The Pros And Cons Of Chemical Warfare

550 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Why bombs were dropped on hiroshima and nagasaki

If a nation possesses anything nuclear, radio chemical or biological that is capable of killing and bringing significant harm to a large number of humans, there is no saying what level of power and trouble said nation could cause. Chemical warfare involves using the toxic properties of chemical substances as weapons. Something as serious as sending chemical substances to a foreign country with the implications of killing a large number of civilians requires immediate attention. The only country to have used a nuclear weapon in war is the United States of America. Two bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II which clearly shows us how threatening weapons of mass destruction are. There are eight countries that have declared I think it’s safe to say that no civilian would get another night of peaceful sleep knowing that they are unprotected and live in a world of terror. Instead of using weapons as defence mechanisms, why not stop using destructive weapons altogether so one would inherently have less to defend himself from? There are two ways to destroy chemical weapons. The first method, incineration, involves the burning of liquid agents in furnaces at a very high temperature. For chemical agents in bombs this is a multistep process. Neutralization, the second method, destroys the chemical agent by mixing it with other chemicals and hot water like Sodium hydroxide and hot water. The way I see it, the reason for war is directly related to the fact that any country would feel responsible to react towards the alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction present in any other country. I believe it is correct for the United States of America to carry out a UN authorized investigation in Iraq to search for any weapon present on Iraqi soil. If a country does not believe in using weapons of mass destruction for any destructive purpose as such, and sees no harm in keeping said weapons in the nation’s soil, why have those weapons in the first place? You can run with a lie, but you can’t hide from the truth. It will catch up to

Show More
Related

  • The Use of Chemical Agents in World War I

    898 Words  | 2 Pages

    History has proven the use of chemical weapons ranging back for decades. From the Greeks in ancient Europe using Greek fire to South American tribes using a form of tear gas made of grounded up hot chili peppers to scare away enemy tribes. As well as dipping the tips of spear heads with a poisonous toxin. Poisonous toxins used from live reptiles like frogs and venom from the snakes found from whichever region had enough potency venom to exterminate. The past has proven, that in order for Armies to survive and win, it relied on out smarting the enemy. New technologies and the evolution of weaponry were left to the brightest minds from those eras to develop.

    Read More

  • How Did the Cold War Affect the Politics of Germany and Italy?

    1982 Words  | 4 Pages

    In 1945, the USA was the only country in the world that had the nuclear weapons. But in the 1949 USSR started to learn about their nuclear weapons. In further developments forced the USSR was soon created by nuclear, and then thermonuclear weapons. Isaacs J, 2008: Fight has become very dangerous for all.

    Read More

  • Comparing the Vietnam War vs. Iraq War

    671 Words  | 2 Pages

    The war in Iraq was declared in March 2003 for many reasons. Some of the reasons are to free Iraq, the oil, and because Saddam Hussein did not allow weapons inspectors search for nuclear weapons. The US wanted to take over Iraq and free its people from the torture they had been enduring for so long. Saddam Hussein had developed weapons of mass destruction that posed a long-term threat to America. He denied weapons inspectors access to search for nuclear war weapons and this served as a threat to other countries. The aim had been the destruction of the Iraqi society enabling the US and Britain to gain control of Iraq's huge oil reserves.

    Read More

  • Chemical Warfare Persuasive Reasearch Essay

    808 Words  | 2 Pages

    "Chemical Warfare Agents - Resources on the health effects from chemical weapons, emergency response & treatment, counterterrorism, and emergency preparedness.au.af." Specialized Information Services - Reliable information on toxicology, environmental health, chemistry, HIV/AIDS, and minority health. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 May 2010.

    Read More

  • Chemical Warfare in WWI

    894 Words  | 2 Pages

    Fries, A. A., & West, C. J. (1921). Chemical warfare,. New York [etc.: McGraw-Hill book company, inc..

    Read More

  • Weapons of Word War I

    1549 Words  | 4 Pages

    Chemical warfare is the use of chemical agents to injure, incapacitate, or kill enemy combatants. First seen during World War I (WWI), the devastating effects of widespread chemical warfare were eventually deemed inhumane by an international consensus and chemical agents were subsequently banned from use. Still, despite the tendency of the modern warrior to overlook antiquated tactics, the threat of chemical agents in the theater of war cannot be entirely discounted by today's Soldier. By analyzing the application, evolution, and overall legacy of chemical weapons in the Great War we can work to minimize the danger they pose in current conflicts and those of the near future. For it is only by understanding the past that we can understand the present and shape tomorrow.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Nuclear Power

    1250 Words  | 3 Pages

    The continuous spread of nuclear technology and nuclear weapons is a threat for national security and the safety of the entire planet. The inextricable link between nuclear energy and nuclear power is arguably the greatest danger of nuclear power. The same low-enriched uranium that is processed in a nuclear power plant is the same uranium used to make nuclear weapons. Nuclear power plants are the contributors to these mass destruction weapon capable of wiping out the human race. An article published by the World Nuclear Stockpile Report says, “ Nine countries in the world posses a total of 15,375 nuclear weapons.

