him up” (Golding 47). Here the reader sees the sin of sloth (or
laziness) in the fact that the other boys did not bother to help with creating shelter or hunting. Arguably, Jack is also an image of sloth. Catholic Answers Magazine states that sloth is “failure to fulfill one’s basic duties” and that “the workaholic, who’s on the job 24-7 and in the process neglects God and family, is the more typical manifestation of sloth in our culture” (Catholic Answers). Based on this definition, Jack is the typical manifestation of sloth, hunting 24-7 and neglecting the wants and needs of the other boys (i.e. his family). Jack also embodies anger, as the “compulsion to [kill]... was swallowing him up”. His anger has blinded him to rational thought, and negatively affects the other boys, as without Jack’s strength it will take a long time to build more shelter. Similarly to the boys in the Lord of the Flies, The Stranger’s affectless Meursault is the literary poster-child for sloth. The novel’s first line says it all: “Mother died today. Or was it yesterday?” (Camus 1). His attitude towards his mother’s death is nonchalant and uncaring, showing that he cannot be touched by anyone or anything. Later on, the story’s defining events are set in motion by Meursault's murder of the Arab on a sunny day. While going to get a drink of water, the foreign Arab uses a knife to shine the sunlight in Meursault's face. This drives Meursault to shoot and kill the Arab with a revolver. He simply says “the trigger gave”, before firing “four more times” at the dead body (Camus 24), showing no remorse for his actions. Interestingly, in Buddhism, the sun symbolizes the God Vishnu, who is believed to manifest in humans as “positive thoughts and emotions” (BBC). Therefore, the sun is a symbol for the feelings and emotions that Meursault cannot deal with. Paradoxically, Meursault, like Gatsby and the schoolboys, is very similar to Christ despite his immoral actions. Through a close reading of the aforementioned texts, the reader can arrive at the conclusion that these Christ-like figures’ demise is brought about by their own sins. Clear is this in The Great Gatsby, where Gatsby’s defining moment of sacrifice is also a misdeed on his part. When Gatsby accepts responsibility for Daisy’s killing of Myrtle (Fitzgerald 137), he is lying about his involvement by taking the fall. Lying is considered a sin, and is forbidden by the Ten Commandments. While Jesus died for the sins of others, he did not lie to do so. Rather, he was falsely accused and accepted his execution because it was part of God’s plan. In fact, theologists have rifled through scripture and found zero instances of Jesus ever lying (Apologetics Press). If Gatsby had not lied, George would not have retaliated against him, and The Great Gatsby would live on. Furthermore, the entire murder scene would not have occurred if Gatsby had truly lived by Christian values. If he had not pursued the very married Daisy in the first place, this whole situation would have easily been avoided. In the same way, Meursault’s actions bring about his own untimely death. Obviously, his murder of the Arab is a sin, one that results in his arrest and eventual execution. Looking deeper into Meursault’s psyche, though, the reader sees that he cares little for human life. In fact, upon hearing about his mother’s death, he comments that it “doesn’t mean anything” (Camus 1). This stands in contrast to the Christian interpretation that "Human life is sacred… involves the creative action of God and it remains for ever in a special relationship with the Creator" (Catechism 2258). It is his lack of compassion for human life that allows him to so easily be drawn to murdering the Arab. His opposition to basic moral values is what is ultimately responsible for his ironically Christ-like death. In Lord of the Flies, Simon is a moral and spiritual character while Jack is a savage. In psychology, the id is the impulsive part of the human psyche, while the superego is the conscience, and the ego mediates between the two, coming up with realistic actions (Freud). So from a Freudian perspective, Simon is the superego of the schoolboys while Jack is the id. We can look at these characters as representing the struggle within every one of us and treat them as one and the same for the sake of this argument. In this case it is clear that Jack’s sins lead to Simon’s death. Jack is the one to whip up the other boys--the ego--into a frenzy of destruction. He leads the boys in the brutal slaughter of a pig, who shove a spear “right up her ass!” (Golding 138) after the pig is already long dead. The hunt is no longer about just having meat to eat—it's about literally bathing in their power over a helpless animal. The basis of Christianity is compassion, and mutilating an already-dead pig is anything but that. He also forces In The Great Gatsby, The Stranger, and Lord of the Flies, there are characters whose story parallels that of Christ: Gatsby and Meursault as well as Simon and Jack. In each work there exists a society full of sin. And in each work, it is the Christ-like figure’s own sins that are responsible for his uprise and demise. All are charismatic yet deeply flawed characters who, in trying to be Christ-like, reveal their true human nature.
