Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Benefits of direct democracy
Benefits of direct democracy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Benefits of direct democracy
The Use of Referenda
A referendum (plural: referendums or referenda) or plebiscite is a
direct vote in which an entire electorate is asked to either accept or
reject a particular proposal. This may be the adoption of a new
constitution, a constitutional amendment, a law, the recall of an
elected official or simply a specific government policy.
There are many arguments for and against a referendum. Starting with
the positive aspects of a referendum, first of all, referendums are
the most legitimate form of political decision-making since it's the
vote of the people, which dictates the policy of their government in
relation to the issue in question. Basically, referendums are seen as
the fairest means by which a nations' government should come to a
decision on a matter of national importance. A second advantage of
conducting referendums is the presence of direct democracy, which
results from it. This allows citizens to vote directly on public
policy issues. Referendums create in contemporary societies, the
fundamentals of the most self-governing of all forms of
administration. That being direct rule, based on the input of all the
people via voting. Thirdly, the use of a referendum can serve to
constrain the behaviour of elected officials by curbing their
dictatorial tendencies since they know that the voters have the power
to review and overturn their decisions. This awareness may also
encourage them to avoid opportunistic behaviour as well as forcing
lobbyists' to attempt to influence all the people, and not just the
elite who hold power. A fourth plus of referendums is the educative
effect which they on the population, who unavo...
... middle of paper ...
...er fifty percent of the votes, but is
the new government. Another disadvantage is that referendum takes more
time and is expensive. The fact that the government sets the question
of the referendum makes the fact less truth that referendum’s results
are people’s voice whereas the government does not sets question on
things which matter to them and could be a big change. In referendum
many people do not turn up for the elections so the views of very few
are known. Some opposition to the referendum has arisen from its use
by dictators such as Hitler and Mussolini who, it is argued, used the
plebiscite to clothe oppressive policies in a veneer of legitimacy.
Hitler's use of the plebiscite is one reason why, since World War II,
there has been no provision in Germany for the holding of referendums
at the federal level.
The excerpt “Congress: The Electoral Connection” written by David Mayhew centers around the fundamental arguments that discusses how members of congress are self-interested for reelection. Mayhew further elaborates on his idea by discussing the electoral activities that congress members devote their time into and resource from, which are advertising, credit-claiming, and position taking. Mayhew’s excerpt further examines the framework in how congress operates which contributes to the explanation of how and why congress partakes in the certain electoral activities.
Larry J. Sabato offered some good notions as to what should be revised in the Constitution. Some of his thoughts were very well thought out, and helped me think much more about how the government should be amended. I agreed with essentially every idea he presented, except holding another Constitutional Convention—that proposal doesn’t seem necessary, since most of ideas could be implemented using the “elastic clause” (which Congress so frequently uses). Some more proposals that I did not agree with were expanding the senate to 136 members to add more representation, allowing non-U.S. citizens to run for president after they have lived in the states for 20 years, expanding the Supreme Court from nine to twelve members, and finally, giving states with a higher population more Electoral College electors. Those are just some of his thoughts that I had a disagreement with, but mostly I agreed with his ideas.
It is the fact that so many of those who do vote don't have their votes counted.
The United States Congress was created by the framers of the Constitution as the most important part of the legislative branch of the national government. The Congress was set up with a bicameral structure composed by the House of Representatives or Lower Chamber and the Senate or Upper Chamber. According to “Origins and Development” and “History of the House”, two descriptions of the history of the Congress, both chambers assembled for the very first time in New York in 1789 and then moved to Philadelphia in 1790 where they stayed for 10 years. In 1800 the Congress moved to Washington, DC; however, it was not until 1857 and 1859 that the House of Representatives and the Senate respectively moved to their current meeting locations in the Capitol after its restoration due to the British invasion of 1814 that burned the building. With more than two centuries legislating, the Congress has acquired great expertise in governing the country and meeting the Constitution’s mandates. Yet, in order to accomplish all its tasks the Congress has a very well-defined structure and very specific ways to proceed. Indeed, in order to undertake the most important of its mandates, “to enact law”, the Congress has a rigorous procedure that is combined with some of the different structural elements of Congress which indicate the direction that bills must follow once introduced. One of the most important of such elements is the congressional committee structure.
