The War in Iraq

674 Words2 Pages

The war in Iraq is over now. Looking back on a huge controversy makes one side seem clearly more “correct” than the other. Yet in the beginning there were two sides to the controversy about the war in Iraq. There was the terror brought upon by the 9/11 attacks, people that the government wished to punish or kill like Saddam Hussain and Osama Bin Laden, and a country which was in “need” of US help both politically and financially. At the time of the Terrorist attacks, people were afraid of what else the terrorists were planning or could do and so George Bush sent troops in to look for Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). In hindsight the war on Iraq was a bad idea. The situation was handled poorly, far too much money was spent, and there were far too many casualties to say that the war was a good idea to enter into. To continue war efforts and gain support, lies were spread about finding actual weapons. Later in the war it was revealed that there were never any WMDs. So beyond the decision that was seemingly wrong after a decade of fighting to enter a way with Iraq, the US government lied to prolong the war and continue to waste resources.
The reasons for going to war with Iraq were just and reasonable. Terrorists from Iraq attacked national monuments and important US buildings killing many innocent people. It turn, the bush administration put forth a statement to rid the middle east of their WMDs and to impose a “power house” of sorts to keep terrorism out of America. The goal was always to find WMDs in the possession of the Iraq Terrorists and to get out. Bush even said himself that we would be at war as long as it took and not a day longer. Yet one day it was announced that we had found these WMDs we were looking for...

... middle of paper ...

... all of these resources were wasted on a war that was based upon lies.

Works Cited

Hersh, Joshua. "Iraq War Cost $800 Billion, And What Do We Have To Show For It?"
The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 18 Mar. 2013. Web. 11 Nov.
2013.
war-costs_n_2885071.html>.

Juul, Peter. "The Iraq War Worked Against the United States and Its Interests." US
News. U.S.News & World Report, 20 Mar. 2013. Web. 11 Nov. 2013.

it/the-iraq-war-worked-against-the-united-states-and-its-interests>.

Bush, George W. "George W. Bush - Iraq War Address at Fort Bragg, NC (6/28/05)."
George W. Bush - Iraq War Address at Fort Bragg, NC (6/28/05). American
Rhetoric, n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2013.
/wariniraq/gwbushiraq62805.htm>.

Show More
Related

  • Analytical Report: Ronald Reagan on the 40th Anniversary of D-Day Pointe Du Hoc, France June 6, 1984

    1300 Words  | 3 Pages

    Reagan, R. (1984, June 6). Normandy Speech: Ceremony Commemorating the 40th Anniversary of the Normandy Invasion, D-day at Point-du-Hoc. Retrieved March 9, 2014, from youtube.com: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEIqdcHbc8I&list=FLF2f9pm57gBaWPqzY_jRIoQ&index=50

    Read More

  • Senator Ross Lightfoot

    454 Words  | 1 Pages

    "I did not take $US20,000 in cash with me to Iraq. The only money I took with me was $US1,000 of my own money for personal expenses. I have a receipt," he said.

    Read More

  • An Analysis Of Sargent Clint Van Winkle

    1252 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to the USA News, the war in Iraq was totally worth it. Despite the loss of almost 4,488 American and more than 32,000 Americans wounded, America have to remember that Iraq was out for the USA and had we not freed Iraq from Saddam dictatorship then we would still be today fighting. The facts and the truth may never be truly reveled, but the fact stands that this war had to happen and Iraq needed America to aid them to their freedom and democracy (USA News).

    Read More

  • Music Analysis: Flobots Handlebars

    1645 Words  | 4 Pages

    "How the Bush Administration Sold the Iraq War." Msnbc.com. NBC News Digital, 14 Oct. 2013. Web. 25 Apr. 2014.

    Read More

  • The Inevitable Two-Party System in the U.S.

    1535 Words  | 4 Pages

    Washington, George. Washington's Farewell Address to the People of the United States. Washington: [U.S. G.P.O.], 2004. Print.

    Read More

  • Comparing the Iraq War and the Vietnam War

    2081 Words  | 5 Pages

    No matter how well intentioned the invasion of Iraq may have been, it was an act of violence and deception that has left many American men dead for no clear reason.

    Read More

  • Bush and Blair 9-11 Speeches: Analysis of Rhetorical Devices

    955 Words  | 2 Pages

    President Bush and Prime Minister Blair delivered speeches shortly after the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centers in New York and the Pentagon in Virginia, which occurred on September 11, 2001. Former President George W Bush utilized pathos, anaphora, and personification in his speech to convey an optimistic tone. Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, addressing the same topic, utilized mild invective and parallel structure to express an affirmative tone. Throughout the speech, the former President George W. Bush strives to empower Americans by instructing them to remain resolute, but to “go back to [their] lives and routines”. He uses the personal pronoun we and the common pronoun us repeatedly to indicate that the people of the United States, who either saw the event on television or experienced this event firsthand, were and still are involved in this national tragedy.

