The Us V. Microsoft Antitrust Case Study

266 Words1 Page

The United States v. Microsoft Corporation antitrust law case was a case where Microsoft was accused of trying to create a monopoly. They were also accused of using practices that were deemed illegal according to the Sherman law. By operating in such a manner, Microsoft was restricting competitors of having an equal opportunity of the free market. This is all because
Microsoft was trying to manipulate certain programs to only be applicable to Internet Explorer, stating that the two companies had merged into one unstoppable organization. The court must answer the question stating was Microsoft violating the Sherman antitrust laws that were created in 1890. The judge that was ordered to the case found that Microsoft had violated the Sherman
antitrust

Show More
Related

  • Trust-Busting: Theodore Roosevelt’s Effectiveness in Regulating Big Business

    1618 Words  | 4 Pages

    Before a series of antitrust acts and laws were instituted by the federal government, it was not illegal for businesses to use any means to eliminate competition in late nineteenth-century America. Production technology was now advanced to the point that supply would surpass product demand. As competition in any given market increased, more and more companies joined together in either trusts or holding companies to bring market dominance under their control (Cengage 2). As President Theodore Roosevelt was sworn into office in 1901, he led America into action with forceful government solutions (“Online” 1). Roosevelt effectively regulated offending business giants by the formation of the Department of Commerce and Labor, the Bureau of Corporations, and antitrust lawsuits.

    Read More

  • Laws for Fair, Balanced and Competitive Business Practice

    658 Words  | 2 Pages

    United States has several laws that ensure that competition among businesses flow rely and new competitors get free access to the market. These laws intend to ensure fair and balanced competitive business practices. However, there are times when some businesses will do anything to gain competitive edge. USA has strong antitrust laws that prohibit fixing market price, price discrimination, conspiring boycott, monopolizing, and adopting unfair business practices. The history of Antitrust laws goes back to 1890 when Congress passed Sherman Act. In 1914, Congress passed two more acts: Federal Trade Commission Act, and Clayton Act. With some revisions, these three acts are still core antitrust acts.

    Read More

  • Progessives and The Pure Food and Drug Act

    859 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many businesses used this new process to raise the price of their competitors. They did this by putting constraints on entry restrictions (Woods 1986). At the state level, other laws were put in place to support the Food and Drug Act mainly to help local and area producers who were and would be facing new nat...

    Read More

  • Case Analysis Of Gordon V. New York Stock Exchange Case

    727 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1971, Gordon individually filed a suit against the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and several other member firms of the Exchanges, arguing that the fixed commission rate NYSE and other exchanges adopted violated federal antitrust laws*.

    Read More

  • Case of United States Versus Microsoft

    964 Words  | 2 Pages

    United States versus Microsoft Corporation case was a set of combined civil engagements filed against Microsoft relating to the Sherman Antitrust Act by the Department of Justice. In the case, the Department of Justice purported that Microsoft abused monopoly supremacy on PCs in its control of OS sales and web browser software sales (Lohr& Brinkley, 2001). The conflict evolved around the integration of the internet explorer browser software in Microsoft’s Windows OS; a move that was argued to restrict web browser competitors like Opera and Netscape from accessing the browser market. Microsoft argued that it did not have a case to answer and stated the misfortune was the result of the fierce competition and innovation strategies in its industry (Glader, 2006). The following paper aims at analyzing the merits generated from the final settlement of the case and outlines the parties that benefited and those whose interests were harmed.

    Read More

  • The Transcontinental Railroad

    686 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...ich developed new corporations. (Gillon p.652) Many in the railroad industry and these newly developed corporations were accused of price fixing, providing illegal kick- backs and challenging government regulations. (Gillon p.652-657) Thus, one could argue that the railroad industry and the titans it produced had a monopolistic approach to business that actually challenged the free market system.

    Read More

  • Doubtful Trust In Baseball

    1232 Words  | 3 Pages

    Anti-trust laws are laws which prohibit anti-competitive behavior and unfair business practices. Their purpose is to make sure that businesses and consumers cannot be abused by powerful firms that hold or wish to hold a monopoly in the market. They also take into account certain ethical standards, and therefore can be considered quite subjective. Many specific strategies are outlawed by anti-trust laws, including price fixing (agreement on prices of uniform goods or services), predatory pricing (setting a low price in order to knock off competitors), and vendor lock-in (virtually forcing a consumer to buy from a certain supplier).