    Read More

  • Extreme Pacifism Essay

    1357 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of the main motives behind actually going to war aside from the acts that occurred on 9/11 was the belief that there were weapons of mass destruction. Weapons of mass destruction were never found. Going to war w...

    Read More

  • The Chemical Warfare Service

    1016 Words  | 3 Pages

    On 10 July 1943, the allied forces attacked Sicily to stop the German occupation of Europe. The allied forces carried out combined attacks utilizing paratroopers, the Navy and Army land forces to start a battle that gave the allied forces a stronghold in Europe that fed into other military operations and a training location for Soldiers landing in Normandy later in the war. The initial battle and beach landing was anything but flawless. The ocean was violent and the paratroopers were scattered off their target area by more than 20 miles (Birtle, 2003). The axis forces unsuccessfully attempted to stop the allied forces by attacking units landing on the beaches. Nevertheless, the allied forces pushed forward and landed on the beaches of Sicily. The allied forces including the 83rd Chemical Battalion, which employed the 4.2 inch HE mortar, were engaged in intense battle against the Germans and the Italian forces (Birtle, 2003). Consequently, the Success of the operation was largely due to the mobility, accuracy and lethality of the 4.2 inch HE mortar. The Chemical Mortar Units provided critical support to the infantry units. However, the 4.2 Inch mortar has not been combat proven in battle prior to this operation. The mortar is a product of the efforts of Soldiers assigned to the Chemical Warfare Service Technical Command.

    Read More

  • War With Iraq

    1075 Words  | 3 Pages

    What does the United States have to gain from a war with Iraq? Supporters of a war with Iraq say it will help prevent the risk of an attack by a weapons of mass destruction developed by Iraq. Critics of a military action that say nothing will be gained, and the U.S. just wants to obtain the oil that Iraq controls. They claim that casualties will be too costly for America to afford. Nonetheless, America should act while others will not for fear of disturbing global peace. Iraq poses a “clear and present danger” to the security of the United States and the security of countries around the world.

    Read More

  • Chemical Warfare

    861 Words  | 2 Pages

    War takes time, and with chemical warfare that time should. in thought, be quicker. Yes, its true that wars may be quicker with these weapons, but it also will kill millions, possibly billions more. Is it worth to lose billions of lives just to end a war quicker? Not at all! We must remember that these lives are not all military. In World War 2 the civilian to combatant death ratio was 3:2 and in Vietnam it was 2:1. These civilians are just like us. These men, women, and children don;t want to be in war, and yet they would die just because someone decided to use chemical weapons to end this war. Is it justified to kill these people just because we don’t want to lose? That is not the way to think.

    Read More

  • Canada and Chemical Weapons

    733 Words  | 2 Pages

    Chemical weapons date back the Peloponnesian war of 428-424 BC when they were used against the Spartans; the chemicals used were incendiary devices and sulfur-based gases that were blown by the wind onto besieged cities. The chemical weapons used then aren't nearly as deadly as those used in more recent times such as mustard gas, they were more to cause there enemies to retreat. There have been many incidents in history in which chemical weapons have been used as I have found in two articles on the history of chemical weapons. The articles I found are "A Short History of Chemical Weapons", and "Creating the Faith: The Canadian Gas Services in the First World War".

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapons

    1262 Words  | 3 Pages

    Governments from other countries should be able to work things out and settle business without fearing that someone will be threatened with a nuclear war. These weapons have a very high percent of total destruction, other countries do not think about when they use these fatal weapons as an excuse, of what they will really do when sending the bombs off. They are only thinking of defending themselves no matter what the consequences are, little do they know that it could come back and bite them in the butt. Nuclear weapons will not only cause destruction to one country but all of them. Banning these dangerous weapons will make sure that these excuses will no longer be a problem to the world, countries and nations will not have to fear if they are putting the entire world in

    Read More

  • Biological and Chemical Weapons

    1197 Words  | 3 Pages

    Chaos, fear, and death. Those three words are what most people’s first thoughts are when they see the destructive offspring of either Biological or Chemical Weapons. These Weapons of Mass Destruction (also known as WMD’s) are actually considered the deadliest weapons of all time to not only humans but also to other animals, and plants. Biological and Chemical Warfare has become a major threat not only to the safety to the people of America, but also on the frontlines across the world but, that in order to fix these that the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention and Chemical Weapons Convention could do is to make mandatory background checks for anyone who buys any additives that are in any Bio/ Chemical weapons, mandatory safety exercises, and make bans heavier on the use of these weapons in war.

    Read More

  • Chemical Weapons Essay

    521 Words  | 2 Pages

    The use of chemicals in weapons dates back thousands of years, from poison arrows to poisonous fumes. However chemical warfare took a new approach during World War I. The first large scale attack was chlorine in april 1915. World War II brought on a entire new spectrum of chemical weapons and many countries obtained large stockpiles.1There are four different categories in which chemical weapons are organized based on what the effects are. The first category is blister agents which cause blistering of the skin. The second category is choking agents which cause the airway passages in the victim's throat to close resulting in death. The third category is nerve agents which causes damages to the victims nerves. The most recent uses of chemical weapons was on august 21, 2013 in Damascus ,Syria which resulted in numerous casualties.2

    Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Chemical Warfare

Open Document