The Pros And Cons Of Microsoft Antitrust

706 Words2 Pages

The Microsoft Antitrust Case Is the Most Signifi cant Monopoly Case since the Breakup of AT&T in the Early 1980s.
The Charges In May 1998 the U.S. Justice Department (under President Clinton), 19 individual states, and the District of Columbia (hereafter, “the government”) filed antitrust charges against Microsoft under the Sherman Antitrust Act. Microsoft had violated Section 2 of the act over a series of illegal actions planned to keep its “Windows” monopoly. The government also charged that some of that behavior violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act.
Microsoft refused the charges, arguing it had succeeded through product innovation and lawful business performs. Microsoft opposed it should not be punished for its excellent forethought, business insight, and technological ability. It also stated that its monopoly was highly temporary because of fast technological development.
The District Court Findings In June 2000: district court directed that the related market was software used to run Intel compatible personal computers (PCs). Microsoft’s 95 percent share of that market clearly gave it monopoly power. The court noted, however, that being a monopoly is not illegal. The violation of the Sherman Act happened because Microsoft used monopolistic means to continue its monopoly power.
According to the court, Microsoft was afraid that the success of Netscape’s Navigator, which allowed people to surf the Internet, might allow Netscape to develop its software to contain a competitive PC operating system (software that would warn the Windows monopoly). Moreover, that Sun’s Internet applications ‘Java’ programming might finally jeopardize Microsoft’s Windows monopoly.
To counter these and similar dangers, Microsoft unlawfully signed agr...

... middle of paper ...

...them with other icons on the Windows desktop; and (4) calls for Microsoft to deliver technical information to other firms so that they can improve programs that work as well with Windows as Microsoft’s own products.
The Microsoft actions and opinion have indirectly caused in billions of dollars of fines and expenses by Microsoft. Main examples: To AOL Time Warner (Netscape), $750 million; to the
European Commission, $600 million; to Sun Microsystems, $1.6 billion; to Novell, $536 million; to Burst.com, $60 million; to Gateway, $150 million; to Inter Trust, $440 million; to Real Networks, $761 million; and to IBM, $850 million.
Source: United States v. Microsoft (District Court Conclusions of Law), April 2000; United States v. Microsoft (Court of Appeals), June 2001; U.S. v. Microsoft (Final Judgment), November 2002; and Reuters and Associated Press News Services.

Open Document