Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparative analysis between pepsi and coke
Comparative analysis between pepsi and coke
Coca cola and pepsi financial comparison
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparative analysis between pepsi and coke
Cola Wars came into existence since 1980’s though marketing campaigns of soft drinks rivals such as coca cola. Different kinds of challenges were being posed by companies like Pepsico and coca cola for marketing their products by innovating products through line extensions and entirely positioning different products for customers at worldwide basis. The modifications were being done in pricing strategy, bottling of products like soft drinks and brand positioning.
Each component has been analyzed though value chain analysis. They are such as resources and capabilities. The value chain analysis will help in creating greater value for customers by soft drink industry by classifying its activities into primary and secondary categories.
Primary activities
…show more content…
• There are higher exit barriers for the bottlers.
• The advertisement budgets have become much higher and getting influenced from perception of customers.
Coca cola got positioned itself in market by creating a sustainable business model with better modifications in taste of its products, packing strategy and promotional activities. Coca cola is trying its best to deal with its competitors like Pepsi and juice manufacturing companies by producing low sugar content soft drinks by considering health and safety related factors of customers. Some recommendations, I would like to give to the management of coca cola Company for improving position with respect to porters five force models are listed below.
Entry barriers:-There is high level of dominance by coca cola Company in market
Rivalry:-There are small numbers of competitors who have been competing with brands like coca cola still there should be better promotional technologies being used for capturing market share.
Bargaining power of buyer:-Coca cola must be careful about bargaining power because customers can easily switch to other products(Calantone, R
Coke continuously out-stands Pepsi, even though they share a very similar taste and colour, however Coke should not be the drink that receives all the love and attention for what it offers. Despite their similar soda colour, the drinks actually contain some different ingredients, which produce a different taste, and affect the body differently. Furthermore, the way the companies markets their drinks makes a huge contribution to how successful their products will become. The major element for success however stems from their impact on society and how the companies utilize their social power to evolve. The two major soda companies are constantly head to head with one another, yet it is what they do that sets them apart.
The beverage industry is highly competitive and presents many alternative products to satisfy a need from within. The principal areas of competition are in pricing, packaging, product innovation, the development of new products and flavours as well as promotional and marketing strategies. Companies can be grouped into two categories: global operations such as PepsiCo, Coca-Cola Company, Monster Beverage Corp. and Red Bull and regional operations such as Ro...
aspects: Carbonated soft drinks industry's structure, evaluation of driving change factors in this industry and finally analysis of key strategic factors it is faced with.
New firms that want to sell beverages can be attracted by higher returns made by the Keurig Dr. Pepper. The new firms can decrease the profit made by Keurig Dr. Pepper. If the profit falls below zero, it can throw Keurig Dr. Pepper firm out of the market. To avoid this, Keurig Dr. Pepper (KDP) must employ unique strategies on how to create a barrier for entry of new rival firms into the market (Stone, 2018). The KDP has to make all necessary steps to maintain their market share. Such steps include utilizing their creditworthiness to acquire bank loans that can help the firm to expand and dominate the market ( Rahman et al., 2015). The organization can also lower prices of their products to create unfair competition with newcomers. The organization has huge capital to avoid low prices to attract many customers and discourage them from buying from recent firms. Keurig Dr. Pepper should also maintain favorable customer loyalty to ensure that customers will not shift and buy other substitutes from brand new business organizations. KDP will also set differentiated beverages for customers in a great way (Rahman et al., 2015). The uniqueness of their products will create a competitive environment with the other products from the rival
The Beverage Industry is a highly competitive one and tends to be dominated by a few major actors. The two biggest worldwide known and most influential companies are Coca-Cola and Pepsi. The limited growth opportunities make this competition very intense, requiring companies to follow the trends and be always aware of the competitors' progress. However, the demand for the products depends a lot on the economic conditions within the society. Those few big players enjoy the benefits of the strong loyal customer base during the growth and stability stage in the economy, whereas in times of economic difficulties customers turn to cheaper substitutes. Thus, although the key feature of the industry is that it is very difficult for a new unknown company to enter the market and compete with well-known long-established businesses, the companies should pay significant attention to the new entrants, especially in times of economic instability. Consumer tastes are also seasonal, meaning that the demand for the carbonated beverages is higher during the hot months of the year. Shifting consumer preferences bring the concern of operating uncertainty, which greatly affects pricing strategies. The large companies pay reliable dividends...
External environmental analysis of US carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry allows concluding that declining CSD sales call for changes in industry operations whereby market players can benefit from the fundamental shift in the industry development and maintain its leadership positions in beverage market. Analyses of macrolevel, industry, and competitive environments suggest that expansion, strong brand recognition, and changes in value chain will be key success factors in the future industry development.
