Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The birth of american colonies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The birth of american colonies
The chartered companies in England, whose major precursor being medieval merchant-guilds, were a form of organization that had lawful trading monopolies over certain goods in specific geographical areas as stipulated in the state-granted royal charters . As many companies became engaged in overseas trading in the sixteenth century, an innovative form of chartered company, namely, the joint-stock company came into being as an evolution from the “regulated” chartered companies. First, their structure minimized commercial and political risks involved in the dynamic conditions overseas, which spread risks and provided incentives to investors in the companies. Second, “the issuance of a royal charter granted these entities quasi-governmental functions, such as recruiting settlers and building fortifications” that gave the companies more flexibility. Joint-stock companies played a linchpin role in the establishment of New England. This essay takes Virginia Company as an example in support of this statement by analyzing the principal evidences that demonstrate Virginia Company’s historical, political and philosophical significance to permanent settlement in America. Most people, during their conversion at the Thanksgiving Dinner table, would not associate Virginia Company with the founding of the United States; however, this is not the case. Virginia Company is equally important to the birth of the United States of America, if not less, than the Massachusetts Bay Company.
In 1606, King James I, a few years after acceding to his throne, granted charters to two companies that applied for the royal charter, the Virginia Company of London and the Plymouth Company. This move catered to the needs of England at that time as England was i...
... middle of paper ...
...l History (Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1909), vol. III, 194
Braddick, M. J., State formation in early modern England, c. 1550-1700, (New York : Cambridge University Press, 2000), 399.
Rudolph Robert, Chartered Companies and their Role in the Development of Overseas Trade (London: G. Bell and Sons, Ltd, 1969), 12.
Encyclopӕdia Britannica Online, s. v. "chartered company," accessed November 12, 2011, http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/107687/chartered-company.
L.H. Roper, The English Empire in America, 1602 – 1658: Beyond Jamestown (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2009), 6.
L. Maren Wood, The Founding of Virginia, accessed November 13, http://www.learnnc.org/lp/editions/nchist-colonial/2029
Rudolph Robert, Chartered Companies and their Role in the Development of Overseas Trade (London: G. Bell and Sons, Ltd, 1969), 100.
. Ibid, 101.
Thesis: The Roanoke colony proved to be an unsuccessful venture in the New World for England, since leaders of the expedition held the viewpoint that privateering would prove to be the most profitable aspect of founding the new settlements in the West. However future, still unsuccessful attempts to make a permanent colony at Roanoke, helped England understand how to build a prosperous one; and it became a building block for establishing future colonies for England and helped shape the ideas that would help launch their empire.
In the early stages of North American colonization by the English, the colony of Jamestown, Virginia was founded in 1607 (Mailer Handout 1 (6)). Soon after the Massachusetts Bay Colony was founded in 1629 (Mailer Handout 2 (1)). These two colonies, although close in the time they were founded, have many differences in aspects of their lives and the way they were settled. The colonies have a different religious system, economic system, political system, and they have a different way of doing things; whether that be pertaining to making money, practicing religion, or electing governors. Along with the differences, there are also a sameness between these two colonies. Each colony has been derived from England and has been founded by companies
The Crusades of the middle ages introduced much innovative and formerly unheard of merchandise into Western Europe; however the scarcity of these luxury goods instilled Europeans with drive to find easier access to the Far East. Although desired "Northwest Passage" never was found, joint-stock companies, like the Virginia Company of London, settled colonies in the New World for untapped resources such as silver and other tradable goods. Many more corporations followed suit, settling mainly in the Chesapeake Bay area, their small settlements eventually developing into the Chesapeake colonies. The Chesapeake colonies were focused primarily on profitable enterprises. At the same time, the New England colonies were being settled with a whole different set of initiatives, principally religious freedoms and family. Governing bodies were established, with their success dependent on the quality of the settlers the colony attracted. The different motives for settlement affected the routine events in such a way that the New England and Chesapeake colonies differed very greatly from one another even though they were both mainly settled by the English.
