Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of the industrial revolution on Britain
Impact of the industrial revolution on Britain
Impact of the industrial revolution on Britain
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of the industrial revolution on Britain
Thomas Shadwell’s famous scientific satire The Virtuoso lampooned the frivolous and non-utilitarian scientific processes that were prevalent during the early years of Royal Society of science. Although Shadwell targeted his contemporary self-proclaimed virtuosos who practiced science only as a fun diversion, he simultaneously managed to predict some of the more dire consequences that would come about from the development of machine technology and the process of industrialization. It would be disingenuous to imply that Shadwell was writing a Marxist critique of technological development and its effect on the English workforce, or even that he was an anti-machine Luddite, as both of those ideologies would not come to be developed until well after two hundred years after the Restoration period. It can, however, be said that many scenes in The Virtuoso make accurate predictions as to what scientific advancement would bring and to what effect it would have, and that Shadwell’s play doubles as both a critique of the scientific process of the Royal Society and of the Industrial Revolution and the socio-economic chaos it would cause, even though it was still one hundred years away from beginning. Industrialization was still a long way in the making, but it’s effects could be seen long beforehand. Shadwell also satirized the attitudes held by those that championed these developments. This is best highlighted by the characterization of the titular virtuoso, Sir Nicholas Gimcrack, as somebody who does not care about the consequences of his actions, and by several scenes, such as where Gimcrack creates horrible sheep-men hybrids, or when Gimcrack and his colleagues are set upon by an angry mob of ribbon-weavers led by his Uncle Snarl, and th...
... middle of paper ...
... in Shadwell’s time created the same effect as the wealth-creating philosopher's stone. Of course, industrialization would have much nastier side effects like pollution and increased workplace-related deaths and injuries.
My intention here is not to portray Shadwell’s The Virtuoso as a politicized play with a specific agenda, nor is to imply that Shadwell’s play has a grotesque plot filled with sinister characters. What I hope to show is that while The Virtuoso was first and foremost a comedic performance that parodied the self-styled virtuosos of its age, it also provided a significant critique of technological development and its effects on society. Shadwell is mocking science and the Royal Society in his work, but without a doubt he recognizes it as powerful force in society, albeit not a force worthy of the reverential attitude that society treats it with.
The factory whistle blows right in the middle of your favorite dream. You wake up in a startle as you glance at the clock. 5:30 am. You rush to get out of bed, seeing that you have to get to work in 30 minutes. You splash some water on your face, brush your teeth, put on some fine factory clothes, pull your hair back, grab an apple and run as fast as a gazelle. The Industrial Revolution had both positive and negatives on the lives of adults and children during that time period.
The industrial revolution had mainly negative effects. The industrial revolution was a time in world history that has technically never ended. It is the time when society started to mass produce goods in order to provide enough goods for the booming population. People started to move from villages to cities where factories were looking for workers. New medical advances were made and people began to live longer. While some might argue that industrialization had primarily positive consequences for society because of the increased amount of new and cheaper products, it was actually a negative thing for society. Industrialization’s negative effects were the dangerous and sometimes lethal work areas, poor living conditions and cramped housing,
With the burgeoning interest in scientific discovery during the Industrial Revolution "transform[ing] British culture" and "changing the world"(Lipking 2065), many concepts of society were also changed, which Shelley looked to explore through Victor's actions. Rooted in the scientifically curious spirit of Industrial England, Victor's attempt to create life can show many examples of how the importance of the individual acquisition of knowledge and accomplishment can disrupt society. Victor's pursuit of knowledge is firmly rooted in this curiosity that Mary Shelley would have seen England and Europe enthralled by, evidenced in many passages, but most notably in his escalating interest in the sciences, changing focus at each new discovery he makes.... ... middle of paper ... ...9 May 2012.
Through the use of satire, the issues presented by Waugh in Vile Bodies become greatly influenced by the time period in which the novel was written. Great Britain, in the late 1920’s and early 1930’s, was placed on the time line between the Great Wars. Thus, the novel’s placement in the history shifts its focus not only toward the emergence of the World War II but also on the depressed postwar economy of Britain at the time. Some of the most prominent ideas evolving during this period of time were embracive of the idea of change in areas such as religion, science, art, social rules, literature and economic and political conditions—changes that most often led to a feeling of “loss of community” (Wellman, 327). Because of the nature and the ongoing changes during this period the idea of modernism also played a major role in Britis...
The Industrial Revolution was a time of great change and increased efficiency. No more would be goods be produced by sole means of farming and agriculture, but now by the use of machinery and factories. Technology was beginning to increase along with the food supply as well as the population. However, this increase in population would greatly impact the social aspect of that time. Urbanization was becoming much more widespread. Cities were becoming overwhelmingly crowded and there was an increase in disease as well as harsh child labor. Although child labor would be reduced somewhat due to unions, the Industrial Revolution still contained both it’s positive and negative results.