    Read More

  • The United States 's Operation Desert Shield

    1183 Words  | 3 Pages

    Saddam Hussein’s main purpose of sending troops to take over Kuwait was to take control of their oil fields, which Hussein believed would be an easy task; however, he failed to understand that the United States and United Nations were keeping a very close watch on the Iraqi’s actions. Hussein also had other motives, such as freeing himself from the debt he was drowning in from the Iran-Iraq War just two years earlier. He set the pretense for war with Kuwait by defining their refusal to give land to Iraq as an act of military belligerence. President Bush ordered the United States to respond just five days after Iraq had invaded Kuwait. If the United States had not taken action, Hussein would have possibly continued to invade other oil producing countries and take control of the United States main sources of oil as well as threaten a number of innocent people’s lives.

    Read More

  • Comparing the Vietnam War vs. Iraq War

    671 Words  | 2 Pages

    The war in Iraq was declared in March 2003 for many reasons. Some of the reasons are to free Iraq, the oil, and because Saddam Hussein did not allow weapons inspectors search for nuclear weapons. The US wanted to take over Iraq and free its people from the torture they had been enduring for so long. Saddam Hussein had developed weapons of mass destruction that posed a long-term threat to America. He denied weapons inspectors access to search for nuclear war weapons and this served as a threat to other countries. The aim had been the destruction of the Iraqi society enabling the US and Britain to gain control of Iraq's huge oil reserves.

    Read More

  • Why the United States Withdrew Its Forces From Vietnam

    1279 Words  | 3 Pages

    final reason that I am going to talk about is the cost of the war for

    Read More

  • War on Terror

    1583 Words  | 4 Pages

    On September 11, 2001, our country was hit with enormous devastation, just after eight o’clock a.m. the first of the twin towers was struck by a suicide pilot, the second was struck slightly later. The towers fell just after ten o’clock a.m., devastating the entire country, and ruining the lives of many. A plane also hit the Pentagon in Washington D.C., and another in rural Pennsylvania causing just as much grief. The U.S. is still in mourning, but standing tall, more Americans showed their American pride in the following months than ever before. In the months to come the only thing that was on the minds of millions was: Should we go to war? War is necessary for the survival of our country. Going to war with Iraq is a fight against terrorism. Many people believed that going to war with Iraq is unjust. Some believe that there are other ways in looking at the situation.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The War On Terror

    217 Words  | 1 Pages

    * There had been several billions of dollars spended since the war on terror began.

    Read More

  • War Profiteering and the Mismanagement of Tax Payer Dollars

    1676 Words  | 4 Pages

    In March of 2003, President George W. Bush launched an invasion of Iraq, thus beginning the Iraq war, or Operation Iraqi Freedom, our most recent involvement with war. Larry Lindsey, an economist for the Bush administration, estimated that this war would cost the United States between $100 billion and $200 billion; however, those numbers were seriously underestimated (Stiglitz 1). In the article, “A Tabulation of the Human, Financial, and Strategic Costs,” Matthew Duss, Peter Juul, and Brian Katulis report that as of May, 2010, the Iraq war has cost the United States $748.2 billion. In the years to come, it is expected that another $422 billion to $717 billion will be spent on veteran health care and disability. As of early 2010, the relief and reconstruction of Iraq has cost the United States an additional $162.83 billio...

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Chemical Warfare

    550 Words  | 2 Pages

    The way I see it, the reason for war is directly related to the fact that any country would feel responsible to react towards the alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction present in any other country. I believe it is correct for the United States of America to carry out a UN authorized investigation in Iraq to search for any weapon present on Iraqi soil. If a country does not believe in using weapons of mass destruction for any destructive purpose as such, and sees no harm in keeping said weapons in the nation’s soil, why have those weapons in the first place? You can run with a lie, but you can’t hide from the truth. It will catch up to

    Read More

  • Vietnam War Counterculture

    1700 Words  | 4 Pages

    Because of its tremendous death toll and subsequent public outrage, the war has created what became known as Vietnam Syndrome, a reluctance to involve ourselves militarily in foreign affairs. If we would involve ourselves, the goal was to get in and out as quickly as possible (Isaacs 67). In many situations, Congress would not give the president permission to deploy troops. They advocated minimal involvement in Latin America affairs during the Reagan administration (Isaacs 73-75). Then, during the George H. W. Bush’s presidency, Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait, effectively forcing the US to use military force. We did not want the Iraqis controlling Kuwait’s oil. Bush promised that the war would not be “another Vietnam.” He planned to use force quickly and strongly to restore Kuwait’s independence. Then we would leave (Isaacs 75). In another effort to prevent “another Vietnam,” the federal government made sure to censor the media, allowing very few bloody images to reach the eyes of the American public. Instead, people saw missiles, but not their targets or the explosions. This was to be a clean war (Isaacs 79). These techniques worked, because people supported the war and patriotism rose. This was a quick war, following the principles of Vietnam Syndrome, which say we should try very hard to stay disentangled from foreign wars (Isaacs

    Read More

More about The War in Iraq

Open Document