The settlement of Jamestown was controlled by the London Company. The London Company, for the most part, had full control of the colony. Jamestown greatly needed to plant crops, but instead the Company, driven by money, ordered the settlers search for gold and other values. The directors of the Company had little knowledge of what really needed to be done in the colony, and they did not seem to care. Plymouth colony was also supposed to be controlled by the London Company, bu...
In a similar economic revolution, the colonies outgrew their mercantile relationship with the mother country and developed an expanding capitalist system of their own. In England, the common view was that the colonies only purpose was to compliment and support the homeland. This resulted in a series of laws and protocols called th...
One facet of this unique system involved the numerous economic differences between England and the colonies. The English government subscribed to the economic theory of mercantilism, which demanded that the individual subordinate his economic activity to the interests of the state (Text, 49). In order to promote mercantilism in all her colonies, Great Britain passed the Navigation Acts in 1651, which controlled the output of British holdings by subsidizing. Under the Navigation Acts, each holding was assigned a product, and the Crown dictated the quantity to be produced. The West Indies, for example, were assigned sugar production and any other colony exporting sugar would face stiff penalties (Text, 50). This was done in order to ensure the economic prosperity of King Charles II, but it also served to restrict economic freedom. The geographical layout of the American colonies made mercantilism impractical there. The cit...
In the early years of the British Colonies, business and trade were very important because they were major factors of growth. Therefore, there had to be little barriers to trade in the newly founded colonies, and the...
A Declaration in 1622 is a piece of history that will forever be debated. It was written by Edward Waterhouse who was a prominent Virginia official. In a Declaration in 1622, he describes his first-hand accounts of English genocide and the relationship between the Powhatan and settlers. The point of this paper is to claim that Waterhouse’s portrayal is realistic due to his factual perspective of the time period on the contrasting aspects of the Powhatan and settlers. Diving into Edwards historical accounts can show the hardships of the settlers, the varying characteristics of both groups, the importance of tobacco, and the demonization of Native Americans. The characteristics will conclude the factually sound delineation of Edward Waterhouse.
The main goal for the Virginia Company was to trade with the native population. They wanted anything that would result in profit. In 1607, male traders who weren’t farmers or ministers were to obtain food, ship exotic crops, gold, and Indian items to England. Many men went searching for gold to gain profit, although they failed to find any. Powhatan, the Paramount Chief saw the English traders as possible allies to gain goods. John Rolfe, a colonist who imported tobacco seeds from the West Indies and produced them caused a migration of thousands of English settlers. To promote more settlers, the Virginia Company allowed them to own land. They also adopted self- government, using a system called a “greate Charter.” The migrants may have succeeded in business, but they fell short on necessities. Since they settled in a swampy peninsula, there was a very
Bentley, J., & Ziegler, H. (2008). Trade and encounters a global perspective on the past. (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 182-401). New York: McGraw-Hill.
In the 17th century, England was late when it came to the colonization of the new world. Which went through many changes before it was able to test the waters, forming the first settlements in the mid-Atlantic, Virginia. Under the guise of a noble mission given to them by King James I, the Virginia Company funded the first Colonies in Virginia. Years later, after perfecting their skills at surviving this new land, colonies in the south, Carolina were formed. These two regions both had their share of challenges, but they overcame them in different ways. Each had a method of doing things by force or from trial and error. The world in 1606 was very different than the world of today, but this is a story based on the
MacMillan, Ken. “Sovereignty “More Plainly Described”: Early English Maps of North America, 1580-1625.” Journal of British Studies 42, no. 4 (2003). Accessed 2 November 2013. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/376461.
Many economic systems are revealed in A Respectable Trade: Slavery, Feudalism, Self-Employment, and Capitalism. England in 1788 was entering a period of economic transition. Viewing this finite period in A Respectable Trade allows us, as economists, to dissect the different market systems prevalent during that time.
Ann Charters. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, a 2011 book. 1629 - 1631. Print. The.
Taylor, Alan American Colonies: The Settling of North America, New York, NY: Penguin Group, 2001. pg. 1685-1730