Since a boy, Frankenstein’s passion is to explore science and that which cannot be seen or understood in the field. He spent the later part of his childhood reading the works of commonly outdated scientists whose lofty goals included fantastic, imaginative desires to “penetrate the secrets of nature” (Vol. 1, Ch. 2). While he was told that these authors predated more real and practical scientists, he became intrigued by their ambitions, and devoted himself to succeeding where they had failed. When Victor is criticized at college for his previous studies in obsolete research, he takes after one of his professors, M. Waldman, in studying chemistry. In a lecture, Waldman tells of ancient teachers in chemistry who promised miracles and sought after “unlimited powers” (Vol. 1...
The American industrial revolution took a dynamic course in history, transforming society with both negative and positive results. For example, some of these positive effects were the creation of new jobs, boosting the economy, and manufacturing of new products. However, there were also the not so nice outcomes, such as low wages, depletion of natural resources, and unsanitary living conditions. Together, both the positive and the negative worked in tandem to transform American society.
When large production and technological innovation arose, change was created in social and economic lives. Before industrialization began, there were only two classes know, the rich and the poor. However, after industrialization, there were the middle working class and the rich. The rich were mainly factory owners and the middle workers were people from farms who migrated to the city to gain a better life and better work. Economically, industrialization made production increase. There was more than one source where people can go buy their goods and therefore, an increase in competition for the better product began. Then came the development of railroads and trains that helped workers get job opportunities. That is why industrialization has been and would be an important part of history.
It was also accountable for numerous other consequences that had long lasting effects on not just America, but the world as a whole. It had a huge influence on the shift of people from rural areas into the cities and an even larger impact on immigration. This industrialization also led to a significant shift in wealth and helped to create the middle class. However, the most significant effect of the industrialization of America is that it shifted the balance of power and eventually led to America becoming one of the world’s superpowers. Stephen Gardiner, a British architect and writer summed it up nicely when he said; “The Industrial Revolution was another one of those extraordinary jumps forward in the story of
The positive results of the Industrial Revolution was worth the negative consequences it brought onto Earth because cities wouldn’t be able to develop and half of the population would continue to farm and use the putting-out system to make clothes and goods. The Industrial Revolution moved civilizations into a new age where traveling became easier and faster, cities became cleaner and safer, and goods became cheaper and more accessible.
When discussing industrialization much of what is discussed occurs during the industrial revolution. Unlike other revolutions which mostly impacted borders, territorial expansions, change in political regimes, etc., the Industrial revolution was change of a different sort. Occurring mostly within America and Europe, the Industrial Revolution impacted society as a whole by introducing innovations which impact the way one generally lives on a day-to-day basis. New machinery, methods, and techniques of producing goods such as the way clothes are made, or the way waste is produced changed the way society functioned. Overall, the Industrial Revolution improved quality of life. Initially, however such rapid change also caused human suffering of a
...not on governments, but on men of initiative, determination, ambition, vision, resourcefulness, single-mindedness, and (not infrequently) good, honest greed” (117). The Industrial Revolution, led by Great Britain, greatly changed the existing attitude of powerlessness towards nature to one of power because now people were able to produce enough goods and food to support the expanding population. The ability to produce a surplus that arose from the ongoing industrialization meant that people no longer had to worry over nature and its effects on the economy. The Industrial Revolution led by Great Britain radically changed Europe's social and economic ways of life and provided the impetus for the tremendous progress of the 19th century.
The Industrial Revolution that began in Europe changed society in many ways. Some changes were positive, but others were negative. Some positive outcomes were that new jobs were created, and trade increased. The negative outcomes consisted of pollution and the slums of working individuals.
The Industrial Revolution was a period from 1750 to 1850 where agriculture, manufacturing, transportation, and technology went through a period of significant change. These changes had a profound impact on the social and cultural conditions of the time, beginning in the Untied Kingdom and spreading throughout Western Europe, North America, and the rest of the world. The Industrial Revolution, considered a major turning point in history, effected almost every aspect of daily life; through new discoveries in technology came new jobs; through new jobs came new working conditions; through new working conditions came new laws and new politics, the repercussions of which extend to today. As Crump emphasizes: ‘The world as we have come to know it in the twenty-first century is impossible to understand without looking at the foundations laid – mainly in the English-speaking world of the eighteenth century – in the course of what is now known, but not then, as the ‘Industrial Revolution’ .
In her intriguing article “Avant-garde theatre: has Britain lost its mind?” arts and media correspondent on the Observer, Vanessa Thorpe, describes avant-garde as follows: