Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essentials of international relations
Essentials of international relations
Instruments of foreign policy in international relations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essentials of international relations
Policy is being viewed as an explicit plan of action adapted to serve specific purposes. Policy as design is directed towards the accomplishment of objectives, thereby generating expectation that those objectives will be achieved. In the context of international relations, policy can also be known as foreign policy (FP) which is accomplished by policymakers through the decision making. FP refers to the external relations of states or simply diplomacy. FP dictates how a country will act with respect to other countries politically, socially, economically and militarily, and to a somewhat minor extent and how it behaves towards non-states actors. Generally, FP was acting based on the tools or way which is taken by another country in the process to guide other country’s action in the international arena. The tools of foreign policy that almost been used in context of international relations is sanctions, diplomacy, and propaganda (refer to Figure 1 in Appendix 1).
The first tool of foreign policy is sanction. The sanctions policy usually used by one party to prohibit an action and coercive other country to change their behavior of foreign policy for any purpose without using weapon and military force. Basically, the most powerful state will be the one who apply sanctions on other state which is weaker than them. Arm embargoes are one of the sanctions that always used by the United States (US) or United Nation (UN) to influence that target country’s foreign policy for the purpose of gaining benefits. For example, the U.S. has used arms embargoes often for disadvantages potential adversaries such as Iran, Iraq, and North Korea. Yet, unilateral arms embargoes often have a little material effect. For instance, North Korea has been able t...
... middle of paper ...
...leader. The reason is to change the North Korea mindset and internal world. Apart from that, South Korea can use the information, education, culture, and value to shake the North Korea ideology to decrease their loyalty to Kim dynasty.
As a conclusion, there are three tools of foreign policy, which is sanctions, diplomacy, and propaganda.
Works Cited
Brahm, E. (2006). Propaganda. Retrieved from http://www.beyonintractability.org
Carter, B., E. (1988). International economic sanction: Improving the haphazard U.S. legal regime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1984). Propaganda. Quebec, Canada: Boulevard St. Laurent.
Smith, M., S. (2004). Sanctions: Diplomatic tool, or warfare by other means?. Retrieved from http://www.beyonintractability.org
Sparknote. (2012). U.S. government and politics study guide. Retrieved from http://www.sparknotes.com
Steven Hook and John Spanier's 2012 book titled “American foreign policy since WWII" serves as one of the most important texts that can be used in understanding the underlying complexities on American foreign policies. Like the first readings that are analyzed in class (American Diplomacy by George Kennan and Surprise, Security, and the American Experience by John Lewis Gaddis), this text also brings history into a more understandable context. Aside from being informative and concise in its historical approach, Hook and Spanier also critiques the several flaws and perspectives that occurred in the American foreign policy history since World War II.
In conclusion, this extensive review of American foreign policy is just very broad. This topic is his shortened summary of a broad topic in a narrative arrangement, if they contributed anything to the historical understanding of this book. Ambrose and Brinkley made the topic very fascinating and easier to comprehend than a plain textbook. By writing Rise to Globalism and narrating stories without including unnecessary truths and statistics. Thanks to this book, I gained a more thorough understanding of the struggles in the Middle East after Vietnam and a new perception on where American presently stands in the world.
A. The three United States Instruments of Nation Policy and they are: Political, Economical and Military. We are presently using the Political and Economical Instruments with the Military Instrument in the area as a force to show our resolve.
During his rule there was decrease in trading because their main trading partner, the Soviet Union, had just collapsed. Not only that, but there were also numerous floods and droughts that occurred too. This left North Korea in famine, since there was only a certain amount of farming land, this left Kim Jong-Il to worry about his power. With the remaining amount of farming land, he instead decided to use those resources for the military instead of the citizens experiencing famine at the time. After this incident, in 2003, it was found out that North Korea was producing nuclear weapons, but Kim Jong-Il said it was only for security reasons.
Kim Jong-un became the supreme leader of North Korea in 2012 after his father, Kim Jong-il passed away. Kim Jong-un is very similar to his father and predecessor. All he wants to see is
” Before I go on, I feel it necessary to define some key phrases in this resolution: ? Economic sanctions- the deliberate, government inspired withdrawal, or threat of withdrawal, of customary trade or financial relations. "Customary" does not mean "contractual"; it simply means levels of trade and financial activity that would probably have occurred in the absence of sanctions. ? To achieve- to fulfill ?
The United Nations General Assembly 36-103 focused on topics of hostile relations between states and justification for international interventions. Specifically mentioned at the UNGA was the right of a state to perform an intervention on the basis of “solving outstanding international issues” and contributing to the removal of global “conflicts and interference". (Resolution 36/103, e). My paper will examine the merits of these rights, what the GA was arguing for and against, and explore relevant global events that can suggest the importance of this discussion and what it has achieved or materialized.
Shiraev, Eric B., and Vladislav M. Zubok. International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
In early 2003, the threat of Saddam Hussein and the possibility of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq captured the attention and concern of the world. One nation decided to illegally act on these unsubstantiated claims, invading the country, violating the UN Charter and breaking several international laws in the process. The penalizations that were subject to the invading country, the United States, were never carried out. The United State’s role and influence over the UN and the Security Council, along with the nature of the unenforceable, politics and power-based international laws, allowed them to escape sanctions after their invasion of Iraq. The United States did not have a legitimate reason for invading, and their ability to repudiate international law would be unacceptable for any other country. Their decision to invade Iraq was one based on money and politics, and the US should be subject to penalties just as any other nation would have to face after unnecessarily waging war on a nation.
Moore, Matthew, “Arming the embargoed: a supply-side understanding of arms embargo violations”, Journal of Conflict Resolution (2010) 54 pp. 593-615
Wendt, Alexander. “Constructing International Politics.” International Security. Cambridge: President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1995. 71-81. Print.
Mingst, K. (2011). Essentials of international relations. (5th ed., p. 70-1). New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company
government. An example of these interests is gaining territory which is under the control of
Endicott, John E.; Johnson, Loch K.; Papp, Daniel S. (2005) American foreign policy: history, politics and policy. N.Y.: Pearson.
Weber, Smith, Allan, Collins, Morgan and Entshami.2002. Foreign Policy in a transformed world. United Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited.