Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Overview of the Bosnian war
The role of the United Nations
Overview of the Bosnian war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Overview of the Bosnian war
The formation of the United Nations in 1945 marked a monumental success in the international political realm. It was founded to foster relations with its member and non-member states, encourage the respect of human rights, and fight to solve social, economic, and humanitarian issues. However, of all of these motives, its foundation was based primarily on creating peace and preventing conflict between members. The idea of collective security in the UN has become the heart of peace keeping within the union and all members vow to preserve peace and eliminate identified aggressors. Chapter VII of the UN charter is the impetus behind collective security and provides the legal foundation for the UN to eradicate all threats to the peace.
One of the most iconic employments of Chapter VII by the UN came in 1992 when the UN Security Council invoked Chapter VII to restore peace and provide humanitarian aid in then crumbling Yugoslavia when all other peace making and mediation attempts failed. An ethnic cleansing by Bosnian Serbs backed by ambitions of territory annexation and a “Greater Serbia” led to one of the most destructive conflicts of the Century. The UN’s decision to invoke Chapter VII authorized the member states to “take all necessary measures” in order to reestablish order. What followed would become one of the most horrific genocides in history, comparable to that of the Jewish cleansing in World War II. The Bosnian War would mark a unique time for the United Nations as it would involve their first cooperation with a local alliance and also mark NATO’s first armed enforcement action.
At the conclusion of the Second World War, the Communist Federal People’s Republic of Yugoslavia was constructed to be a multinational state, c...
... middle of paper ...
...ade strong enough to still stand today.
Although the Dayton agreement did end the War, it is not seen as flawless by any means. Similarly to the Vance-Owen Plan, which would have split up Bosnia into 10 different cantons, the Dayton agreement also seemed to award Serb aggression because the territories Bosnia lost were not returned to it. Instead of being severally punished, the Serbs seemed to get a slap on the wrist and were able to keep the land acquired. Holbrooke stated that returning all lost territories to Bosnia would have required much more bombing which could have stirred up problems with Russia and China and potentially sabotaged the progress made. Operation Deliberate Force ended at what was thought to be the realistic and practical limit. The Dayton Agreement was a vital step in establishing the framework for democracy and capitalism in the region.
Nationalism has been a potent force for change since the development of human civilization. However, opinion about the extent to which nationalism may be appropriately pursued is highly diverse, a factor that has led to immense tragedy and suffering in countless regions worldwide. While it is both appropriate and sometimes encouraged to take pride in being part of a nation, it is of the utmost importance that it is done without harming or subjugating people of another. Uniting a people by force and potentially eliminating or destroying those who may oppose it or not belong to it is unacceptable ethically, morally, and socially.
Unfortunately this upset the native Bosnian people. So, although the United States feels obligated to help the Bosnian Cause, they may be worsening the situation with their involvement, both there and in the U.S There are two sides to this story. The first is the opinion that the United States should completely withdraw from Bosnia. The other opinion is that the United States should go headlong and give Bosnia their full support, and commit more troops and more supplies to the Bosnian Cause. There are some positive things done by the United States in Bosnia. The presence of U.S troops did bring temporary peace to the area. Although the peace is purely an act, it does give leaders time to talk and plan without worrying about their people dying. Also, the United States presence in Bosnia helped to eradicate the most horrific problem in Bosnia, large Serbian concentration camps and mass Albanian genocide.
Genocide, the systematic and planned extermination of an entire national, racial, political, or ethnic group. From 1992-1995 that was happening in Bosnia-Herzegovina. In the Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina, conflict between the three main ethnic groups, the Serbs, Croats, and Muslims, resulted in genocide committed by the Serbs against the Muslims in Bosnia.
...he Balkan region, and neither force stepped in to help resolve it. A common theory is that NATO will greatly benefit from Kosovo if it becomes detached from Serbia. NATO will benefit from this because Kosovo is in a prime area in which a base for NATO forces would allow them to "keep tabs" on the area. To the Serbs, U.S. involvement is seen strictly as a way for president Clinton to make his time in office memorable militarily as well as historically, and help to cover up his sex and money scandals (Thompson, 1). The Kosovo conflict is growing with each day. New information is being given and different countries are becoming involved. The countries that are involved need to finish what they have already started. Nobody knows what the future will hold for the people of Kosovo. In the upcoming weeks and months, many decisions will be made, and history will be written.
Genocide is a pressing issue with a multitude of questions and debates surrounding it. It is the opinion of many people that the United Nations should not get involved with or try to stop ongoing genocide because of costs or impositions on the rights of a country, but what about the rights of an individual? The UN should get involved in human rights crimes that may lead to genocide to prevent millions of deaths, save money on humanitarian aid and clean up, and fulfill their responsibilities to stop such crimes. It is preferable to stop genocide before it occurs through diplomacy, but if necessary, military force may be used as a last resort. Navi Pillay, Human Rights High Commissioner, stated, “Concerted efforts by the international community at critical moments in time could prevent the escalation of violence into genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity or ethnic cleansing.”
