In The Time Of The Butterflies Summary

1505 Words4 Pages

In the Time of the Butterflies, The Year my Parents Went on Vacation, and Cautiva are three powerful stories that take place during the twentieth century in the Dominican Republic, Brazil, and Argentina. The stories all revolve around the political turmoil that was brought on by evil dictatorships, and raises a number of questions as to the moral dilemmas people were faced with. For example, In the Time of the Butterflies three sisters chose to go up against the dictatorship when knowing full well that they were risking their lives. In The Year my Parents Went on Vacation, Shlomo was faced with the decision of keeping the young boy Mauro, and risked his life in an attempt to track down Mauro’s parents. With Cautiva, the judge is faced with …show more content…

The author, Alvarez, uses the Mirabal sisters to portray different paths to resistance against political oppression, and illustrates why these sisters decided to go up against the dictatorship. Minerva is the first sister to learn the truth about the evil dictator, Rafael Trujillo. She is the second youngest, and is the most intellectual, as well as the most outspoken of the four sisters. After hearing that her school friend Sinita’s brother was killed by Trujillo, she decides to join the underground resistance. I think Minerva realized at that point what this dictatorship was all about, and decided that it must be stopped at all costs. Because this evil dictatorship stripped people of any rights, especially woman, which Minerva experienced first hand. She was prohibited for years from attending law school, and then when she got her degree, she was denied a license to practice. Additionally, her father employed similar violations against woman, being able to withhold education from his daughters, while at the same time secretly having a second family of daughters living in poverty. Accordingly, if nothing was done, then her children, along with everyone else, will have to live through the same oppressive dictatorship, which is no way to live. With that reasoning, I believe that gave her the courage to go out and fight for the future …show more content…

The story is about a 12-year-old boy named Mauro, who gets hurriedly dropped off to his grandfather Motel, by his parents who are left-wing political activist on the run out of fear of being captured by the brutal military regime. The parents tell Mauro that there going on vacation, and will be back for the World cup. Sadly, Mauro is left at the doorstep only to find that his grandfather had died. His father and grandfather were Jewish, and the neighborhood that he got dropped into was mainly Jewish inhabitants, whose language was mainly Yiddish. After waiting at the door for sometime, his grandfathers neighbor and friend Shlomo, comes home to find the waiting boy. Shlomo and the rest of the Jewish community are now face with a moral dilemma. Should the community take in a boy, raised as a “goy,” but the grandson of a recently departed member of their community? And if so, should Shlomo himself be the one to take on this duty? Being the compassionate caring community that they were, most of them agreed that the boy should be taken in, however; the Chief Rabbi tells Shlomo that God brought the boy to your doorstep, and therefore, Shlomo should take the boy, which I agree with. Not just because of God, but because it’s a 12-year-old boy we’re talking about. It would be our duty as human beings to take care of someone in such circumstances, in addition to the fact that Judaism demands that

Open Document