According to a study done by Nonprofit Vote only “an estimated 58.7% of eligible voters turned out to vote” ("Voter Turnout" ) in 2012’s presidential election, which is below the 62% that was achieved in 2008. (Ginsberg 306). According to the United States Census Bureau in 2012 71.2 percent of Americans reported that they were registered to vote, but only 61.8 reported that they actually did so. ("Voting and Registration"). While each source didn’t report the exact same statistics in America these percentages are considered highs in political participation. Even worse, in midterm elections voter turnout is normally closer to 33% and even lower for any local elections. (Ginsberg 306). While we may consider any of those statistics good for America, looking at world democracies we are trailing far behind, in many “European countries and other western democracies [the] national voter turnout is usually between 70 to 90 percent.”(Ginsberg 306). The question is then asked why don’t American’s vote, which is then an...
Low turnout may not be an accurate reflection of the will of the people. Low turnouts can lead to unequal representation among various parts of the population. The lower the turnout, the greater the chance that the election result is not the outcome preferred by the population of potential voters. Low turnout makes it possible for minorities to defeat majorities. The most important impact of low electoral turnout is that decisions are made by a minority of the population.
The different strategies in political campaigning have led to lower voter turnout and less political participation by the general public according to Steven Schier in his book, "Payment Due: A Nation In Debt, A Generation In Trouble." Different public and private interest groups can link these downturns to the changing political strategies and the lobbying of the government. Political participation and lower voter turnout is something that we should not be concerned about and doesn’t pose a significant problem in the United States.
In both turnout rate charts, the highest turnout of voters in November happens during Presidential elections. The second highest turnout rate happens during Gubernatorial elections, while the lowest turnout of all the elections happens during special Constitutional elections. Analysis of these rates over the span of 2001 – 2014 shows that more voters participated in Presidential elections. This is also the type of election that is the least frequent of the three election types analyzed. This suggests that voters are more likely to participate in elections that do not happen every year.
Voter turnout, according to the text, “. . .means the portion of the eligible citizens who actually cast ballots--not the portion of those registered, . . . (142).” Data reveals that the voter turnout of Texas is relatively lower than that of the United States as a whole. During presidential elections, voter turnout is higher than that of state and local elections. For example, the text states that in the 2008 presidential balloting, Texas voter turnout was about eight percentage points below the national turnout level(142). However, the voter turnout of the United States compared to that of other countries is lower than the global level. In a graph presented for voter turnout rate of registered voters, the United States is located on the bottom of the list. From U.S News, Flock states,“The U.S has one of the lowest voter turnout rates of any rich democracy in the world(Flock).” Factors that influence voting around the world, for example, may be the choice to submit a vote online, such as in India, rather than going into a v...
...ds, William. <a href="http://click.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/stat?id=pcZ8g7DjAzA&offerid=6424&type=2&subid=0&url=http%253A//search.borders.com/fcgi-bin/db2www/search/search.d2w/Details%253F%2526mediaType%253DBook%2526prodID%253D3901535" >Political Attitudes in the Nation & the States<IMG border=0 alt=icon width=1 height=1 src="http://ad.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/show?id=pcZ8g7DjAzA&bids=6424&type=2&subid=0" >. University North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Institute for Research in Social Science. 1974Mulcahy, Kevin and Katz, Richard. <a href="http://click.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/stat?id=pcZ8g7DjAzA&offerid=6424&type=2&subid=0&url=http%253A//search.borders.com/fcgi-bin/db2www/search/search.d2w/Details%253F%2526mediaType%253DBook%2526prodID%253D14579075" >America Votes: What You Should Know About Elections Today<IMG border=0 alt=icon width=1 height=1 src="http://ad.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/show?id=pcZ8g7DjAzA&bids=6424&type=2&subid=0" >. New Jersey, Prentice Hall Inc. 1976.U.S. News & World Report Politics Inside and Out Washington D.C., U.S. News and World Report. 1970
of the public, or they realize the suppression of voters after the damage has already been
during election time are aiming at a certain type of group. Regardless, I think that the candidate
This election proved there are way more people in the world that can vote and have chosen not to. Trump was able to pull voters out of their
‘The Parliamentary legislative process fails to achieve its primary purpose: it fails to ensure effective legislative scrutiny of Parliamentary Bills.’ Discuss.
The Veto Power wielded by the President of the United States of America has grown to be a symbol of the power enjoyed by the Executive. The Veto itself is a power often dramatized in the media as one that is only wielded in the most extreme of circumstances. It is a power that is often attacked by critics of a powerful executive as one that is the epitome of the excesses of the modern executive. Yet it is a power that has its core roots in the checks and balances of the ancient Roman Republic. The power of the Consul to veto one another’s decisions was hugely important to the success of the Roman Republic and the prevention of tyrants and despots in Rome.