Thomas C. Foster in his work How to Read Literature Like a Professor argues that even though characters may display evil characteristics, their religious values overpower and express “themselves in connection with the [character’s] role within society” (Foster 125). Literary characters may display some of the same characteristics as Christ while accomplishing actions with “redemption, hope, or miracle” (132). Jay Gatsby in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby symbolically resembles a Christ figure—sacrificing himself to save Daisy from the law, outstretching his arms towards hope, and coming to West Egg to retrieve Daisy’s unworthy world.
The recurring themes of society, class, and self identity can be seen throughout many different writings of the 20th century. Two of these writings include, “The Great Gatsby” by F. Scott Fitzgerald and, “Their Eyes Were Watching God” by Zora Neale Hurston. Both novels focus on the protagonist's goal of achieving equal rights in their own environment while at the same time trying to figure out who they are in the world. In the early 1900s, when “Their Eyes Were Watching God” takes place, slavery had very recently been abolished (relatively speaking) and the lasting effects of segregation take a toll on Janie, the protagonist. In the Great Gatsby, although Jay Gatsby is white, and thus does not have to deal with the factor of race, he struggles with many different aspects of American Society, mainly the class system and the American Dream. The American dream depicted by F.Scott Fitzgerald is a desire to gain wealth and prosperity. However, at the same time the book does not suggest that wealth equates to success. Even though Gatsby does have material wealth, he is not successful in gaining what he wants to be happy. Despite his material wealth, Gatsby is never united with the love of his life, Daisy. This shows that even though Gatsby has achieved the dream of wealth and prosperity, he has not achieved his final goal. In Their Eyes Were Watching God, Janie too believes in the American Dream, and similarly to Gatsby, it is not a dream of wealth and prosperity. For her, it’s a dream of Freedom in all aspects of life. Both characters however, spend much of their time trying to conform to the rest of the world and essentially be like “everyone” else instead of trying to be distinct individuals. Societal norms of the early 1900s tak...
Christensen, Bryce J. "The Mystery of Godliness." Major Literary Characters: Gatsby. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1991.
In his critical essay, “The Mystery of Ungodliness”, Bryce J. Christensen writes about the parallel that F. Scott Fitzgerald creates between Jay Gatsby and Jesus of Nazareth from the New Testament of the Christian Bible. Christensen explains that Fitzgerald once wrote a letter to his friend, John Jamieson, explaining that he was going to write the story of Jay Gatsby’s youth, but he did not because he wanted to maintain the element of mystery that goes along with the novel. Christensen parallels this to the absence of any detail about the childhood and adolescence of Jesus in the New Testament. Other parallels that Christensen describes include the description of Gatsby by Nick Carraway:
“Earth provides enough to satisfy every man 's needs, but not every man 's greed.” As humans, we work countless hours in order to have a greater opportunity to succeed in life to fulfill our wants. F Scott Fitzgerald, author of The Great Gatsby, utilizes effective language and punctuation in the text in order to accomplish his purpose: Illustrate what material goods does to a society. From a rhetorical standpoint, examining logos, ethos, and pathos, this novel serves as a social commentary on how pursuing the “The American Dream” causes people in society to transform into greedy and heartless individuals.
F. Scott Fitzgerald wrote The Great Gatsby around the 1920s. During the time period of the 1920s, it was considered the “Jazz Age”. This time period dealt with the issue of prohibition, many people attended parties and clubs. Religion did not affect the 1920s social dance very much. During the 1920s people had a sense of freedom, and were not bound by what their religion guided. Many people like flappers went against the standard and did not listen or go by the rule. Written during the Jazz Age period, Fitzgerald wrote the novel The Great Gatsby, and ironically, it is one that explores the concept of an omnipresent God which readers can guess come from the author’s knowledge of catholicism and christianity.