The Porter’s model of competitive advantage of nations is based on four key elements including factor endowments, demand conditions, related and supporting industries and firm strategy, structure and rivalry. This makes it suitable in understanding the competition existing in the soft drinks industry in the Asian markets. The factor conditions identify the natural resources, climate, location, and demographics. Coca cola and Pepsi enjoy the growing population in the Asian markets (Yoffie, 2002). A higher population guarantees the two companies adequate revenues. Other factors include communication infrastructure and availability of skilled workers. Most of the Asian countries are embracing new technologies that grow much knowledge of the diverse beverage drinks. Secondly, the demand conditions play a significant role in enhancing competitiveness for the firms. Both Coca cola and Pepsi are an
Control of market share is the key issue in this case study. The situation is both Coke and Pepsi are trying to gain market share in this beverage market, which is valued at over $30 billion a year. Just how is this done in such a competitive market is the underlying issue. The facts are that each company is coming up with new products and ideas in order to increase their market share.
... objects and customer regions. Do making a clear differentiation image between its soft drinks and bottled water. Because the consumers may believe that bottled water of Nestle sounds healthier than Coca-Cola brand since Nestle tend to emphasize their image on healthy food products. Then do market test for new taste, new packaging, or new innovation according to each regions, and especially for Europe, the company should launch the new one to replace Dasani image in order to seize their market shares. They may renew all nutrients and packaging. Finally Coca-Cola should continue its joint ventures with the regional companies in order to protect their products from barriers to entry both international trade restrictions and distribution channels. Furthermore, joint venture with local brand is a long term contract guarantee to make it easier for HOD to a specific region.
Pepsi had the great idea to use the general public in their commercials and show that Pepsi was preferred over Coke. ("Rock and... Wars"). This worked well, since the people in the commercials and the people watching at home were both included in the ‘general Public.’ ("Rock and... Wars"). Pepsi and Coke began using famous people in their commercials and advertisements. Coke and Pepsi began having blind taste tests to see which beverage is preferred. The blindfolding made it fair. People began worrying about their health and taking soda out of their diet. ("Rock and... Wars"). Due to this both Pepsi and Coke have been dropping in sales. ("Rock and... Wars"). To try and avoid competition the two brands try to use different consumers, sponsor different sports, and make different their logos. ("Rock and... Wars"). They also chose different colors for their packaging, and built different images for their brand. ("Rock and...
Soft drinks consisted of: flavor base, sweetener, and carbonated water. On the other hand, there are main participants in the cola industry: concentrate and syrup producers, bottles, and distributors. 1-Concentrate Producers (CP): They blended the needed raw, then packaged in plastic canisters, and then shipped to the bottler. This process needed little capital investment in machinery, overhead or labor. 2- Bottlers: They added carbonated water and high fructose corn syrup then bottled the soft drink and delivered it to customer's accounts. It is worth mentioning here that only Coke added sugar before shipping thee blend to the bottlers. This process was capital-intensive.3-Distributors: In 1993, Pepsi-Cola and Coca-Cola each had a 16% share of all retail channel volume, and the main distribution channel for soft drinks was supermarkets. Historically, Pepsi focused on sales through retail outlets, while Coke on fountain sales. Suppliers: CPs and bottlers purchased two major inputs: packaging, and sweetens .When diet soft drinks were introduced; Pepsi and Coke negotiated with artificial sweetener companies and sold its concentrate to bottles already sweetened.
The Coca-Cola Company was founded in 1892. Since its inception, the organization has seen a steady increase in its market share over the years, and to this day has operations in over 200 countries worldwide. To achieve such success in its competitive market, Coca-Cola has employed sound strategies that have helped it become among the leaders in its industry. The Coca-Cola Company utilizes Market Based Management (MBM) techniques as well as Value Driven Management (VDM) techniques within the organization and in its market to help the firm sustain its stronghold of the market.
The case study "Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century" focuses on describing Coke and Pepsi within the CSD industry by providing detailed statements about the companies’ accounts and strategies to increase their market share. Furthermore, the case also focuses on the Coke vs. Pepsi products which target similar groups of customers, and how these companies have had and still have great reputation and continue to take risks due to their high capital. This analysis of the Cola Wars Continue case study will focus mainly on the profitability of the industry by carefully considering and analyzing the below questions. Why is the soft drink industry so profitable? Compare the economics of the concentrate business to the bottling business: Why is the profitability so different?
Coca-Cola is a company with sustainable competitive advantage. The company is innovative and has an extensive business model with boasts of a sustainable distribution network. The company was incorporated in the late 1800s to commence the production of a sweet fizzy beverage that has become the world's most known brand. Presently, the company is still on an upward trajectory as it remains one of the world's most sought-after stocks. The company's competitive advantage has shown resilience and sustainability over the years.
Learning from experience Coca-Cola has had some fierce competition over the years but nothing in the form of an entire health market shift like now. As well as mounting political persecution of its products like they are facing today. They must rely on past experiences to get through but likely will need to start studying the new trends to stay relevant.