More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on joseph stalins five year plans
Essays on joseph stalins five year plans
Stalin's plans for communism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Split between Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union in 1948 occurred due to a conflict of interest between Josip Broz Tito and Joseph Stalin, the respective leaders of the Nations. Through this essay my aim is to highlight the causes of the dispute and then discuss the consequences of the split for both the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union.
The period of 1948-1955 was known as the Informbiro and the distinguishing features of this period were conflict and schism between Yugolslavia and the Soviet Union. The main causes for the Split were the implementation of the Cominform, Yugoslav role in the civil war in Greece, and the personalities of the leaders. Tito’s popularity and political position were both strengthened by his role in the liberation of Yugoslavia in World War II and also his survival of Stalin’s 1930s purges. This in turn led to the Partizan leader believing that he would be granted more political freedom in comparison to other eastern bloc states who had relied on Soviet assistance in the war. This did not prove to be the case due to the establishment of the Cominform (Communist Information Bureau) in September 1947, which held the main aim of securing and ensuring faithfulness of the Satellite States. Belgrade was chosen as the permanent seat of its Secretarist and Yugoslav delegates Kardelj and Djilas were urged to play a significant role. However it very quickly became clear that the Communist Party of Yugoslavia (CPY) would be subordinate to the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. This soon became one of the main causes of the split as Stalin was so engrossed with ensuring conformity, uniformity, radicalisation and imitation of the USSR, that the Soviet Union began to impose itself in...
... middle of paper ...
...o see that the split between Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union was caused due to the personalities of both Tito and Stalin. Both seamed reluctant to allow the other to make the decisions. Tito was gained great confidence from the Partizan victory in the war and believed he would be granted significant political freedom. However it became apparent that Stalin simply wanted Tito to act as a puppet and follow commands. Tito did do that to an extent and was very loyal to Stalin and the Soviet Union, however the disagreements over the Cominform, Marshall Plan and also the Yugoslav involvement led to the Split and by 1949 the Soviet Union denounced their treaties of friendship with Yugoslavia. As mentioned initially the consequences of the split were dramatic and Yugoslavia had to rely on western aid before implementing Self-management which was by most accounts a success.
The United States, led by President Truman, wanted to form democracies in Europe and create a capitalistic society to build economically strong nations that would complement the American economy through trade. In contrast, the Soviet Union, led by Joseph Stalin, wanted to rebuild itself and spread communism through Europe and Asia. In a desperate attempt to rebuild, many countries devastated by war fell under Soviet influence and resorted to communism. The Soviet Union called these nations satellite nations and hoped that they would serve as?buffers? nations, preventing invasion from the West.
In 1992 (and with resolutions created earlier) Kosovo's Albanian majority also voted to secede from Serbia and Yugoslavia, hoping to unite with Albania. The conflict in Kosovo could be seen as t...
It was created out of the Austria-Hungary empire that lost the war and lost its land. Serbians, Croatians, Slovenes, and Bosnians and Muslims lived all in one country. The problem was the people didn't get along and each republic wanted to take control of the country. This went on until after WWII, when the Soviet Union took power and control over the country. Joseph Broz (Tito) was leader of Yugoslavia until the 6 republics separated.
The last two decades of the twentieth century gave rise to turbulent times for constituent republics of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, eventually leading them to split apart. There were a number of damaging aspects of past history and of the political and economic circumstances that contributed to the breakup and eventually caused the situation to snowball into a deadly series of inter-ethnic conflicts. Yugoslavia was reunified at the end of the war when the communist forces of Josip Broz Tito liberated the country. Under Tito, Yugoslavia adopted a relatively liberal form of government in comparison to other East European communist states at the time and experienced a period of relative economic and political stability until Tito’s death in 1980. In addition to internal power struggles following the loss of their longtime leader, Yugoslavia faced an unprecedented economic crisis in the 1980’s. As other communist states began to fall in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, some former Communist leaders abandoned communism and founded or supported ethno-national parties, blaming the economic suffering on the flaws of communism and other ethnic groups. The ethnic violence that followed would not have been possible without the willingness of politicians from every side to promote ethno-nationalist symbols and myths through media blitzes, which were especially effective due to low levels of education in the former Yugoslavia. Shadows of the events of World War II gave these politicians, especially the Serbs, an opportunity to encourage the discussion and exaggeration of past atrocities later in the century. The ethnic violence in the former Yugoslavia can be traced back to a series of linked damaging factors such as the de...
