The Warren Commision Conspiracy

On the fateful day of November 22nd, 1963, our 35th President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas. Seven days after the death of John F. Kennedy, the new President Lyndon Johnson launched a federal investigation into the assassination of JFK. Led by Supreme Court Chief Justice Earl Warren the investigation became known as the Warren Commision. The Warren Commision concluded that Lee Harvey Oswald acted as a lone shooter, and that a single bullet struck JFK in the throat and then struck Texas Governor John Connally. This understanding became known as the Single Bullet Theory. The Warren Commision is clearly flawed, shown through research suggesting a great amount of evidence proving so.One piece of evidence that proves the Warren Commission is faulty is the Zapruder Film, correlating with the words and recollection of events that occurred on November 22nd from the first lady herself, Jacqueline Kennedy. More evidence that proves that the single bullet theory is incorrect comes from a witness named James Teague, who was injured during the shooting. The Warren Commision also made many mistakes early on in the investigation, with other

government agencies such as the CIA and FBI withholding information from the Commission contributing to the theory being an insufficent concept. The Warren Commision is undoubtedly incorrect considering the faults depicted through the evidence shown in the Zapruder Film, the words of Jacqueline Kennedy, the witness James Teagues testimony of the event, and the oversights made by government agencies.
The Zapruder Film is a short amatuer movie captured by a man named Abraham Zapruder. The 30 second film was captured on November 22nd, 1963 in Dallas and depicts the horrifying moment that John F. Kennedy was assassinated. This film is pivotal evidence because it proves that more than one ?bullet was fired alongside showing the direction in which the President was shot from.
In the Zapruder Film, the president is shown clutching his neck, portraying the shot that the Warren Commission believed was the single bullet that shot JFK and Governor Connally. But as shown in the film, “the President [is] jerked backwards as soon as he was hit in the head,” (20, Carey Jr.). The film then captures a second shot, showing John F. Kennedy violently blown backwards after he is shot for a second time.
This piece of visual evidence proves that the Warren Commision is flawed. If Kennedy was shot from behind then why is he seen jerking backwards? If Kennedy was shot from behind he would be seen jerking forwards, not backwards. The Zapruder film also proves that there was another shooter in a different location, because Oswald was behind the motorcade at the Texas School Book Depository, but the second shot came from in front of the motorcade. With this evidence it is clear that the single bullet theory is false, and with this evidence it is clear that Lee Harvey Oswald was not the only shooter.
Another piece of evidence that proves the Warren Commission is flawed is the recollection of events from the first lady herself who witnessed this horror firsthand.

In an interview with Jacqueline Kennedy, she explains of how she heard 2 shots fired and possibly even a third shot that was fired, saying, “There must have been two because the one that made me turn around was Governor Connally yelling...I used to think if I only had been looking to the right I would have seen the first shot hit him, then I could have pulled him down, and then the second shot would not have hit him. But I heard Governor Connally yelling and that made me turn around, and as I turned to the right my husband was doing this (indicating with hand at neck). He was receiving a bullet. And those are the only two I remember.” (43, Carey

