Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social media and arab spring essay
Arab Spring (Syria Civil War)
Arab Spring (Syria Civil War)
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social media and arab spring essay
In 2011 an extraordinary wave of mass demonstrations swept all over the Middle East. Enormous mass mobilization toppled leaders in Tunisia and Egypt, helped spark bloody battle in Syria, Bahrain, Yemen, and Libya, and essentially reshaped the regime in the area. Social media got a lot of attention during the Arab uprising. Some studies gave the social media major credit for being platform for starting, guiding the civil revolutions, and playing a significant role in the uprisings. While other studies proved that social media did not deserve glorification. this article discuss the two views and try to analyze the facts in order to reach a satisfied conclusion for whether Arab spring needed the social media to spark it or not.
Many people believe that social media played a significant role and helped to accelerate the pace of the revolutions in the Arab spring. (Howard & Hussain, 2013) said that social media is one of the most substantial and mandatory terms for the Arab Spring. Also, the evidence proves that social media spread a cascade of democratic thoughts all over the Middle East, and increased the likelihood of success of political revolution. In the same way, (Khondker, 2011) stressed on the role of social media evidenced by the protests in Tunisia which were forcibly dispersed in 2008 without any backlash. One of the causes was that at that point there were just 28,000 Facebook users in Tunisia; hence the social media penetration was insignificant. The self-immolation of Bouazizi became eventually worldwide event, thanks to the social media that disseminating news, galvanizing the mass sentiment and paving the path for mass protests in Tunisia.
“Facebook revolution” is just an exaggeration. This is on the other hand, wha...
... middle of paper ...
...day prayers and places such as Tahrir Square or the Corniche in Alexandria gave explicit “focal points” for demonstrators. Moreover; many of citizens joined to the marches when they saw it passed by their windows. The same scenario happened in Syria. Both virtual and real demonstrators came out in droves to lead the revolution in the actual ground not in the virtual world.
Last but not least; yes; the social media highlighted the issues of tyranny in some countries in the Arab world so the whole world can reach it. However; it did not play a vital role in the revolution in-country. Also, using the term “Facebook revolution” to name such a revolution is just an insulting. The tools have never been in the history of the humanity a motivator that cause people to go out of their house directly to the streets demanding for their rights. Simply; it is just a tool.
The article named “spring awakening” wrote by Jose Vargas describes the impact of social media in converting the mentality of young Egyptian generations into bold and defend their inalienable rights as a citizen. This article justifies how social media can mobilize a tremendous number of people to stand up for their rights. The reasons that inspire my emotion is emerging of “Wael Ghonim” as a legendary vocal figure of action for change, revelation of social media as earthquake for change, and fundamental soci-political change.
The issues of how technology is influencing our nation today has come into play with social media and surveillance in our personal lives. We use twitter, Facebook, Instagram, etc. to express our opinions on things and as a voice to inform people on what’s going on in today’s society. We have learned how to use the tools we’ve been given to change our lives forever; our government has access to all of our personal information in exchange for our protection against terrorism. In Bijan Stephen’s article on “Black Lives Matter” and Rebecca McKinnon’s chapter on “the Arab Spring”, they both touch on the power of technology in negative and positive ways.
Often times social media isn’t given much thought, and protestors come together and then fall apart. Violence strikes, extremist messages are conveyed, and the central goal becomes lost. If our society looks at social media in a different light, we could find a way to strengthen our activism, instead of ruin it. Twitter isn’t going to disappear, Facebook won’t get shut down, people aren’t going to throw away their phones. We have to adapt. Transforming how we can integrate technology, instead of banishing it, is our only option, because let’s be honest: millennials are too connected. But maybe if we stop seeing this as a bad thing, and rather an adaptive necessity, then our revolution can continue. As Gladwell explains, activism “challenges the status quo” (4). So why not challenge the way we view social
Malcolm Gladwell in his article “Small Change”, published in The New Yorker in 2010, identifies our present time as a long sequence of revolutions, in which the new instruments of mass media have changed the nature of social activism. I think it is possible to agree and disagree with his position at the same time. Obviously, Facebook and Twitter and the like have modulated the existing links between the authorities and the public. They have altered kinds of activism, and the organizations with so-called “strong-ties” gave way to a weak-tie gatherings somewhere on-line. I support Gladwell's claim that “friends” on Facebook, in spite of their assistance in providing their interlocutors with new ideas and news, can't be regarded true friends, ready to back you up in a dangerous, politically unstable situation.
While many people throughout the world see social media as a trendy new application in the service of personal amusement, the political upheavals in the Arab world have shown how it can change the dynamics of modern day activism. The Arab Spring Uprising interlaced social unrest with a technological revolution. Blogs, news websites, twitter feeds, and political list servers became avenues for communication, information flow and solidarity. Being capable of sharing an immense amount of uncensored information through social media sites has contributed to the success of many Arab Spring activists. Social media played a role in facilitating the events of the Arab Spring, but the main issues are rooted in a broader set of economic, political, and social factors. This paper will examine how social media impacted the Arab Spring Uprising. Specifically, I will look at how social media introduced a novel resource that helped to created internet activist communities, changed the dynamics of social mobilization and revolutionized interactions between protesters and the rest of the world.