During World War II, Yugoslavia was invaded by Nazi Germany and was partitioned. A fierce resistance movement sprang up led by Josip Tito. Following Germany's defeat, Tito reunified Yugoslavia under the slogan "Brotherhood and Unity," merging together Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia, Serbia, Montenegro, Macedonia, along with two self-governing provinces, Kosovo and Vojvodina. Tito, a Communist, was a strong leader who maintained ties with the Soviet Union and the United States during the Cold War, playing one superpower against the other while obtaining financial assistance and other aid from both. After his death in 1980 and without his strong leadership, Yugoslavia quickly plunged into political and economic chaos.
Yugoslavia also joined the Communist bloc. The Communist Party of Yugoslavia had helped drive out the Germans near the end of the war. Communists led by Josip Broz Tito then took over the government (Cold War). East and West opposed each other in the United Nations. In 1946, the U.S.S.R. rejected a U.S. proposal for an international agency to control nuclear energy production and research.
Although Milosevic was a key figure during this period whose actions undoubtedly influenced the chain of events that unfolded, I believe his power-seeking motives were not unique to him; his actions in the former Yugoslavia could have been committed by a number of others who had the same desire for power driving them. Nevertheless, as he was president of Serbia and essentially commander-in-chief of Serb forces who carried out unconscionable acts of cruelty against Muslims and other non-Serb civilians, particularly in the attempt to annex Bosnia-Herzegovina, he bears responsibility for his actions as an authority figure. Though his main goal seemed to be focused on territorial expansion of the Serbian state, he led military forces to deport and murder non-Serb civilians in massive numbers and therefore was in vi...
Yugoslavia came to be because of a group of people wanted their own nation, and worked out as the Allies of Britain wondered what could come of dominating the Austro-Hungarians. The beginning of Yugoslavia is well known, but why did the country fall apart completely? As stated in the thesis, there was always a sense of nationality and diversity between the republics of the nation. The six never came together as one nation, and if there would have, many of Yugoslavia 's conflicts would have ceased to happen.
This move helped usher in the Serbian presidency of Slobodan Milošević during his time as president he amassed control of the votes. With this power they were now adept to influence too federal government. This caused conflict in repub...
to assume the role of dictator. This was a phenomenon which was to become a
In conclusion, the chaos that was encountered by t the Soviet Union together with the ideas the new leaders brought in enlightenment Eastern Europe about communism. This made the countries understand their freedom and rights through the Glasnot. The collapse of the Soviet Union led to the freedom and independence of many soviet states. They were no longer a world super power and with the difficulties it faced economically, politically and socially, led to its own downfall. The collapse of communism in the Soviet Union also led to the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe as the countries became democratic.
Between 1985 and 1991, the youngest individual in decades to become head of the Soviet Communist Party dominated the history of the Soviet Union. Mikhail Gorbachev launched a program of political and economic reform that dramatically affected domestic life and the place of his country in world affairs. The Soviet dictatorship was transformed into a multiparty state in which the Communist Party had to struggle to maintain a role. Meanwhile, the Soviet Union moved toward a free-market economy. With equal drama, the longstanding Cold War with the United States diminished and then turned into a cooperative relationship.
According to Quincy Wright, war is a “necessary means to establish, maintain, or expand the power of a government, party, or class within a state.” Wright’s statement is applicable to the Yugoslav Wars during the late twentieth century. The fragmented government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was losing its grip on legitimacy rather quickly due to the Socialist Republic collapsing fast. Wars rooted in deep internal ethnic and religious conflict propelled the Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic and the Federation’s government in to a period of pseudo-legitimacy while the nations of the region struggled for autonomy, recognition, and harmony. This paper will attempt to prove how the diversionary theory of war is applicable
The cause for the collapse of the United of Soviet Socialist Republics cannot be pinpointed to one event, one policy, one movement, or one outlook. The series of events, policies, movement, and outlooks are not black and white; they connect multifariously: politically, socially, economically, and culturally. The causes of the collapse of the Soviet Union were both short and long term. Overall, the long-term cause of the collapse was the embedded disposition of the Soviet Union: the politics, the society, the economy, and the culture. The short-term causes include: local nationalism, ethnic disjunction, Chernobyl, ‘perestroika,’ and ‘glasnost.’ Carried out by Gorbachev, the proceedings of the collapse of the Soviet Union are unlike anything else in history.
The latter half of the 20th century records the rise and fall of history’s most controversial ideologies, Communism. Pioneered under the leadership of the Soviet Union, the communist ideology transformed the Eastern European region; in the process, altering its territory and populace. Communism accomplished much across Eastern Europe, several of which being; its ability to ensure mass industrialization under centrally planned economies, unite a region under one Soviet flag, and employ mass collectivism. Though communism was not to remain within the Soviet Union, and it collapsed in 1991 under the leadership Mikhail Gorbachev. While the purpose of its decline has many underlying reasons, it can have summarized into three primary points. Communism