Jay Gatsby and F. Scott Fitzgerald, two different beings, one a book character, the other a human being but both are the same person. Jay Gatsby, as evinced by the the title, is the main character in The Great Gatsby. His goals and achievements is what the novel revolves around. Gatsby is the most interesting character which is why he leaves something to think about in everything he does in the book, but what makes him amazing are the parallels between him and Fitzgerald. Fitzgerald uses Gatsby as a catalyst of his life in the novel.
show how to use that in order to “get rich”. Gatsby was in the bootlegging business and wants to
A fantasy world is a personality trait in which a person experiences a lifelong extensive and deep involvement in fantasy. This is what Scott Fitzgerald attempted to portray about people living in the 1920’s in his novel, the Great Gatsby. This book takes place in the 1920’s, shortly after WWI, a period of time where people were trying to block out the bad memories associated with war and embrace happiness. Embracing happiness meant creating fantasy worlds filled with money and materialistic items, blocking out reality and attempting to relive old memories. In the Great Gatsby, reality clouded by fantasy illustrates that people are not capable of living their lives in a rational way, because their mind has blocked out the harsh reality in which
There lies a child within every human being. No matter how small, some sense of freedom and hope tends to endure in adults, as they once experienced youth. While Tom, Daisy and Jordan exhibit how they share this feeling in the novel, this youthful instinct most evidently appears in the behaviors of Jay Gatsby and Myrtle Wilson. Because they never learn how to survive in the real, adult world, their uncontrollable attitudes catalyze their early deaths. In F. Scott Fitzgerald 's The Great Gatsby, Myrtle Wilson and Jay Gatsby represent childlike desire and the corruption of maturity in the 1920s. Their deaths signify the actuality that childhood terminates, exposing the inevitable reality of adulthood.
The character of Simon in William Golding’s Lord of the Flies has often been viewed as the Christ figure of the novel. If you were to examine the actions of both Simon and Jesus, you would find a number of incidents that parallel each other.
Book Analysis F. Scott Fitzgerald, the author of "The Great Gatsby," reveals many principles about today's society and the "American dream. " One of the biggest fears in today's world is the fear of not fitting into society. People of all age groups and backgrounds share this fear. Many individuals believe that to receive somebody's affection, they must assimilate into that person's society. In the story, Jay Gatsby pursues the American dream and his passion for being happy only to come to a tragedy and total loss.
"The Great Gatsby" is a book full of passion. There is Gatsby 's passionate love for Daisy. There is Tom 's passion for money. When reading this book I realized that these people broke the American dream in their time. They couldn 't be happy when all they did was chase money. The Great Gatsby was full of themes, motif 's, and symbolism and the way that fitzgerald used his characters to get his point across of what it was like back them was marvelous. Gatsby just wanted the love of his life back, so he did everything he could so that he could support her. I think that out of every single character, Gatsby 's choices were the most pure. The only reason he wanted all of the money that he got was because he wanted to make the woman he loved happy,
Themes of hope, success, and wealth overpower The Great Gatsby, leaving the reader with a new way to look at the roaring twenties, showing that not everything was good in this era. F. Scott Fitzgerald creates the characters in this book to live and recreate past memories and relationships. This was evident with Gatsby and Daisy’s relationship, Tom and Daisy’s struggling marriage, and Gatsby expecting so much of Daisy and wanting her to be the person she once was. The theme of this novel is to acknowledge the past, but do not recreate and live in the past because then you will not be living in the present, taking advantage of new opportunities.
The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald tells the story of a world lost to superficiality and greed. Falsehood and deception are the currency which fuels the characters in the novel. Dwelling in this fallen world, Fitzgerald has placed a fallen god. Gatsby is bathed in descriptions that identify him as the Son of God. Fitzgerald makes a conscious effort to clothe this character with imagery and actions to make him the patron deity of this fallen world, but Gatsby is too much enveloped by his surroundings to save them and is consumed in the attempt. Despite the biblical allusions, strong images and explicit statements identifying Gatsby with Christ, the prevailing tone of the novel prevents him from being a Christ-figure.