Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Examples of social psychology experiments
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Examples of social psychology experiments
The Stanford Prison Experiment is an infamous social psychology experiment conducted by Phillip Zimbardo to test what normal civilians do when placed in an environment where some are given power over others. In a make-shift prison built in the school basement, individuals were assigned to be either a prison guard or a prisoner and Zimbardo was the jail superintendent. Chaos ensued as everyone abandoned their former personalities and immersed themselves into their designated roles. Prison guards became authoritative and abused the submissive prisoners while Zimbardo stood by and allowed the abuse to continue. A simple pretend jail cell had convinced the participants that their roles were their true selves (Zimbardo). The Water Knife, a novel …show more content…
written by Paolo Bacigalupi, attempts to explore the significance of the environment on human nature. For the duration of the novel, Lucy Monroe, a daring journalist, is overwhelmed by Phoenix and its plethora of problems, including water scarcity, betrayal, and gang violence. She refuses to abandon it at the expense of her safety. However, Lucy finds that the longer she stays in Phoenix, the harder it is for her to maintain the sense of who she truly is. Through the portrayal of Lucy’s self-destructive tendencies and struggle to maintain her morality, Bacigalupi shapes the character into an embodiment of the deteriorating Phoenix. This symbolism reveals that regardless of willpower and personal desires, human nature will ultimately be controlled by the surrounding environment. Throughout The Water Knife, readers clearly see that Lucy is an earnest journalist who passionately pursues the truth behind her stories. Despite her portrayal as an intelligent and resourceful woman, she often makes questionable decisions that puts her into life-threatening situations. In Phoenix, the inhabitants value their survival above all else and to ensure their safety, they must follow the rules of the narcos (drug dealers) and avoid unnecessary attention. However, Lucy grows tired of these restrictions and decides to instead pursue the forbidden topic of James Sanderson’s death and the mystery behind ancient water rights. Through her pursuit, she finds herself stuck in the middle of a power struggle between California and Nevada over water. Although she realizes the involved risks, she submerges herself deeper into the conflict. She is even offered an escape from the hell of Phoenix by her sister, Anna, but refuses to leave. Her obsession with the reveal of the truth, regardless of the peril, exposes her self-destructive nature. Only people who are suicidal would continuously endanger themselves for a meaningless story that, in the end, will not change their society’s workings. Lucy’s chase after the story may appear as a valiant endeavor of righteousness, but it is truly an act to ensure her own demise. Aside from her self-destructive tendencies, Lucy appears to also struggle with maintaining her morality. She debates the extent at which she is willing to use immoral means to accomplish what she wants. Angel’s first meeting with Lucy clearly reveals this struggle. During the encounter, Lucy arms herself with a gun and threatens to shoot Angel, but Angel comments that she does not appear capable of murder. However, to his surprise, Lucy replies, “I don’t have any idea what kind of a person I am anymore” (Bacigalupi 158). This statement reveals that in the past, Lucy’s righteousness may have prevented her from harming others, but the mentality that no one, besides herself, can be trusted has caused her to lose the desire to behave in a moral manner. Instead, she has become more willing to take drastic measures to ensure her well-being. In an environment where dishonesty and sabotage is common, it is impossible for a person to maintain a firm grasp on his/her morality. Eventually, like Lucy, people find that the difference between ethical and unethical deeds is unclear as their surroundings encourage immoral acts above righteous ones. An action that previously was deemed unethical is now considered normal. As the readers observe Lucy’s path towards self-destruction, there is a clear similarity between her character development and the deterioration of her home, Phoenix.