For example, in Saleem Kassim views, “As a result of the many technological advancements and innovations that have revolutionized how individuals communicate, an abundance of information has become available to everyone.” Saleem Kassim’s point is that anyone and everybody can put out information that can be seen by everyone when you are an internet user. For example, the news can tell you that there’s nothing happening in a certain country; whereas, someone from that country can post on twitter and upload videos showing anyone that decides to see the truth of what is really happening in their country. Kassim also states, “Ultimately, public information supplied by social networking websites has played an important role during modern-day activism, specifically as it pertains to the Arab Spring.” In other words, Kassim believes that digital communication has brought people together to fight for something that is a good cause. To have people aware of the truth and to have someone do something about it. Indeed it is highly likely that we bring people together for a good cause but digital communication can also cause a downside through having no censorship on what you post. When more people are brought up of current events trending they decide to hope on board to see if there is anything they can do to help. Not to mention, Graff and Birkenstein view it the same way. Like I mentioned earlier, Graff and
The digital unarmed strategies in Arab Spring are not the substitute to the physical actions and insurrections, yet they worked jointly with the traditional insurgency methods to reach greater audiences and appeal more public support. Social media is not the strategy that sparked or guaranteed the revolution, but it vitally contributed to the spread of movements.
Although there are notable cases, such as Kony2012 that proved that activism using social media was unable to respond to issues affecting individuals in the modern world. Unlike slacktivism, activism is inclined towards accomplishing a common good in the society. For instance, when women in Saudi Arabia protested the decision by its government to deny them access to driving licenses, it only took activism through social media to attain this right. In the case of Arab Spring, the revolutionary demonstrations were achieved through social media. However, Kony2012 was a big failure in the world of activism due to networked individualism that reduced the impact of
In mere minutes, any active user can access information and associations regarding various causes, such as the riots happening in Egypt and the Middle East. Teenagers, in the Middle East, used their Facebook accounts to campaign the “Day of Rage” in Saudi Arabia. Helping to set the Arab riots in motion, the event demanded elections, freedom for women, and the liberation of political prisoners. The activists’ goals to bring democracy to Egypt and removing Hosni Mubarak, Egypt’s fourth president from 1981 to 2011, still continue and perhaps with the assistance of Facebook they will accomplish these ambitions. The causes campaigned through Facebook have served as a fundraise...
From the words of United States President Barack Obama "Call your members of Congress. Write them an email. Tweet it using the hashtag #My2K." (Coffee). Social media has played an increasing and larger part in today's government. Social media has the power to influence elections and connect the people to the policy makers in new ways.
Moreover, the typical expression of individual freedom is free communication of ideas and opinions through social network, Gladwell says,“With and Twitter and the like,the traditional relationship between political authority and popular will has been upended,making it easier for the powerless to collaborate,coordinate,and give voice to their concern”(134). Gladwell mentions social media as the weak tie relate people together,and he Facebook and Twitter represent the platform which people can freely speaking their voice and communicating with others.and he mentions “Without Twitter the people Iran would not have felt empowered and confident to stand up for freedom and democracy”(134) Social network not only used by American people to freely speaking their voice but also for other countries. Every citizen may speak, write, and print freely for the right is protected by government. Except for the actions forbidden by law, whatever is not forbidden may not be prevented, and no one may be constrained to do what it does not
A contributing factor of how the media is able to positively influence our opinions is the access it provides to information, at an almost instant rate that extends to an international scale. Most recently, following the ISIS terror attacks carried out in Paris; people were informed of the events within hours all around the world GIVE A STATISTIC, maybe find a French one as I can’t find one. The response of the general public on discovering the news was overwhelmingly positive in support of the people of France, in spite of the negativity of the occurrence. The media was the leading example to demonstrate how people all over the world were affected predominantly in a positive manner both in terms of self-definition and personal identity as a result of the terrorist attack. As often is the case in today’s society social media is the fastest and primary outlet that the public use to communicate, react and respond to events around the world. The social network Twitter REFERENCE – maybe you need to put the twitter website? announced on 7th December 2015 that the most talked about subject on their social network was the attacks in Paris with nine million uses of the #JeSuisParis hashtag. The use of social media websites in particular portrays most clearly the feelings of
On social media, each individual has the power to be influential and important. There is a freedom of expression on social media that we are allowed to express. A user on Facebook can post anything they want or anything they want for free.... ... middle of paper ... ...
Social media, a quickly growing and popular knowledge outlet, can become dangerously addictive if the user lacks self-control. There are so many wonderful outcomes from the invention of social media. The biggest being how quickly news can spread. Anyone can share the news that they desire with a few taps on a screen. The fault in this action though, is that false testimonies can be spread just as quickly as true ones. The question is, does the positive outweigh the negative enough for a person to proceed with using social media? Without this innovative creation, though, communication would be dull and boring, so by all means, social media should be used.
...ts. By simply posting a picture on Facebook, a movement for basic rights began. Since the users create the content of new media, people are able to inspire a mass audience.