Jr.).
Even the first lady heard two shots fired. But why wouldn’t the Warren Commission say more than one shot was fired? Why would the Warren Commission not take the word of someone who experienced the assassination first hand? The Warren Commission not taking the accounts of the first lady shows even more that the Warren Commission's theory is flawed.
More evidence that disproves the Warren Commission is another witness to the assassination. James Tague, who was watching the parade like any other American on that day was injured from the gunfire. Describing the event, author Spignesi stated, “The first shot missed completely..The only evidence of the first bullet was a nick on a concrete curb near the triple underpass. A piece of flying concrete from the first shot cut witness James Tague on the cheek”(124,Spignesi). Tague’s injury not only proves that Oswald fired more than one shot, but also proves that Oswald fired a shot that completely missed the presidential motorcade.
Early on into the Warren Commission’s investigation of John F. Kennedy’s assassination, the commission made many errors which could have proved to be pivotal evidence into the investigation. One mistake the commission made was the allowance of ,“...Connally’s clothes to be taken away and cleaned and pressed before being examined as evidence” (129, Mishkin). These clothes could have been important evidence, because they could have shown exactly the angle in which Governor Connally and JFK were shot at. Another very important piece of evidence that could have been used was conducting tests on “Oswald’s rifle to see if it was recently fired”(129 ,Mishkin).Why wouldn’t the commission test the suspected murder weapon? Testing the weapon to see if it was recently fired would be crucial in seeing if Oswald actually did assassinate Kennedy.
Earl Warren hid key evidence from the rest of the commission. Being a close friend of the Kennedy Family, Warren “...denied his fellow commission members access to Kennedy’s autopsy photos becaused he deemed them too disturbing”(Paragraph 3,Andrews). As well as denying this access, “He later refused to allow the commission to interview certain witnesses whom Lee Harvey Oswald may have known in Mexico, and even tried to block an interview with first lady Jackie Kennedy because he didn’t want to invade her privacy” (Paragraph 3, Andrews). In order to avoid conversation regarding Oswald, he went great measures to prevent interviews with people Oswald may have known.
Earl Warren may have let his personal friendship with the Kennedy family take route over seeking justice to get to the bottom of the investigation. If Warren showed the rest of the commission the autopsy photos, the commission could have seen that Kennedy was shot more than one time as well as providing a better explanation to the public on how John F. Kennedy was killed. And if the commission was allowed to interview certain witnesses that Oswald knew, they could have discovered a motive for why Oswald killed JFK. Unfortunately, Oswald was killed by local nightclub owner Jack Ruby 2 days after he assassinated JFK, so it is unclear what Oswald’s motives were in killing Kennedy. It may have been difficult for Jackie Kennedy to explain what happened on that day, but the interview with her could have potentially included details to help the commission provide a better answer as to what happened.
Considering the fact that government agencies such as the FBI and CIA misled them, the Warren Commision had no benefit in reaching out to the bureaus for help. Before the assassination occurred, both the FBI and CIA tracking Oswald. But once the assassination occurred both agencies acted as if they had no knowledge of this criminal .
The FBI misled the commision by failing to inform that Oswald left an FBI officer a threatening note, which the “ FBI later destroyed.. and even removed the agent’s name from a typewritten transcript of Oswald’s address book provided to the Warren Commission. Congressman Hale Boggs would later say that FBI director J. Edgar Hoover lied his eyes out to the commission’s investigators”(Paragraph 5, Andrews). Fearing that they may be blamed for the assassination, the FBI did not confide this information after the events occurred because they may have prevented it. This evidence shows that the Warren Commission was misled and how the FBI prevented the commission from obtaining pivotal evidence in the investigation.
Even the CIA denied they had been watching Oswald although they monitored him when he visited places in 1963. Stated in records, “the CIA [had] Oswald under surveillance when he made a trip to mexico in September 1963 and visited the Cuban and Soviet embassies, but the agency repeatedly denied any connection to the alleged shooter”(Paragraph 5, Andrews). This suggests that agencies hid their evidence from the Warren Commision. If these agencies did inform the commission of Lee Harvey Oswald’s suspicious activities the Assassination of John F. Kennedy could have possibly been prevented.
With all the evidence it is clear that Lee Harvey Oswald did not act alone, it is also clear that the single bullet theory the Warren Commission came up with is false. It is important to discuss that the Warren Commission is false because the American people deserve to know the truth behind the Assassination of John F. Kennedy, a man who truly sought out to change the world and make it a better place.
It seems like everyone remembers where they were on November 22nd, 1963. In a personal interview a relative stated, “I remember the day he was assassinated clearly, it seemed like the whole country was in a state of shock after hearing he was killed. Everyone was so sad to hear about it he was such a great man who was moving the country in a great direction. I still get emotional when I talk about this, it was and still is a great shock,”(C.Cofsky, Personal Interview, May 7th, 2017).
To this day, many people still believe that Oswald was a lone shooter and that there was some kind of conspiracy behind John F. Kennedy’s assassination. The topic of disproving the Warren Commission is important because the American people should be informed about the loss of a great leader, and a great president, while debunking the lies set out by the commission stating what is not at all truthful