For instance, Angel can recognize Lucy’s resemblance to Phoenix due to his encounter with others who have been negatively influenced by their environment. After a careful observation of Lucy’s photograph, he describes her appearance to possess “striated sun-browned skin, wild pale grey eyes” and that “She’d gone native. In some indefinable way, she’d gone pure Phoenix. She was going crazy. Lost in uncharted territory” (Bacigalupi 141). His comment that Lucy is a full-fledge native indicates that through Lucy’s many years in Phoenix, she has adapted with her environment to the extent that she is now immediately identifiable as a part of Phoenix. She has suffered due to her hostile surroundings, but rather than feel disgust for this horrible place, she developed a deep, personal connection with it. Towards the end of the novel, Lucy realizes that the moment she wrote about forbidden topics signifies the point where “she’d become another bit in the maelstrom, paddling just as madly as everyone else to keep her head above the water and to avoid being sucked down for good” (Bacigalupi 290). This reveals that like the helpless Phoenix who does not wish to collapse under the powerful states, Lucy does not wish to fall under the influence of the malevolence that surrounds her. However, it is evident that both Phoenix and Lucy are unsuccessful in the prevention of their downfalls. Phoenix is pushed on the brink of extinction as Las Vegas cuts off its water supply and Lucy is forced to abandon her own will and commit
betrayal. Lucy’s journey also represents the decline of Phoenix. In the beginning of the novel, Lucy is a high-profile journalist who has snagged a Pulitzer award, owns her own home, and has generated many articles that provide her with a stable income. One can assume that she is doing well in a world where the majority live in poverty. However, at the end of the novel, due to her foolish desire to pursue her story, she finds herself living in hiding amongst the Texans in the slums of the city. She was forced to abandon her home and dog and she finds that all her money has been used to pay for leads in her story. She is unsure whether her next day will be her last. The downward spiral of Lucy’s life and career mirrors the collapse of Phoenix. Phoenix had once thought highly of itself as an untouchable place with its vast amount of expandable water. However, in its present condition, people acknowledge Phoenix as a hopeless case and as a region that is no better than the barren desert. It is viewed upon with contempt by stronger states. Lucy and Phoenix had glorified beginnings, but in the end, both have eventually deteriorated to insignificant existences on the brink of survival. Furthermore, Lucy’s gradual change to an immoral person directly resembles how Phoenix has turned into a depraved place filled with corruption, violence, and narcos. Lucy can no longer be described as a person who has a strong moral code while Phoenix is no longer a place that can nurture people to become honest and ethical. Through Lucy’s stay in Phoenix, she has let the culture and happenings of the place influence her to the point where she is now an embodiment of Phoenix physically and internally. The fate of Phoenix has become the fate of Lucy Monroe. Lucy’s character development due to the influence of Phoenix reveals a critical theme of The Water Knife, which is human nature is ultimately controlled by the environment that one lives in rather than by his/her own will. At first, readers witness Lucy’s refusal to admit that she been influenced by the malevolent environment of Phoenix. She attempts to justify that her morality is still intact through her pursuit of the truth. However, as she continues in her endeavor, she comprehends that it is impossible to remain a neutral spectator as she personally witnesses Phoenix’s hellish nature. Lucy’s betrayal to Angel allows her to realize that “she’d lie to herself all along, pretending she could wade among the refugees and swimmers and dealers and narcos and not have any of it rub on her” (Bacigalupi 290). Lucy foolishly believed that if she desired to remain ethical, the surroundings could never cause her to waver from her morality. Unfortunately, the environment has always been “pressing to make her another of its creatures. Another agent of its horror, creating one more swimmer in a city full of them” and eventually, it succeeds (Bacigalupi 308). Like many other inhabitants, Phoenix corrupts Lucy’s moral nature and she is forced to turn to deception and crime for her own personal interests. Even her attempt to salvage herself from the maelstrom ends in failure as Maria selfishly puts an end to Lucy’s retrieval of Phoenix’s water rights. It is evident that even if people wish to diverge from the normalcy of their environment, they will fail due to the inability to remain indifferent to change. The Water Knife provides a pessimistic portrayal of a strong, independent woman’s inability to resist the negative influence of her surroundings. This ultimately leads her to face the same demise as her home. Strong will and determination is useless when there is pressure to conform to what the surroundings deems as the most ideal way to behave and survive. Along with Lucy, readers come to the realization that human nature is ultimately shaped by the environment. If the environment promotes kindness and honesty, there will be moralistic people. However, if the environment encourages treachery and selfishness, there is no hope for success with righteousness. “Maybe people got choices. But mostly they just do what they’re pushed to do” (Bacigalupi 283).
Her trip is full of obstacles, from bushes of thorns that get caught in her dress, to her crossing of a creek. These elements complicate the conflict and increase the readers' curiosity about the plot. Phoenix can't trust her eyes, choosing instead to walk along with her eyes closed and sense her way with the help of her cane. While needed rest forces her to stop for a while, she has a vision of a little boy handing her a slice of marble cake. So many questions arise in the minds of the readers. Who was the little boy? Is she halluci...