The Split between Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union in 1948 occurred due to a conflict of interest between Josip Broz Tito and Joseph Stalin, the respective leaders of the Nations. Through this essay, my aim is to highlight the causes of the dispute and then discuss the consequences of the split for both the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union. The period of 1948-1955 was known as the Informbiro and the distinguishing features of this period were conflict and schism between Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union. The main causes for the Split were the implementation of the Cominform, Yugoslav role in the civil war in Greece, and the personalities of the leaders. Tito’s popularity and political position were both strengthened by his role in the liberation of Yugoslavia in World War II and also his survival of Stalin’s 1930s purges.
It took almost a century, from the emergence of the South Slavic unification movement in the early nineteenth century to the end of World War I, to create Yugoslavia. It took only a few years to destroy it [. . .] Visions of national liberation and modernization brought the South Slavs [. . .] together at last in 1919. Seventy years later, a retrograde, mythical, antimodern vision tore them apart (11). The fall of Yugoslavia was brought about by brutal military force, but the energy needed to utterly dismantle the country was supplied by the political ethno-kitsch (1).
Communism was a strong standing form of government in Bosnia, lasting for almost 50 years. However, the fall of communism was shorter, spanning 3 years, from1989 to 1992. The fall began with the end of the long lasting Cold War, along with the deconstruction of the physical barrier that was a sign of separation - the Berlin Wall. Tearing down the walls of communism in countries around them led to the break up and the collapse of Y...
Their action to prevent this was to dissolve the rest of Yugoslavia and created Serbia and Montenegro. This was the end of Yugoslavia.
A. The "Josef Tito" History Learning Site -. N.p., n.d. Web. The Web. The Web.
The suppression of ethnic culture and identity also made people want to return to older ways. When Tito died in 1980, a council of ethnic chieftains replaced him. His bans on nationalism and ethnic identity were undone, and while peace did last, Yugoslavia was as divided as it had been before the unification. The enmity between groups was only worsened by the rise of radical politicians like the Serb leader Slobodan Milosevic, who was largely responsible for spurring on the Bosnian genocide. Despite the growing threat in the region, the European Community, precursor to the European Union, supported the independence of Yugoslavian countries. (Doder). With the rifts between peoples growing every day, and the peace growing ever more strained, it was ridiculous that the EC didn’t anticipate violence in Yugoslavia. Yet they enacted no precautionary measures at all, and at the start of the last decade of the 20th century, brutality and insanity was just days
Bosnia and Herzegovina has been called the most complicated country in the world and rightfully so. Over the years, it has been the center of conflict for many different wars of several different nations, which have left the country scarred and bitter. To understand the complex country of Bosnia fully, one must study its basic history, culture, and government.
Ed. John Merriman and Jay Winter. "Slovakia." Europe Since 1914: Encyclopedia of the Age of War and Reconstruction. Vol. 4. Detroit: Charles Scribner's Sons, 2006. 2358-2359. World History in Context. Web. 11 Mar. 2014.
The League of Nations was an Intergovernmental Organisation which persisted from 1919 up until 1946 where it was formally replaced with the United Nations towards the end of the Second World War. Many consider the League as one of the International Systems greatest failures due to it being widely regarded as an ‘ineffective instrument to tackle aggressors’ (Catterall, 1999, p. 52) and its inherent failure to prevent international conflict. However,
Collective security is one type of coalition building strategy whether global or regional in which a group of nations agree not to attack each other and to defend each other against an attack from one of the others, if such an attack is made. The principal is that "an attack against one is an attack against all." It differs from "collective defense" which is a coalition of nations which agree to defend its own group against outside attacks. It can also be described as a system where states attempt with its use to prevent or stop wars. Examples of Collective defense are NATO and the Warsaw Pact .The United Nations (UN) is the best example at an attempt at collective security. Many nations enter into such an agreement in an effort to maintain the status quo and to secure their best interests. Collective security is achieved when states come to an agreement on the need for same. As a result an international organization is formed under the rules of international law. The collective security organization then becomes an arena for diplomacy, balance of power and exercise of soft power. The use of hard power by states, unless legitimized by the Collective Security organization, is considered illegitimate, reprehensible and needing remediation of some kind. This idea of collective security was posited by people such as Immanuel Kant and Woodrow Wilson. There are a few basic assumptions as it relates to collective security, including , In an armed conflict, member nation-states will be able to agree on which nation is the aggressor another basic assumption is that each member state has freedom of action and ability to join in proceedings against the aggressor. Also of great importance is the fact that all member nation-states are e...