    Read More

  • Why Some Things Should Not Be For Sale By Debra Satz

    1160 Words  | 3 Pages

    All markets may be affected by parts of the four criteria however, some markets are operationally reliant on on them, and these are the markets, Satz argues, are noxious markets, that need regulating. Satz focuses on “noxious markets” because they can restrain or undermine the development of desirable human qualities, shape preferences in undesirable ways or promote objectionable social relationships. Satz argues that the solution is not prohibition because the consequences of prohibition may be worse than the market itself. Satz instead states that markets need a greater r...

    Read More

  • Microsoft is Not Guilty of Anti-Trust Laws

    936 Words  | 2 Pages

    Isn't it sad when an act of injustice is done? I personally have never witnessed any innocent people being shot or being arrested right in the middle of a public place but I do know of one injustice that has been done. Ladies and gentlemen Bill Gates and Microsoft are being wrongfully accused of violating Anti-Trust laws. Through my examples I will prove to you that Mr. Gates has conducted nothing but good business and has done nothing wrong. Also where would we be without Microsoft revolutionizing the computer software industry. Also another point to bring up is that this is supposed to be a free enterprise system where the government doesn't interfere with the people's business (like Laissez faire) but obviously we see that isn't true in many ways. It is true Bill Gates did buy out much of his competition or just wiped them out, but who wouldn't want to without the help of Microsoft technology would be years behind what it is today.

    Read More

  • Sherman Antitrust Failure

    1786 Words  | 4 Pages

    In an attempt to decrease competition in the computer technology industry, Microsoft had violated the Sherman Antitrust. In the 1998 case of U.S. vs. Microsoft, the Microsoft company was charged for anticompetitive and monopolistic practices that violated antitrust laws. The plaintiff had claimed that Microsoft had engaged “in a series of exclusionary, anticompetitive, and predatory acts to maintain its monopoly power” (Excerpts) which went against Section 2 of the antitrust law. Microsoft had also allegedly violated Section 1 by “tying its browser to its operating system and entering into exclusive dealing arrangements” which was ruled as a “combination… in restraint of trade or commerce” (Excerpts). The Court ruled against Microsoft, exemplifying the ability of the Sherman Antitrust to curb unethical and illegal monopolistic operations even in modern

    Read More

  • Microsoft Not a Monopoly

    1289 Words  | 3 Pages

    I believe that Microsoft has the best intensions for society, because they are constantly developing the software market into a more competitive and challenging industry. Microsoft’s success as a company is partly due to its commitment to making the best product possible and strategic business practices. The first reason Microsoft is not a monopoly is because of the standardized quality of its OS. Second is the intelligent business practices Microsoft has engaged in through many of its business partners. The legal issues of the alleged antitrust accusations from the department of justice are just totally overrated.

    Read More

  • Progressivism

    1908 Words  | 4 Pages

    Anti-Trust policy of 1902 pledged government intervention to break up illegal monopolies and regulate corporations for

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Microsoft Antitrust

    706 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Charges In May 1998 the U.S. Justice Department (under President Clinton), 19 individual states, and the District of Columbia (hereafter, “the government”) filed antitrust charges against Microsoft under the Sherman Antitrust Act. Microsoft had violated Section 2 of the act over a series of illegal actions planned to keep its “Windows” monopoly. The government also charged that some of that behavior violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act.

    Read More

  • Microsoft As A Monopoly

    843 Words  | 2 Pages

    "Microsoft Corporation, is a multinational computer technology corporation with global annual revenue of US$44.28 billion and 71,553 employees in 102 countries as of July 2006. It develops, manufactures, licenses, and supports a wide range of software products for computing devices. Headquartered in Redmond, Washington, USA, its best selling products are the Microsoft Windows operating system and the Microsoft Office suite of productivity software, each of which has achieved near-ubiquity in the desktop computer market. Microsoft possesses footholds in other markets, with assets such as the MSNBC cable television network, the MSN Internet portal, and the Microsoft Encarta multimedia encyclopedia. The company also markets both computer hardware products such as the Microsoft mouse as well as home entertainment products such as the Xbox, Xbox 360 and MSN TV" ("Microsoft").

    Read More

  • Microsoft Corporation Case Analysis

    1254 Words  | 3 Pages

    Microsoft is the leading and the largest Software Company in the world. Found by William Gates and Paul Allen in 1975 Microsoft has grown and become a multibillion company in only ten years. It all started with a great vision – “a computer on every desk and every home” - that seemed almost impossible at the time. Now Microsoft has over 44,000 employees in 60 countries, net income of $3.45 billion and revenue of 11.36 billion. Company dramatic growth and success was driven by development and marketing of operational systems and personal productivity applications software.

    Read More

More about The Us V. Microsoft Antitrust Case Study

Open Document