The Implications of the Stanford Prison Experiment In 1971 Dr Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment in the basement of Stanford University. This involved imprisoning nine volunteers in a mock up of Stanford prison, which was policed by nine guards (more volunteers). These guards had complete control over the prisoners. They could do anything to the prisoners, but use physical violence.
On August 14, 1971, the Stanford Prison Experiment had begun. The volunteers who had replied to the ad in the newspaper just weeks before were arrested for the claims of Armed Robbery and Burglary. The volunteers were unaware of the process of the experiment, let alone what they were getting themselves into. They were in shock about what was happening to them. Once taken into the facility, the experimenters had set up as their own private jail system; the twenty-four volunteered individuals were split up into two different groups (Stanford Prison Experiment).
Phoenix Jackson had a vivid description painted for herself by the author. Phoenix was a small and frail elderly Negro woman. She wore a red rag tied upon her head holding up her yet black, curly hair that fell into ringlets. Upon her, she wore a long and dark striped dress with an equally long apron over the top of it. Upon her feet were untied tennis shoes. She always carried her thin and small cane with her, which was actually an umbrella. Her old eyes were blue with age, and her skin had become a pattern of numberless branching wrinkles. By being able to create a vivid picture of Phoenix, the author has allowed a connection between her character and the reader where the reader can now comprehend Pho...
In this study Zimbardo chose 21 participants from a pool of 75, all male college students, screened prior for mental illness, and paid $15 per day. He then gave roles. One being a prisoner and the other being a prison guard, there were 3 guards per 8 hour shift, and 9 total prisoners. Shortly after the prisoners were arrested from their homes they were taken to the local police station, booked, processed, given proper prison attire and issued numbers for identification. Before the study, Zimbardo concocted a prison setting in the basement of a Stanford building. It was as authentic as possible to the barred doors and plain white walls. The guards were also given proper guard attire minus guns. Shortly after starting the experiment the guards and prisoners starting naturally assuming their roles, Zimbardo had intended on the experiment lasting a fortnight. Within 36 hours one prisoner had to be released due to erratic behavior. This may have stemmed from the sadistic nature the guards had adopted rather quickly, dehumanizing the prisoners through verbal, physical, and mental abuse. The prisoners also assumed their own roles rather efficiently as well. They started to rat on the other prisoners, told stories to each other about the guards, and placated the orders from the guards. After deindividuaiton occurred from the prisoners it was not long the experiment completely broke down ethically. Zimbardo, who watched through cameras in an observation type room (warden), had to put an end to the experiment long before then he intended
The Stanford Prison Experiment commenced in 1973 in pursuit of Zimbardo needed to study how if a person are given a certain role, will they change their whole personality in order to fit into that specific role that they were given to. Zambrano significantly believed that personality change was due to either dispositional, things that affect personal life and make them act differently. Or situational, when surrounded by prisoners, they can have the authority to do whatever they want without having to worry about the consequences. Furthermore, it created a group of twenty-four male participants, provided them their own social role. Twelve of them being a prisoners and the other twelve prison guards, all of which were in an examination to see if they will be able to handle the stress that can be caused based upon the experiment, as well as being analysis if their personality change due to the environment or their personal problems.
In the Stanford Prison Experiment, a study done with the participation of a group of college students with similar backgrounds and good health standing who were subjected to a simulated prison environment. The participants were exposed completely to the harsh environment of a real prison in a controlled environment with specific roles of authority and subordinates assigned to each individual. The study was formulated based on reports from Russian novelist Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky. Dostoevsky had spent four years in a Siberian prison and his view on how a man is able to withstand anything after experiencing the horrors of prison prompted Dr. Philip Zimbardo a Professor of Psychology at Stanford and his
There are also mental obstacles that obstruct Phoenix’s journey. She has to triumph over her weariness because of her old age and her mental fatigue. As she is walking her mind plays tricks on her, such as the time when she is in the field and mistakes the scarecrow for a dark mysterious figure that she is frightened of. Another time is when she talks to herself and the animals in the woods. She tells them not to get in her way because she has a long trip ahead of her. The love that one person gives to another is never truly appreciated until the recipient realizes what that person has actually done. The grandson may be too ill or even too young to realize what his grandmother is doing for his safety.
The Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted in 1971 by Philip Zimbardo of Stanford University. The purpose of the experiment was a landmark study of the human response to captivity, in particular, to the real world circumstances of prison life. In social psychology, this idea is known as “mundane realism”. Mundane realism refers to the ability to mirror the real world as much as possible, which is just what this study did. Twenty-four subjects were randomly assigned to play the role of "prisoner" or "guard" and they were made to conform to these roles.
The Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted in 1971 by Philip Zimbardo of Stanford University. The experiment was a landmark study of the human response to captivity, in particular, to the real world circumstances of prison life. In social psychology, this idea is known as “mundane realism”. Mundane realism refers to the ability to mirror the real world as much as possible, which is just what this study did. Twenty-four subjects were randomly assigned to play the role of "prisoner" or "guard" and they were made to conform to these roles.
To begin the experiment the Stanford Psychology department interviewed middle class, white males that were both physically and mentally healthy to pick 18 participants. It was decided who would play guards and who would be prisoners by the flip of a coin making nine guards and nine prisoners. The guards were taken in first to be told of what they could and could not do to the prisoners. The rules were guards weren’t allowed t o physically harm the prisoners and could only keep prisoners in “the hole” for a hour at a time. Given military like uniforms, whistles, and billy clubs the guards looked almost as if they worked in a real prison. As for the prisoners, real police surprised them at their homes and arrested them outside where others could see as if they were really criminals. They were then blindfolded and taken to the mock prison in the basement of a Stanford Psychology building that had been decorated to look like a prison where guards fingerprinted, deloused, and gave prisoners a number which they would be calle...
When put into an authoritative position over others, is it possible to claim that with this new power individual(s) would be fair and ethical or could it be said that ones true colors would show? A group of researchers, headed by Stanford University psychologist Philip G. Zimbardo, designed and executed an unusual experiment that used a mock prison setting, with college students role-playing either as prisoners or guards to test the power of the social situation to determine psychological effects and behavior (1971). The experiment simulated a real life scenario of William Golding’s novel, “Lord of the Flies” showing a decay and failure of traditional rules and morals; distracting exactly how people should behave toward one another. This research, known more commonly now as the Stanford prison experiment, has become a classic demonstration of situational power to influence individualistic perspectives, ethics, and behavior. Later it is discovered that the results presented from the research became so extreme, instantaneous and unanticipated were the transformations of character in many of the subjects that this study, planned originally to last two-weeks, had to be discontinued by the sixth day. The results of this experiment were far more cataclysmic and startling than anyone involved could have imagined. The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast the discoveries from Philip Zimbardo’s Stanford prison experiment and of Burrhus Frederic “B.F.” Skinner’s study regarding the importance of environment.
In the beginning, Lucy’s arrival was comfortable and non-invasive of her private life, her intentions were to report laid-back stories and to make swift cash. To put it bluntly her and fellow colleagues, made jokes about Zoners, and the Merry Perrys while reporting collapse porn during the fall of Phoenix. However, it is simply not accurate that an individual cannot become personal with their surroundings during such traumatic events. As stated by Lucy after she set down roots in the city, educated herself on the Cadillac Desert and stories adjacent to her career “she was one of the actors” in her own written story. In other words, Lucy believes that becoming an actor of her written stories, and opening herself up to her environments she has not only grown to care for the public she has also become one of the people she reported about. As a result, she finds herself desperately reporting on the wrong things, excessively considerate about each dead body found not comprehending how much she endangers herself in the
Popular films are replete with characters that possess symptoms indicating severe psychological disorders. In the film “The Machinist”, the main character displays many symptoms, indicating more than one disorder. This essay will discuss the character’s background, symptoms, and actions in order to attempt to provide an appropriate psychological diagnosis. It is important to remember that filmmakers do not strictly follow the criteria found within the DSM, but any diagnosis found within this essay will be as accurate as possible.
Due to the social status intertwined with Phoenix Jackson, the main character in Welty’s short story, alienation from her society has matured into a prevalent element of Phoenix’s everyday life.